Organization principles in genetic interaction networks

Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology

Volumn 751, Issue , 2012, Pages 53-78

  Jacobs, Christopher ^a   Segrè, Daniel ^a,b  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b USA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL REACTION; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; EVOLUTIONARY DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE INTERACTION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENETIC EPISTASIS; GENETIC MANIPULATION; GENOTYPE PHENOTYPE CORRELATION; HUMAN; METABOLIC REGULATION; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION GENETIC STRUCTURE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; ADAPTATION; ALLELE; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EVOLUTION; GENOTYPE;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; ALLELES; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; GENOTYPE; HUMANS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

EID: 84866790609     PISSN: 00652598     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3567-9_3     Document Type: Review

References (119)

1. Andrianantoandro E, Basu S, Karig DK, Weiss R (2006) Synthetic biology: new engineering rules for an emerging discipline. Mol Syst Biol 2:2006.0028. doi:10.1038/msb4100073
2. Arigoni F, Talabot F, Peitsch M et al (1998) A genome-based approach for the identification of essential bacterial genes. Nat Biotechnol 16:851-856. doi:10.1038/nbt0998-851
3. Arnqvist G, Dowling DK, Eady P et al (2010) Genetic architecture of metabolic rate: environment specific epistasis between mitochondrial and nuclear genes in an insect. Evolution 64:3354-3363. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01135. x
4. Azevedo RBR, Lohaus R, Srinivasan S et al (2006) Sexual reproduction selects for robustness and negative epistasis in artificial gene networks. Nature 440:87-90. doi:10.1038/nature04488
5. Bandyopadhyay S, Kelley R, Krogan NJ, Ideker T (2008) Functional maps of protein complexes from quantitative genetic interaction data. PLoS Comput Biol 4:e1000065. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000065
6. Bateson W,Mendel G (2009) Mendels principles of heredity: a defence, with a translation of Mendels original papers on hybridisation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
7. Beard DA, Babson E, Curtis E, Qian H (2004) Thermodynamic constraints for biochemical networks. J Theor Biol 228:327-333. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.01.008
8. Benner SA, Sismour AM (2005) Synthetic biology. Nat Rev Genet 6:533-543. doi:10.1038/nrg1637
9. Bershtein S, Segal M, Bekerman R et al (2006) Robustness-epistasis link shapes the fitness landscape of a randomly drifting protein. Nature 444:929-932. doi:10.1038/nature05385
10. Bordbar A, Feist AM, Usaite-Black R et al (2011) A multi-tissue type genome-scale metabolic network for analysis of whole-body physiology. BMC Syst Biol 5:180. doi:10. 1186/1752-0509-5-180
11. Brem RB, Kruglyak L (2005) The landscape of genetic complexity across 5,700 gene expression traits in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:1572-1577. doi:10.1073/pnas. 0408709102
12. Brem RB, Yvert G, Clinton R, Kruglyak L (2002) Genetic dissection of transcriptional regulation in budding yeast. Science 296:752-755. doi:10.1126/science.1069516
13. Burch CL, Turner PE, Hanley KA (2003) Patterns of epistasis in RNA viruses: a review of the evidence from vaccine design. J Evol Biol 16:1223-1235. doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003. 00632.x
14. Carlborg O, Haley CS (2004) Epistasis: too often neglected in complex trait studies? Nat Rev Genet 5:618-625. doi:10.1038/nrg1407
15. Carter GW, Rush CG, Uygun F et al (2010) A systems-biology approach to modular genetic complexity. Chaos 20:026102. doi:10.1063/1.3455183
16. Chait R, Craney A, Kishony R (2007) Antibiotic interactions that select against resistance. Nature 446:668-671. doi:10.1038/nature05685
17. Chiu H-C, Marx CJ, Segr̀e D Epistasis from functional dependence of fitness on underlying traits. Submitted
18. Chou H-H, Chiu H-C, Delaney NF et al (2011) Diminishing returns epistasis among beneficial mutations decelerates adaptation. Science (New York, NY) 332:1190-1192. doi:10.1126/science.1203799
