The proteasome and its regulatory roles in gene expression

Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms

Volumn 1809, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 88-96

  Kwak, Jaechan ^a   Workman, Jerry L ^b   Lee, Daeyoup ^a  

^a Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

^b STOWERS INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

19S regulatory particle; 26S proteasome; Chaperone activity; Histone modification; Transcriptional regulation; Ubiquitin

Indexed keywords

26S PROTEASOME; MESSENGER RNA; PROTEASOME; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

COMPLEX FORMATION; GENE EXPRESSION; HISTONE MODIFICATION; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMOTER REGION; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION;

ANIMALS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HUMANS; PROTEASOME ENDOPEPTIDASE COMPLEX; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

EID: 79151480945     PISSN: 18749399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2010.08.001     Document Type: Review

References (144)

1. Hershko A., Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin system. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1998, 67:425-479.
2. Ravid T., Hochstrasser M. Diversity of degradation signals in the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9:679-690.
3. Goldberg A.L. Protein degradation and protection against misfolded or damaged proteins. Nature 2003, 426:895-899.
4. Glickman M.H., Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway: destruction for the sake of construction. Physiol. Rev. 2002, 82:373-428.
5. Ventii K.H., Wilkinson K.D. Protein partners of deubiquitinating enzymes. Biochem. J. 2008, 414:161-175.
6. Varshavsky A. Regulated protein degradation. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2005, 30:283-286.
7. Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin proteolytic system: from a vague idea, through basic mechanisms, and onto human diseases and drug targeting. Neurology 2006, 66:S7-S19.
8. Tai H.C., Schuman E.M. Ubiquitin, the proteasome and protein degradation in neuronal function and dysfunction. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2008, 9:826-838.
9. Pickart C.M., Eddins M.J. Ubiquitin: structures, functions, mechanisms. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2004, 1695:55-72.
10. Swaffield J.C., Bromberg J.F., Johnston S.A. Alterations in a yeast protein resembling HIV Tat-binding protein relieve requirement for an acidic activation domain in GAL4. Nature 1992, 357:698-700.
11. Rubin D.M., Coux O., Wefes I., Hengartner C., Young R.A., Goldberg A.L., Finley D. Identification of the gal4 suppressor Sug1 as a subunit of the yeast 26S proteasome. Nature 1996, 379:655-657.
12. St-Arnaud R. Dual functions for transcriptional regulators: myth or reality?. J. Cell. Biochem. Suppl. 1999, 32-33:32-40.
13. Kodadek T. No Splicing, no dicing: non-proteolytic roles of the ubiquitin-proteasome system in transcription. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285:2221-2226.
14. Lipford J.R., Deshaies R.J. Diverse roles for ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis in transcriptional activation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2003, 5:845-850.
15. Muratani M., Tansey W.P. How the ubiquitin-proteasome system controls transcription. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003, 4:192-201.
16. Groll M., Ditzel L., Lowe J., Stock D., Bochtler M., Bartunik H.D., Huber R. Structure of 20S proteasome from yeast at 2.4 A resolution. Nature 1997, 386:463-471.
17. Kisselev A.F., Callard A., Goldberg A.L. Importance of the different proteolytic sites of the proteasome and the efficacy of inhibitors varies with the protein substrate. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281:8582-8590.
18. Groll M., Bajorek M., Kohler A., Moroder L., Rubin D.M., Huber R., Glickman M.H., Finley D. A gated channel into the proteasome core particle. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2000, 7:1062-1067.
19. Glickman M.H., Rubin D.M., Coux O., Wefes I., Pfeifer G., Cjeka Z., Baumeister W., Fried V.A., Finley D. A subcomplex of the proteasome regulatory particle required for ubiquitin-conjugate degradation and related to the COP9-signalosome and eIF3. Cell 1998, 94:615-623.
20. Braun B.C., Glickman M., Kraft R., Dahlmann B., Kloetzel P.M., Finley D., Schmidt M. The base of the proteasome regulatory particle exhibits chaperone-like activity. Nat. Cell Biol. 1999, 1:221-226.
