Experience and sentence processing: Statistical learning and relative clause comprehension

Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 58, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 250-271

  Wells, Justine B ^a   Christiansen, Morten H ^b   Race, David S ^c   Acheson, Daniel J ^a   MacDonald, Maryellen C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Individual differences; Relative clauses; Sentence processing; Statistical learning; Working memory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; LEARNING; PROBABILITY; READING; SHORT TERM MEMORY; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; COMPREHENSION; HUMANS; LEARNING; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; PROBABILITY; READING; WISCONSIN;

EID: 56449125875     PISSN: 00100285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.08.002     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Acheson D.J., Wells J.B., and MacDonald M.C. New and updated tests of print exposure and reading abilities in college students. Behavior Research Methods 40 (2008) 278-289
2. Arai M., Van Gompel R.P.G., and Scheepers C. Priming ditransitive structures in comprehension. Cognitive Psychology 54 (2007) 218-250
3. Bates E., and MacWhinney B. Competition, variation, and language learning. In: MacWhinney B. (Ed). Mechanisms of language acquisition (1987), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 157-193
4. Bever T.G. The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In: Hayes J.R. (Ed). Cognition and the development of language (1970), Wiley, New York 279-332
5. Bock K., and Griffin Z.M. The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129 (2000) 177-192
6. Booth J., MacWhinney B., and Harasaki Y. Developmental differences in visual and auditory processing of complex sentences. Child Development 71 (2000) 981-1003
7. Brooks P.J., Braine M.D., and Catalano L. Acquisition of gender-like noun subclasses in an artificial language: The contribution of phonological markers to learning. Journal of Memory and Language 32 (1993) 76-95
8. Chang F., Bock K., and Goldberg A. Do thematic roles leave traces of their places?. Cognition 90 (2003) 29-49
9. Chang F., Dell G.S., and Bock K. Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review 113 (2006) 234-272
10. Chase W.G., and Ericsson K.A. Skill and working memory. In: Bower G.H. (Ed). The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 16 (1982), Academic Press, New York 1-58
11. Christiansen M.H., and Chater N. Toward a connectionist model of recursion in human linguistic performance. Cognitive Science 23 (1999) 157-205
12. Christiansen, M. H., Kelly, L., Shillcock, R., & Greenfield, K. (submitted for publication). Impaired artificial grammar learning in agrammatism.
13. Daneman M.E., and Carpenter P.A. Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19 (1980) 450-466
14. Dickey M.W., and Thompson C. The resolution and recovery of filler-gap dependencies in aphasia: Evidence from on-line anomaly detection. Brain and Language 88 (2004) 108-127
15. Elman J.L. Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science 14 (1990) 179-211
16. Elman J.L. Distributed representations, simple recurrent networks, and grammatical structure. Machine Learning 7 (1991) 195-225
17. Ericsson K.A., and Kintsch W. Long-term working memory. Psychological Review 102 (1995) 211-245
18. Evans, J., & Saffran, J. R. (2005). Statistical learning in children with specific language impairment. Paper presented at the Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, MA, November 2005.
19. Farmer T.A., Christiansen M.H., and Kemtes K.A. Sentence processing in context: The impact of experience on individual differences. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (2005), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 642-647
20. Farmer T.A., Christiansen M.H., and Monaghan P. Phonological typicality influences on-line sentence comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103 (2006) 12203-12208
21. Ferreira V.S., and Bock K. The functions of structural priming. Language and Cognitive Processes 21 (2006) 1011-1029
22. Ferreira F., and Clifton J.C. The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language 25 (1986) 348-368
23. Friedmann N., and Novogrodsky R. Is the movement deficit in syntactic SLI related to traces or to thematic role transfer?. Brain and Language 101 (2007) 50-63
24. Frigo L., and McDonald J.L. Properties of phonological markers that affect the acquisition of gender-like subclasses. Journal of Memory and Language 38 (1998) 218-245
25. Gennari S.P., and MacDonald M.C. Acquisition of negation and quantification: Insights from adult production and comprehension. Language Acquisition 13 (2006) 125-168
26. Gennari S.P., and MacDonald M.C. Semantic indeterminacy and relative clause comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 58 (2008) 161-187
27. Gennari, S. P., & MacDonald, M. C. (submitted for publication). Linking production and comprehension processes: The case of relative clauses.
