Species tree inference in a recent radiation of orioles (Genus Icterus): Multiple markers and methods reveal cytonuclear discordance in the northern oriole group

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 460-469

  Jacobsen, Frode ^a   Omland, Kevin E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian MCMC; Congruence; Icterus; Introns; Multi allelic; Multi locus; Oriole; Phylogeny

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; CELL NUCLEUS; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DNA SEQUENCE; EVOLUTION; GENETICS; INTRON; PHYLOGENY; SONGBIRD;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CELL NUCLEUS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; INTRONS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SONGBIRDS;

ICTERUS GALBULA;

EID: 80052751970     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2011.06.017     Document Type: Article

References (111)

1. Allen, E.S., 2002. Long-term Hybridization and the Maintenance of Species Identity in Orioles (Icterus). Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.
2. Allen E.S., Omland K.E. Novel intron phylogeny supports plumage convergence in orioles (Icterus). Auk 2003, 120:961-969.
3. Allman E., Degnan J., Rhodes J. Identifying the rooted species tree from the distribution of unrooted gene trees under the coalescent. J. Math. Biol. 2010, 1:30.
4. Ané C. Reconstructing concordance trees and testing the coalescent model from genome-wide data sets. Estimating Species Trees: Practical and Theoretical Aspects 2010, 35-52. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, New Jersey. L.L. Knowles, L.S. Kubatko (Eds.).
5. Ané C., Larget B., Baum D.A., Smith S.D., Rokas A. Bayesian estimation of concordance among gene trees. Mol. Biol. Evolut. 2007, 24:412-426.
6. AOU, 1983. Check-list of North American Birds. American Ornithologist's Union, Lawrence, KS.
7. AOU Fortieth supplement to the American Ornithologist's Union check-list of North American birds. Auk 1995, 112:819-830.
8. Ballard J.W.O., Whitlock N.C. The incomplete natural history of mitochondria. Mol. Ecol. 2004, 13:729-744.
9. Barker F.K. Monophyly and relationships of wrens (Aves: Troglodytidae): a congruence analysis of heterogeneous mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequence data. Mol. Phyl. Evolut. 2004, 31:486-504.
10. Baum D.A. Concordance trees, concordance factors, and the exploration of reticulate genealogy. Taxon 2007, 56:417-426.
11. Belfiore N.M., Liu L., Moritz C. Multilocus phylogenetics of a rapid radiation in the genus Thomomys (Rodentia: Geomyidae). Syst. Biol. 2008, 57:294-310.
12. Borge T., Webster M.T., Andersson G., Sætre G.-P. Contrasting patterns of polymorphism and divergence on the Z chromosome and autosomes on two Ficedula flycatcher species. Genetics 2005, 171:1861-1873.
13. Brelsford A., Irwin D.E. Incipient speciation despite little assortative mating: the yellow-rumped warbler hybrid zone. Evolution 2009, 63:3050-3060.
14. Brumfield R.T., Liu L., Lum D.E., Edwards S.V. Comparison of species tree methods for reconstructing the phylogeny of bearded manakins (Aves: Piridae, Manacus) from multilocus sequence data. Syst. Biol. 2008, 57:719-731.
15. Buckley T.R., Cordeiro M., Marshall D.C., Simon C. Differentiating between hypotheses of lineage sorting and introgression in New Zealand alpine cicadas (Maoricicada Dugdale). Syst. Biol. 2006, 55:411-425.
16. Bureš S., Nádvorník P., Sætre G.-P. Hybridization and apparent hybridization between meadow pipit (Anthus pratensis) and water pipit (A. Spinoletta). Hereditas 2002, 136:254-256.
17. Carling M.D., Brumfield R.T. Haldane's rule in an avian system: using cline theory and divergence population genetics to test for differential introgression of mitochondrial, autosomal, and sex-linked loci across the Passerina bunting hybrid zone. Evolution 2008, 62:2600-2615.
18. Carling M.D., Serene L.G., Lovette I.J. Using historical DNA to characterize hybridization between Baltimore (Icterus galbula) and Bullock's Orioles. Auk 2011, 128:61-68.