19. Collins SR, Schuldiner M, Krogan NJ, Weissman JS (2006) A strategy for extracting and analyzing large-scale quantitative epistatic interaction data. Genome Biol 7:R63. doi:10.1186/gb-2006-7-7-r63
20. Combarros O, Cortina-Borja M, Smith AD, Lehmann DJ (2009) Epistasis in sporadic Alzheimers disease. Neurobiol Aging 30:1333-1349. doi:10.1016/j. neurobiolaging.2007.11. 027
21. Cooper TF, Remold SK, Lenski RE, Schneider D (2008) Expression profiles reveal parallel evolution of epistatic interactions involving the CRP regulon in Escherichia coli. PLoS Genet 4:e35. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0040035
22. Cordell HJ (2002) Epistasis: what it means, what it doesnt mean, and statistical methods to detect it in humans. Hum Mol Genet 11:2463-2468. doi:10.1093/hmg/11.20.2463
23. Costanzo M, Baryshnikova A, Bellay J et al (2010) The genetic landscape of a cell. Science 327:425-431. doi:10.1126/science.1180823
24. Costanzo M, Baryshnikova A, Myers CL et al (2011) Charting the genetic interaction map of a cell. Curr Opin Biotechnol 22:66-74. doi:10.1016/j.copbio. 2010.11.001
25. Dekel E, Alon U (2005) Optimality and evolutionary tuning of the expression level of a protein. Nature 436:588-592. doi:10.1038/nature03842
26. Deutscher D, Meilijson I, Kupiec M, Ruppin E (2006) Multiple knockout analysis of genetic robustness in the yeast metabolic network. Nat Genet 38:993-998. doi:10.1038/ng1856
27. Deutscher D,Meilijson I, Schuster S, Ruppin E (2008) Can single knockouts accurately single out gene functions? BMC Syst Biol 2:50. doi:10.1186/1752- 0509-2-50
28. Draghi JA, Parsons TL, Plotkin JB (2011) Epistasis increases the rate of conditionally neutral substitution in an adapting population. Genetics 187:1139-52. doi:10.1534/genetics.110. 125997
29. Duarte NC, Herrgard MJ, Palsson B (2004) Reconstruction and validation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae iND750, a fully compartmentalized genome-scale metabolic model. Genome Res 14(7):1298-1309. doi:10.1101/gr.2250904
30. Dumas M-E, Wilder SP, Bihoreau M-T et al (2007) Direct quantitative trait locus mapping of mammalian metabolic phenotypes in diabetic and normoglycemic rat models. Nat Genet 39:666-672. doi:10.1038/ng2026
31. Edwards JS, Ibarra RU, Palsson BO (2001) In silico predictions of Escherichia coli metabolic capabilities are consistent with experimental data. Nat Biotechnol 19:125-130. doi:10.1038/84379
32. Edwards JS, Covert M, Palsson B (2002) Metabolic modelling of microbes: the flux-balance approach. Environ Microbiol 4:133-140. doi:10.1046/j.1462-2920. 2002.00282.x
33. Eleftherohorinou H, Wright V, Hoggart C et al (2009) Pathway analysis of GWAS provides new insights into genetic susceptibility to 3 inflammatory diseases. PLoS ONE 4:e8068. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008068
34. Elena SF, Soĺe RV, Sardanýes J (2010) Simple genomes, complex interactions: epistasis in RNA virus. Chaos 20:026106. doi:10.1063/1.3449300
35. Eronen V-P, Lind́en RO, Lindroos A et al (2010) Genome-wide scoring of positive and negative epistasis through decomposition of quantitative genetic interaction fitness matrices. PLoS ONE 5:e11611. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0011611
36. Famili I, Fu P, Palsson BO, Nielsen J (2003) Genome-scale reconstruction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolic network. Genome Res 13(2):244-253. doi:10.1101/gr.234503. complex
37. Feist AM, Henry CS, Reed JL et al (2007) A genome-scale metabolic reconstruction for Escherichia coli K-12MG1655 that accounts for 1260 ORFs and thermodynamic information. Mol Syst Biol 3:121. doi:10.1038/msb4100155
38. Folger O, Jerby L, Frezza C et al (2011) Predicting selective drug targets in cancer through metabolic networks. Mol Syst Biol 7:501. doi:10.1038/msb.2011.35
39. Forster J, Famili I, Palsson B, Nielsen J (2003) Large-scale evaluation of in silico gene deletions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. OMICS 7:193-202. doi:10.1089/153623103322246584
40. Frezza C, Zheng L, Folger O et al (2011) Haem oxygenase is synthetically lethal with the tumour suppressor fumarate hydratase. Nature 477:225-228. doi:10.1038/nature10363
41. Gao H, Granka JM, Feldman MW (2010) On the classification of epistatic interactions. Genetics 184:827-837. doi:10.1534/genetics.109.111120
42. Greenspan RJ (2001) The flexible genome. Nat Rev Genet 2:383-387. doi:10.1038/35072018
