Tandem BRCT domains: DNA's praetorian guard

Genes and Cancer

Volumn 1, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1140-1146

  Mesquita, Rafael D ^a   Woods, Nicholas T ^b   Seabra Junior, Eloy S ^a   Monteiro, Alvaro N A ^b  

^a INSTITUTO FEDERAL DE EDUCAÇÃO   (Brazil)

^b H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Brct; Cancer; Dna damage; Modular domains; Networks; Systems biology

Indexed keywords

ATM PROTEIN; ATR PROTEIN; BRCA1 PROTEIN; CELL DNA; DNA DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE; PAIRED BOX TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR INTERACTING PROTEIN; PEPTIDE; PHOSPHOPEPTIDE; PHOSPHOSERINE; PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BRCT DOMAIN; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SUSCEPTIBILITY; CELL STIMULATION; CYTOGENETICS; ENZYME ACTIVATION; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; NONHUMAN; OVARY CANCER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TANDEM REPEAT;

EID: 79960041185     PISSN: 19476019     EISSN: 19476027     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1947601910392988     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Friedberg EC. DNA damage and repair. Nature. 2003;421:436-40.
2. Sancar A, Lindsey-Boltz LA, Unsal-Kacmaz K, Linn S. Molecular mechanisms of mammalian DNA repair and the DNA damage checkpoints. Annu Rev Biochem. 2004;73:39-85.
3. Jackson SP, Bartek J. The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature. 2009;461:1071-8.
4. Kastan MB, Bartek J. Cell-cycle checkpoints and cancer. Nature. 2004;432:316-23.
5. Zhou BB, Elledge SJ. The DNA damage response: putting checkpoints in perspective. Nature. 2000;408:433-9.
6. Bartkova J, Rezaei N, Liontos M, et al. Oncogeneinduced senescence is part of the tumorigenesis barrier imposed by DNA damage checkpoints. Nature. 2006;444:633-7.
7. Bartkova J, Horejsi Z, Koed K, et al. DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis. Nature. 2005;434:864-70.
8. Aravind L, Walker DR, Koonin EV. Conserved domains in DNA repair proteins and evolution of repair systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27:1223-42.
9. Jin J, Xie X, Chen C, et al. Eukaryotic protein domains as functional units of cellular evolution. Sci Signal. 2009;2:ra76.
10. Pawson T, Nash P. Assembly of cell regulatory systems through protein interaction domains. Science. 2003;300:445-52.
11. Mohammad DH, Yaffe MB. 14-3-3 proteins, FHA domains and BRCT domains in the DNA damage response. DNA Repair (Amst). 2009;8:1009-17.
12. Marcotte EM, Pellegrini M, Ng HL, Rice DW, Yeates TO, Eisenberg D. Detecting protein function and protein-protein interactions from genome sequences. Science. 1999;285:751-3.
13. Basu MK, Carmel L, Rogozin IB, Koonin EV. Evolution of protein domain promiscuity in eukaryotes. Genome Res. 2008;18:449-61.
14. Koonin EV, Altschul SF, Bork P. BRCA1 protein products: functional motifs. Nat Genet. 1996;13:266-8.
15. Bork P, Hofmann K, Bucher P, Neuwald AF, Altschul SF, Koonin EV. A superfamily of conserved domains in DNA damage-responsive cell cycle checkpoint proteins. FASEB J. 1997;11:68-76.
16. Callebaut I, Mornon JP. From BRCA1 to RAP1: a widespread BRCT module closely associated with DNA repair. FEBS Letters. 1997;400:25-30.
17. Cantor SB, Bell DW, Ganesan S, et al. BACH1, a novel helicase-like protein, interacts directly with BRCA1 and contributes to its DNA repair function. Cell. 2001;105:149-60.
18. Dore AS, Furnham N, Davies OR, et al. Structure of an Xrcc4-DNA ligase IV yeast ortholog complex reveals a novel BRCT interaction mode. DNA Repair (Amst). 2006;5:362-8.