21. Liu C.W., Millen L., Roman T.B., Xiong H., Gilbert H.F., Noiva R., DeMartino G.N., Thomas P.J. Conformational remodeling of proteasomal substrates by PA700, the 19S regulatory complex of the 26S proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277:26815-26820.
22. Smith D.M., Chang S.C., Park S., Finley D., Cheng Y., Goldberg A.L. Docking of the proteasomal ATPases' carboxyl termini in the 20S proteasome's alpha ring opens the gate for substrate entry. Mol. Cell 2007, 27:731-744.
23. Rubin D.M., Glickman M.H., Larsen C.N., Dhruvakumar S., Finley D. Active site mutants in the six regulatory particle ATPases reveal multiple roles for ATP in the proteasome. EMBO J. 1998, 17:4909-4919.
24. Kohler A., Cascio P., Leggett D.S., Woo K.M., Goldberg A.L., Finley D. The axial channel of the proteasome core particle is gated by the Rpt2 ATPase and controls both substrate entry and product release. Mol. Cell 2001, 7:1143-1152.
25. Lam Y.A., Lawson T.G., Velayutham M., Zweier J.L., Pickart C.M. A proteasomal ATPase subunit recognizes the polyubiquitin degradation signal. Nature 2002, 416:763-767.
26. Archer C.T., Burdine L., Liu B., Ferdous A., Johnston S.A., Kodadek T. Physical and functional interactions of monoubiquitylated transactivators with the proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283:21789-21798.
27. Gonzalez F., Delahodde A., Kodadek T., Johnston S.A. Recruitment of a 19S proteasome subcomplex to an activated promoter. Science 2002, 296:548-550.
28. Verma R., Oania R., Graumann J., Deshaies R.J. Multiubiquitin chain receptors define a layer of substrate selectivity in the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Cell 2004, 118:99-110.
29. Elsasser S., Chandler-Militello D., Muller B., Hanna J., Finley D. Rad23 and Rpn10 serve as alternative ubiquitin receptors for the proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:26817-26822.
30. Isasa M., Katz E., Kim W., Yugo V., Gonzalez S., Kirkpatrick D., Thomson T., Finley D., Gygi S., Crosas B. Monoubiquitination of RPN10 regulates substrate recruitment to the proteasome. Mol. Cell 2010, 38:733-745.
31. Elsasser S., Gali R.R., Schwickart M., Larsen C.N., Leggett D.S., Muller B., Feng M.T., Tubing F., Dittmar G.A., Finley D. Proteasome subunit Rpn1 binds ubiquitin-like protein domains. Nat. Cell Biol. 2002, 4:725-730.
32. Crosas B., Hanna J., Kirkpatrick D.S., Zhang D.P., Tone Y., Hathaway N.A., Buecker C., Leggett D.S., Schmidt M., King R.W., Gygi S.P., Finley D. Ubiquitin chains are remodeled at the proteasome by opposing ubiquitin ligase and deubiquitinating activities. Cell 2006, 127:1401-1413.
33. Rosenzweig R., Osmulski P.A., Gaczynska M., Glickman M.H. The central unit within the 19S regulatory particle of the proteasome. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2008, 15:573-580.
34. Husnjak K., Elsasser S., Zhang N., Chen X., Randles L., Shi Y., Hofmann K., Walters K.J., Finley D., Dikic I. Proteasome subunit Rpn13 is a novel ubiquitin receptor. Nature 2008, 453:481-488.
35. Mazumdar T., Gorgun F., Sha Y., Tyryshkin A., Zeng S., Hartmann-Petersen R., J©argensen J., Hendil K., Eissa N. Regulation of NF-¥êB activity and inducible nitric oxide synthase by regulatory particle non-ATPase subunit 13 (Rpn13). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2010.