43. Guo J, Tian D, McKinney BA, Hartman JL (2010) Recursive expectation-maximization clustering: a method for identifying buffering mechanisms composed of phenomic modules. Chaos 20:026103. doi:10.1063/1.3455188
44. Harrison R, Papp B, Ṕal C et al (2007) Plasticity of genetic interactions in metabolic networks of yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:2307-2312. doi:10.1073/pnas.0607153104
45. Hartwell LH, Hopfield JJ, Leibler S, Murray AW (1999) From molecular to modular cell biology. Nature 402:C47-C52. doi:10.1038/35011540
46. Hayden EJ, Ferrada E, Wagner A (2011) Cryptic genetic variation promotes rapid evolutionary adaptation in an RNA enzyme. Nature 474:92-95. doi:10.1038/nature10083
47. Herrgard MJ, Swainston N, Dobson P et al (2008) A consensus yeast metabolic network reconstruction obtained from a community approach to systems biology. Nat Biotechnol 26:1155-1160. doi:10.1038/nbt1492
48. Hunter KW, Crawford NPS (2008) The future of mouse QTL mapping to diagnose disease in mice in the age of whole-genome association studies. Ann Rev Genet 42:131-141. doi:10. 1146/annurev.genet.42.110807.091659
49. Imielinski M, Belta C (2008) Exploiting the pathway structure of metabolism to reveal highorder epistasis. BMC Syst Biol 2:40. doi:10.1186/1752-0509-2-40
50. Imielinski M, Belta C (2010) Deep epistasis in human metabolism. Chaos 20:026104. doi:10. 1063/1.3456056
51. Imielinski M, Klitgord N, Belta C (2008) Investigating the genomic basis of metabolic robustness through in silico flux analysis. IEEE Conf Decis Contr 47:793-798. doi:10.1109/cdc.2008.4739459
52. Kauffman KJ, Prakash P, Edwards JS (2003) Advances in flux balance analysis. Curr Opin Biotechnol 14:491-496. doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2003.08.001
53. Kaufman A, Keinan A, Meilijson I et al (2005) Quantitative analysis of genetic and neuronal multi-perturbation experiments. PLoS Comput Biol 1:e64. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010064
54. Keasling JD (2010) Manufacturing molecules through metabolic engineering. Science (New York, NY) 330:1355-1358. doi:10.1126/science.1193990
55. Kelley R, Ideker T (2005) Systematic interpretation of genetic interactions using protein networks. Nat Biotechnol 23:561-566. doi:10.1038/nbt1096
56. Khan AI, Dinh DM, Schneider D et al (2011) Negative epistasis between beneficial mutations in an evolving bacterial population. Science 332:1193-1196. doi:10.1126/science.1203801
57. Khosla C (2003) Metabolic engineering for drug discovery and development. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2:1019-1025. doi:10.1038/nrd1256
58. Kishony R, Leibler S (2003) Environmental stresses can alleviate the average deleterious effect of mutations. J Biol 2(2):14. doi:10.1186/1475-4924- 2-14
59. Klamt S, Gilles ED (2004) Minimal cut sets in biochemical reaction networks. Bioinformatics 20:226-234. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg395
60. Klamt S, Haus U-U, Theis F (2009) Hypergraphs and cellular networks. PLoS Comput Biol 5:e1000385. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000385
61. Kliebenstein D (2009) Advancing genetic theory and application by metabolic quantitative trait loci analysis. Plant Cell 21:1637-1646. doi:10.1105/tpc.109.067611
62. Klitgord N, Segr̀e D (2010) Environments that induce synthetic microbial ecosystems. PLoS Comput Biol 6:e1001002. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi. 1001002
63. Klitgord N, Segr̀e D (2011) Ecosystems biology of micrbial metabolism. Curr Opin Biotechnol 22:541-546. doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2011.04.018
64. Koffas M, Roberge C, Lee K, Stephanopoulos G (1999) Metabolic engineering. Ann Rev Biomed Eng 1:535-557. doi:10.1002/biot.201100289
65. Kondrashov AS (1988) Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sexual reproduction. Nature 336:435-440. doi:10.1038/336435a0
66. Kondrashov FA, Kondrashov AS (2001) Multidimensional epistasis and the disadvantage of sex. PNAS 98:12089-12092. doi:10.1073/pnas.211214298
67. Kvitek DJ, Sherlock G (2011) Reciprocal sign epistasis between frequently experimentally evolved adaptive mutations causes a rugged fitness landscape. PLoS Genet 7:e1002056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002056
68. Leh́ar J, Krueger AS, Zimmermann G, Borisy A (2008) High-order combination effects and biological robustness. Mol Syst Biol 4:215. doi:10.1038/msb.2008.51
