Conceptual customization for learning with multimedia: Developing individual instructional experiences to support science understanding

Cognitive Effects of Multimedia Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 260-287

  Butcher, Kirsten R ^a,b   de la Chica, Sebastian ^c   Ahmad, Faisal ^c   Gu, Qianyi ^c   Sumner, Tamara ^d   Martin, James H ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^d UCB 450   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952840656     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-158-2.ch014     Document Type: Chapter

References (73)

1. AAAS. (1993). Benchmarks for Science Literacy. New York: Project 2061, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Oxford University Press.
2. Ahmad, F., de la Chica, S., Butcher, K. R., Sumner, T., & Martin, J. H. (2007). Towards Automatic Conceptual Personalization Tools. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Vancouver, BC (pp. 452-461). New York, NY: ACM Press.
3. Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2), 167-207.
5. Britton, B. K., & Gulgoz, S. (1991). Using Kintsch's computational model to improve instructional text: Effects of repairing inference calls on recall and cognitive structures. Journal of Educational Psychology 83, 329-345.
6. Butcher, K. R., Bhushan, S., & Sumner, T. (2006). Multimedia displays for conceptual search processes: Information seeking with strand maps. ACM Multimedia Systems Journal, 11(3), 236-248.
7. Butcher, K. R. (2006). Learning from text with diagrams: Promoting mental model development and inference generation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 182-197.
8. Byrt, T., Bishop, J., & Carlin, J. B. (1993). Bias, prevalence, and kappa. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46(5), 423-429.
9. Cen, H., Koedinger, K. R., & Junker, B. (2007). Is over practice necessary? Improving learning efficiency with the cognitive tutor through educational data mining. In R. Lunkin, K. R. Koedinger & J. Greer (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 511-518). Marina Del Ray, CA: IOS Press.
10. Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293-332.
11. Chi, M. T., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M.-H., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18(3), 439-477.
12. Chi, M. T., Siler, S. A., & Jeong, H. (2004). Can tutors monitor students' understanding accurately? Cognition and Instruction, 22(3), 363-387.
13. Chi, M. T. H. (in press). Three types of conceptual change: Belief revision, mental model transformation, and categorical shift. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), Handbook of research on conceptual change. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Chi, M. T. H., Siler, S. A., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., & Hausmann, R. G. (2001). Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science, 25(4), 471-533.
15. Chmielewski, T. L., & Dansereau, D. F. (1998). Enhancing the recall of text: Knowledge mapping training promotes implicit transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 407-413.
16. Conati, C., Gertner, A., & Vanlehn, K. (2002). Using bayesian networks to manage uncertainty in student modeling. User Modeling and UserAdapted Interaction, 12(4), 371-417.
17. Conlon, T. (2006). But is our concept map any good? Classroom experiences with the Reasonable Fallible Analyser. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Concept Mapping, San José, Costa Rica.
18. de la Chica, S., Ahmad, F., Sumner, T., Martin, J. H., & Butcher, K. (in press). Computational foundations for personalizing instruction with digital libraries. International Journal on Digital Libraries.
19. Di Eugenio, B., & Glass, M. (2004). The kappa statistic: A second look. Computational Linguistics, 30(1), 95-101.
20. Dwyer, F. M. (1967). The relative effectiveness of varied visual illustrations in complementing programmed instruction. Journal of Experimental Education, 36, 34-42.
21. Dwyer, F. M. (1968). The effectiveness of visual illustrations used to complement programmed instruction. Journal of Psychology, 70, 157-162.
22. Dwyer, F. M. (1969). The effect of varying the amount of realistic detail in visual illustrations designed to complement programmed instruction. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 6, 147-153.
23. Fellbaum, C. (1998). WordNet: An electronic lexical database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Gouli, E., Gogoulou, A., Papanikalaou, K., & Grigoriadou, M. (2004, September). Compass: An adaptive web-based concept map assessment tool. Paper presented at the First International Conference on Concept Mapping, Pamplona, Spain.
25. Graesser, A. C., Lu, S., Jackson, G. T., Mitchell, H. H., Ventura, M., Olney, A., & Louwerse, M. M. (2004). AutoTutor: A tutor with dialogue in natural language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(2), 180-192.
26. Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 104-137.
27. Graesser, A. C., Person, N. K., Harter, D., & the Tutoring Research Group. (2001). Teaching tactics and dialogue in AutoTutor. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Education, 12, 257-279.
28. Hanson, K., & Carlson, B. (2005). Effective access: Teachers' use of digital resources in STEM teaching. Retrieved November 15, 2007, from http://www2.edc.org/gdi/publications_SR/EffectiveAccessReport.pdf
29. Hill, L. L. (2000). Core elements of digital gazetteers: Placenames, categories, and footprints. In J. Borbinha & T. Baker (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Digital Libraries, Lisbon, Portugal (pp. 380-390). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
30. Jonassen, D. H., & Grabowski, B. L. (1993). Handbook of individual differences, learning and instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31. Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 23-31.
32. Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1999). Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13(4), 351-371.
33. Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2000). Incorporating learner experience into the design of multimedia instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 126-136.
34. Koedinger, K. R., & Aleven, V. (2007). Exploring the assistance dilemma in experiments with cognitive tutors. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 239-264.