36. Chen X., Lee B., Finley D., Walters K. Structure of proteasome ubiquitin receptor hRpn13 and its activation by the scaffolding protein hRpn2. Mol. Cell 2010, 38:404-415.
37. Verma R., Aravind L., Oania R., McDonald W.H., Yates J.R., Koonin E.V., Deshaies R.J. Role of Rpn11 metalloprotease in deubiquitination and degradation by the 26S proteasome. Science 2002, 298:611-615.
38. Schwarz T., Sohn C., Kaiser B., Jensen E., Mansky K. The 19S proteasomal lid subunit POH1 enhances the transcriptional activation by Mitf in osteoclasts. J. Cell. Biochem. 2010, 109:967-974.
39. Sone T., Saeki Y., Toh-e A., Yokosawa H. Sem1p is a novel subunit of the 26S proteasome from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:28807-28816.
40. Faza M.B., Kemmler S., Jimeno S., Gonzalez-Aguilera C., Aguilera A., Hurt E., Panse V.G. Sem1 is a functional component of the nuclear pore complex-associated messenger RNA export machinery. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 184:833-846.
41. Fleming J.A., Lightcap E.S., Sadis S., Thoroddsen V., Bulawa C.E., Blackman R.K. Complementary whole-genome technologies reveal the cellular response to proteasome inhibition by PS-341. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99:1461-1466.
42. Dembla-Rajpal N., Seipelt R., Wang Q., Rymond B.C. Proteasome inhibition alters the transcription of multiple yeast genes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2004, 1680:34-45.
43. Sikder D., Johnston S.A., Kodadek T. Widespread, but non-identical, association of proteasomal 19 and 20S proteins with yeast chromatin. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281:27346-27355.
44. Liu C., Yuan S., Li K. Patterns of co-expression for protein complexes by size in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37:526.
45. Tansey W.P. Death, destruction, and the proteasome. N Engl J. Med. 2004, 351:393-394.
46. Goldberg A.L. Functions of the proteasome: from protein degradation and immune surveillance to cancer therapy. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2007, 35:12-17.
47. Demartino G.N., Gillette T.G. Proteasomes: machines for all reasons. Cell 2007, 129:659-662.
48. Hanna J., Finley D. A proteasome for all occasions. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581:2854-2861.
49. Tanaka K. The proteasome: overview of structure and functions. Proc. Jpn Acad. B Phys. Biol. Sci. 2009, 85:12-36.
50. Auld K.L., Brown C.R., Casolari J.M., Komili S., Silver P.A. Genomic association of the proteasome demonstrates overlapping gene regulatory activity with transcription factor substrates. Mol. Cell 2006, 21:861-871.
51. Fatyol K., Grummt I. Proteasomal ATPases are associated with rDNA: the ubiquitin proteasome system plays a direct role in RNA polymerase I transcription. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Gene Regulatory Mechanisms 2008, 1779:850-859.
52. Sulahian R., Sikder D., Johnston S.A., Kodadek T. The proteasomal ATPase complex is required for stress-induced transcription in yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34:1351-1357.
53. Satoh T., Ishizuka T., Yoshino S., Tomaru T., Nakajima Y., Shibusawa N., Hashimoto K., Yamada M., Mori M. Roles of proteasomal 19S regulatory particles in promoter loading of thyroid hormone receptor. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009, 386:697-702.
54. Bhaumik S.R., Malik S. Diverse regulatory mechanisms of eukaryotic transcriptional activation by the proteasome complex. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2008, 43:419-433.
55. Hoppe T., Matuschewski K., Rape M., Schlenker S., Ulrich H.D., Jentsch S. Activation of a membrane-bound transcription factor by regulated ubiquitin/proteasome-dependent processing. Cell 2000, 102:577-586.
56. Tian L., Matouschek A. Where to start and when to stop. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2006, 13:668-670.
57. Palombella V.J., Rando O.J., Goldberg A.L., Maniatis T. The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway is required for processing the NF-kappa B1 precursor protein and the activation of NF-kappa B. Cell 1994, 78:773-785.
