Language adaptation and learning: Getting explicit about implicit learning

Linguistics and Language Compass

Volumn 6, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 259-278

  Chang, Franklin ^a   Janciauskas, Marius ^a   Fitz, Hartmut ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860461349     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1749818X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/lnc3.337     Document Type: Article

References (147)

1. Abrahamse, Elger L., Luis Jiménez, Willem B. Verwey, and Benjamin A. Clegg. 2010. Representing serial action and perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 17. 603-23.
2. Anderson, John R., Daniel Bothell, Michael D. Byrne, Scott Douglass, Christian Lebiere, and Yulin Qin. 2004. An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review 111. 1036-60.
3. Arnon, Inbal, and Neal Snider. 2010. More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language 62. 67-82.
4. Aslin, Richard N., Jenny R. Saffran, and Elissa L. Newport. 1998. Computation of conditional probability statistics by 8-month-old infants. Psychological Science 9. 321-4.
5. Bannard, Colin, and Danielle Matthews. 2008. Stored word sequences in language learning: The effect of familiarity on children's repetition of four-word combinations. Psychological Science 19. 241-8.
6. Bernolet, Sarah, and Robert J. Hartsuiker. 2010. Does verb bias modulate syntactic priming? Cognition 114. 455-61.
7. Bock, Kathryn. 1986. Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology 18. 355-87.
8. Bock, Kathryn. 1989. Closed-class immanence in sentence production. Cognition 31. 163-86.
9. Bock, Kathryn, Gary S. Dell, Franklin Chang, and Kristine H. Onishi. 2007. Persistent structural priming from language comprehension to language production. Cognition 104. 437-58.
10. Bock, Kathryn, and Zenzi M. Griffin. 2000. The persistence of structural priming: transient activation or implicit learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129. 177-92.
11. Bock, Kathryn, and Helga Loebell. 1990. Framing sentences. Cognition 35. 1-39.
12. Branigan, Holly P., Martin J. Pickering, and Alexandra A. Cleland. 1999. Syntactic priming in written production: Evidence for rapid decay. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 6. 635-40.
13. Buchner, Axel, Melanie C. Steffens, and Rainer Rothkegel. 1998. On the role of fragmentary knowledge in a sequence learning task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 51. 251-81.
14. Cave, Carolyn B. 1997. Very long-lasting priming in picture naming. Psychological Science 8. 322-5.
15. Chambers, Kyle E., Kristine H. Onishi, and Cynthia Fisher. 2003. Infants learn phonotactic regularities from brief auditory experiences. Cognition 87. B69-77.
16. Chambers, Kyle E., Kristine H. Onishi, and Cynthia Fisher. 2010. A vowel is a vowel: Generalizing newly learned phonotactic constraints to new contexts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 36. 821-8.
17. Chang, Franklin. 2002. Symbolically speaking: A connectionist model of sentence production. Cognitive Science 26. 609-51.
18. Chang, Franklin. 2009. Learning to order words: A connectionist model of heavy NP shift and accessibility effects in Japanese and English. Journal of Memory and Language 61. 374-97.
19. Chang, Franklin, Kathryn Bock, and Adele E. Goldberg. 2003. Can thematic roles leave traces of their places? Cognition 90. 29-49.
20. Chang, Franklin, Gary S. Dell, and Kathryn Bock. 2006. Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review 113. 234-72.
21. Chang, Franklin, Elena Lieven, and Michael Tomasello. 2008. Automatic evaluation of syntactic learners in typologically-different languages. Cognitive Systems Research 9. 198-213.
22. Christiansen, Morten H., and Nick Chater. 1999. Toward a connectionist model of recursion in human linguistic performance. Cognitive Science 23. 157-205.
23. Christiansen, Morten H., M. Louise Kelly, Richard C. Shillcock, and Katie Greenfield. 2010. Impaired artificial grammar learning in agrammatism. Cognition 116. 382-93.
24. Cleeremans, Axel, and Zoltán Dienes. 2008. Computational models of implicit learning. The Cambridge handbook of computational modeling, ed. by Ron Sun, 396-421. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25. Cleeremans, Axel, and James L. McClelland. 1991. Learning the structure of event sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 120. 235-53.
