Speech errors reflect the phonotactic constraints in recently spoken syllables, but not in recently heard syllables

Cognition

Volumn 112, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 81-96

  Warker, Jill A ^a   Xu, Ye ^a   Dell, Gary S ^a   Fisher, Cynthia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Perception; Phonotactic learning; Production; Speech errors

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONSONANT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION;

ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VERBAL LEARNING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67349115706     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.03.009     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Bock J.K. Toward a cognitive psychology of syntax: Information processing contributions to sentence formulation. Psychological Review 89 (1982) 1-47
2. Bock J.K., Dell G.S., Chang F., and Onishi K.H. Persistent structural priming from language comprehension to language production. Cognition 104 (2007) 437-458
3. Bradlow A.R., and Bent T. Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech. Cognition 106 (2008) 707-729
4. Bradlow A.R., Pisoni D.B., Yamada R.A., and Tohkura Y. Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. Journal of Acoustical Society of America 10 (1997) 2299-2310
5. Branigan H.P., Pickering M.J., and Cleland A.A. Syntactic coordination in dialogue. Cognition 75 (2000) B13-B25
6. Caramazza A. How many levels of processing are there in lexical access?. Cognitive Neuropsychology 14 (1997) 177-208
7. Chambers, K. E. (2004). Phonological development: Mechanisms and representations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
8. Chambers K.E., Onishi K.H., and Fisher C. Infants learn phonotactic regularities from brief auditory experiences. Cognition 87 (2003) B69-B77
9. Chang F., Dell G.S., and Bock K. Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review 113 (2006) 234-272
10. Cholin J., Schiller N.O., and Levelt W.J.M. The preparation of syllables in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language 50 (2004) 47-61
11. Clark E.V., and Hecht B.F. Comprehension, production, and language acquisition. Annual Review of Psychology 34 (1983) 325-349
12. Clark H.H., and Malt B.C. Psychological constraints on language: A commentary on Bresnan and Kaplan and on Givon. In: Kintsch W., Miller J.R., and Polson P.G. (Eds). Method and tactics in cognitive science (1984), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 191-214
13. Conway C.M., and Christiansen M.H. Statistical learning within and between modalities: Pitting abstract against stimulus-specific representations. Psychological Science 17 (2006) 905-912
14. Cooper W.E. Speech perception and production: Studies in selective adaptation (1979), Ablex Publishing Company, Norwood, NJ
15. Dell G.S. A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review 93 (1986) 283-321
16. Dell G.S., Martin N., and Schwartz M.F. A case-series test of the interactive two-step model of lexical access: Predicting word repetition from picture naming. Journal of Memory and Language 56 (2007) 490-520
17. Dell G.S., Reed K.D., Adams D.R., and Meyer A.S. Speech errors, phonotactic constraints, and implicit learning: A study of the role of experience in language production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26 (2000) 1355-1367
18. Dell G.S., Schwartz M.F., Martin N., Saffran E.M., and Gagnon D.A. Lexical access in aphasic and non-aphasic speakers. Psychological Review 104 (1997) 801-838
19. Dupoux E., Kakehi K., Hirose Y., Pallier C., and Mehler J. Epenthetic vowels in Japanese: A perceptual illusion?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25 (1999) 1568-1578
20. Federmeier K.D. Thinking ahead: The role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. Psychophysiology 44 (2007) 491-505
21. Ferreira V.S., and Bock K. The functions of structural priming. Language and Cognitive Processes 21 (2006) 1011-1029
22. Foygel D., and Dell G.S. Models of impaired lexical access in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language 43 (2000) 182-216
23. Fromkin V.A. The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language 47 (1971) 27-52
24. Galantucci B., Fowler C.A., and Turvey M.T. The motor theory of speech perception reviewed. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 13 (2006) 361-377
25. Garcia J., and Koelling R.A. Relation of cue to consequence in avoidance learning. Psychonomic Science 4 (1966) 123-124
26. Goldinger S.D. Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review 105 (1998) 251-279
27. Goldinger S.D., and Azuma T. Episodic memory reflected in printed word naming. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 11 (2004) 716-722
28. Goldrick M. Phonological features and phonotactic constraints in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language 51 (2004) 586-603
29. Goldrick M., and Larson M. Phonotactic probability influences speech production. Cognition 107 (2008) 1155-1164
30. Gupta P., and MacWhinney B. Vocabulary acquisition and verbal short-term memory: Computational and neural bases. Brain and Language 59 (1997) 267-333
31. Gupta P., and Dell G.S. The emergence of language from serial order and procedural memory. In: MacWhinney B. (Ed). The emergence of language (1999), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 447-481
