A Molecular Phylogeny of the New World Orioles (Icterus): The Importance of Dense Taxon Sampling

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 224-239

  Omland, Kevin E ^a   Lanyon, Scott M ^a   Fritz, Sabine J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHROME B; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; REDUCED NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE DEHYDROGENASE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SONGBIRD;

ANIMALS; CYTOCHROME B GROUP; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; NADH DEHYDROGENASE; PHYLOGENY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SONGBIRDS; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 0033161714     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/mpev.1999.0611     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Check-List of North American Birds. 1957;American Ornithologists' Union, Lawrence.
2. Check-List of North American Birds. 1983;American Ornithologists' Union, Lawrence.
3. Auk. 112:1995;819-830.
4. Avise J. C., Ankney C. D., Nelson W. S. Mitochondrial gene trees and the evolutionary relationship between mallard and black ducks. Evolution. 44:1990;1109-1119.
5. Beecher W. J. Convergent evolution in the American orioles. Wilson Bull. 62:1950;51-86.
6. Blake E. R. Family Icteridae. Paynter R. A. J. Check-List of Birds of the World. 1968;138-202 Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge.
7. Bull J. J., Huelsenbeck J. P., Cunningham C. W., Swofford D. L., Waddell P. J. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42:1993;384-397.
8. Collura R. V., Stewart C-B. Insertions and duplications of mtDNA in the nuclear genomes of Old World monkeys and hominids. Nature. 378:1995;485-489.
9. Cracraft J. Speciation and its ontology: The empirical consequences of alternative species concepts for understanding patterns and processes of differentiation. Otte D., Endler J. A. Speciation and Its Consequences. 1989;28-59 Sinauer, Sunderland.
10. Cummings M. P., Otto S. P., Wakeley J. Sampling properties of DNA sequence data in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:1995;814-822.
11. Cunningham C. W. Is congruence between data partitions a reliable indicator of phylogenetic accuracy. Syst. Biol. 46:1997;464-478.
12. Desjardins P., Morais R. Sequence and gene organization of chicken mitochondrial genome. A novel gene order in higher vertebrates. J. Mol. Biol. 212:1990;599-634.
13. Farris J. S., Källersjö M., Kluge A. G., Bult C. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics. 10:1994;315-319.
14. Felsenstein J. Cases in which parsimony and compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27:1978;401-410.
15. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 39:1985;783-791.
16. Freeman S., Zink R. M. A phylogenetic study of the blackbirds based on variation in mitochondrial DNA restriction sites. Syst. Biol. 44:1995;409-420.
17. Funk D. J., Futuyma D. J., Orti G., Meyer A. A history of host associations and evolutionary diversification for Ophraella (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): New evidence from mitochondrial DNA. Evolution. 49:1995;1008-1017.
18. Gill F. B., Mostrom A. M., Mack A. L. Speciation in North American chickadees: I. Patterns of mtDNA genetic divergence. Evolution. 47:1993;195-212.
19. Graybeal A. Evaluating the phylogenetic utility of genes: A search for genes informative about deep divergences among vertebrates. Syst. Biol. 43:1994;174-193.
20. Graybeal A. Naming species. Syst. Biol. 44:1995;237-250.
21. Graybeal A. Is it better to add taxa or characters to a difficult phylogenetic problem. Syst. Biol. 47:1998;9-17.
22. Griffiths C. S. Correlation of functional domains and rates of nucleotide substitution in cytochrome b. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 7:1997;352-365.
23. Hackett S. J. Molecular phylogenetics and biogeography of tanagers in the genus Ramphocelus (Aves). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 5:1996;368-382.
24. Harshman, J. 1996, Phylogeny, Evolutionary Rates and Ducks, Ph. D. dissertation, Univ. of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
25. Hillis D. M. Inferring complex phylogenies. Nature. 383:1996;130-131.
26. Hillis D. M., Larson A., Davis S. K., Zimmer E. A. Nucleic acids III: Sequencing. Hillis D. M., Moritz C. Molecular Systematics. 1990;318-372 Sinauer, Sunderland.
27. Howell S. N. G., Webb S. The Birds of Mexico and Northern Central America. 1995;Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
28. Huelsenbeck J. P. Systematic bias in phylogenetic analysis: Is the Strepsiptera problem solved. Syst. Biol. 47:1998;519-537.