28. Gibson E.A.F. Linguistic complexity: Locality and syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68 (1998) 1-76
29. Gómez R. Word frequency effects in priming performance in young and older adults. Journals of Gerontology. Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 57B 3 (2002) P233-P240
30. Gómez R.L., and Gerken L. Infant artificial language learning and language acquisition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (2000) 178-186
31. Gordon P.C., Hendrick R., and Johnson M. Memory interference during language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Language 27 (2001) 1411-1423
32. Gordon P.C., Hendrick R., and Johnson M. Effects of noun phrase type on sentence complexity. Journal of Memory and Language 51 (2004) 97-114
33. Green T.R. The necessity of syntax markers: Two experiments with artificial languages. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18 (1979) 481-496
34. Grodner D., and Gibson E. Consequences of the serial nature of linguistic input. Cognitive Science 29 (2005) 261-291
35. Gupta P. Examining the relationship between word learning, nonword repetition, and immediate serial recall in adults. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (A) 56 (2003) 1213-1236
36. Gupta, P., & Tisdale, J. (submitted for publication). Does phonological short-term memory causally determine vocabulary learning? Toward a computational resolution of the debate.
37. Hare M.L., and Goldberg A.E. Structural priming: Purely syntactic?. In: Hahn M., and Stones S.C. (Eds). Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (1999), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 208-211
38. Hart B., and Risley T.R. Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children (1995), Brookes, Baltimore, MD
39. Hsu, H.-J., Christiansen, M. H., Tomblin, J. B., Zhang, X., & Gómez, R. L. (2006). Statistical learning of nonadjacent dependencies in adolescents with and without language impairment. Poster presented at the 2006 Symposium on Research in Child Language Disorders, Madison, WI.
40. Huttenlocher J., Vasilyeva M., Cymerman E., and Levine S. Language input and child syntax. Cognitive Psychology 45 (2002) 337-374
41. Jaeger, T. F. (2005). Optional that indicates production difficulty: Evidence from disfluencies. In Proceedings of DiSS'05, Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech Workshop, 10-12 September 2005. Aix-en-Provence, France, pp. 103-109.
42. Jaeger, T.F. & Wasow, T. (2005). Processing as a Source of Accessibility Effects on Variation. Proceedings of the 31st Berkeley Linguistics Society.
43. Juliano, C., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1993). Contingent frequency effects in syntactic ambiguity resolution. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 593-598.
44. Just M.A., and Carpenter P.A. A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review 99 (1992) 122-149
45. Just M.A., Carpenter P.A., and Woolley J.D. Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 111 (1982) 228-238
46. Kidd E., Brandt S., Lieven E., and Tomasello M. Object relatives made easy: A cross-linguistic comparison of the constraints influencing young children's processing of relative clauses. Language and Cognitive Processes 22 (2007) 860-897
47. King J., and Just M.A. Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language 30 (1991) 580-602
48. Langley P., and Simon H.A. The central role of learning in cognition. In: Anderson J. (Ed). Cognitive skills and their acquisition (1981), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
49. Lewis R.L., and Nakayama M. Syntactic and positional similarity effects in the processing of Japanese embeddings. In: Nakayama M. (Ed). Sentence Processing in East Asian Languages (2002), CSLI Publications
50. Lewis R.L., Vasishth S., and VanDyke J.A. Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 (2006) 447-454
51. MacDonald M.C., Almor A., Henderson V.W., Kempler D., and Andersen E. Assessing working memory and language comprehension in Alzheimer's disease. Brain & Language 78 (2001) 17-42
52. MacDonald M.C., and Christiansen M.H. Reassessing working memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). Psychological Review 109 (2002) 35-54
53. MacDonald M.C., and Seidenberg M.S. Constraint satisfaction approaches to lexical and sentence comprehension. In: Gernsbacher M.A., and Traxler M.J. (Eds). Handbook of psycholinguistics (2006), Elsevier
54. MacWhinney B., and Pléh C. The processing of restrictive relative clauses in Hungarian. Cognition 29 (1988) 95-141
55. Mak W.M., Vonk M., and Schriefers H. The influence of animacy on relative clause processing. Journal of Memory and Language 47 (2002) 50-68
56. Miller G.A. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 63 (1956) 81-97
57. Miller, G. A., & Chomsky, N. (1963). Finitary models of language users. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology (Vol II, pp. 419-491).