19. Carstens B.C., Knowles L.L. Estimating species phylogeny from gene-tree probabilities despite incomplete lineage sorting: an example from Melanoplus grasshoppers. Syst. Biol. 2007, 56:400-411.
20. Castillo-Ramírez S., Liu L., Pearl D., Edwards S.V. Bayesian estimation of species trees: a practical guide to optimal sampling and analysis. Estimating Species Trees: Practical and Theoretical Aspects 2010, 15-34. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ. L.L. Knowles, L.S. Kubatko (Eds.).
21. Clements J.F. The Clements Checklist of Birds of the World 2007, Comstock Publishing Associates, Ithaca, New York.
22. Cranston K.A., Hurwitz B., Ware D., Stein L., Wing R.A. Species trees from highly incongruent gene trees in rice. Syst. Biol. 2009, 58:489-500.
23. de Queiroz A., Donoghue M.J., Kim J. Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1995, 26:657-681.
24. Degnan J.H., DeGiorgio M., Bryant D., Rosenberg N.A. Properties of consensus methods for inferring species trees from gene trees. Syst. Biol. 2009, 58:35-54.
25. Degnan J.H., Rosenberg N.A. Discordance of species trees with their most likely gene trees. PLoS Genet. 2006, 2:762-768.
26. Degnan J.H., Rosenberg N.A. Gene tree discordance, phylogenetic inference and the multispecies coalescent. Trends Ecol. Evolut. 2009, 24:332-340.
27. Doyle J.J. Gene trees and species trees: molecular systematics as one-character taxonomy. Syst. Bot. 1992, 17:144-163.
28. Drummond A.J., Rambaut A. BEAST: bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evolut. Biol. 2007, 7:214-221.
29. Eckert A.J., Carstens B.C. Does gene flow destroy phylogenetic signal? The performance of three methods for estimating species phylogenies in the presence of gene flow. Mol. Phyl. Evolut. 2008, 49:832-842.
30. Edwards S.V. Is a new and general theory of molecular systematics emerging?. Evolution 2009, 63:1-19.
31. Edwards S.V., Jennings W.B., Shedlock A.M. Phylogenetics of modern birds in the era of genomics. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 2005, 272:979-992.
32. Edwards S.V., Liu L., Pearl D.K. High-resolution species trees without concatenation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104:5936-5941.
33. Flórez-Rodríguez A., Carling M.D., Cadena C.D. Reconstructing the phylogeny of " Buarremon" brush-finches and near relatives (Aves, Emberizidae) from individual gene trees. Mol. Phyl. Evolut. 2011, 58:297-303.
34. Funk D.J., Omland K.E. Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evolut. 2003, 34:397-423.
35. Gadagkar S.R., Rosenberg M.S., Kumar S. Inferring species phylogenies from multiple genes: concatenated sequence tree versus consensus gene tree. J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evolut.) 2005, 304:64-74.
36. Haag-Liautard C., Coffey N., Houle D., Lynch M., Charlesworth B., Keightley P.D. Direct estimation of the mitochondrial DNA mutation rate in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Biol. 2008, 6:e204.
37. Hare M.P., Cipriano F., Palumbi S.R. Genetic evidence on the demography of speciation in allopatric dolphin species. Evolution 2002, 56:804-816.
38. Heled J., Drummond A.J. Bayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data. Mol. Biol. Evolut. 2010, 27:570-580.
39. Hey J. Recent advances in assessing gene flow between diverging populations and species. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2006, 16:592-596.
40. Hey J. Isolation with migration models for more than two populations. Mol. Biol. Evolut. 2010, 27:905-920.
41. Huang H., He Q., Kubatko L.S., Knowles L.L. Sources of error inherent in species-tree estimation: impact of mutational and coalescent effects on accuracy and implications for choosing among different methods. Syst Biol. 2010, 59:573-583.
42. Huang, H., Knowles, L.L., 2009. What is the danger of the anomaly zone for empirical phylogenetics? Syst. Biol. syp047.
43. Hudson R.R., Turelli M. Stochasticity overrules the " three-times rule": genetic drift, genetic draft, and coalescence times for nuclear loci versus mitochondrial DNA. Evolution 2003, 57:182-190.
