Reconstructing the phylogeny of " Buarremon" brush-finches and near relatives (Aves, Emberizidae) from individual gene trees

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 58, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 297-303

  Flórez Rodríguez, Alexander ^a   Carling, Matthew D ^b   Cadena, Carlos Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LOS ANDES   (Colombia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING   (United States)

Author keywords

Anomalous genes trees; BEST; COAL; Minimizing deep coalescences; Species tree; Topological incongruence

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; FINCH; GENETICS; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MULTILOCUS SEQUENCE TYPING; PHYLOGENY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FINCHES; MULTILOCUS SEQUENCE TYPING; PHYLOGENY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

AVES; BUARREMON; EMBERIZINAE; FRINGILLIDAE;

EID: 79951577346     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2010.11.012     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Brito P., Edwards S.V. Multilocus phylogeography and phylogenetics using sequence-based markers. Genetica 2009, 135:439-455.
2. Brumfield R.T., Liu L., Lum D.E., Edwards S.V. Comparison of species tree methods for reconstructing the phylogeny of bearded Manakins (Aves: Pipridae, Manacus) from multilocus sequence data. Syst. Biol. 2008, 57:719-731.
3. Cadena C.D., Cuervo A.M. Molecules, morphology, ecology, and songs in concert: How many species is " Arremon torquatus" (Aves, Emberizidae)?. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2010, 99:152-176.
4. Cadena C.D., Klicka J., Ricklefs R.E. Evolutionary differentiation in the Neotropical montane region: molecular phylogenetics and phylogeography of Buarremon brush-finches (Aves, Emberizidae). Mol. Phylogent. Evol. 2007, 44:993-1016.
5. Carling M.D., Brumfield R.T. Integrating phylogenetic and population genetic analyses of multiple loci to test species divergence hypothesis in passerina buntings. Genetics 2008, 178:363-377.
6. Carstens B.C., Knowles L.L. Estimating phylogeny from gene tree probabilities in Melanoplus grasshoppers despite incomplete lineage sorting. Syst. Biol. 2007, 56:400-411.
7. Cummings M.P. Transmission patterns of eukaryotic transposable elements: arguments for and against horizontal transfer. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1994, 9:141-145.
8. De Queiroz A. For consensus (sometimes). Syst. Biol. 1993, 42:368-372.
9. Decker J.E., Pires J.C., Conant G.C., McKay S.D., Heaton M.P., Chen K.C., Cooper A., Vilkki J., Seabury C.M., Caetano A.R., Johnson G.S., Brenneman R.A., Hanotte O., Eggert L.S., Wiener P., Kim J., Kim K.S., Sonstegard T.S., Van Tassell C.P., Neibergs H.L., McEwan J.C., Brauning R., Coutinho L.L., Babar M.E., Wilson G.A., McClure M.C., Rolf M.M., Kim J.W., Schnabel R.D., Taylor J.F. Resolving the evolution of extant and extinct ruminants with high-throughput phylogenomics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106:18644-18649.
10. Degnan J.H., Rosenberg N.A. Discordance of species trees with their most likely gene trees. PLoS Genet. 2006, 2:762-768.
11. Degnan J.H., Rosenberg N.A. Gene tree discordance, phylogenetic inference, and the multispecies coalescent. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009, 24:332-340.
12. Degnan J.H., Salter L.A. Gene tree distributions under the coalescent process. Evolution 2005, 59:24-37.
13. Degnan J.H., De Giorgio M., Bryant D., Rosenberg N.A. Properties of consensus methods for inferring species trees from gene trees. Syst. Biol. 2009, 58:35-54.
14. Drummond, A.J., Ashton, B., Cheung, M., Heled, J., Kearse, M., Moir, R., Stones-Havas, S., Thierer, T., Wilson, A., 2007. Geneious v3.0. http://www.geneious.com/.
15. Edgar R.C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32:1792-1797.
16. Edwards S.V., Liu L., Pearl D.K. High-resolution species tree without concatenation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104:5936-5941.
17. Fitch W.M. Distinguishing homologous from analogous proteins. Syst. Zool. 1970, 19:99-113.
18. Gadagkar S., Rosenberg S., Kumar S. Inferring species phylogenies from multiple genes: concatenated sequence tree versus consensus gene tree. J. Exp. Zool. 2005, 304B:64-74.
19. Hird S., Kubatko L.S., Carstens B.C. Rapid and accurate species tree estimation for phylogeographic investigations using replicated subsampling. Mol. Phylogent. Evol. 2010, 57:888-898.
20. Huang H., He Q., Kubatko L.S., Knowles L.L. Sources of error inherent in species-tree estimation: impact of mutational and coalescent effects on accuracy and implications for choosing among different methods. Syst. Biol. 2010, 59:573-583.
21. Huelsenbeck J.P., Swofford D.L., Cunningham C.W., Bull J.J., Waddell P. Is character weighting a panacea for the problem of data heterogeneity in phylogenetic analysis?. Syst. Biol. 1994, 43:288-291.
22. Jennings W.B., Edwards S.V. Speciational history of Australian grass finches (Poephila) inferred from 30 gene trees. Evolution 2005, 59:2033-2047.
23. Kimball R.T., Braun E.L., Barker F.K., Bowie R.C.K., Braun M.J., Chojnowski J.L., Hackett S.J., Han K.L., Harshman J., Heimer-Torres V., Holznagel W., Huddleston C.J., Marks B.D., Miglia K.J., Moore W.S., Reddy S., Sheldon F.H., Smith J.V., Witt C.C., Yuri T. A well-tested set of primers to amplify regions spread across the avian genome. Mol. Phylogent. Evol. 2009, 50:654-660.