26. Cleeremans, Axel, David Servan-Schreiber, and James L. McClelland. 1989. Finite state automata and simple recurrent networks. Neural Computation 1. 372-81.
27. Clegg, Benjamin A., Gregory J. DiGirolamo, and Steven W. Keele. 1998. Sequence learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2. 275-81.
28. Cleland, Alexandra A., and Martin J. Pickering. 2003. The use of lexical and syntactic information in language production: Evidence from the priming of noun-phrase structure. Journal of Memory and Language 49. 214-30.
29. Cohen, Asher, Richard I. Ivry, and Steven W. Keele. 1990. Attention and structure in sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 16. 17-30.
30. Conway, Christopher M., and Morten H. Christiansen. 2001. Sequential learning in non-human primates. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5. 539-46.
31. Conway, Christopher M., and David B. Pisoni. 2008. Neurocognitive basis of implicit learning of sequential structure and its relation to language processing. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1145. 113-31.
32. Corkin, Suzanne. 2002. What's new with the amnesic patient H.M.? Nature Reviews Neuroscience 3. 153-60.
33. Coyle, Jacqueline M., and Michael P. Kaschak. 2008. Patterns of experience with verbs affect long-term cumulative structural priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15. 967-70.
34. Curran, Tim. 1997. Higher-order associative learning in amnesia: Evidence from the serial reaction time task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 9. 522-33.
35. Curran, Tim, and Steven W. Keele. 1993. Attentional and nonattentional forms of sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 19. 189-202.
36. Cutting, J. Cooper, and Kathryn Bock. 1997. That's the way the cookie bounces: syntactic and semantic components of experimentally elicited idiom blends. Memory & Cognition 25. 57-71.
37. Davidson, Doug J., and Peter Indefrey. 2011. Error-related activity and correlates of grammatical plasticity. Frontiers in Psychology 2. 1-16.
38. Dell, Gary S., Kristopher D. Reed, David R. Adams, and Antje S. Meyer. 2000. Speech errors, phonotactic constraints, and implicit learning: A study of the role of experience in language production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26. 1355-67.
39. Destrebecqz, Arnaud, and Axel Cleeremans. 2001. Can sequence learning be implicit? New evidence with the process dissociation procedure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 8. 343-50.
40. Dienes, Zoltán, Gerry T. M. Altmann, Liam Kwan, and Alastair Goode. 1995. Unconscious knowledge of artificial grammars is applied strategically. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21. 1322-38.
41. Dulany, Don E., Richard A. Carlson, and Gerald I. Dewey. 1984. A case of syntactical learning and judgment: How conscious and how abstract? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113. 541-55.
42. Eichenbaum, Howard, and Neal J. Cohen. 2004. From conditioning to conscious recollection: Memory systems of the brain. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
43. Elman, Jeffrey L. 1990. Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science 14. 179-211.
44. Elman, Jeffrey L. 1993. Learning and development in neural networks: The importance of starting small. Cognition 48. 71-99.
45. Ferreira, Victor S., Kathryn Bock, Michael P. Wilson, and Neal J. Cohen. 2008. Memory for syntax despite amnesia. Psychological Science 19. 940-6.
46. Fitz, Hartmut. 2009. Neural syntax. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam. Institute for Logic, Language, and Computation dissertation series.
47. Fitz, Hartmut, and Franklin Chang. 2008. The role of the input in a connectionist account of the accessibility hierarchy in development. Proceeding of the 32nd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, ed. by Harvey Chan, Heather Jacob and Enkeleida Kapia, 120-31. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
48. Franco, Ana, Axel Cleeremans, and Arnaud Destrebecqz. 2011. Statistical learning of two artificial languages presented successively: how conscious? Frontiers in Psychology 2. 1-12.
49. Frank, Michael C., Sharon Goldwater, Thomas L. Griffiths, and Joshua B. Tenenbaum. 2010. Modeling human performance in statistical word segmentation. Cognition 117. 107-25.
50. French, Robert M., Caspar Addyman, and Denis Mareschal. 2011. TRACX: A recognition-based connectionist framework for sequence segmentation and chunk extraction. Psychological Review 118. 614-36.
