Recent developments in quantitative proteomics

Mutation Research - Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis

Volumn 722, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 171-182

  Becker, Christopher H ^a   Bern, Marshall ^b  

^a Caprion Proteomics US   (United States)

^b PALO ALTO RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Affinity depletion; Affinity enrichment; LC MS; Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry; Protein identification; Quantitative proteomics

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; DATA BASE; FRAGMENTATION REACTION; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; HUMAN; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN DEPLETION; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SCORING SYSTEM; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATA MINING; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY-MASS SPECTROMETRY; GENE EXPRESSION; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; PROTEOMICS; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 79957745193     PISSN: 13835718     EISSN: 18793592     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.06.016     Document Type: Article

References (108)

1. Tanford C., Reynolds J.A. Nature's Robots: A History of Proteins 2001, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York.
2. Levy E.D., Boeri Erba E., Robinson C.V., Teichmann S.A. Assembly reflects evolution of protein complexes. Nature 2008, 453:1262-1265.
3. Alber F., Dokudovskaya S., Veenhoff L.M., Zhang W., Kipper J., Devos D., Suprapto A., Karni-Schmidt O., Williams R., Chait B.T., Sali A., Rout M.P. The molecular architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Nature 2007, 450:695-701.
4. Gavin A.C., Aloy P., Grandi P., Krause R., Boesche M., Marzioch M., Rau C., Jensen L.J., Bastuck S., Dumpelfeld B., Edelmann A., Heurtier M.A., Hoffman V., Hoefert C., Klein K., Hudak M., Michon A.M., Schelder M., Schirle M., Remor M., Rudi T., Hooper S., Bauer A., Bouwmeester T., Casari G., Drewes G., Neubauer G., Rick J.M., Kuster B., Bork P., Russell R.B., Superti-Furga G. Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature 2006, 440:631-636.
5. Chance M. Mass Spectrometry Analysis for Protein-Protein Interactions and Dynamics 2008, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
6. Brückner A., Polge C., Lentze N., Auerbach D., Schlattner U. Yeast Two-Hybrid: a powerful tool for systems biology. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2009, 10:2763-2788.
7. Ramachandran N., Raphael J.V., Hainsworth E., Demirkan G., Fuentes M.G., Rolfs A., Hu Y., LaBaer J. Next-generation high-density self-assembling functional protein arrays. Nat. Meth. 2008, 5:535-538.
8. Mulder J., Bjorling E., Jonasson K., Wernerus H., Hober S., Hokfelt T., Uhlen M. Tissue profiling of the mammalian central nervous system using human antibody-based proteomics. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2009, 8:1612-1622.
9. Fasolo J., Snyder M. Protein microarrays. Meth. Mol. Biol. 2009, 548:209-222.
10. Patwa T.H., Qiu Y., Zhao J., Simeone D.M., Lubman D.M. All-liquid separations, protein microarrays, and mass spectrometry to interrogate serum proteomes: an application to serum glycoproteomics. Meth. Mol. Biol. 2009, 520:75-87.
11. Hu J, He X., Baggerly K.A., Coombes K.R., Hennessy B.T., Mills G.B. Non-parametric quantification of protein lysate arrays. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:1986-1994.
12. Gu Y., Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A., Linkov F., Koenig K.L., Liu M., Velikokhatnaya L., Shore R.E., Marrangoni A., Toniolo P., Lokshin A.E., Arslan A.A. Reproducibility of serum cytokines and growth factors. Cytokine 2009, 45:44-49.
13. Boyne M.T., Garcia B.A., Li M., Zamdborg L., Wenger C.D., Babai S., Kelleher N.L. Tandem mass spectrometry with ultrahigh mass accuracy clarifies peptide identification by database retrieval. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8:374-379.
14. Breuker K., Jin M., Han X., Jiang H., McLafferty F.W. Top-down identification and characterization of biomolecules by mass spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2008, 19:1045-1053.
15. McCormack A.L., Schieltz D.M., Goode B., Yang S., Barnes G., Drubin D., Yates J.R. Direct analysis and identification of proteins in mixtures by LC/MS/MS and database searching at the low-femtomole level. Anal. Chem. 1997, 69:767-776.