32. Howard D., and Nickels L.A. Separating input and output phonology: Semantic, phonological, and orthographic effects in short term memory impairment. Cognitive Neuropsychology 21 (2005) 57-78
33. Jusczyk P.W., Friederici A.D., Wessels J.M., and Svenkerud V.Y. Infants' sensitivity to the sound patterns of native language words. Journal of Memory and Language 32 (1993) 402-420
34. Jusczyk P.W., Luce P.A., and Charles-Luce J. Infants' sensitivity to phonotactics patterns in the native language. Journal of Memory and Language 33 (1994) 630-645
35. Kraljic T., Brennan S.E., and Samuel A.G. Accommodating variation: Dialects, idiolects, and speech processing. Cognition 107 (2008) 54-81
36. Labov W. Principles of linguistic change: Internal factors (1994), Blackwell, Oxford, UK
37. Levelt W.J.M., Roelofs A., and Meyer A.S. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1999) 1-75
38. MacKay D.G. Spoonerisms: The structure of errors in the serial order of speech. Neuropsychologia 8 (1970) 323-350
39. MacKay D.G. The problems of flexibility, fluency, and speed-accuracy trade-off in skilled behavior. Psychological Review 89 (1982) 483-506
40. Martin N., and Saffran E.M. The relationship of input and output phonological processing: An evaluation of models and evidence to support them. Aphasiology 16 (2002) 107-150
41. Martin N., Dell G.S., Saffran E.M., and Schwartz M.F. Origins of paraphasias in deep dysphasia: Testing the consequences of a decay impairment to an interactive spreading activation model of lexical retrieval. Brain and Language 47 (1994) 609-660
42. Martin R.C. Language processing: Functional organization and neuroanatomical basis. Annual Review of Psychology 54 (2003) 55-89
43. Massaro D., and Cohen M. Phonological context in speech perception. Perception and Psychophysics 23 (1983) 338-348
44. McQueen J.M. Segmentation of continuous speech using phonotactics. Journal of Memory and Language 39 (1998) 21-46
45. Menn L. Developmen.t of articulatory, phonetic, and phonological abilities. In: Butterworth B. (Ed). Language production Vol. 2 (1983), Academic Press, London 3-50
46. Monsell S. On the relation between lexical input and output pathways for speech. In: Allport A., Mackay D., Prinz W., and Scheerer E. (Eds). Language perception and production (1987), Academic Press, London 273-311
47. Nickels L., and Howard D. Phonological errors in aphasic naming: Comprehension monitoring and lexicality. Cortex 31 (1995) 209-237
48. Onishi K.H., Chambers K.E., and Fisher C. Learning phonotactic constraints from brief auditory experience. Cognition 83 (2002) B13-B23
49. Oppenheim G.M., and Dell G.S. Inner speech slips exhibit lexical bias, but not the phonemic similarity effect. Cognition 106 (2008) 528-537
50. Pardo J.S. On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119 (2006) 2382-2393
51. Plaut D.C., and Kello C.T. The emergence of phonology from the interplay of speech comprehension and production: A distributed connectionist approach. In: MacWhinney B. (Ed). The emergence of language (1999), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 381-415
52. Pickering M.J., and Ferreira V.S. Structural priming: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin 134 (2008) 427-459
53. Redford M.A. Production constraints on learning novel onset phonotactics. Cognition 107 (2008) 785-816
54. Saffran J.R., and Thiessen E.E. Pattern induction by infant language learners. Developmental Psychology 39 (2003) 484-494
55. Sancier M.L., and Fowler C.A. Gestural drift in a bilingual speaker of Brazilian Portuguese and English. Journal of Phonetics 25 (1997) 421-436
56. Seidl A., and Buckley E. On the learning of arbitrary phonological rules. Language Learning and Development 1 (2005) 289-316
57. Shallice T., McLeod P., and Lewis K. Isolating cognitive modules with the dual-task paradigm: Are speech perception and production spearate process. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 37A (1985) 507-532
58. Shallice T., Rumiati R.I., and Zadini A. The selective impairment of the phonological output buffer. Cognitive Neuropsychology 17 (2000) 517-546
59. Shattuck-Hufnagel S., and Klatt D.H. The limited use of distinctive features and markedness in speech production: Evidence from speech error data. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18 (1979) 41-55
60. Stemberger J.P. An interactive activation model of language production. In: Ellis A.W. (Ed). Progress in the psychology of language Vol. 1 (1985), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 143-186
61. Taylor, C. F. (2003). The acquisition of phonemic constraints: Implications for models of phonological encoding. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Wales, Bangor.
62. Taylor C.F., and Houghton G. Learning artificial phonotactic constraints: Time course, durability, and relationship to natural constraints. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31 (2005) 1398-1416
63. Thomas B., and Hay J. A pleasant malady: The ellen/allan merger in New Zealand English. Te Reo 48 (2006) 69-93
64. Warker J.A., and Dell G.S. Speech errors reflect newly learned phonotactic constraints. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 32 (2006) 387-398
65. Warker J.A., Dell G.S., Whalen C.A., and Gereg S. Limits on learning phonotactic constraints from recent production experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 34 (2008) 1289-1295