58. Misyak J.B., and Christiansen M.H. Extending statistical learning farther and further: Long-distance dependencies, and individual differences in statistical learning and language. In: McNamara D.S., and Trafton J.G. (Eds). Proceedings of the 29th annual cognitive science society conference (2007), Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX 1307-1312
59. Mitchell D.C. An evaluation of subject-paced reading tasks and other methods for investigating immediate processes in reading. In: Kieras D.E., and Just M.A. (Eds). New methods in reading comprehension research (1984), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 69-90
60. Monaghan P., Chater N., and Christiansen M.H. The differential role of phonological and distributional cues in grammatical categorisation. Cognition 96 (2005) 143-182
61. Morgan J.L., Meier R.P., and Newport E.L. Structural packaging in the input to language learning: Contributions of prosodic and morphological marking of phrases to the acquisition of language. Cognitive Psychology 19 (1987) 498-550
62. Onnis L., Christiansen M., Chater N., and Gómez R. Reduction of uncertainty in human sequential learning: Evidence from artificial language learning. Proceedings of the 25th annual conference of the cognitive science society (2003), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ pp. 886-891
63. Pearlmutter N.J., and MacDonald M.C. Individual differences and probabilistic constraints in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 34 (1995) 521-542
64. Plante E., Gómez R., and Gerken L. Sensitivity to word order cues by normal and language/learning disabled adults. Journal of Communication Disorders 35 (2002) 453-462
65. Race D.S., and MacDonald M.C. The use of "that" in the production and comprehension of object relative clauses. Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual meeting of the cognitive science society (2003), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 946-951
66. Reali F., and Christiansen M.H. Processing of relative clauses is made easier by frequency of occurrence. Journal of Memory and Language 57 (2007) 1-23
67. Reali F., and Christiansen M.H. Word chunk frequencies affect the processing of pronominal object-relative clauses. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 60 (2007) 161-170
68. Reber A.S. Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious (1993), New York, Oxford University Press, New York
69. Rohde, D. L. T. (2002). A connectionist model of sentence comprehension and production. Unpublished PhD thesis, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
70. Roland D., Dick F., and Elman J.L. Frequency of basic English grammatical structures: A corpus analysis. Journal of Memory and Language 57 (2007) 348-379
71. Roth F.P. Accelerating language learning in young children. Child Language 11 (1984) 89-107
72. Saffran J.R. The use of predictive dependencies in language learning. Journal of Memory and Language 44 4 (2001) 493-515
73. Saffran J.R. Statistical language learning: Mechanisms and constraints. Current Directions in Psychological Science 12 4 (2003) 110-114
74. Seidenberg M.S. The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems. Cognition 19 (1985) 1-30
75. Seidenberg M.S. Language acquisition and use: Learning and applying probabilistic constraints. Science 275 (1997) 1599-1603
76. Seidenberg M.S., and MacDonald M.C. A probabilistic constraints approach to language acquisition and processing. Cognitive Science 23 (1999) 569-588
77. Snedeker J., and Trueswell J.C. The developing constraints on parsing decisions: The role of lexical-biases and referential scenes in child and adult sentence processing. Cognitive Psychology 49 (2004) 238-299
78. Stanovich K.E., and West R.F. Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly 24 (1989) 402-433
79. Traxler M.J., Morris R.K., and Seely R.E. Processing subject and object relative clauses: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language 47 (2002) 69-90
80. Trueswell J.C., Tanenhaus M.K., and Garnsey S.M. Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic disambiguation. Journal of Memory and Language 33 (1994) 285-318
81. Vasishth S., and Lewis R.L. Argument-head distance and processing complexity: Explaining both locality and antilocality effects. Language 82 (2006) 767-794
82. Warren T., and Gibson E. The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity. Cognition 85 (2002) 79-112
83. Waters G.S., and Caplan D. The capacity theory of sentence comprehension: Critique of Just and Carpenter (1992). Psychological Review 103 (1996) 761-772
84. Weckerly J., and Elman J. A PDP approach to processing center-embedded sentences. Proceedings of the fourteenth annual meeting of the cognitive science society (1992), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ 414-419
85. Wingfield A., Peelle J., and Grossman M. Speech rate and syntactic complexity as multiplicative factors in speech comprehension by young and older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition 10 (2003) 310-322