35. Koedinger, K. R., Aleven, V., Heffernan, N., McLaren, B. M., & Hockenberry, M. (2004). Opening the door to non-programmers: Authoring intelligent tutor behavior by demonstration. In J. C. Lester, R. M. Vicari & F. Paraguaçu (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th annual Intelligent Tutoring Systems Conference (pp. 162-174). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
36. Koedinger, K. R., & Anderson, J. R. (1990). Abstract planning and perceptual chunks: Elements of expertise in geometry. Cognitive Science, 14(4), 511-550.
37. Koedinger, K. R., Anderson, J. R., Hadley, W. H., & Mark, M. A. (1997). Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8, 30-43.
38. Landauer, T. K. (1998). Learning and representing verbal meaning: The latent semantic analysis theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 161-164.
39. Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211-240.
40. Laurillard, D. (1993). Rethinking university teaching: A framework for the effective use of educational technology. New York: Routledge.
41. Levie, W., & Lentz, R. (1982). Effects of text illustrations: A review of research. Educational Communication & Technology Journal, 30(4), 195-232.
42. Lowe, R. K. (1996). Background knowledge and the construction of a situtational representation from a diagram. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 11(4), 377-397.
43. Lowe, R. K. (1999). Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14(2), 225-244.
44. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Mayer, R. E., & Gallini, J. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 715-726.
46. Mayer, R. E., Steinhoff, K., Bowers, G., & Mars, R. (1995). A generative theory of textbook design: Using annotated illustrations to foster meaningful learning of science text. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(1), 31-43.
47. McKeown, M. G., Beck, I. L., Sinatra, G. M., & Loxterman, J. A. (1992). The contribution of prior knowledge and coherent text to comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 79-93.
48. McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition & Instruction, 14(1), 1-43.
49. McNamara, D. S., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from text: Effect of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22, 247-288.
50. Means, M., & Voss, J. F. (1985). Star wars: A developmental study of expert and novice knowledge structures. Memory and Language, 24, 746-757.
51. Moravcsik, J. E., & Kintsch, W. (1993). Writing quality, reading skills, and domain knowledge as factors in text comprehension. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 360-374.
52. Morris, J., & Hirst, G. (1991). Lexical cohesion computed by thesaural relations as an indicator of the structure of text. Computational Linguistics, 17(1), 21-48.
53. Narayanan, N. H., & Hegarty, M. (2002). Multimedia design for communication of dynamic information. International Journal of HumanComputer Studies, 57(4), 279-315.
54. NRC. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Research Council (NRC), National Academy Press.
55. NRC. (2000). How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition. Washington, DC: National Research Council: Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Academy Press.
56. O'Donnell, A. M., Dansereau, D. F., & Hall, R. H. (2002). Knowledge maps as scaffolds for cognitive processing. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 71-86.
57. Pask, G. (1975). Conversation, cognition, and learning: A cybernetic theory and methodology. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
58. Person, N. K., Graesser, A. C., Kreuz, R. J., Pomeroy, V., & the Tutoring Research Group. (2001). Simulating human tutor dialog moves in AutoTutor. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 23-39.
59. Petre, M. (1995). Why looking isn't always seeing: Readership skills and graphical programming. Communications of the ACM, 38(6), 33-44.
60. Petre, M., & Green, T. R. (1993). Learning to read graphics: Some evidence that "seeing" an information display is an acquired skill. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 4, 55-70.
61. Radev, D., Allison, T., Blair-Goldensohn, S., Blitzer, J., Celebi, A., Dimitrov, S., et al. (2004, May). MEAD - A platform for multidocument multilingual text summarization. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Lisbon, Portugal.
62. Schwan, S., & Riempp, R. (2004). The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: Learning to tie nautical knots. Learning and Instruction, 14(3), 293-305.
63. Schwartz, D. L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16(4), 475-522.
64. Scott, B. (2001). Conversation theory: A constructivist, dialogical approach to educational technology. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 8(4), 25-46.
65. Spilich, G. J., Vesonder, G. T., Chiesi, H. L., & Voss, J. F. (1979). Text processing of domain related information for individuals with high and low domain knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 275-290.
66. Susarla, S. C., Adcock, A., Van Eck, R., Moreno, K., & Graesser, A. (2003). Development and evaluation of a lesson authoring tool for AutoTutor. In V. Aleven, U. Hoppe, J. Kay, R. Mizoguchi, H. Pain, F. Verdejo, & K. Yacef (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Sydney, Australia (pp. 378-387). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
67. VanLehn, K. (2006). The behavior of tutoring systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Education, 16, 227-265.
68. VanLehn, K., Lynch, C., Schulze, K., Shapiro, J. A., Shelby, R., Taylor, L., et al. (2005). The Andes physics tutoring system: Lessons learned. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Education, 15, 147-204.
69. Viera, A. J., & Garrett, J. M. (2005). Understanding interobserver agreement: The kappa statistic. Family Medicine, 37(5), 360-363.
70. Voss, J. F., & Silfies, L. N. (1996). Learning from history text: The interaction of knowlede and comprehension skill with text structure. Cognition and Instruction, 14(1), 45-68.
71. Wade-Stein, D., & Kintsch, E. (2004). Summary Street: Interactive computer support for writing. Cognition and Instruction, 22(3), 333-362.
72. Wolfe, M. B. W., Schreiner, M. E., Rehder, B., Laham, D., Foltz, P. W., Kintsch, W., et al. (1998). Learning from text: Matching readers and texts by latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25(2-3), 309-336.
73. Zahn, C., Barquero, B., & Schwan, S. (2004). Learning with hyperlinked videos--design criteria and efficient strategies for using audiovisual hypermedia. Learning and Instruction, 14(3), 275-291.