51. Freudenthal, Daniel, and Julian M. Pine. 2005. On the resolution of ambiguities in the extraction of syntactic categories through chunking. Cognitive Systems Research 6. 17-25.
52. Freudenthal, Daniel, Julian M. Pine, Javier Aguado-Orea, and Fernand Gobet. 2007. Modeling the developmental patterning of finiteness marking in English, Dutch, German, and Spanish using MOSAIC. Cognitive Science 31. 311-41.
53. Fu, Qiufang, Xiaolan Fu, and Zoltán Dienes. 2008. Implicit sequence learning and conscious awareness. Consciousness and Cognition 17. 185-202.
54. Garnsey, Susan M., Neal J. Pearlmutter, Elizabeth Myers, and Melanie A. Lotocky. 1997. The contributions of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences. Journal of Memory and Language 37. 58-93.
55. Geschwind, Norman. 1970. The organization of language and the brain. Science 170. 940-4.
56. Goldrick, Matthew. 2004. Phonological features and phonotactic constraints in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language 51. 586-603.
57. Goldrick, Matthew, and Meredith Larson. 2008. Phonotactic probability influences speech production. Cognition 107. 1155-64.
58. Gómez, Rebecca L. 1997. Transfer and complexity in artificial grammar learning. Cognitive Psychology 33. 154-207.
59. Gómez, Rebecca L., and LouAnn Gerken. 1999. Artificial grammar learning by 1-year-olds leads to specific and abstract knowledge. Cognition 70. 109-35.
60. Gómez, Rebecca L., and LouAnn Gerken. 2000. Infant artificial language learning and language acquisition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4. 178-86.
61. van Gompel, Roger P. G., and Martin J. Pickering. 2007. Syntactic parsing. The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics, ed. by Gareth Gaskell, 289-307. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
62. Grodzinsky, Yosef, and Andrea Santi. 2008. The battle for Broca's region. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12. 474-80.
63. Gupta, Prahlad, and Neal J. Cohen. 2002. Theoretical and computational analysis of skill learning, repetition priming, and procedural memory. Psychological Review 109. 401-48.
64. Hartsuiker, Robert J., Sarah Bernolet, Sofie Schoonbaert, Sara Speybroeck, and Dieter Vanderelst. 2008. Syntactic priming persists while the lexical boost decays: evidence from written and spoken dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language 58. 214-38.
65. Hirst, William, Elizabeth A. Phelps, Marcia K. Johnson, and Bruce T. Volpe. 1988. Amnesia and second language learning. Brain and Cognition 8. 105-16.
66. Howard, David, Lyndsey Nickels, Max Coltheart, and Jennifer Cole-Virtue. 2006. Cumulative semantic inhibition in picture naming: Experimental and computational studies. Cognition 100. 464-82.
67. Hunt, Ruskin H., and Richard N. Aslin. 2010. Category induction via distributional analysis: Evidence from a serial reaction time task. Journal of Memory and Language 62. 98-112.
68. Jacoby, Larry L. 1991. A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language 30. 513-41.
69. Jaeger, T. Florian, and Neal Snider. 2007. Implicit learning and syntactic persistence: Surprisal and cumulativity. University of Rochester Working Papers in the Language Sciences 3. 26-44.
70. Jiang, Yuhong, and Marvin M. Chun. 2001. Selective attention modulates implicit learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 54. 1105-24.
71. Jiménez, Luis. 2008. Taking patterns for chunks: Is there any evidence of chunk learning in continuous serial reaction-time tasks? Psychological Research 72. 387-96.
72. Jiménez, Luis, and Castor Méndez. 1999. Which attention is needed for implicit sequence learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 25. 236-59.
73. Jiménez, Luis, Castor Méndez, and Axel Cleeremans. 1996. Comparing direct and indirect measures of implicit learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22. 948-69.
74. Juliano, Cornell, and Michael K. Tanenhaus. 1994. A constraint-based lexicalist account of the subject/object attachment preference. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 23. 459-71.
75. Kaschak, Michael P. 2007. Long-term structural priming affects subsequent patterns of language production. Memory & Cognition 35. 925-37.
