Defining genetic interaction

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 105, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 3461-3466

  Mani, Ramamurthy ^a   St Onge, Robert P ^b   Hartman IV, John L ^c   Giaever, Guri ^d   Roth, Frederick P ^e  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^e DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Epistasis; Fitness; Gene function

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPISTASIS; GENE FUNCTION; GENE INTERACTION; GENE MUTATION; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MUTATION; THEORETICAL MODEL;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

METABOLIC NETWORKS AND PATHWAYS; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; REPRODUCTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 42149137884     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0712255105     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Phillips PC, Otto SP, Whitlock MC (2000) in Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process, eds Wolf JB, Brodie ED, Wade MJ (Oxford Univ Press, New York).
2. Hartman JL, Garvik B, Hartwell L (2001) Principles for the buffering of genetic variation. Science 291:1001-1004.
3. Boone C, Bussey H, Andrews BJ (2007) Exploring genetic interactions and networks with yeast. Nat Rev Genet 8:437-449.
4. Elena SF, Lenski RE (1997) Test of synergistic interactions among deleterious mutations in bacteria. Nature 390:395-398.
5. Peters AC, Lively CM (2000) in Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process, eds Wolf JB, Brodie ED, Wade MJ (Oxford Univ Press, New York), pp 99-112.
6. Jasnos L, Korona R (2007) Epistatic buffering of fitness loss in yeast double deletion strains. Nat Genet 39:550-554.
7. Zeyl C (2007) How missing genes interact. Nat Genet 39:440-442.
8. Tong AH, et al. (2001) Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science 294:2364-2368.
9. Szafraniec K, Wloch DM, Sliwa P, Borts RH, Korona R (2003) Small fitness effects and weak genetic interactions between deleterious mutations in heterozygous loci of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genet Res 82:19-31.
10. Baetz KK, Krogan NJ, Emili A, Greenblatt J, Hieter P (2004) The ctf13-30/CTF13 genomic haploinsufficiency modifier screen identifies the yeast chromatin remodeling complex RSC, which is required for the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. Mol Cell Biol 24:1232-1244.
11. Hartman JL, Tippery NP (2004) Systematic quantification of gene interactions by phenotypic array analysis. Genome Biol 5:R49.
12. Tong AH, et al. (2004) Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network. Science 303:808-813.
13. Davierwala AP, et al. (2005) The synthetic genetic interaction spectrum of essential genes. Nat Genet 37:1147-1152.
14. Drees BL, et al. (2005) Derivation of genetic interaction networks from quantitative phenotype data. Genome Biol 6:R38.
15. Segre D, Deluna A, Church GM, Kishony R (2005) Modular epistasis in yeast metabolism. Nat Genet 37:77-83.
16. Schuldiner M, et al. (2005) Exploration of the function and organization of the yeast early secretory pathway through an epistatic miniarray profile. Cell 123:507-519.
17. Pan X, et al. (2006) A DNA Integrity Network in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 124:1069-1081.
18. Sopko R, Papp B, Oliver SG, Andrews BJ (2006) Phenotypic activation to discover biological pathways and kinase substrates. Cell Cycle 5:1397-1402.
19. St. Onge RP, et al. (2007) Systematic pathway analysis using high-resolution fitness profiling of combinatorial gene deletions. Nat Genet 39:199-206.
20. Haarer B, Viggiano S, Hibbs MA, Troyanskaya OG, Amberg DC (2007) Modeling complex genetic interactions in a simple eukaryotic genome: actin displays a rich spectrum of complex haploinsufficiencies. Genes Dev 21:148-159.
21. Collins SR, et al. (2007) Functional dissection of protein complexes involved in yeast chromosome biology using a genetic interaction map. Nature 446:806-810.
22. Puniyani A, Liberman U, Feldman MW (2004) On the meaning of non-epistatic selection. Theor Popul Biol 66:317-321.
23. Otto SP, Lenormand T (2002) Resolving the paradox of sex and recombination. Nat Rev Genet 3:252-261.
24. Sanjuan R, Elena SF (2006) Epistasis correlates to genomic complexity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:14402-14405.
25. Pan X, et al. (2004) A robust toolkit for functional profiling of the yeast genome. Mol Cell 16:487-496.
26. Stark C, et al. (2006) BioGRID: a general repository for interaction datasets. Nucleic Acids Res 34:D535-D539.
27. Ashburner M, et al. (2000) Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 25:25-29.
28. Kaliraman V, et al. (2001) Functional overlap between Sgs1-Top3 and the Mms4-Mus81 endonuclease. Genes Dev 15:2730-2740.
29. Fabre F, Chan A, Heyer WD, Gangloff S (2002) Alternate pathways involving Sgs1/Top3, Mus81/Mms4, and Srs2 prevent formation of toxic recombination intermediates from single-stranded gaps created by DNA replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:16887-16892.
30. Beerenwinkel N, et al. (2007) Analysis of epistatic interactions and fitness landscapes using a new geometric approach. BMC Evol Biol 7:60.