Summary Street: Interactive computer support for writing

Cognition and Instruction

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 333-362

  Wade Stein, David ^a   Kintsch, Eileen ^b  

^a MySentient US (R and D) Inc   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4444349455     PISSN: 07370008     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s1532690xci2203_3     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Baumann, J. F. (1984). The effectiveness of a direct instruction paradigm for teaching main idea comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 93-115.
2. Bean, T. W., & Steenwyk, F. L. (1984). The effect of three forms of summarization instruction on sixth-graders' summary writing and comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 16, 287-306.
3. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
4. Brown, A. L., Bransford, J. D., Ferrara, R. A., & Campione, J. C. (1983). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In J. Flavell & E. M. Markman (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Cognitive development (4th ed., pp. 515-629). New York: Wiley.
5. Brown, A. L., & Day, J. D. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 1-14.
6. Brown, A. L., Day, J. D., & Jones, R. S. (1983). The development of plans for summarizing texts. Child Development, 54, 968-979.
7. Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. S. (1989). Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 393-451). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
8. Brown, A. L., & Smiley, S. S. (1977). Rating the importance of structural units of prose passages: A problem of metacognitive development. Child Development, 48, 1-8.
9. Casazza, M. E. (1992). Teaching summary writing to enhance comprehension. Reading Today, 9, 28.
10. Foltz, P. W., Gilliam, S., & Kendall, S. (2000). Supporting content-based feedback in on-line writing evaluation with LSA. Interactive Learning Environments, 8(20), 111-127.
11. Foltz, P. W., Laham, D., & Landauer, T. K. (1999). The Intelligent Essay Assessor: Applications to educational technology. Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer-Enhanced Learning, 1(2). Retrieved June 29, 2004, from http://www.knowledge-technologies.com
12. Gajria, M., & Salvia, J. (1992). The effects of summarization instruction on text comprehension of students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 58, 508-516.
13. Jitendra, A. K., Cole, C. L., Hoppes, M. K., & Wilson, B. (1998). Effects of a direct instruction main idea summarization program and self-monitoring on reading comprehension of middle school students with learning disabilities. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 14, 379-396.
14. Kintsch, E., & Kintsch, W. (1997). Learning from text. In E. D. DeCorte & F. E. Weinert (Eds.), International encyclopedia of developmental and instructional psychology (pp. 519-524). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
15. Kintsch, E., Steinhart, D., Stahl, G., LSA Research Group, Matthews, C., & Lamb, R. (2000). Developing summarization skills through the use of LSA-based feedback. Interactive Learning Environments, 8, 87-109.
16. Kintsch, W. (2001). Predication. Cognitive Science, 25, 173-202.
17. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18. Landauer, T. K. (1998). Learning and representing verbal meaning: The latent semantic analysis theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 161-164.
19. Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of the acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211-240.
20. Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998). An introduction to latent semantic analysis [special issue]. Discourse Processes, 25, 259-284.
21. Landauer, T. K., Laham, D., & Foltz, P. W. (2000, September-October). The intelligent essay assessor. IEEE Intelligent Systems: Trends and Controversies, 27-31.
22. Landauer, T. K., & Psotka, J. (2000). Simulating text understanding for educational applications with latent semantic analysis: Introduction to LSA. Interactive Learning Environments, 8, 73-86.
23. Malone, L. D., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1992). Reading comprehension instruction: Summarization and self-monitoring training for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 58, 270-279.
24. Mannes, S. M., & Kintsch, W. (1987). Knowledge organization and text organization. Cognition and Instruction, 4, 91-115.
25. McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Kintsch, W., & Songer, N. B. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 1-43.
26. McNeil, J., & Donant, L. (1982). Summarization strategy for improving reading comprehension. In J. A. Niles & L. A. Harris (Eds.), New inquiries in reading research and instruction (pp. 215-219). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
27. Moore, S. R. (1995). Focus on research questions for research into reading-writing relationships and text structure knowledge. Language Arts, 72, 598-606.
28. National Energy Education Development Project. (1999). Secondary energy fact sheet: Solar energy [Brochure]. Reston, VA: Author.
29. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 117-175.
30. Paris, S. G., Wasik, B. A., & Turner, J. C. (1991). The development of strategic readers. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 609-640). New York: Longman.
31. Reis, R., & Leone, P. E. (1987). Teaching reading and study skills to mildly handicapped learners. The Pointer, 31, 41-43.
32. Rinehart, S. D., Stahl, S. A., & Erickson, L. G. (1986). Some effects of summarization training on reading and studying. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 422-437.
33. Ross, S. M., & DiVesta, F. J. (1976). Oral summary as a review strategy for enhancing recall of textual material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 689-695.
34. Taylor, B. M. (1982). Text structure and children's comprehension and memory for expository material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 323-340.
35. Taylor, B. M., & Beach, R. W. (1984). The effect of text structure instruction on middle-grade students' comprehension and production of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 132-146.
36. Tierney, R. J., & Shanahan, T. (1991). Research on the reading-writing relationship: Interactions, transactions, and outcomes. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 246-280). New York: Longman.
37. Uttero, D. A. (1988). Activating comprehension through cooperative learning. The Reading Teacher, 41, 390-395.
38. van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
39. Weisberg, R., & Balajthy, E. (1990). Development of disabled readers' metacomprehension ability through summarization training using expository text: Results of three studies. Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities, 6, 117-136.
40. Winograd, P. N. (1984). Strategic difficulties in summarizing texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 404-425.
41. Wolfe, M. B. W., & Goldman, S. R. (2003). Use of latent semantic analysis for predicting psychological phenomena: Two issues and proposed solutions. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 35, 22-31.
42. Wolfe, M. B., Schreiner, M. E., Rehder, B., Laham, D., Foltz, P. W., Kintsch, W., et al. (1998). Learning from text: Matching readers and texts by latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 309-336.