29. Huelsenbeck J. P., Hillis D. M. Success of phylogenetic methods in the four-taxon case. Syst. Biol. 42:1993;247-264.
30. Johnson K., Sorenson M. Comparing molecular evolution in two mitochondrial protein coding genes (cytochrome b and ND2) in the dabbling ducks (Tribe: Anatini). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 10:1998;82-94.
31. Klicka J., Zink R. M. The importance of recent ice ages in speciation: A failed paradigm. Science. 227:1997;1666-1669.
32. Kocher T. D., Thomas W. K., Meyer A., Edwards S. V., Paabo S., Villablanca F. X., Wilson A. C. Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in mammals: Amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 86:1989;6196-6200.
33. Lanyon S. M. Detecting internal inconsistencies in distance data. Syst. Zool. 34:1985;397-403.
34. Lanyon S. M. Phylogenetic frameworks: Towards a firmer foundation for the comparative approach. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 49:1993;45-61.
35. Lanyon S. M. Polyphyly of the blackbird genus Agelaius and the importance of assumptions of monophyly in comparative studies. Evolution. 48:1994;679-693.
36. Lanyon S. M., Omland K. E. A molecular phylogeny of the blackbirds (Icterini): Five lineages revealed by cytochrome-b sequence data. Auk. 1999.
37. Lowther P. Geographic and ecological variation in the family Icteridae. Wilson Bull. 87:1975;481-495.
38. Maddison, W. P, and, Maddison, D. R. 1992, MacClade: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. 3.04, Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
39. Melnick D. J., Hoelzer G. A., Absher R., Ashley M. V. mtDNA diversity in rhesus monkeys reveals overestimates of divergence time and paraphyly with neighboring species. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:1993;282-295.
40. Meyer A. The shortcomings of the cytochrome b gene as a molecular marker. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9:1994;278-280.
41. Miller W. D. List of birds collected in northwestern Durango, Mexico, by J. H. Batty, during 1903. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 22:1906;161-183.
42. Miyamoto M. M., Fitch W. M. Testing species phylogenies and phylogenetic methods with congruence. Syst. Biol. 44:1995;64-76.
43. Moore W. S., DeFilippis V. R. The window of taxonomic resolution for phylogenies based on mitochondrial cytochrome b. Mindell D. P. Avian Molecular Evolution and Systematics. 1997;84-120 Academic Press, San Diego.
44. Olmstead R. G., Sweere J. A. Combining data in molecular systematics: An empirical approach using three molecular data sets in the Solanaceae. Syst. Biol. 43:1994;467-481.
45. Omland K. E. Character congruence between a molecular and a morphological phylogeny for dabbling ducks (Anas). Syst. Biol. 43:1994;369-386.
46. Omland K. E. Examining two standard assumptions of ancestral reconstructions: Repeated loss of dimorphism in dabbling ducks (Anatini). Evolution. 51:1997;1636-1646.
47. Patton J. L., Smith M. F. Paraphyly, polyphyly, and the nature of species boundaries in pocket gophers (Genus Thomomys). Syst. Biol. 43:1994;11-26.
48. Purvis A., Quicke D. L. J. Building phylogenies: Are the big easy. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12:1997;49-50.
49. Sanderson M. J., Donoghue M. J. Patterns of variation in levels of homoplasy. Evolution. 43:1989;1781-1795.
50. Sibley C. G., Short L. L. Hybridization of orioles on the Great Plains. Condor. 66:1964;130-150.
51. Sibley C. G., Monroe B. L. Distribution and Taxonomy of Birds of the World. 1990;Yale Univ. Press, New Haven.
52. Sorenson M. D., Quinn T. Q. Numts: A challenge for avian systematics and population biology. Auk. 115:1998;214-221.
53. Sullivan J. Combining data with different distributions of among site rate variation. Syst. Biol. 45:1996;375-379.
54. Weller S. J., Friedlander T. P., Martin J. A., Pashley D. P. Phylogenetic studies of ribosomal RNA variation in higher moths and butterflies (Lepidoptera: Ditrysia). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1:1992;312-337.
55. Williams P. L., Fitch W. M. Finding the minimal change in a given tree. Fernholm B., Bremer K., Jornvall H. The Hierarchy of Life. 1989;453-470 Elsevier, New York.
56. Zink R. M., McKitrick M. C. The debate over species concepts and its implications for ornithology. Auk. 112:1995;701-719.
57. Zink R. M., Weller S. J., Blackwell R. C. Molecular phylogenetics of the avian genus Pipilo and a biogeographic argument for taxonomic uncertainty. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 10:1998;191-201.