16. Perry R.H., Cooks R.G., Noll R.J. Orbitrap mass spectrometry: instrumentation, ion motion and applications. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2008, 27:661-699.
17. Makarov A Electrostatic axially harmonic orbital trapping: a high-performance technique of mass analysis. Anal. Chem. 2000, 72:1156-1162.
18. Becker C.H., Kumar P., Jones T., Lin H. Nonparametric mass calibration using hundreds of internal calibrants. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79:1702-1707.
19. Vestal M.L. Modern MALDI time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom. 2009, 44:303-317.
20. Anderson L., Hunter C.L. Quantitative mass spectrometric multiple reaction monitoring assays for major plasma proteins. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2006, 5:573-588.
21. Barr J.R., Maggio V.L., Patterson D.G., Cooper G.R., Henderson L.O., Turner W.E., Smith S.J., Hannon W.H., Needham L.L., Sampson E.J. Isotope dilution-mass spectrometric quantification of specific proteins: model application with apolipoprotein A-I. Clin. Chem. 1996, 42:1676-1682.
22. Lin S., Shaler T.A., Becker C.H. Quantification of intermediate-abundance proteins in serum by multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry in a single-quadrupole ion trap. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78:5762-5767.
23. Syka J.E., Coon J.J., Schroeder M.J., Shabanowitz J., Hunt D.F. Peptide and protein sequence analysis by electron transfer dissociation mass spectrometry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101:9528-9533.
24. Pitteri S.J., Chrisman P.A., Hogan J.M., McLuckey S.A. Electron transfer ion/ion reactions in a three-dimensional quadrupole ion trap: reactions of doubly and triply protonated peptides with SO2*. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77:1831-1839.
25. Zubarev R.A., Horn D.M., Fridriksson E.K., Kelleher N.L., Kruger N.A., Lewis M.A., Carpenter B.K., McLafferty F.W. Electron capture dissociation for structural characterization of multiply charged protein cations. Anal. Chem. 2000, 72:563-573.
26. Plumb R., Mazzeo J.R., Grumbach E.S., Rainville P., Jones M., Wheat T., Neue U.D., Smith B., Johnson K.A. The application of small porous particles, high temperatures, and high pressures to generate very high resolution LC and LC/MS separations. J. Sep. Sci. 2007, 30:1158-1166.
27. Jemal M, Xia Y.Q. LC-MS development strategies for quantitative bioanalysis. Curr. Drug Metab. 2006, 7:491-502.
28. Zhang H., Li X.J., Martin D.B., Aebersold R. Identification and quantification of N-linked glycoproteins using hydrazide chemistry, stable isotope labeling and mass spectrometry. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003, 21:660-666.
29. Bodenmiller B, Mueller L.N., Mueller M., Domon B., Aebersold R. Reproducible isolation of distinct, overlapping segments of the phosphoproteome. Nat. Meth. 2007, 4:231-237.
30. Zhan X., Desiderio D.M. Nitroproteins from a human pituitary adenoma tissue discovered with a nitrotyrosine affinity column and tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Biochem. 2006, 354:279-289.
31. Cravatt B.F., Wright A.T., Kozarich J.W. Activity-based protein profiling: from enzyme chemistry to proteomic chemistry. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2008, 77:383-414.
32. Bennett E.J., Shaler T.A., Woodman B., Ryu K.Y., Zaitseva T.S., Becker C.H., Bates G.P., Schulman H., Kopito R.R. Global changes to the ubiquitin system in Huntington's disease. Nature 2007, 448:704-708.
33. E.J. Bennett, T.A. Shaler, C.H. Becker, H. Schulman, R.R. Kopito, Unpublished results, 2007.
34. Sechi S. Quantitative Proteomics by Mass Spectrometry 2007, Humana Press, Totowa, NJ.
35. Hevesy G., Hofer E. Elimination of water from the human body. Nature 1934, 134:879.
36. Caprioli R.M. Use of stable isotopes. Biochem. Appl. Mass Spectrom. 1972, 735-776.
37. Gygi S.P., Rist B., Gerber S.A., Turecek F., Gelb M.H., Aebersold R. Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nat. Biotechnol. 1999, 17:994-999.