69. Leh́ar J, Krueger AS, Avery W et al (2009) Synergistic drug combinations tend to improve therapeutically relevant selectivity. Nat Biotechnol 27:659-66. doi:10.1038/nbt.1549
70. Lehman N (2008) The molecular underpinnings of genetic phenomena. Heredity 100:6-12. doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6801053
71. Li F, Long T, Lu Y et al (2004) The yeast cell-cycle network is robustly designed. PNAS 101:4781-4786. doi:10.1073/pnas.0305937101
72. Lisec J, Meyer RC, Steinfath M et al (2008) Identification of metabolic and biomass QTL in Arabidopsis thaliana in a parallel analysis of RIL and IL populations. Plant J 53:960-972. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03383.x
73. MacCarthy T, Bergman A (2007) Coevolution of robustness, epistasis, and recombination favors asexual reproduction. PNAS 104:12801-12806. doi:10.1073/pnas.0705455104
74. Mahadevan R, Schilling CH (2003) The effects of alternate optimal solutions in constraintbased genome-scale metabolic models.Metab Eng 5:264-276. doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2003.09. 002
75. Mani R, St Onge RP, Hartman JL et al (2008) Defining genetic interaction. PNAS 105:3461-3466. doi:10.1073/pnas.0712255105
76. Martin G, Elena SF, Lenormand T (2007) Distributions of epistasis in microbes fit predictions from a fitness landscape model. Nat Genet 39:555-560. doi:10.1038/ng1998
77. Michaut M, Baryshnikova A, Costanzo M et al (2011) Protein complexes are central in the yeast genetic landscape. PLoS Comput Biol 7:e1001092. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001092
78. Mitchison NA, Rose AM (2011) Epistasis: the key to understanding immunological disease? Eur J Immunol 41:2152-2154. doi:10.1002/eji.201141811
79. Mo ML, Palsson BO, Herrgard MJ (2009) Connecting extracellular metabolomic measurements to intracellular flux states in yeast. BMC Syst Biol 3:37. doi:10.1186/1752-0509-3- 37
80. Moore JH (2003) The ubiquitous nature of epistasis in determining susceptibility to common human diseases. Hum Hered 56:73-82. doi:10.1159/000073735
81. Moore JH (2005) A global view of epistasis. Nat Genet 37:13-14. doi:10.1038/ng0105-13
82. Moore JH, Williams SM (2005) Traversing the conceptual divide between biological and statistical epistasis: systems biology and a more modern synthesis. BioEssays 27:637-646. doi:10.1002/bies.20236
83. Orth JD, Thiele I, Palsson BO (2010) What is flux balance analysis? Nat Biotechnol 28:245-248. doi:10.1038/nbt.1614
84. Orth JD, Conrad TM, Na J et al (2011) A comprehensive genome-scale reconstruction of Escherichia coli metabolism - 2011. Mol Syst Biol 7:1-9. doi:10.1038/msb.2011.65
85. Papp B, Ṕal C, Hurst LD (2004) Metabolic network analysis of the causes and evolution of enzyme dispensability in yeast. Nature 429:661-664. doi:10.1038/nature02636
86. Parsons AB, Brost RL, Ding H et al (2004) Integration of chemical-genetic and genetic interaction data links bioactive compounds to cellular target pathways. Nat Biotechnol 22:62-69. doi:10.1038/nbt919
87. Penrod N, Greene CS, Granizo-MacKenzie D, Moore JH (2010) Artificial immune systems for epistasis analysis in human genetics. Lect Notes Comp Sci 6023:194-204. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-12211-8 17
88. Phillips PC (1998) The language of gene interaction. Genetics 1171:1167-1171
89. Phillips PC (2008) Epistasis - the essential role of gene interactions in the structure and evolution of genetic systems. Nature Rev Genet 9:855-867. doi:10.1038/nrg2452
90. Poelwijk FJ, Tanase-Nicola S, Kiviet DJ, Tans SJ (2011) Reciprocal sign epistasis is a necessary condition for multi-peaked fitness landscapes. J Theor Biol 272:141-144. doi:10. 1016/j.jtbi.2010.12.015
91. Raman K, Chandra N (2009) Flux balance analysis of biological systems: applications and challenges. Brief Bioinformatics 10:435-449. doi:10.1093/bib/bbp011
92. Schuetz R, Kuepfer L, Sauer U (2007) Systematic evaluation of objective functions for predicting intracellular fluxes in Escherichia coli.Mol Syst Biol 3:119. doi:10.1038/msb4100162
93. Schuldiner M, Collins SR, Thompson NJ et al (2005) Exploration of the function and organization of the yeast early secretory pathway through an epistatic miniarray profile. Cell 123:507-519. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.031
94. Segr̀e D, Vitkup D, Church GM (2002) Analysis of optimality in natural and perturbed metabolic networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:15112-15117. doi:10.1073/pnas.232349399