58. Aza-Blanc P., Ramirez-Weber F.A., Laget M.P., Schwartz C., Kornberg T.B. Proteolysis that is inhibited by hedgehog targets Cubitus interruptus protein to the nucleus and converts it to a repressor. Cell 1997, 89:1043-1053.
59. Sasaki H., Nishizaki Y., Hui C., Nakafuku M., Kondoh H. Regulation of Gli2 and Gli3 activities by an amino-terminal repression domain: implication of Gli2 and Gli3 as primary mediators of Shh signaling. Development 1999, 126:3915-3924.
60. Chi Y., Huddleston M.J., Zhang X., Young R.A., Annan R.S., Carr S.A., Deshaies R.J. Negative regulation of Gcn4 and Msn2 transcription factors by Srb10 cyclin-dependent kinase. Genes Dev. 2001, 15:1078-1092.
61. Lipford J.R., Smith G.T., Chi Y., Deshaies R.J. A putative stimulatory role for activator turnover in gene expression. Nature 2005, 438:113-116.
62. Muratani M., Kung C., Shokat K.M., Tansey W.P. The F box protein Dsg1/Mdm30 is a transcriptional coactivator that stimulates Gal4 turnover and cotranscriptional mRNA processing. Cell 2005, 120:887-899.
63. Zhang N., Oliver S. The transcription activity of Gis1 is negatively modulated by proteasome-mediated limited proteolysis. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285:6465.
64. Alarid E.T. Lives and times of nuclear receptors. Mol. Endocrinol. 2006, 20:1972-1981.
65. Kinyamu H.K., Archer T.K. Proteasome activity modulates chromatin modifications and RNA polymerase II phosphorylation to enhance glucocorticoid receptor-mediated transcription. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007, 27:4891-4904.
66. Kinyamu H.K., Jefferson W.N., Archer T.K. Intersection of nuclear receptors and the proteasome on the epigenetic landscape. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2008, 49:83-95.
67. Ferry C., Gianni M., Lalevee S., Bruck N., Plassat J.L., Raska I., Garattini E., Rochette-Egly C. SUG-1 plays proteolytic and non-proteolytic roles in the control of retinoic acid target genes via its interaction with SRC-3. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284:8127-8135.
68. Sanjo H., Zajonc D., Braden R., Norris P., Ware C. Allosteric regulation of the ubiquitin: NIK and ubiquitin: TRAF3 E3 ligases by the lymphotoxin-¥â receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285:17148.
69. Yao J., Munson K.M., Webb W.W., Lis J.T. Dynamics of heat shock factor association with native gene loci in living cells. Nature 2006, 442:1050-1053.
70. Nalley K., Johnston S.A., Kodadek T. Proteolytic turnover of the Gal4 transcription factor is not required for function in vivo. Nature 2006, 442:1054-1057.
71. Akerfelt M., Morimoto R.I., Sistonen L. Heat shock factors: integrators of cell stress, development and lifespan. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11:545-555.
72. Collins G.A., Lipford J.R., Deshaies R.J., Tansey W.P. Gal4 turnover and transcription activation. Nature 2009, 461:E7. discussion E8.
73. Gillette T.G., Gonzalez F., Delahodde A., Johnston S.A., Kodadek T. Physical and functional association of RNA polymerase II and the proteasome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101:5904-5909.
74. Collins G.A., Tansey W.P. The proteasome: a utility tool for transcription?. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2006, 16:197-202.
75. Schmid H.P., Akhayat O., Martins De Sa C., Puvion F., Koehler K., Scherrer K. The prosome: an ubiquitous morphologically distinct RNP particle associated with repressed mRNPs and containing specific ScRNA and a characteristic set of proteins. EMBO J. 1984, 3:29-34.
76. Kloetzel P.M., Falkenburg P.E., Hossl P., Glatzer K.H. The 19S ring-type particles of Drosophila. Cytological and biochemical analysis of their intracellular association and distribution. Exp Cell Res 1987, 170:204-213.