38. Ross P.L., Huang Y.N., Marchese J.N., Williamson B., Parker K., Hattan S., Khainovski N., Pillai S., Dey S., Daniels S., Purkayastha S., Juhasz P., Martin S., Bartlet-Jones M., He F., Jacobson A., Pappin D.J. Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2004, 3:1154-1169.
39. Julka S., Regnier F. Quantification in proteomics through stable isotope coding: a review. J. Proteome Res. 2004, 3:350-363.
40. Julka S., Regnier F.E. Recent advancements in differential proteomics based on stable isotope coding. Brief Funct. Genomic Proteomic 2005, 4:158-177.
41. 18O stable isotope labeling in MS-based proteomics. Brief Funct. Genomic Proteomic 2009, 8:136-144.
42. Oda Y., Nagasu T., Chait B.T. Enrichment analysis of phosphorylated proteins as a tool for probing the phosphoproteome. Nat. Biotechnol. 2001, 19:379-382.
43. Wang W., Zhou H., Lin H., Roy S., Shaler T.A., Hill L.R., Norton S., Kumar P., Anderle M., Becker C.H. Quantification of proteins and metabolites by mass spectrometry without isotopic labeling or spiked standards. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75:4818-4826.
44. Wiener M.C., Sachs J.R., Deyanova E.G., Yates N.A. Differential mass spectrometry: a label-free LC-MS method for finding significant differences in complex peptide and protein mixtures. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76:6085-6096.
45. Roy S.M., Becker C.H. Quantification of proteins and metabolites by mass spectrometry without isotopic labeling. Meth. Mol. Biol. 2007, 359:87-105.
46. Radulovic D., Jelveh S., Ryu S., Hamilton T.G., Foss E., Mao Y., Emili A. Informatics platform for global proteomic profiling and biomarker discovery using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2004, 3:984-997.
47. Katajamaa M., Oresic M. Processing methods for differential analysis of LC/MS profile data. BMC Bioinform. 2005, 6:179.
48. Old W.M., Meyer-Arendt K., Aveline-Wolf L., Pierce K.G., Mendoza A., Sevinsky J.R., Resing K.A., Ahn N.G. Comparison of label-free methods for quantifying human proteins by shotgun proteomics. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2005, 4:1487-1502.
49. Liu H., Sadygov R.G., Yates J.R. A model for random sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance in shotgun proteomics. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76:4193-4201.
50. Roy S., Josephson S.A., Fridlyand J., Karch J., Kadoch C., Karrim J., Damon L., Treseler P., Kunwar S., Shuman M.A., Jones T., Becker C.H., Schulman H., Rubenstein J.L. Protein biomarker identification in the CSF of patients with CNS lymphoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008, 26:96-105.
51. M.a.S. Kinter, N.E., Protein Sequencing and Identification Using Tandem Mass Spectrometry, John Wiley & Sons, 2000.
52. Biemann K., Cone C., Webster B.R., Arsenault G.P. Determination of the amino acid sequence in oligopeptides by computer interpretation of their high-resolution mass spectra. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88:5598-5606.
53. Hertz H.S., Hites R.A., Biemann K. Identification of mass spectra by computer-searching a file of known spectra. Anal. Chem. 1971, 43:681-691.
54. Herlihy W.C., Royal N.J., Biemann K., Putney S.D., Schimmel P.R. Mass spectra of partial protein hydrolysates as a multiple phase check for long polypeptides deduced from DNA sequences: NH2-terminal segment of alanine tRNA synthetase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1980, 77:6531-6535.
55. Eng J., McCormack A.L., Yates J.R. An approach to correlate tandem mass spectra data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1994, 5:976-989.
56. Moore R.E., Young M.K., Lee T.D. Qscore: an algorithm for evaluating SEQUEST database search results. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2002, 13:378-386.
