Conceptual representations enhance knowledge construction in asynchronous collaboration

Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL

Volumn 8, Issue PART 2, 2007, Pages 704-713

  Suthers, Daniel ^a   Vatrapu, Ravi ^a   Medina, Richard ^a   Joseph, Sam ^a   Dwyer, Nathan ^a  

^a University of Hawai'i at Manoa   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; MAMMALS;

ASYNCHRONOUS COLLABORATION; COLLABORATIVE KNOWLEDGE CONSTRUCTIONS; INFORMATION SHARING; KNOWLEDGE CONSTRUCTION; KNOWLEDGE MAP; ONLINE LEARNING; PROFILE DESIGNS; THREADED DISCUSSIONS;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 76649145136     PISSN: 15734552     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1599600.1599729     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Ainsworth, S. E., Bibby, P. A., & Wood, D. J. (1998). Analyzing the costs and benefits of multi-representational learning environments. In M. W. van Someren, P. Reimann, H. P. A. Boshuizen & T. de Jong (Eds.), Learning with Multiple Representations (pp. 120-134). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, Ltd.
2. Baker, M. J., & Lund, K. (1996). Flexibly Structuring the Interaction in a CSCL environment. In P. Brna, A. Paiva & J. Self (Eds.), Proceedings of the EuroAIED Conference (pp. 401-407). Edições Colibri, Lisbon.
3. Bell, P., Davis, E. A., & Linn, M. C. (1995). The Knowledge Integration Environment: Theory and design, Proceedings of the Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Conference '95 (pp. 14-24). Toronto: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
4. Brna, P., Cox, R., & Good, J. (2001). Learning to think and communicate with diagrams: 14 questions to consider. Artificial Intelligence Review, 15(1-2), 115-134.
5. Dillenbourg, P. (2005). Designing biases that augment socio-cognitive interactions. In R. Bromme, F. W. Hesse & H. Spada (Eds.), Barriers and Biases in Computer-Mediated Knowledge Communication-and How TheyMay Be Overcome. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
6. Gigerenzer, G. (2004). Mindless statistics The Journal of Socio-Economics, 33, 587-606.
7. Grosz, B. J., & Sidner, C. L. (1986). Attention, Intentions, and the Structure of Discourse. ComputationalLinguistics, 12(3), 175-204.
8. Guzdial, M., & Hmelo, C. (1997). Integrating and guiding collaboration: Lessons learned in computer-supported collaborative learning research at Georgia Tech, Proceedings of Computer Supported CollaborativeLearning '97 (pp. 91-100). Toronto, Ontario.
9. Hawkes, M., & Romiszowski, A. (2001). Examining the reflective outcomes of asynchronous computer-mediated communication on inservice teacher development. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(2), 285-308.
10. Herring, S. C. (1999). Interactional Coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 4(4).
11. Hewitt, J. (2001). Beyond Threaded Discourse. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7(3), 207-221.
12. Hewitt, J. (2003). How habitual online practices affect the development of asynchronous discussion threads. Journalof Educational Computing Research, 28(1), 31-45.
13. Hoadley, C., & Enyedy, N. (1999). Between information and communication: Middle spaces in computer media for learning. In C. Hoadley & J. Roschelle (Eds.), Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) (pp. 242-251). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.
14. Lieberman, A. (2004). What You Should Know About Guam, Plants, Flying Foxes and Parkinson Disease: National Parkinson Foundation.
15. Mayadas, F. (1997). Asynchronous Learning Networks: A Sloan Foundation Perspective. Journal of AsynchronousLearning Networks, 1, http://www.aln.org/ alnweb/journal/jaln-issue1.htm#mayadas.
16. Mühlpfordt, M., & Wessner, M. (2005). Explicit Referencing In Chat Supports Collaborative Learning. In T. Koschmann, D. Suthers & T. W. Chan (Eds.), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning: The Next 10Years! (pp. 460-469). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Reyes, P., & Tchounikine, P. (2003). Supporting Emergence of Threaded Learning Conversations Through Augmenting Interactional and Sequential Coherence. In B. Wasson, S. Ludvigsen & U. Hoppe (Eds.), Designing for Change in Networked Learning Environments-Proceedings of Conference CSCL 2003 (pp. 83-92). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
18. Roschelle, J. (1996). Designing for cognitive communication: Epistemic fidelity or mediating collaborating inquiry. In D. L. Day & D. K. Kovacs (Eds.), Computers, Communication & Mental Models (pp. 13-25). London: Taylor & Francis.
19. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696-735.
20. Scardamalia, M. (2004). CSILE/Knowledge Forum®. In Education and technology: An encyclopedia. (pp. 183-193). Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.
21. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265-283.
22. Stahl, G. (2006). Collaborating with Technology: Mediation of Group Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Stasser, G., & Stewart, D. (1992). Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 67-78.
24. Suthers, D. D. (2001). Collaborative Representations: Supporting Face to Face and Online Knowledge-building Discourse. In Proceedings of the 34th Hawai'i International Conference on the System Sciences (HICSS-34), January 3-6, 2001, Maui, Hawai'i (CD-ROM): Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE).
25. Suthers, D. D., & Hundhausen, C. (2003). An Experimental Study of the Effects of Representational Guidance on Collaborative Learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 183-219.
26. Suthers, D. D., Medina, R., Vatrapu, R., & Dwyer, N. (2007). Information Sharing is Incongruous with Collaborative Convergence: The Case for Interaction. In Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2007(this volume).
27. Suthers, D. D., Vatrapu, R., Medina, R., Joseph, S., & Dwyer, N. (in press). Beyond threaded discussion: Representational guidance in asynchronous collaborative learning environments. Computers & Education, doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.10.007.
28. Toth, E. E., Suthers, D. D., & Lesgold, A. M. (2002). "Mapping to Know": The Effects of Representational Guidance and Reflective Assessment on Scientific Inquiry: Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
29. Turoff, M., Hiltz, S. R., Bieber, M., Fjermestad, J., & Rana, A. (1999). Collaborative discourse structures in computer mediated group communications. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 4(4), http://jcmc.huji.ac.il/.
30. van der Pol, J., Admiraal, W., & Simons, P. R. J. (2006). The affordance of anchored discussion for the collaborative processing of academic texts. Comptuer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(3), 339-357.
31. Veerman, A. (2003). Constructive discussions through electronic dialogue. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker & D. D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative LearningEnvironments (pp. 117-143). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
32. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Toward a sociocultural practice and theory of education. New York: Cambridge University Press.