44. Huelsenbeck J.P., Bull J.J., Cunningham C.W. Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Trends Ecol. Evolut. 1996, 11:152-157.
45. Huelsenbeck J.P., Ronquist F. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. BMC Bioinform. 2001, 17:754-755.
46. Irwin D.E., Rubtsov A.S., Panov E.N. Mitochondrial introgression and replacement between yellowhammers (Emberiza citrinella) and pine buntings (Emberiza leucocephalus) (Aves: Passeriformes). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2009, 98:422-438.
47. Jacobsen, F., 2011. Challenges to Inferring Evolutionary Relationships of Closely-related Species: Multilocus Approaches Resolve the Evolutionary History of New World Orioles (Icterus). Ph.D. Dissertation, Biological Sciences, University of Maryland Baltimore County.
48. Jacobsen F., Friedman N.R., Omland K.E. Congruence between nuclear and mitochondrial DNA: Combination of multiple nuclear introns resolves a well-supported phylogeny of New World orioles (Icterus). Mol. Phyl. Evolut. 2010, 56:419-427.
49. Jaramillo A., Burke P. New World Blackbirds: The Icterids 1999, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
50. Joly S., McLenachan Patricia A., Lockhart Peter J. A statistical approach for distinguishing hybridization and incomplete lineage sorting. Am. Natural. 2009, 174:E54-E70.
51. Knowles L.L. Estimating species trees: methods of phylogenetic analysis when there is incongruence across genes. Syst. Biol. 2009, 58:463-467.
52. Knowles L.L., Kubatko L.S. Estimating Species Trees: Practical and Theoretical Aspects 2010, Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ.
53. Kondo B., Peters J.L., Rosensteel B.B., Omland K.E. Coalescent analyses of multiple loci support a new route to speciation in birds. Evolution 2008, 62:1182-1191.
54. Kubatko L.S., Carstens B.C., Knowles L.L. STEM: species tree estimation using maximum likelihood for gene trees under coalescence. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:971-973.
55. Kubatko L.S., Degnan J.H. Inconsistency of phylogenetic estimates from concatenated data under coalescence. Syst. Biol. 2007, 56:17-24.
56. Kubatko L.S., Gibbs L.H. Estimating species relationships and taxon distinctiveness in Sistrurus rattlesnakes using multi-locus data. Estimating Species Trees: Practical and Theoretical Aspects 2010, 145-162. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, New Jersey. L.L. Knowles, S.L. Kubatko (Eds.).
57. Larget B.R., Kotha S.K., Dewey C.N., Ané C. BUCKy: gene tree/species tree reconciliation with Bayesian concordance analysis. Bioinformatics 2010, 26:2910-2911.
58. Larkin M.A., et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:2947-2948.
59. Leaché A.D. Species tree discordance traces to phylogeographic clade boundaries in North American fence lizards (Sceloporus). Syst. Biol. 2009, 58:547-559.
60. Leaché A.D. Species trees for spiny lizards (genus Sceloporus): identifying points of concordance and conflict between nuclear and mitochondrial data. Mol. Phyl. Evolut. 2010, 54:162-171.
61. Linnen C.R., Farrell B.D. Comparison of methods for species-tree inference in the sawfly genus Neodiprion (Hymenoptera: Diprionidae). Syst. Biol. 2008, 57:876-890.
62. Liu L. BEST: Bayesian estimation of species trees under the coalescent model. BMC Bioinform. 2008, 24:2542-2543.
63. Liu L., Edwards S.V. Phylogenetic analysis in the anomaly zone. Syst. Biol. 2009, 58:452-460.
64. Liu L., Pearl D.K. Species trees from gene trees: reconstructing Bayesian posterior distributions of a species phylogeny using estimated gene trees distributions. Syst. Biol. 2007, 56:504-514.
65. Liu L., Pearl D.K., Brumfield R.T., Edwards S.V. Estimating species trees using multiple-allele DNA sequence data. Evolution 2008, 62:2080-2091.