19. Glover JN, Williams RS, Lee MS. Interactions between BRCT repeats and phosphoproteins: tangled up in two. Trends Biochem Sci. 2004;29:579-85.
20. Goldberg M, Stucki M, Falck J, et al. MDC1 is required for the intra-S-phase DNA damage checkpoint. Nature. 2003;421:952-6.
21. Kim JE, Billadeau DD, Chen J. The tandem BRCT domains of Ect2 are required for both negative and positive regulation of Ect2 in cytokinesis. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:5733-9.
22. Lou Z, Minter-Dykhouse K, Franco S, et al. MDC1 maintains genomic stability by participating in the amplification of ATM-dependent DNA damage signals. Mol Cell. 2006;21: 187-200.
23. Dulic A, Bates PA, Zhang X, et al. BRCT domain interactions in the heterodimeric DNA repair protein XRCC1-DNA ligase III. Biochemistry. 2001;40:5906-13.
24. Manke IA, Lowery DM, Nguyen A, Yaffe MB. BRCT repeats as phosphopeptide-binding modules involved in protein targeting. Science. 2003;302:636-9.
25. Williams RS, Lee MS, Hau DD, Glover JN. Structural basis of phosphopeptide recognition by the BRCT domain of BRCA1. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2004;11:519-25.
26. Yu X, Chini CC, He M, Mer G, Chen J. The BRCT domain is a phospho-protein binding domain. Science. 2003;302:639-42.
27. Mirkovic N, Marti-Renom MA, Weber BL, Sali A, Monteiro AN. Structure-based assessment of missense mutations in human BRCA1: implications for breast and ovarian cancer predisposition. Cancer Res. 2004;64:3790-7.
28. Shiozaki EN, Gu L, Yan N, Shi Y. Structure of the BRCT repeats of BRCA1 bound to a BACH1 phosphopeptide: implications for signaling. Mol Cell. 2004;14:405-12.
29. Williams RS, Green R, Glover JN. Crystal structure of the BRCT repeat region from the breast cancer-associated protein BRCA1. Nat Struct Biol. 2001;8:838-42.
30. Derbyshire DJ, Basu BP, Serpell LC, et al. Crystal structure of human 53BP1 BRCT domains bound to p53 tumour suppressor. EMBO J. 2002;21:3863-72.
31. Edwards RA, Lee MS, Tsutakawa SE, Williams RS, Tainer JA, Glover JN. The BARD1 Cterminal domain structure and interactions with polyadenylation factor CstF-50. Biochemistry. 2008;47:11446-56.
32. Joo WS, Jeffrey PD, Cantor SB, Finnin MS, Livingston DM, Pavletich NP. Structure of the 53BP1 BRCT region bound to p53 and its comparison to the Brca1 BRCT structure. Genes Dev. 2002;16:583-93.
33. Lee MS, Edwards RA, Thede GL, Glover JN. Structure of the BRCT repeat domain of MDC1 and its specificity for the free COOH-terminal end of the gamma-H2AX histone tail. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:32053-6.
34. Rao ST, Rossmann MG. Comparison of supersecondary structures in proteins. J Mol Biol. 1973;76:241-56.
35. Orengo CA, Thornton JM. Protein families and their evolution-a structural perspective. Annu Rev Biochem. 2005;74:867-900.
36. Ma BG, Chen L, Ji HF, et al. Characters of very ancient proteins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;366:607-11.
37. Botuyan MV, Nomine Y, Yu X, et al. Structural basis of BACH1 phosphopeptide recognition by BRCA1 tandem BRCT domains. Structure (Camb). 2004;12:1137-46.
38. Clapperton JA, Manke IA, Lowery DM, et al. Structure and mechanism of BRCA1 BRCT domain recognition of phosphorylated BACH1 with implications for cancer. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2004;11:512-8.
39. Rodriguez M, Yu X, Chen J, Songyang Z. Phosphopeptide binding specificities of BRCA1 COOH-terminal (BRCT) domains. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:52914-8.
40. Shiozaki EN, Gu L, Yan N, Shi Y. Structure of the BRCT repeats of BRCA1 bound to a BACH1 phosphopeptide: implications for signaling. Mol Cell. 2004;14:405-12.