95. Segr̀e D, Deluna A, Church GM, Kishony R (2005) Modular epistasis in yeast metabolism. Nature Genet 37:77-83. doi:10.1038/ng1489
96. Shao H, Burrage LC, Sinasac DS et al (2008) Genetic architecture of complex traits: large phenotypic effects and pervasive epistasis. PNAS 105:19910-19914. doi:10.1073/pnas. 0810388105
97. Shlomi T, Herrgard MJ, Portnoy V et al (2007) Systematic condition-dependent annotation of metabolic genes. Genome Res 17:1626-1633. doi:10.1101/gr.6678707
98. Snitkin ES, Segr̀e D (2008) Optimality criteria for the prediction of metabolic fluxes in yeast mutants. Genome Inform 20:123-34; International Conference on Genome Informatics
99. Snitkin ES, Segr̀e D (2011) Epistatic Interaction Maps Relative to Multiple Metabolic Phenotypes. PLoS Genet 7(2):e1001294. doi:20.1371/journal. pgen.1001294
100. Snitkin ES, Dudley AM, Janse DM et al (2008) Model-driven analysis of experimentally determined growth phenotypes for 465 yeast gene deletion mutants under 16 different conditions. Genome Biol 9:R140. doi:10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r140
101. Stelling J, Sauer U, Szallasi Z et al (2004) Robustness of cellular functions. Cell 118:675-685. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.09.008
102. Szappanos B, Kov́acs K, Szamecz B et al (2011) An integrated approach to characterize genetic interaction networks in yeast metabolism. Nat Genet 43:656-662. doi:10.1038/ng. 846
103. Tong AHY, Evangelista M, Parsons AB et al (2001) Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science 294:2364-2368. doi:10.1126/science.1065810
104. Tong AHY, Lesage G, Bader GD et al (2004) Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network. Science 303:808-813. doi:10.1126/science.1091317
105. Trindade S, Sousa A, Xavier KB et al (2009) Positive epistasis drives the acquisition of multidrug resistance. PLoS Genet 5:e1000578. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000578
106. Varma A, Palsson BO (1994) Stoichiometric flux balance models quantitatively predict growth and metabolic by-product secretion in wild-type Escherichia coli W3110. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:3724-3731. doi:10.1128/AEM.00027-0254
107. de Visser JAGM, Hermisson J, Wagner GP et al (2003) Perspective: evolution and detection of genetic robustness. Evolution 57(9):1959-1972. doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00377.x
108. de Visser JAGM, Cooper TF, Elena SF (2011) The causes of epistasis. Proc Roy Soc B. 278: 3617-3624. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.1537
109. Wagner A (2005) Distributed robustness versus redundancy as causes of mutational robustness. BioEssays 27:176-188. doi:10.1002/bies.20170
110. Weinreich DM, Watson RA, Chao L (2005) Sign epistasis and genetic constraint on evolutionary trajectories. Evolution 59:1165-1174. doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01768.x
111. Weinreich DM, Delaney NF, DePristo MA, Hartl DL (2006) Darwinian evolution can follow only very few mutational paths to fitter proteins. Science 312:111. doi:10.1126/science. 1123539
112. Wintermute EH, Silver PA (2010) Emergent cooperation in microbial metabolism. Mol Syst Biol 6:1-7. doi:10.1038/msb.2010.66
113. Winzeler EA, Shoemaker DD, Astromoff A et al (1999) Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. Science 285:901-906. doi:10.1126/science.285.5429.901
114. Wolf JB, Brodie ED, Wade JM (2000) Epistasis and the evolutionary process. Oxford University Press, New York
115. Xu C, Li Z, Xu S (2005) Joint mapping of quantitative trait loci for multiple binary characters. Genetics 169:1045-1059. doi:10.1534/genetics.103. 019406
116. Yeh P, Tschumi AI, Kishony R (2006) Functional classification of drugs by properties of their pairwise interactions. Nat Genet 38:489-494. doi:10.1038/ng1755
117. Yeh PJ, Hegreness MJ, Aiden AP, Kishony R (2011) Drug interactions and the evolution of anibiotic resistance. Nat Rev Microbiol 11:330. doi:10.1038/nrmicro2133
118. You L, Yin J (2002) Dependence of epistasis on environment and mutation severity as revealed by in silico mutagenesis of phage t7. Genetics 160:1273-1281
119. Young ND (1996) QTL mapping and quantitative disease resistance in plants. Ann Rev Phytopathol 34:479-501. doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.34.1.479