76. Kaschak, Michael P., and Arthur M. Glenberg. 2004. This construction needs learned. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133. 450-67.
77. Kaschak, Michael P., Timothy J. Kutta, and Christopher Schatschneider. 2011. Long-term cumulative structural priming persists for (at least) one week. Memory & Cognition 39. 381-8.
78. Kensinger, Elizabeth A., Michael T. Ullman, and Suzanne Corkin. 2001. Bilateral medial temporal lobe damage does not affect lexical or grammatical processing: Evidence from amnesic patient HM. Hippocampus 11. 347-60.
79. Kidd, Evan. 2012. Implicit statistical learning is directly associated with the acquisition of syntax. Developmental Psychology 48. 171-84.
80. Knowlton, Barbara J., Seth J. Ramus, and Larry R. Squire. 1992. Intact artificial grammar learning in amnesia: Dissociation of classification learning and explicit memory for specific instances. Psychological Science 3. 172-9.
81. Knowlton, Barbara J., and Larry R. Squire. 1996. Artificial grammar learning depends on implicit acquisition of both abstract and exemplar-specific information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22. 169-81.
82. Komorowski, Robert W., Joseph R. Manns, and Howard Eichenbaum. 2009. Robust conjunctive item-place coding by hippocampal neurons parallels learning what happens where. The Journal of Neuroscience 29. 9918-29.
83. Konopka, Agnieszka E, and Kathryn Bock. 2009. Lexical or syntactic control of sentence formulation? Structural generalizations from idiom production. Cognitive Psychology 58. 68-101.
84. Levelt, Willem J. M. 1993. Speaking: from intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
85. MacKay, Donald G., Deborah M. Burke, and Rachel Stewart. 1998a. HM's language production deficits: Implications for relations between memory, semantic binding, and the hippocampal system. Journal of Memory and Language 38. 28-69.
86. MacKay, Donald G., and Christopher B. Hadley. 2009. Supra-normal age-linked retrograde amnesia: Lessons from an older amnesic (H.M.). Hippocampus 19. 424-45.
87. MacKay, Donald G., and Lori E. James. 2002. Aging, retrograde amnesia, and the binding problem for phonology and orthography: A longitudinal study of "hippocampal amnesic" H.M. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition 9. 298-333.
88. MacKay, Donald G., Lori E. James, Christopher B. Hadley, and Kethera A. Fogler. 2011. Speech errors of amnesic H.M.: Unlike everyday slips-of-the-tongue. Cortex 47. 377-408.
89. MacKay, Donald G., Lori E. James, Jennifer K. Taylor, and Diane E. Marian. 2007. Amnesic HM exhibits parallel deficits and sparing in language and memory: Systems versus binding theory accounts. Language and Cognitive Processes 22. 377-452.
90. MacKay, Donald G., Rachel Stewart, and Deborah M. Burke. 1998b. H.M. revisited: Relations between language comprehension, memory, and the hippocampal system. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 10. 377-94.
91. Mazuka, Reiko. 1998. The development of language processing strategies: A cross-linguistic study between Japanese and English. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
92. McClelland, James L., Bruce L. McNaughton, and Randall C. O'Reilly. 1995. Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: Insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychological Review 102. 419-57.
93. McCloskey, Michael, and Neal J. Cohen. 1989. Catastrophic interference in connectionist networks: The sequential learning problem. The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, ed. by Brian H. Ross, 24:109-65. San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
94. Meyer, Patric, Axel Mecklinger, Thomas Grunwald, Juergen Fell, Christian E. Elger, and Angela D. Friederici. 2005. Language processing within the human medial temporal lobe. Hippocampus 15. 451-9.
95. Mintz, Toben H. 2002. Category induction from distributional cues in an artificial language. Memory & Cognition 30. 678-86.
96. Mintz, Toben H., Elissa L. Newport, and Thomas G. Bever. 2002. The distributional structure of grammatical categories in speech to young children. Cognitive Science 26. 393-424.
97. Mirman, Daniel, Katharine Graf Estes, and James S. Magnuson. 2010. Computational modeling of statistical learning: effects of transitional probability versus frequency and links to word learning. Infancy 15. 471-86.
