What is the danger of the anomaly zone for empirical phylogenetics?

Systematic Biology

Volumn 58, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 527-536

  Huang, Huateng ^a   Knowles, L Lacey ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Anomaly zone; Coalescence; Gene tree; Lineage sorting; Mutation; Phylogenetics; Species tree

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENE; GENETICS; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MUTATION; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; PROCEDURES;

CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENES; MODELS, GENETIC; MUTATION; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 70450237691     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syp047     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Brumfield R.T., Liu L., Lum D.E., Edwards S.V. 2008. Comparison of species tree methods for reconstructing the phylogeny of bearded manakins (Aves: Pipridae, Manacus) from multilocus sequence data. Syst. Biol. 57:719-731.
2. Carling M.D., Brumfield R.T. 2007. Gene sampling strategies for multi-locus population estimates of genetic diversity (theta). PLoS ONE. 2:e160.
3. Carling M.D., Brumfield R.T. 2008. Integrating phylogenetic and population genetic analyses of multiple loci to test species divergence hypotheses in Passerina buntings. Genetics. 178:363-377.
4. Carstens B.C., Knowles L.L. 2007. Estimating species phylogeny from gene-tree probabilities despite incomplete lineage sorting: an example from Melanoplus grasshoppers. Syst. Biol. 56:400-411.
5. Degnan J.H., DeGiorigio M., Bryant D., Rosenberg N.A. 2009. Properties of consensus methods for inferring species trees from gene trees. Syst. Biol. 58:35-64.
6. Degnan J.H., Rosenberg N.A. 2006. Discordance of species trees with their most likely gene trees. PLoS Genet. 2:e68.
7. Degnan J.H., Salter L.A. 2005. Gene tree distributions under the coa-lescent process. Evolution. 59:24-37.
8. Drost J.B., Lee W.R. 1995. Biological basis of germline mutation: comparisons of spontaneous germline mutation rates among drosophila, mouse, and human. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 25(Suppl 26):48-64.
9. Edwards S.V., Liu L., Pearl D.K. 2007. High-resolution species trees without concatenation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. US A. 104:5936-5941.
10. Ewing G.B., Ebersberger I., Schmidt H.A., von Haeseler A. 2008. Rooted triple consensus and anomalous gene trees. BMC Evol. Biol. 8:118.
11. Hudson R.R. 1990. Gene genealogies and the coalescent process. In: Futuyma D., Antonovics J., editors. Oxford surveys in evolutionary biology. Vol.7. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 1-44.
12. Hudson R.R. 2002. Generating samples under a Wright-Fisher neutral model of genetic variation. Bioinformatics. 18:337-338.
13. Huelsenbeck J.P., Kirkpatrick M. 1996. Do phylogenetic methods produce trees with biased shapes? Evolution. 50:1418-1424.
14. Jennings W.B., Edwards S.V. 2005. Speciational history of Australian grass finches (Poephila) inferred from thirty gene trees. Evolution. 59:2033-2047.
15. Kingman J.F.C. 1982. The coalescent. Stoch. Process. Appl. 13:235-248.
16. Knowles L.L., Carstens B.C. 2007. Estimating a geographically explicit model of population divergence. Evolution. 61:477-493.
17. Knowles L.L., Chan Y.-H. 2008. Resolving species phylogenies of recent evolutionary radiations. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 95:224-231.
18. Kubatko L.S., Carstens B.C., Knowles L.L. 2009. STEM: species tree estimation using maximum likelihood for gene trees under coalescence. Bioinformatics. 25:971-973.
19. Kubatko L.S., Degnan J.H. 2007. Inconsistency of phylogenetic estimates from concatenated data under coalescence. Syst. Biol. 56: 17-24.
20. Liu L., Pearl D.K. 2007. Species trees from gene trees: reconstructing Bayesian posterior distributions of a species phylogeny using estimated gene tree distributions. Syst. Biol. 56:504-514.
21. Maddison W.P. 1997. Gene trees in species trees. Syst. Biol. 46:523-536.
22. Maddison W.P., Knowles L.L. 2006. Inferring phylogeny despite incomplete lineage sorting. Syst. Biol. 55:21-30.
23. McCormack J.E., Huang H., Knowles L.L. 2009. Maximum-likelihood estimates of species trees: how accuracy of phylogenetic inference depends upon the divergence history and sampling design. Syst. Biol (in press).
24. Pamilo P., Nei M. 1988. Relationships between gene trees and species trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5:568-583.
25. Rambaut A., Grassly N.C. 1997. Seq-Gen: an application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13:235-238. (Pubitemid 27249927)
26. Ripplinger J., Sullivan J. 2008. Does choice in model selection affect maximum likelihood analysis? Syst. Biol. 57:76-85.
27. Rosenberg N.A., Tao R. 2008. Discordance of species trees with their most likely gene trees: the case of five taxa. Syst. Biol. 57:131-140.
28. Saitou N., Nei M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4:406-425.
29. Sanderson M.J. 2008. Phylogenetic signal in the eukaryotic tree of life. Science. 321:121-123.
30. Swofford D.L. 2000. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0b. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates.
31. Takahata N. 1989. Gene genealogy in three related populations: consistency probability between gene and population trees. Genetics. 122:957-966.
32. Takahata N., Nei M. 1985. Gene genealogy and variance of interpopu-lational nucleotide differences. Genetics. 110:325-344.
33. Wong A., Jensen J.D., Pool J.E., Aquadro C.F. 2007. Phylogenetic incon-gruence in the Drosophila melanogaster species group. Mol. Phylo-genet. Evol. 43:1138-1150.
34. Zhou H., Gu J., Lamont S.J., Gu X. 2007. Evolutionary analysis for functional divergence of the toll-like receptor gene family and altered functional constraints. J. Mol. Evol. 65:119-123.