Cognitive tutor: Applied research in mathematics education

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 249-255

  Ritter, Steven ^a   Anderson, John R ^b   Koedinger, Kenneth R ^b   Corbett, Albert ^b  

^a Carnegie Learning Inc   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547525359     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194060     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (41)

1. ALEVEN, V. A. W. M. M., & KOEDINGER, K. R. (2002). An effective metacognitive strategy: Learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor. Cognitive Science, 26, 147-179.
2. ANDERSON, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. ANDERSON, J. R. (1990). The adaptive character of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. ANDERSON, J. R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. ANDERSON, J. R. (2002). Spanning seven orders of magnitude: A challenge for cognitive modeling. Cognitive Science, 26, 85-112.
6. ANDERSON, J. R., BOTHELL, D., BYRNE, M. D., DOUGLASS, S.,LEBTÈRE, C., & QIN, Y. (2004). An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review, 111, 1036-1060.
7. ANDERSON, J. R., BOYLE, C. F., CORBETT, A. T., & LEWIS, M. W. (1990). Cognitive modeling and intelligent tutoring. Artificial Intelligence, 42,7-49.
8. ANDERSON, J. R., BOYLE, C. F., FARRELL, R., & REISER, B. J. (1987). Cognitive principles in the design of computer tutors. In P. Morris (Ed.), Modelling cognition (pp. 93-133). Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
9. ANDERSON, J. R., CONRAD, F. G., & CORBETT, A. T. (1989). Skill acquisition and the LISP tutor. Cognitive Science, 13, 467-505.
10. ANDERSON, J. R., CORBETT, A. T., KOEDINGER, K. R., & PELLETIER, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 167-207.
11. ANDERSON, J. R., & LEBIÈRE, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. CEN, H., KOEDINGER, K. R., & JUNKER, B. (2005). Learning Factors Analysis: A general method for cognitive model evaluation and improvement In M. Ikeda, K. Ashley, & T. Chan (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems 8th International Conference (pp. 164-175). Berlin: Springer.
13. CORBETT, A. T., & ANDERSON, J. R. (1995a). Knowledge decomposition and subgoal reification in the ACT programming tutor. In J. Greer (Ed.), Artificial intelligence and education, 1995: The proceedings of AI-ED 95 (pp. 469-476). Charlottesville, VA: AACE Press.
14. CORBETT, A. T., & ANDERSON, J. R. (1995b). Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Modeling & User-Adapted Interaction, 4, 253-278.
15. CORBETT, A. T., KOEDINGER, K. R., & ANDERSON, J. R. (1997). Intelligent tutoring systems. In M. G. Helander, T. K. Landauer, & P. Prabhu (Eds.), Handbook of human-computer interaction (2nd ed., pp. 849-874). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
16. CORBETT, A. [T.], MCLAUGHLIN, M., SCARPINATTO, K. C., & HADLEY, W. H. (2000). Analyzing and generating mathematical models: An Algebra II cognitive tutor design study. In G. Gautier, C. Frasson, & K. van Lehn (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Fifth international conference (pp. 314-323). Berlin: Springer.
17. CORBETT, A. T., TRASK, H. J., SCARPINATTO, K. C., & HADLEY, W. S. (1998). A formative evaluation of the PACT Algebra II Tutor Support for simple hierarchical reasoning. In B. P. Goettl, H. Halff, C. Redfield, & V Shute (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Fourth International Conference, ITS '98 (pp. 374-383). New York: Springer.
18. GLUCK, K. A. (1999). Eye movements and algebra tutoring. Dissertation Abstracts International, 61, 1664B.
19. JUNKER, B. W., KOEDINGER, K. R., & TROTTINI, M. (2000, July). Finding improvements in student models for intelligent tutoring systems via variable selection for a linear logistic test model. Paper presented at the 65th Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Vancouver.
20. KOEDINGER, K. R., & ANDERSON, J. R. (1990). Abstract planning and perceptual chunks: Elements of expertise in geometry. Cognitive Science, 14, 511-550.
21. KOEDINGER, K. R., & ANDERSON, J. R. (1993). Effective use of intelligent software in high school math classrooms. In Proceedings of the Sixth World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 241-248). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