66. Liu L., Yu L., Kubatko L., Pearl D.K., Edwards S.V. Coalescent methods for estimating phylogenetic trees. Mol. Phyl. Evolut. 2009, 53:320-328.
67. Maddison W.P. Gene trees in species trees. Syst. Biol. 1997, 46:523-536.
68. Maddison W.P., Knowles L.L. Inferring phylogeny despite incomplete lineage sorting. Syst. Biol. 2006, 55:21-30.
69. Maddison, W.P., Maddison, D.R., 2010. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 2.73 http://mesquiteproject.org.
70. Maureira-Butler I.J., Pfeil B.E., Muangprom A., Osborn T.C., Doyle J.J. The reticulate history of medicago (Fabaceae). Syst. Biol. 2008, 57:466-482.
71. McCormack J.E., Huang H., Knowles L.L. Maximum likelihood estimates of species trees: how accuracy of phylogenetic inference depends upon the divergence history and sampling design. Syst. Biol. 2009, 501:508.
72. Meng C., Kubatko L.S. Detecting hybrid speciation in the presence of incomplete lineage sorting using gene tree incongruence. A model. Theory Popul. Biol. 2009, 75:35-45.
73. Miller W.D. Lists of birds collected in northwestern Durango, Mexico, by F. H. Batty, during 1903. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 1906, 22:161-183.
74. Milne I., Wright F., Rowe G., Marshall D.F., Husmeier D., McGuire G. TOPALi: software for automatic identification of recombinant sequences within DNA multiple alignments. Bioinformatics 2004, 20:1806-1807.
75. Moore W.S. Inferring phylogenies from mtDNA variation: mitochondrial-gene trees versus nuclear-gene trees. Evolution 1995, 49:718-726.
76. Nakhleh L. Evolutionary phylogenetic networks: models and issues. The problem solving handbook for computational biology and bioinformatics 2011, 125-158. Springer Verlag. L.S. Heath, N. Ramakrishnan (Eds.).
77. Nosil P. Speciation with gene flow could be common. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 2103:2106.
78. Nylander J.A.A., Ronquist F., Huelsenbeck J.P., Nieves-Aldrey J.L. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of combined data. Syst. Biol. 2004, 53:47-67.
79. Omland K.E. Character congruence between a molecular and a morphological phylogeny for dabbling ducks (Anas). Syst. Biol. 1994, 43:369-386.
80. Omland K.E., Lanyon S.M., Fritz S.J. A molecular phylogeny of the New World orioles (Icterus): the importance of dense taxon sampling. Mol. Phyl. Evolut. 1999, 12:224-239.
81. Palumbi S.R., Cipriano F., Hare M.P. Predicting nuclear gene coalescence from mitochondrial data: the three-times rule. Evolution 2001, 55:859-868.
82. Pamilo P., Nei M. Relationships between gene trees and species trees. Mol. Biol. Evolut. 1988, 5:568-583.
83. Patton J.L., Smith M.F. Paraphyly, polyphyly, and the nature of species boundaries in pocket gophers (genus Thomomys). Syst. Biol. 1994, 43:11-26.
84. Peters J.L., Zhuravlev Y., Fefelov I., Logie A., Omland K.E. Nuclear loci and coalescent methods support ancient hybridization as cause of mitochondrial paraphyly between gadwall and falcated duck (Anas spp.). Evolution 2007, 61:1992-2006.
85. Pielou E.C. After the Ice Age: the Return of Life to Glaciated North America 1991, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
86. Primmer C.R., Borge T., Lindell J., Sætre G.-P. Single-nucleotide polymorphism characterization in species with limited available sequence information: high nucleotide diversity revealed in the avian genome. Mol. Ecol. 2002, 11:603-612.
87. Rambaut, A., Drummond, A.J., 2004. Tracer v1.3 http://www.evolve.zoo.ox.ac.uk.
88. Rheindt F.E., Christidis L., Norman J.A. Genetic introgression, incomplete lineage sorting and faulty taxonomy create multiple cases of polyphyly in a montane clade of tyrant-flycatchers (Elania, Tyrannidae). Zool. Scr. 2009, 38:143-153.