57. Elias J.E., Gygi S.P. Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat. Meth. 2007, 4:207-214.
58. Siuzdak G. The Expanding Role of Mass Spectrometry in Biotechnology 2003, MCC Press, San Diego.
59. Zhang W., Chait B.T. ProFound: an expert system for protein identification using mass spectrometric peptide mapping information. Anal. Chem. 2000, 72:2482-2489.
60. Clauser K.R., Baker P., Burlingame A.L. Role of accurate mass measurement (+/- 10ppm) in protein identification strategies employing MS or MS/MS and database searching. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71:2871-2882.
61. Ma B., Zhang K., Hendrie C., Liang C., Li M., Doherty-Kirby A., Lajoie G. PEAKS: powerful software for peptide de novo sequencing by tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2003, 17:2337-2342.
62. Frank A., Pevzner P. PepNovo: de novo peptide sequencing via probabilistic network modeling. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77:964-973.
63. Bern M., Goldberg D. De novo analysis of peptide tandem mass spectra by spectral graph partitioning. J. Comput. Biol. 2006, 13:364-378.
64. Savitski M.M., Nielsen M.L., Kjeldsen F., Zubarev R.A. Proteomics-grade de novo sequencing approach. J. Proteome Res. 2005, 4:2348-2354.
65. R.a.B. Datta, M., Spectrum fusion: using multiple mass spectra for de novo peptide sequencing, J. Comput. Biol. 16 (2009).
66. Perkins D.N., Pappin D.J., Creasy D.M., Cottrell J.S. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 1999, 20:3551-3567.
67. Craig R., Beavis R.C. TANDEM: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics 2004, 20:1466-1467.
68. Chamrad D.C., Korting G., Stuhler K., Meyer H.E., Klose J., Bluggel M. Evaluation of algorithms for protein identification from sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Proteomics 2004, 4:619-628.
69. Hernandez P., Gras R., Frey J., Appel R.D. Popitam: towards new heuristic strategies to improve protein identification from tandem mass spectrometry data. Proteomics 2003, 3:870-878.
70. Tanner S., Shu H., Frank A., Wang L.C., Zandi E., Mumby M., Pevzner P.A., Bafna V. InsPecT: identification of posttranslationally modified peptides from tandem mass spectra. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77:4626-4639.
71. Tsur D., Tanner S., Zandi E., Bafna V., Pevzner P.A. Identification of post-translational modifications by blind search of mass spectra. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23:1562-1567.
72. Bern M., Cai Y., Goldberg D. Lookup peaks: a hybrid of de novo sequencing and database search for protein identification by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79:1393-1400.
73. Han Y., Ma B., Zhang K. SPIDER: software for protein identification from sequence tags with de novo sequencing error. J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol. 2005, 3:697-716.
74. Tabb D.L., Saraf A., Yates J.R. GutenTag: high-throughput sequence tagging via an empirically derived fragmentation model. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75:6415-6421.
75. Shilov I.V., Seymour S.L., Patel A.A., Loboda A., Tang W.H., Keating S.P., Hunter C.L., Nuwaysir L.M., Schaeffer D.A. The Paragon Algorithm, a next generation search engine that uses sequence temperature values and feature probabilities to identify peptides from tandem mass spectra. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2007, 6:1638-1655.
76. Craig R, Cortens J.P., Beavis R.C. The use of proteotypic peptide libraries for protein identification. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2005, 19:1844-1850.
77. Desiere F., Deutsch E.W., King N.L., Nesvizhskii A.I., Mallick P., Eng J., Chen S., Eddes J., Loevenich S.N., Aebersold R. The PeptideAtlas project. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34:D655-D658.
78. Craig R., Beavis R.C. A method for reducing the time required to match protein sequences with tandem mass spectra. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2003, 17:2310-2316.
79. Kim S., Gupta N., Pevzner P.A. Spectral probabilities and generating functions of tandem mass spectra: a strike against decoy databases. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7:3354-3363.
80. Keller A., Nesvizhskii A.I., Kolker E., Aebersold R. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74:5383-5392.
81. Elias J.E., Gibbons F.D., King O.D., Roth F.P., Gygi S.P. Intensity-based protein identification by machine learning from a library of tandem mass spectra. Nat. Biotechnol. 2004, 22:214-219.