77. Arrigo A.P., Tanaka K., Goldberg A.L., Welch W.J. Identity of the 19S 'prosome' particle with the large multifunctional protease complex of mammalian cells (the proteasome). Nature 1988, 331:192-194.
78. Falkenburg P.E., Haass C., Kloetzel P.M., Niedel B., Kopp F., Kuehn L., Dahlmann B. Drosophila small cytoplasmic 19S ribonucleoprotein is homologous to the rat multicatalytic proteinase. Nature 1988, 331:190-192.
79. Ferdous A., Gonzalez F., Sun L., Kodadek T., Johnston S.A. The 19S regulatory particle of the proteasome is required for efficient transcription elongation by RNA polymerase II. Mol. Cell 2001, 7:981-991.
80. Ferdous A., Kodadek T., Johnston S.A. A nonproteolytic function of the 19S regulatory subunit of the 26S proteasome is required for efficient activated transcription by human RNA polymerase II. Biochemistry 2002, 41:12798-12805.
81. Archer C.T., Burdine L., Kodadek T. Identification of Gal4 activation domain-binding proteins in the 26S proteasome by periodate-triggered cross-linking. Mol. Biosyst. 2005, 1:366-372.
82. Archer C.T., Delahodde A., Gonzalez F., Johnston S.A., Kodadek T. Activation domain-dependent monoubiquitylation of Gal4 protein is essential for promoter binding in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283:12614-12623.
83. Patton E.E., Willems A.R., Sa D., Kuras L., Thomas D., Craig K.L., Tyers M. Cdc53 is a scaffold protein for multiple Cdc34/Skp1/F-box proteincomplexes that regulate cell division and methionine biosynthesis in yeast. Genes Dev. 1998, 12:692-705.
84. Kaiser P., Flick K., Wittenberg C., Reed S.I. Regulation of transcription by ubiquitination without proteolysis: Cdc34/SCF(Met30)-mediated inactivation of the transcription factor Met4. Cell 2000, 102:303-314.
85. Flick K., Ouni I., Wohlschlegel J.A., Capati C., McDonald W.H., Yates J.R., Kaiser P. Proteolysis-independent regulation of the transcription factor Met4 by a single Lys 48-linked ubiquitin chain. Nat. Cell Biol. 2004, 6:634-641.
86. Flick K., Raasi S., Zhang H., Yen J.L., Kaiser P. A ubiquitin-interacting motif protects polyubiquitinated Met4 from degradation by the 26S proteasome. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006, 8:509-515.
87. Lee D., Ezhkova E., Li B., Pattenden S.G., Tansey W.P., Workman J.L. The proteasome regulatory particle alters the SAGA coactivator to enhance its interactions with transcriptional activators. Cell 2005, 123:423-436.
88. Bhaumik S.R., Green M.R. SAGA is an essential in vivo target of the yeast acidic activator Gal4p. Genes Dev. 2001, 15:1935-1945.
89. Bhaumik S.R., Raha T., Aiello D.P., Green M.R. In vivo target of a transcriptional activator revealed by fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Genes Dev. 2004, 18:333-343.
90. Baker S.P., Grant P.A. The SAGA continues: expanding the cellular role of a transcriptional co-activator complex. Oncogene 2007, 26:5329-5340.
91. Cabal G.G., Genovesio A., Rodriguez-Navarro S., Zimmer C., Gadal O., Lesne A., Buc H., Feuerbach-Fournier F., Olivo-Marin J.C., Hurt E.C., Nehrbass U. SAGA interacting factors confine sub-diffusion of transcribed genes to the nuclear envelope. Nature 2006, 441:770-773.
92. Kurshakova M.M., Krasnov A.N., Kopytova D.V., Shidlovskii Y.V., Nikolenko J.V., Nabirochkina E.N., Spehner D., Schultz P., Tora L., Georgieva S.G. SAGA and a novel Drosophila export complex anchor efficient transcription and mRNA export to NPC. EMBO J. 2007, 26:4956-4965.