24. Knowles L.L. Estimating species trees: methods of phylogenetic analysis when there is incongruence across genes. Syst. Biol. 2009, 58:463-467.
25. Knowles L.L. Sampling strategies for species-tree estimation. Estimating Species Trees: Practical and Theoretical Aspects 2010, 163-173. Wiley-Blackwell. L.L. Knowles, L.S. Kubatko (Eds.).
26. Knowles L.L., Kubatko L.S. Estimating species trees: practical and theoretical aspects 2010, Wiley, Blackwell.
27. Leaché A.D. Species tree discordance traces to phylogeographic clade boundaries in North American fence lizards (Sceloporus). Syst. Biol. 2009, 58:547-559.
28. Lewis P.O. Maximum likelihood as an alternative to parsimony for inferring phylogeny using nucleotide sequence data. Molecular Systematics of Plants II 1998, 132-163. Kluwer, Boston. D.E. Soltis, P.S. Soltis, J.J. Doyle (Eds.).
29. Linnen C., Farrell B. Comparison of methods for species-tree inference in the sawfly genus neodiprion (hymenoptera: Diprionidae). Syst. Biol. 2008, 57:876-890.
30. Liu L., Edwards S.V. Phylogenetic analysis in the anomaly zone. Syst. Biol. 2009, 58:452-460.
31. Liu L., Pearl D. Species tree from gene trees: reconstructing bayesian posterior distribution of species phylogeny using estimated gene tree distributions. Syst. Biol. 2007, 56:504-514.
32. Liu L., Pearl D., Brumfield R., Edwards S.V. Estimating species trees using multiple-allele DNA sequence data. Evolution 2008, 62:2080-2091.
33. Maddison W.P. Gene trees in species trees. Syst. Biol. 1997, 46:523-536.
34. Maddison W.P., Knowles L.L. Inferring phylogeny despite incomplete lineage sorting. Syst. Biol. 2006, 55:21-30.
35. Maddison, W.P., Maddison, D.R., 2004. Mesquite: A Modular System for Evolutionary Analysis, Version 1.01. http://mesquiteproject.org.
36. McCormack J.E., Huang H., Knowles L.L. Maximum-likelihood estimates of species trees: how accuracy of phylogenetic inference depends upon the divergence history and sampling design. Syst. Biol. 2009, 58:501-508.
37. Meng C., Kubatko L.S. Detecting hybrid speciation in the presence of incomplete lineage sorting using gene tree incongruence: a model. Theor. Pop. Biol. 2009, 75:35-45.
38. Nichols R. Gene trees and species trees are not the same. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2001, 16:358-364.
39. Nylander J.A.A. MrModeltest v2. Program Distributed by the Author 2004, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University.
40. Pamilo P., Nei M. Relationships between gene trees and species trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1988, 5:568-583.
41. Philippe H., Derelle R., Lopez P., Pick K., Borchiellini C., Boury-Esnault N., Vacelet J., Renard E., Houliston E., Queinnec E., Da Silva C., Winicker P., Le Guyader H., Leys S., Jackson D.J., Schrieber F., Erpenbeck D., Morgenstern B., Worheide G., Manuel M. Phylogenomics revives traditional views on deep animal relationships. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:706-712.
42. Piganeau G.V., Gardner M., Eyre-Walker A. A broad survey of recombination in animal mitochondrial. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2004, 21:2319-2325.
43. Posada D., Crandall K.A. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 1998, 14:817-818.
44. Rambaut, A., Drummond, A., 2007. Tracer v1.4 2003-2008. Mcmc Trace.
45. Remsen Jr., J.V., Cadena, C.D., Jaramillo, A., Nores, M., Pacheco, J.F., Robbins, M.B., Schulenberg, T.S., Stiles, F.G., Stotz, D.F., Zimmer, K.J., 2010. A Classification of the Bird Species of South America. American Ornithologists' Union. http://www.museum.lsu.edu/~Remsen/SACCBaseline.html.
46. Rokas A., King N., Finnerty J., Carroll S.B. Conflicting phylogenetic signals at the base of the metazoan tree. Evol. Dev. 2003, 5:346-359.
47. Ronquist F., Huelsenbeck J.P. MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 2003, 19:1572-1574.
48. Slade R.W., Moritz C., Heideman A. Rapid assessment of single-copy nuclear DNA variation in diverse species. Mol. Ecol. 1993, 2:359-373.
49. Sorenson M.D., Ast J.C., DimcheV D.E., Yuri T., Mindell D.P. Primers for a PCR-based approach to mitochondrial genome sequencing in birds and other vertebrates. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1999, 12:105-114.
50. Spinks P.Q., Thomson R.C., Lovely G.A., Shaffer H.B. Assessing what is needed to resolve a molecular phylogeny: simulations and empirical data from emydid turtles. BMC Evol. Biol. 2009, 9:56.
51. * and Other Methods), Version 4 2002, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
52. Takahata N. Gene genealogy in three related populations: consistency probability between gene and population trees. Genetics 1989, 122:957-966.
53. Wakeley J., Nielsen R., Liu-Cordero S.N., Ardlie K. The discovery of single-nucleotide polymorphisms and inferences about human demographic history. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2001, 69:1332-1347.
54. Waters J.M., Rowe D.L., Burridge C.P., Wallis G.P. Gene trees versus species trees: reassessing life-history evolution in a freshwater fish radiation. Syst. Biol. 2010, 59:504-517.
55. Wilgenbusch, J.C., Warren, D.L., Swofford, D.L., 2004. AWTY: A System for Graphical Exploration of MCMC Convergence in Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference. http://ceb.csit.fsu.edu/awt.