82. Gibbons F.D., Elias J.E., Gygi S.P., Roth F.P. SILVER helps assign peptides to tandem mass spectra using intensity-based scoring. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2004, 15:910-912.
83. Kall L., Canterbury J.D., Weston J., Noble W.S., MacCoss M.J. Semi-supervised learning for peptide identification from shotgun proteomics datasets. Nat. Meth. 2007, 4:923-925.
84. Kall L., Storey J.D., MacCoss M.J., Noble W.S. Assigning significance to peptides identified by tandem mass spectrometry using decoy databases. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7:29-34.
85. Kall L., Storey J.D., MacCoss M.J., Noble W.S. Posterior error probabilities and false discovery rates: two sides of the same coin. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7:40-44.
86. Tabb D.L., McDonald W.H., Yates J.R. DTASelect and Contrast: tools for assembling and comparing protein identifications from shotgun proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 2002, 1:21-26.
87. Nesvizhskii A.I., Keller A., Kolker E., Aebersold R. A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75:4646-4658.
88. Bern M., Goldberg D. Improved ranking functions for protein and modification-site identifications. J. Comput. Biol. 2008, 15:705-719.
89. Bradshaw R.A., Burlingame A.L., Carr S., Aebersold R. Reporting protein identification data: the next generation of guidelines. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2006, 5:787-788.
90. Zehl M., Rand K.D., Jensen O.N., Jorgensen T.J. Electron transfer dissociation facilitates the measurement of deuterium incorporation into selectively labeled peptides with single residue resolution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130:17453-17459.
91. Scholten A., Visser N.F., van den Heuvel R.H., Heck A.J. Analysis of protein-protein interaction surfaces using a combination of efficient lysine acetylation and nanoLC-MALDI-MS/MS applied to the E9:Im9 bacteriotoxin-immunity protein complex. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2006, 17:983-994.
92. Xu G., Chance M.R. Hydroxyl radical-mediated modification of proteins as probes for structural proteomics. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107:3514-3543.
93. S.S. Shapiro, M.B. Wilk, An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples), Biometrika 52 (1965) 591-611.
94. Hinkelmann K., Kempthorne O. Design and Analysis of Experiments: Introduction to Experimental Design 1994, John Wiley and Sons.
95. Baggerly K.A., Coombes K.R., Neeley E.S. Run batch effects potentially compromise the usefulness of genomic signatures for ovarian cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008, 26:1186-1187. (author reply 1187-1188).
96. Hollander M., Wolfe D.A. Nonparametric Statistical Methods 1973, Wiley.
97. E.R. DeLong, D.M. DeLong, D.L. Clarke-Pearson, Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach, Biometrics (1988) 837-845.
98. Smyth G.K. Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2004, 3. (Article 3).
99. Benjamini J., Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. B: Met. 1995, 57:289-300.
100. Grant G.R., Liu J., Stoeckert C.J. A practical false discovery rate approach to identifying patterns of differential expression in microarray data. Bioinformatics 2005, 21:2684-2690.
101. Qian H.R., Huang S. Comparison of false discovery rate methods in identifying genes with differential expression. Genomics 2005, 86:495-503.
102. Storey J.D. The positive false discovery rate: a Bayesian interpretation and the q-value. Ann. Stat. 2003, 31:2013-2035.
103. Yang J.J., Yang M.C. An improved procedure for gene selection from microarray experiments using false discovery rate criterion. BMC Bioinform. 2006, 7:15.
104. Tusher V.G., Tibshirani R., Chu G. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98:5116-5121.
105. Cristianini N., Shawe-Taylor J. An Introduction to Support Vector Machines 2000, Cambridge University Press.
106. Breiman L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 2001, 45:5-32.
107. Tibshirani R., Hastie T., Narasimhan B., Chu G. Diagnosis of multiple cancer types by shrunken centroids of gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99:6567-6572.
108. Tai F., Pan W. Incorporating prior knowledge of gene functional groups into regularized discriminant analysis of microarray data. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:3170-3177.