93. Kohler A., Schneider M., Cabal G.G., Nehrbass U., Hurt E. Yeast Ataxin-7 links histone deubiquitination with gene gating and mRNA export. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008, 10:707-715.
94. Malik S., Shukla A., Sen P., Bhaumik S.R. The 19S proteasome subcomplex establishes a specific protein interaction network at the promoter for stimulated transcriptional initiation in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284:35714-35724.
95. Wyce A., Xiao T., Whelan K.A., Kosman C., Walter W., Eick D., Hughes T.R., Krogan N.J., Strahl B.D., Berger S.L. H2B ubiquitylation acts as a barrier to Ctk1 nucleosomal recruitment prior to removal by Ubp8 within a SAGA-related complex. Mol. Cell 2007, 27:275-288.
96. Bhat K.P., Turner J.D., Myers S.E., Cape A.D., Ting J.P., Greer S.F. The 19S proteasome ATPase Sug1 plays a critical role in regulating MHC class II transcription. Mol. Immunol. 2008, 45:2214-2224.
97. Bhat K.P., Truax A.D., Greer S.F. Phosporylation and ubiquitination of degron proximal residues is essential for CIITA transactivation and MHC class II expression. J. Biol. Chem. 2010.
98. Ransom M., Williams S.K., Dechassa M.L., Das C., Linger J., Adkins M., Liu C., Bartholomew B., Tyler J.K. FACT and the proteasome promote promoter chromatin disassembly and transcriptional initiation. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284:23461-23471.
99. Orphanides G., LeRoy G., Chang C.H., Luse D.S., Reinberg D. FACT, a factor that facilitates transcript elongation through nucleosomes. Cell 1998, 92:105-116.
100. Belotserkovskaya R., Oh S., Bondarenko V.A., Orphanides G., Studitsky V.M., Reinberg D. FACT facilitates transcription-dependent nucleosome alteration. Science 2003, 301:1090-1093.
101. Xu Q., Singer R.A., Johnston G.C. Sug1 modulates yeast transcription activation by Cdc68. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1995, 15:6025-6035.
102. Russell S.J., Johnston S.A. Evidence that proteolysis of Gal4 cannot explain the transcriptional effects of proteasome ATPase mutations. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276:9825-9831.
103. Sun L., Johnston S.A., Kodadek T. Physical association of the APIS complex and general transcription factors. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2002, 296:991-999.
104. Ezhkova E., Tansey W.P. Proteasomal ATPases link ubiquitylation of histone H2B to methylation of histone H3. Mol. Cell 2004, 13:435-442.
105. Dover J., Schneider J., Tawiah-Boateng M., Wood A., Dean K., Johnston M., Shilatifard A. Methylation of histone H3 by COMPASS requires ubiquitination of histone H2B by Rad6. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277:28368.
106. Robzyk K., Recht J., Osley M.A. Rad6-dependent ubiquitination of histone H2B in yeast. Science 2000, 287:501-504.
107. Hwang W.W., Venkatasubrahmanyam S., Ianculescu A.G., Tong A., Boone C., Madhani H.D. A conserved RING finger protein required for histone H2B monoubiquitination and cell size control. Mol. Cell 2003, 11:261-266.
108. Xiao T., Kao C.F., Krogan N.J., Sun Z.W., Greenblatt J.F., Osley M.A., Strahl B.D. Histone H2B ubiquitylation is associated with elongating RNA polymerase II. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005, 25:637-651.
109. Laribee R.N., Shibata Y., Mersman D.P., Collins S.R., Kemmeren P., Roguev A., Weissman J.S., Briggs S.D., Krogan N.J., Strahl B.D. CCR4/NOT complex associates with the proteasome and regulates histone methylation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104:5836-5841.
110. Dover J., Schneider J., Tawiah-Boateng M.A., Wood A., Dean K., Johnston M., Shilatifard A. Methylation of histone H3 by COMPASS requires ubiquitination of histone H2B by Rad6. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277:28368-28371.