22. KOEDINGER, K. R., & ANDERSON, J. R. (1998). Illustrating principled design: The early evolution of a cognitive tutor for algebra symbolization. Interactive Learning Environments, 5, 161 -180.
23. KOEDINGER, K. R., ANDERSON, J. R., HADLEY, W. H., & MARK, M. (1997). Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8, 30-43.
24. KOEDINGER, K. R., CORBETT, A T., RITTER, S., & SHAPIRO, L. J. (2000). Carnegie Learning's Cognitive Tutor: Summary research results. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Learning. Available at www.carnegielearning .com/web_docs/CMU_research_results.pdf.
25. KOEDINGER, K. R., & NATHAN, M.J. (2004). The real story behind story problems: Effects of representations on quantitative reasoning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 129-164.
26. LEBIÈRE, C. (1999). The dynamics of cognition: An ACT-R model of cognitive arithmetic. Kognitionswissenschaft, 8, 5-19.
27. MARK, M. A., & KOEDINGER, K. R. (1999). Strategic support of algebraic expression writing. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on User Modeling (pp. 149-158). Available at www .cs.usask.ca/UM99/Proc/mark.pdf.
28. MORGAN, P., & RITTER, S. (2002). An experimental study of the effects of Cognitive Tutor Algebra I on student knowledge and attitude. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Learning. Available at www.carnegielearning .com/web_docs/morgan_ritter_2002.pdf.
29. NATHAN, M. J., & KOEDINGER, K. R. (2000a). An investigation of teachers' beliefs of students' algebra development. Cognition & Instruction, 18, 209-237.
30. NATHAN, M. J., & KOEDINGER, K. R. (2000b). Teachers' and researchers' beliefs about the development of algebraic reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 168-190.
31. NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL (2003). Strategic education research partnership (M. S. Donovan, A. K. Wigdor, & C. E. Snow, Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
32. NEWELL, A. (1973). You can't play 20 questions with nature and win: Projective comments on the papers of this symposium. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 283-310). New York: Academic Press.
33. NEWELL, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. RITTER, S., & ANDERSON, J. R. (1995). Calculation and strategy in the equation solving tutor. In J. D. Moore & J. F. Lehman (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 413-418). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. RITTLE-JOHNSON, B., & KOEDINGER, K. R. (2002). Comparing instructional strategies for integrating conceptual and procedural knowledge. In D. S. Mewborn, P. Sztajin, D. Y. White, H. G. Wiegel, R. L. Bryant, & K. Nooney (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapters of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 969-978). Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
36. RITTLE-JOHNSON, B., & KOEDINGER, K. R. (2005). Designing better learning environments: Knowledge scaffolding supports mathematical problem solving. Cognition & Instruction, 23, 313-349.
37. RITTLE-JOHNSON, B., & SIEGLER, R. S. (1998). The relation between conceptual and procedural knowledge in learning mathematics: A review. In C. Donlan (Ed.), The development of mathematical skills: Studies in developmental psychology (pp. 75-110). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
38. RITTLE-JOHNSON, B., SIEGLER, R. S., & ALIBALI, M. W. (2001). Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 346-362.
39. SARKIS, H. (2004). Cognitive Tutor Algebra I program evaluation: MiamiDade County public schools. Lighthouse Point, FL: The Reliability Group. Available at www.camegielearning.com/web_docs/sarkis_2004 .pdf.
40. SIEGLER, R. S., & CROWLEY, K. (1991). The microgenetic method: A direct means for studying cognitive development American Psychologist, 46, 606-620.
41. SIEGLER, R. S., & SHIPLEY, C. (1995). Variation, selection, and cognitive change. In T. J. Simon & G. S. Halford (Eds.), Developing cognitive competence: New approaches to process modeling (pp. 31-76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.