98. Misyak, Jennifer B., Morten H. Christiansen, and J. Bruce Tomblin. 2010a. On-line individual differences in statistical learning predict language processing. Frontiers in Language Sciences 1. 1-9.
99. Misyak, Jennifer B., Morten H. Christiansen, and J. Bruce Tomblin. 2010b. Sequential expectations: The role of prediction-based learning in language. Topics in Cognitive Science 2. 138-53.
100. Mitchell, David B., and Alan S. Brown. 1988. Persistent repetition priming in picture naming and its dissociation from recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 14. 213-22.
101. Morgan, James L., and Elissa L. Newport. 1981. The role of constituent structure in the induction of an artificial language. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20. 67-85.
102. Nissen, Mary J., and Peter Bullemer. 1987. Attentional requirements of learning: evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology 19. 1-32.
103. Novick, Jared M., John C. Trueswell, and Sharon L. Thompson-Schill. 2010. Broca's area and language processing: Evidence for the cognitive control connection. Language and Linguistics Compass 4. 906-24.
104. Onishi, Kristine H., Kyle E. Chambers, and Cynthia Fisher. 2002. Learning phonotactic constraints from brief auditory experience. Cognition 83. B13-23.
105. Oppenheim, Gary M., Gary S. Dell, and Myrna F. Schwartz. 2010. The dark side of incremental learning: A model of cumulative semantic interference during lexical access in speech production. Cognition 114. 227-52.
106. O'Reilly, Randall C., and Jerry W. Rudy. 2001. Conjunctive representations in learning and memory: Principles of cortical and hippocampal function. Psychological Review 108. 311-45.
107. Pelucchi, Bruna, Jessica F. Hay, and Jenny R. Saffran. 2009. Statistical learning in a natural language by 8-month-old infants. Child Development 80. 674-85.
108. Perruchet, Pierre, Emmanuel Bigand, and Fabienne Benoit-Gonin. 1997. The emergence of explicit knowledge during the early phase of learning in sequential reaction time tasks. Psychological Research 60. 4-13.
109. Perruchet, Pierre, and Chantal Pacteau. 1990. Synthetic grammar learning: Implicit rule abstraction or explicit fragmentary knowledge? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 119. 264-75.
110. Perruchet, Pierre, and Sébastien Pacton. 2006. Implicit learning and statistical learning: One phenomenon, two approaches. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10. 233-8.
111. Petersson, Karl-Magnus, Vasiliki Folia, and Peter Hagoort. 2012. What artificial grammar learning reveals about the neurobiology of syntax. Brain and Language 120. 83-95.
112. Pickering, Martin J., and Holly P. Branigan. 1998. The representation of verbs: evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language 39. 633-51.
113. Pickering, Martin J., and Victor S. Ferreira. 2008. Structural priming: a critical review. Psychological Bulletin 134. 427-59.
114. Pinker, Steven. 1984. Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
115. Pothos, Emmanuel M. 2007. Theories of artificial grammar learning. Psychological Bulletin 133. 227-44.
116. Reber, Arthur S. 1967. Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 6. 855-63.
117. Rodriguez, P. 2003. Comparing simple recurrent networks and n-grams in a large corpus. Applied Intelligence 19. 39-50.
118. Rohde, Douglas L.T. 2002. A connectionist model of sentence comprehension and production. Technical Report. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.
119. Rowland, Caroline, Franklin Chang, Ben Ambridge, Julian M. Pine, and Elena Lieven. 2011. The development of abstract syntax: Evidence from structural priming and the lexical boost. Paper presented at the Conference on Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing, Paris.
120. Rowland, Lee A., and David R. Shanks. 2006. Sequence learning and selection difficulty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 32. 287-99.
121. Rumelhart, David E., Geoffrey E. Hinton, and Ronald J. Williams. 1986. Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 323. 533-6.
122. Saffran, Jenny R. 2001. The use of predictive dependencies in language learning. Journal of Memory and Language 44. 493-515.
123. Saffran, Jenny R., Richard N. Aslin, and Elissa L. Newport. 1996. Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science 274. 1926-8.