111. Lee J.S., Shukla A., Schneider J., Swanson S.K., Washburn M.P., Florens L., Bhaumik S.R., Shilatifard A. Histone crosstalk between H2B monoubiquitination and H3 methylation mediated by COMPASS. Cell 2007, 131:1084-1096.
112. Pavri R., Zhu B., Li G., Trojer P., Mandal S., Shilatifard A., Reinberg D. Histone H2B monoubiquitination functions cooperatively with FACT to regulate elongation by RNA polymerase II. Cell 2006, 125:703-717.
113. Daniel J.A., Torok M.S., Sun Z.W., Schieltz D., Allis C.D., Yates J.R., Grant P.A. Deubiquitination of histone H2B by a yeast acetyltransferase complex regulates transcription. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:1867-1871.
114. Gardner R.G., Nelson Z.W., Gottschling D.E. Ubp10/Dot4p regulates the persistence of ubiquitinated histone H2B: distinct roles in telomeric silencing and general chromatin. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005, 25:6123-6139.
115. Casolari J.M., Brown C.R., Drubin D.A., Rando O.J., Silver P.A. Developmentally induced changes in transcriptional program alter spatial organization across chromosomes. Genes Dev. 2005, 19:1188-1198.
116. Casolari J.M., Brown C.R., Komili S., West J., Hieronymus H., Silver P.A. Genome-wide localization of the nuclear transport machinery couples transcriptional status and nuclear organization. Cell 2004, 117:427-439.
117. Brickner J.H., Walter P. Gene recruitment of the activated INO1 locus to the nuclear membrane. PLoS Biol. 2004, 2:e342.
118. Menon B.B., Sarma N.J., Pasula S., Deminoff S.J., Willis K.A., Barbara K.E., Andrews B., Santangelo G.M. Reverse recruitment: the Nup84 nuclear pore subcomplex mediates Rap1/Gcr1/Gcr2 transcriptional activation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102:5749-5754.
119. Shukla A., Bhaumik S.R. H2B-K123 ubiquitination stimulates RNAPII elongation independent of H3-K4 methylation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007, 359:214-220.
120. Koues O.I., Dudley R.K., Mehta N.T., Greer S.F. The 19S proteasome positively regulates histone methylation at cytokine inducible genes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2009, 1789:691-701.
121. Koues O.I., Dudley R.K., Truax A.D., Gerhardt D., Bhat K.P., McNeal S., Greer S.F. Regulation of acetylation at the major histocompatibility complex class II proximal promoter by the 19S proteasomal ATPase Sug1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2008, 28:5837-5850.
122. Koues O.I., Mehta N.T., Truax A.D., Dudley R.K., Brooks J.K., Greer S.F. Roles for common MLL/COMPASS subunits and the 19S proteasome in regulating CIITA pIV and MHC class II gene expression and promoter methylation. Epigenetics Chromatin 2010, 3:5.
123. Elad N., Maimon T., Frenkiel-Krispin D., Lim R.Y., Medalia O. Structural analysis of the nuclear pore complex by integrated approaches. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2009, 19:226-232.
124. Brown C.R., Silver P.A. Transcriptional regulation at the nuclear pore complex. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2007, 17:100-106.
125. Akhtar A., Gasser S.M. The nuclear envelope and transcriptional control. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2007, 8:507-517.
126. Komili S., Silver P.A. Coupling and coordination in gene expression processes: a systems biology view. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2008, 9:38-48.
127. Wilmes G.M., Bergkessel M., Bandyopadhyay S., Shales M., Braberg H., Cagney G., Collins S.R., Whitworth G.B., Kress T.L., Weissman J.S., Ideker T., Guthrie C., Krogan N.J. A genetic interaction map of RNA-processing factors reveals links between Sem1/Dss1-containing complexes and mRNA export and splicing. Mol. Cell 2008, 32:735-746.