89. Rising J.D. A comparison of metabolism and evaporative water loss of baltimore and bullock orioles. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 1969, 31:915-925.
90. Rising J.D. Morphological variation and evolution in some North American orioles. Syst. Zool. 1970, 19:315-351.
91. Rising J.D. Morphological variation and status of the orioles, Icterus galbula, I. Bullockii, and I. abeillei, in the northern Great Plains and in Durango, Mexico. Can. J. Zool. 1973, 51:1267-1273.
92. Rising J.D. The progress of Oriole hybridization in Kansas. Auk 1983, 100:885-897.
93. Rising J.D. The stability of the oriole hybrid zone in Western Kansas. Condor 1996, 98:658-663.
94. Rokas A., Williams B.L., King N., Carroll S.B. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 2003, 425:798-804.
95. Ronquist F., Huelsenbeck J.P. MrBayes 3: bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 2003, 19:1572-1574.
96. Rosenberg N.A., Tao R. Discordance of species trees with their most likely gene trees: the case of five taxa. Syst. Biol. 2008, 57:131-140.
97. Shaw K.L. Conflict between nuclear and mitochondrial DNA phylogenies of a recent species radiation: what mtDNA reveals and conceals about modes of speciation in Hawaiian crickets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99:16122-16127.
98. Sibley C.G., Short L.L.J. Hybridization in the orioles of the great plains. Condor 1964, 66:130-150.
99. Slade R.W., Moritz C., Heideman A. Multiple nuclear-gene phylogenies: application to Pinnipeds and comparison with a mitochondrial DNA gene phylogeny. Mol. Biol. Evolut. 1994, 11:341-356.
100. Sota T., Vogler A.P. Reconstructing species phylogeny of the carabid beetles Ohomopterus using multiple nuclear DNA sequences: heterogeneous information content and the performance of simultaneous analyses. Mol. Phyl. Evolut. 2003, 26:139-154.
101. Stephens M., Donnelly P. A comparison of Bayesian methods for haplotype reconstruction from population genotype data. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2003, 73:1162-1169.
102. Sturge R.J., Jacobsen F., Rosensteel B.B., Neale R.J., Omland K.E. Colonization of South America from Caribbean Islands confirmed by molecular phylogeny with increased taxon sampling. Condor 2009, 111:575-579.
103. Takahata N. Gene genealogy in three related populations: consistency probability between gene and population trees. Genetics 1989, 122:957-966.
104. Tamura K., Dudley J., Nei M., Kumar S. MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evolut. 2007, 24:1596-1599.
105. Thompson J.D., Gibson T.J., Plewniak F., Jeanmougin F., Higgins D.G. The CLUSTAL X windows interface. Flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucl. Acids Res. 1997, 25:4876-4882.
106. Waltari E., Edwards S.V. Evolutionary dynamics of intron size, genome size, and physiological correlates in Archosaurs. Am. Nat. 2002, 160:539-552.
107. Weckstein J.D., Zink R.M., Blackwell-Rago R.C., Nelson D.A. Anomalous variation in mitochondrial genomes of White-crowned (Zonotrichia leucophrys) and Golden-crowned (Z. atricapilla) Sparrows: pseudogenes, hybridization, or incomplete lineage sorting?. Auk 2001, 118:231-236.
108. Weibel A.C., Moore W.S. A test of a mitochondrial gene-based phylogeny of woodpeckers (genus Picoides) using an independent nuclear gene, beta-fibrinogen intron 7. Mol. Phyl. Evolut. 2002, 22:247-257.
109. Willyard A., Wallace L.E., Wagner W.L., Weller S.G., Sakai A.K., Nepokroeff M. Estimating the species tree for Hawaiian Schiedea (Caryophyllaceae) from multiple loci in the presence of reticulate evolution. Mol. Phyl. Evolut. 2011, 60:29-48.
110. Yakes F.M., Van Houten B. Mitochondrial DNA damage is more extensive and persists longer than nuclear DNA damage in human cells following oxidative stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94:514-519.
111. Zink R.M., Barrowclough G.F. Mitochondrial DNA under siege in avian phylogeography. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17:2107-2121.