124. Saffran, Jenny R., Elissa L. Newport, Richard N. Aslin, Rachel A. Tunick, and Sandra Barrueco. 1997. Incidental language learning: listening (and learning) out of the corner of your ear. Psychological Science 8. 101-5.
125. Saffran, Jenny R., and Diana P. Wilson. 2003. From syllables to syntax: Multilevel statistical learning by 12-month-old infants. Infancy 4. 273-84.
126. Schacter, Daniel L. 1987. Implicit memory: History and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 13. 501-18.
127. Seger, Carol Augart. 1994. Implicit learning. Psychological Bulletin 115. 163-96.
128. Seidl, Amanda, Alex Cristià, Amelie Bernard, and Kristine H. Onishi. 2009. Allophonic and phonemic contrasts in infants' learning of sound patterns. Language Learning and Development 5. 191-202.
129. Shanks, David R., and Theresa Johnstone. 1999. Evaluating the relationship between explicit and implicit knowledge in a sequential reaction time task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 25. 1435-51.
130. Shanks, David R., Lee A. Rowland, and Mandeep S. Ranger. 2005. Attentional load and implicit sequence learning. Psychological Research 69. 369-82.
131. Skotko, Brian G., Edna Andrews, and Gillian Einstein. 2005. Language and the medial temporal lobe: Evidence from HM's spontaneous discourse. Journal of Memory and Language 53. 397-415.
132. Smith, Mark C., and Linda R. Wheeldon. 2001. Syntactic priming in spoken sentence production-an online study. Cognition 78. 123-64.
133. Squire, Larry R. 2004. Memory systems of the brain: A brief history and current perspective. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 82. 171-7.
134. Squire, Larry R. 2009. The legacy of patient H.M. for neuroscience. Neuron 61. 6-9.
135. Taylor, Conrad F., and George Houghton. 2005. Learning artificial phonotactic constraints: Time course, durability, and relationship to natural constraints. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31. 1398-416.
136. Thomas, Kathleen M., and Charles A. Nelson. 2001. Serial reaction time learning in preschool and school-age children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 79. 364-87.
137. Thompson, Susan P., and Elissa L. Newport. 2007. Statistical learning of syntax: The role of transitional probability. Language Learning and Development 3. 1-42.
138. Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
139. Toro, Juan M., Scott Sinnett, and Salvador Soto-Faraco. 2011. Generalizing linguistic structures under high attention demands. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 37. 493-501.
140. de Vries, Meinou H., Andre C. R. Barth, Sandra Maiworm, Stefan Knecht, Pienie Zwitserlood, and Agnes Flöel. 2010. Electrical stimulation of Broca's area enhances implicit learning of an artificial grammar. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22. 2427-36.
141. de Vries, Meinou H., Morten H. Christiansen, and Karl-Magnus Petersson. 2011. Learning recursion: Multiple nested and crossed dependencies. Biolinguistics 5. 010-35.
142. Warker, Jill A., Gary S. Dell, Christine A. Whalen, and Samantha Gereg. 2008. Limits on learning phonotactic constraints from recent production experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 34. 1289-95.
143. Warker, Jill A., Ye Xu, Gary S. Dell, and Cynthia Fisher. 2009. Speech errors reflect the phonotactic constraints in recently spoken syllables, but not in recently heard syllables. Cognition 112. 81-96.
144. Wells, J. B., M. H. Christiansen, D. S. Race, D. J. Acheson, and M. C. MacDonald. 2009. Experience and sentence processing: Statistical learning and relative clause comprehension. Cognitive Psychology 58. 250-71.
145. Wilkinson, Leonora, and David R. Shanks. 2004. Intentional control and implicit sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 30. 354-69.
146. Wilson, Michael P., and Susan M. Garnsey. 2009. Making simple sentences hard: Verb bias effects in simple direct object sentences. Journal of Memory and Language 60. 368-92.
147. Wonnacott, Elizabeth, Elissa L. Newport, and Michael K. Tanenhaus. 2008. Acquiring and processing verb argument structure: Distributional learning in a miniature language. Cognitive Psychology 56. 165-209.