41. Stucki M, Clapperton JA, Mohammad D, Yaffe MB, Smerdon SJ, Jackson SP. MDC1 directly binds phosphorylated histone H2AX to regulate cellular responses to DNA double-strand breaks. Cell. 2005;123:1213-26.
42. Munoz IM, Jowsey PA, Toth R, Rouse J. Phosphoepitope binding by the BRCT domains of hPTIP controls multiple aspects of the cellular response to DNA damage. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:5312-22.
43. Zhao A, Gray FC, MacNeill SA. ATPand NAD+-dependent DNA ligases share an essential function in the halophilic archaeon Haloferax volcanii. Mol Microbiol. 2006;59: 743-52.
44. Kobayashi M, Ab E, Bonvin AM, Siegal G. Structure of the DNA-bound BRCA1 C-terminal region from human replication factor C p140 and model of the protein-DNA complex. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:10087-97.
45. Wilkinson A, Smith A, Bullard D, et al. Analysis of ligation and DNA binding by Escherichia coli DNA ligase (LigA). Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005;1749:113-22.
46. Feng H, Parker JM, Lu J, Cao W. Effects of deletion and site-directed mutations on ligation steps of NAD+-dependent DNA ligase: a biochemical analysis of BRCA1 C-terminal domain. Biochemistry. 2004;43:12648-59.
47. Singh SK, Choudhury SR, Roy S, Sengupta DN. Sequential, structural, and phylogenetic study of BRCT module in plants. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2008;26:235-45.
48. Kumar A, Joo WS, Meinke G, Moine S, Naumova EN, Bullock PA. Evidence for a structural relationship between BRCT domains and the helicase domains of the replication initiators encoded by the Polyomaviridae and Papillomaviridae families of DNA tumor viruses. J Virol. 2008;82:8849-62.
49. Wolfe BA, Takaki T, Petronczki M, Glotzer M. Polo-like kinase 1 directs assembly of the HsCyk-4 RhoGAP/Ect2 RhoGEF complex to initiate cleavage furrow formation. PLoS Biol. 2009;7:e1000110.
50. Pincus D, Letunic I, Bork P, Lim WA. Evolution of the phospho-tyrosine signaling machinery in premetazoan lineages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:9680-4.
51. Mayer BJ. Clues to the evolution of complex signaling machinery. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:9453-4.
52. Manning G, Young SL, Miller WT, Zhai Y. The protist, Monosiga brevicollis, has a tyrosine kinase signaling network more elaborate and diverse than found in any known metazoan. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:9674-9.
53. Harper JW, Elledge SJ. The DNA damage response: ten years after. Mol Cell. 2007;28: 739-45.
54. Cimprich KA, Cortez D. ATR: an essential regulator of genome integrity. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9:616-27.
55. Matsuoka S, Ballif BA, Smogorzewska A, et al. ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage. Science. 2007;316:1160-6.
56. Meek K, Dang V, Lees-Miller SP. DNA-PK: the means to justify the ends? Adv Immunol. 2008;99:33-58.
57. Bartek J, Lukas J. Chk1 and Chk2 kinases in checkpoint control and cancer. Cancer Cell. 2003;3:421-9.
58. Bartek J, Falck J, Lukas J. CHK2 kinase: a busy messenger. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001;2: 877-86.
59. Freeman AK, Monteiro AN. Phosphatases in the cellular response to DNA damage. Cell Commun Signal. 2010;8:27.
60. Li W, Pio F, Pawlowski K, Godzik A. Saturated BLAST: an automated multiple intermediate sequence search used to detect distant homology. Bioinformatics. 2000;16:1105-10.
61. Tatusov RL, Koonin EV, Lipman DJ. A genomic perspective on protein families. Science. 1997; 278:631-7.
62. Finn RD, Mistry J, Tate J, et al. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:D211-22.