128. Thakurta A.G., Gopal G., Yoon J.H., Kozak L., Dhar R. Homolog of BRCA2-interacting Dss1p and Uap56p link Mlo3p and Rae1p for mRNA export in fission yeast. EMBO J. 2005, 24:2512-2523.
129. Mannen T., Andoh T., Tani T. Dss1 associating with the proteasome functions in selective nuclear mRNA export in yeast. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008, 365:664-671.
130. Funakoshi M., Li X., Velichutina I., Hochstrasser M., Kobayashi H. Sem1, the yeast ortholog of a human BRCA2-binding protein, is a component of the proteasome regulatory particle that enhances proteasome stability. J. Cell Sci. 2004, 117:6447-6454.
131. Krogan N.J., Lam M.H., Fillingham J., Keogh M.C., Gebbia M., Li J., Datta N., Cagney G., Buratowski S., Emili A., Greenblatt J.F. Proteasome involvement in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Mol. Cell 2004, 16:1027-1034.
132. Kohler A., Hurt E. Exporting RNA from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 8:761-773.
133. Strasser K., Masuda S., Mason P., Pfannstiel J., Oppizzi M., Rodriguez-Navarro S., Rondon A.G., Aguilera A., Struhl K., Reed R., Hurt E. TREX is a conserved complex coupling transcription with messenger RNA export. Nature 2002, 417:304-308.
134. Rodriguez-Navarro S., Fischer T., Luo M.J., Antunez O., Brettschneider S., Lechner J., Perez-Ortin J.E., Reed R., Hurt E. Sus1, a functional component of the SAGA histone acetylase complex and the nuclear pore-associated mRNA export machinery. Cell 2004, 116:75-86.
135. Pascual-Garcia P., Govind C.K., Queralt E., Cuenca-Bono B., Llopis A., Chavez S., Hinnebusch A.G., Rodriguez-Navarro S. Sus1 is recruited to coding regions and functions during transcription elongation in association with SAGA and TREX2. Genes Dev. 2008, 22:2811-2822.
136. Rodriguez-Navarro S. Insights into SAGA function during gene expression. EMBO Rep. 2009, 10:843-850.
137. Qin S., Wang Q., Ray A., Wani G., Zhao Q., Bhaumik S.R., Wani A.A. Sem1p and Ubp6p orchestrate telomeric silencing by modulating histone H2B ubiquitination and H3 acetylation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37:1843-1853.
138. Matilla A., Gorbea C., Einum D.D., Townsend J., Michalik A., van Broeckhoven C., Jensen C.C., Murphy K.J., Ptacek L.J., Fu Y.H. Association of ataxin-7 with the proteasome subunit S4 of the 19S regulatory complex. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2001, 10:2821-2831.
139. Nakamura Y., Umehara T., Tanaka A., Horikoshi M., Padmanabhan B., Yokoyama S. Structural basis for the recognition between the regulatory particles Nas6 and Rpt3 of the yeast 26S proteasome. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007, 359:503-509.
140. Hamazaki J., Iemura S., Natsume T., Yashiroda H., Tanaka K., Murata S. A novel proteasome interacting protein recruits the deubiquitinating enzyme UCH37 to 26S proteasomes. EMBO J. 2006, 25:4524-4536.
141. Lier S., Paululat A. The proteasome regulatory particle subunit Rpn6 is required for Drosophila development and interacts physically with signalosome subunit Alien/CSN2. Gene 2002, 298:109-119.
142. Gudmundsdottir K., Lord C.J., Ashworth A. The proteasome is involved in determining differential utilization of double-strand break repair pathways. Oncogene 2007, 26:7601-7606.
143. Tone Y., Tanahashi N., Tanaka K., Fujimuro M., Yokosawa H., Toh-e A. Nob1p, a new essential protein, associates with the 26S proteasome of growing Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells. Gene 2000, 243:37-45.
144. Collins S.R., Kemmeren P., Zhao X.C., Greenblatt J.F., Spencer F., Holstege F.C., Weissman J.S., Krogan N.J. Toward a comprehensive atlas of the physical interactome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2007, 6:439-450.