Supporting student learning with adaptive technology: Personalized conceptual assessment and remediation

Generalization of Knowledge: Multidisciplinary Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 297-330

  Butcher, Kirsten R ^a   De la Chica, Sebastian ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952822463     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203848036     Document Type: Chapter

References (64)

1. Ainsworth, S., & Loizou, A. T. (2003). The effects of self-explaining when learning with textor diagrams. Cognitive Science, 27, 669–681.
2. Barnett, S. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 612–637.
3. Britt, M. A., & Gabrys, G. (2002). Implications of document-level literacy skills for Web site design. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 170–176.
4. Butcher, K., Bhushan, S., & Sumner, T. (2006). Multimedia displays for conceptual search processes: Information seeking with strand maps. ACM Multimedia Systems Journal, 11, 236–248.
5. Butcher, K., de la Chica, S., Ahmad, F., Gu, Q., Sumner, T., & Martin, J. H. (2009). Conceptual customization for learning with multimedia: Developing individual instructional experiences to support science understanding. In R. Zheng (Ed.), Cognitive effects of multimedia learning (pp. 260–287). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
6. Butcher, K. R. (2006). Learning from text with diagrams: Promoting mental model development and inference generation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 182–197.
7. Byrt, T., Bishop, J., & Carlin, J. B. (1993). Bias, prevalence, and kappa. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46, 423–429.
8. Carey, S. (1991). Knowledge acquisition: Enrichment or conceptual change? In S. Carey & R. Gelman (Eds.), The epigenesis of mind: Essays on biology and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Chi, M. T., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145–182.
10. Chi, M. T., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M.-H., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439–477.
11. Chi, M. T., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physicsproblems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121–152.
12. Chi, M. T. H. (2008). Three types of conceptual change: Belief revision, mental model transformation, and categorical shift. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 61–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Chi, M. T. H., Siler, S. A., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., & Hausmann, R. G. (2001). Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science, 25, 471–533.
14. Corbett, A. T., McLaughlin, M., & Scarpinatto, K. C. (2000). Modeling student knowledge: Cognitive tutors in high school and college. User Modeling and User-adapted Interaction, 10, 81–108.
15. de la Chica, S. (2007). SciNews Online: Scaffolding the construction of scientific explanations. Paper presented at the 2007 SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Extended Abstracts—ACM Student Research Competition, San Jose, California.
16. de la Chica, S., Ahmad, F., Sumner, T., Martin, J. H., & Butcher, K. (2008). Computational foundations for personalizing instruction with digital libraries. International Journal of Digital Libraries, 9(1), 3–18. (Special Issue on Digital Libraries and Education) Digital Library for Earth System Education (DLESE). (N.d.). [Home page]. Retrieved November 17, 2009, from http://www.dlese.org
17. Goldstone, R. L., & Son, J. Y. (2005). The transfer of scientific principles using concrete and idealized simulations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 69–110.
18. Graesser, A. C., Lu, S., Jackson, G. T., Mitchell, H. H., Ventura, M., Olney, A., et al. (2004). AutoTutor: A tutor with dialogue in natural language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 180–192.
19. Graesser, A. C., Person, N. K., Harter, D., & the Tutoring Research Group. (2001). Teaching tactics and dialogue in AutoTutor. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Education, 12, 257–279.
20. Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371–395.
21. Griffin, T. D., Wiley, J., & Thiede, K. W. (2008). Individual differences, rereading, and selfexplanation: Concurrent processing and cue validity as constraints on metacomprehension accuracy. Memory & Cognition, 36, 93–103.
22. Halpern, D. F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains. American Psychologist, 53, 449–455.
23. Hanson, K., & Carlson, B. (2005). Effective access: Teachers’ use of digital resources in STEM teaching. Retrieved November 15, 2007, from http://www2.edc.org/gdi/publications_SR/EffectiveAccessReport.pdf
24. Hegarty, M. (1992). Mental animation: Inferring motion from static displays of mechanical systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1084–1102.
25. Hegarty, M., & Just, M. A. (1993). Constructing mental models of machines from text and diagrams. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 717–742.
26. Hilgard, E. R., Irvine, R. P., & Whipple, J. E. (1953). Rote memorization, understanding, and transfer: An extension of Katona’s card-trick experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 288–292.
27. Johnson, H. M., & Seifert, C. M. (1994). Sources of the continued influence effect: When misinformation in memory affects later inferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1420–1436.
28. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29. Kelley, J. F. (1983, December 12–15). An empirical methodology for writing user-friendly natural language computer applications. Paper presented at the 1983 SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Boston, MA.
30. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A constructionintegration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182.
31. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Koedinger, K. R., Aleven, V., Heffernan, N., McLaren, B. M., & Hockenberry, M. (2004). Opening the door to non-programmers: Authoring intelligent tutor behavior by demonstration. In J. C. Lester, R. M. Vicari & F. Paraguaçu (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th annual Intelligent Tutoring Systems Conference (pp. 162–174). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
33. Koedinger, K. R., Anderson, J. R., Hadley, W. H., & Mark, M. A. (1997). Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8, 30–43.
34. Kozma, R. (2003). The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding. Learning and Instruction, 13, 205–226.
35. Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240.
36. Lin, L.-M., & Zabrucky, K. M. (1998). Calibration of comprehension: Research and implications for education and instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 345–391.
37. Lowe, R. K. (1993). Constructing a mental representation from an abstract technical diagram. Learning & Instruction, 3, 157–179.
38. Marchionini, G. (1995). Information seeking in electronic environments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
40. Mayer, R. E., Bove, W., Bryman, A., Mars, R., & Tapangco, L. (1996). When less is more: Meaningful learning from visual and verbal summaries of science textbook lessons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 64–73.
41. McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99, 440–466.
42. McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition & Instruction, 14, 1–43.
43. Nelson, T. O., Dunlosky, J., Graf, A., & Narens, L. (1994). Utilization of metacognitive judgments in the allocation of study during multitrial learning. Psychological Science, 5, 207–213.
44. O’Donnell, A. M., Dansereau, D. F., & Hall, R. H. (2002). Knowledge maps as scaffolds for cognitive processing. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 71–86.
45. Olander, H. (1941). Children’s knowledge of the flag salute. Journal of Educational Research, 35, 300–305.
46. Rawson, K. A., Dunlosky, J., & Thiede, K. W. (2000). The rereading effect: Metacomprehension accuracy improves across reading trials. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1004–1010.
47. Ritter, S., Anderson, J., Cytrynowicz, M., & Medvedeva, O. (1998). Authoring content in the PAT Algebra Tutor. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 98, Article 9. Retrieved May 31, 2008, from http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/98/9/
48. Ritter, S., Anderson, J. R., Koedinger, K. R., & Corbett, A. T. (2007). Cognitive tutor: Applied research in mathematics education. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 249–255.
49. Royer, J. M., Carlo, M. S., Dufresne, R., & Mestre, J. (1996). The assessment of levels of domain expertise while reading. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 373–408.
50. Salton, G., & Lesk, M. E. (1968). Computer evaluation of indexing and text processing. Journal of the ACM, 15, 8–36.
51. Schnotz, W., & Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. Learning & Instruction, 13, 141–156.
52. Susarla, S. C., Adcock, A., Van Eck, R., Moreno, K., & Graesser, A. (2003, July 20–24). Development and evaluation of a lesson authoring tool for AutoTutor. Paper presented at the 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Sydney, Australia.
53. Suthers, D. D., Vatrapu, R., Medina, R., Joseph, S., & Dwyer, N. (2007). Conceptual representations enhance knowledge construction in asynchronous collaboration. In C. Chinn, G. Erkens, & S. Puntambekar (Eds.), The Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Conference 2007 (pp. 704–713). New Brunswick, NJ: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
54. Svitil, K. (N.d.). Mountains of fire. PBS Online. Retrieved November 18, 2009, from http://www.thirteen.org/savageearth/volcanoes
55. Thiede, K. W. (1999). The importance of monitoring and self-regulation during multitrial learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 662–667.
56. Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M. C., & Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 66–73.
57. Thiede, K. W., & Dunlosky, J. (1994). Delaying students’ metacognitive monitoring improves their accuracy in predicting their recognition performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 290–302.
58. van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
59. VanLehn, K., Lynch, C., Schulze, K., Shapiro, J. A., Shelby, R., Taylor, L., et al. (2005). The Andes physics tutoring system: Lessons learned. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Education, 15, 147–204.
60. van Rijsbergen, C. J. (1979). Information retrieval (2nd ed.). Glasgow: Department of Computer Science, University of Glasgow.
61. Wade-Stein, D., & Kintsch, E. (2004). Summary Street: Interactive computer support for writing. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 333–362.
62. Weatherley, J. (2005, June 7–11). A Web service framework for embedding discovery services in distributed library interfaces. Paper presented at the 5th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Denver, CO.
63. Wiley, J., & Voss, J. F. (1999). Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 1–11.
64. Wolfe, M. B. W., Schreiner, M. E., Rehder, B., Laham, D., Foltz, P. W., Kintsch, W., et al. (1998). Learning from text: Matching readers and texts by latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 309–336.