Primary and secondary teachers' conceptions of assessment: A qualitative study

Teaching and Teacher Education

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 472-482

  Remesal, Ana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Assessment function; Compulsory education; Conception; Learning assessment; Teacher belief

Indexed keywords

EID: 78651357956     PISSN: 0742051X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2010.09.017     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Aguirre J., Speer N.M. Examining the relationship between beliefs and goals in teacher practice. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 2000, 18(3):327-356.
2. Barnes M., Clarke D.J., Stephens M. Assessment: the engine of systemic curricular reform?. Journal of Curricular Studies 2000, 32(5):623-650.
3. Basit T. Manual or electronic? The role of coding in qualitative data analysis. Educational Research 2003, 45(2):143-154.
4. Black P., Wiliam D. Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education 1998, 5(1):7-74.
5. Black P., Wiliam D. Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational assessment. Evaluation and Accountability 2009, 21:5-31.
6. Bos W., Tarnai C. Content analysis in empirical social research. International Journal of Educational Research 1999, 31(8):659-671.
7. Brown, G. T. L. (2002). Teachers' conceptions of assessment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Auckland, Auckland.
8. Brown, G. T. L. (2007). Teachers' conceptions of assessment: comparing measurement models for primary & secondary teachers in New Zealand. In: Refereed paper presented to the New Zealand Association for Research in Education (NZARE) annual conference, Christchurch, NZ.
9. Brown G.T.L., Lake R., Matters G. Assessment policy and practice effects on New Zealand and Queensland teachers' conceptions of teaching. Journal of Education for Teaching 2009, 35(1):61-75. 10.1080/02607470802587152.
10. Brown, G. T. L., & Remesal, A. (submitted for publication). Prospective teachers' conceptions of assessment: a cross-cultural comparison. The Spanish Journal of Psychology.
11. Calderhead J. Teachers: beliefs and knowledge. Handbook of educational psychology 1996, 709-725. Simon & Schuster Macmillan, New York. D.C. Berliner, R.C. Calfee (Eds.).
12. Chang, Ch.- W. (2006). Teachers' beliefs towards oral language assessment in Taiwan collegiate EFL classrooms. In: Paper presented at the 2006 international conference on English instruction and assessment, Taiwan.
13. Clark C.M., Peterson P. Teachers' thought processes. Handbook of research on teaching 1986, 255-296. Macmillan, New York. M.C. EnWittrock (Ed.).
14. Clarke D.J. Assessment. International handbook of mathematics education 1996, 327-370. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. A.J. Bishop (Ed.).
15. Coll C., Barberà E., Onrubia J. La atención a la diversidad en las prácticas de evaluación. Infancia y Aprendizaje 2000, 90:111-132.
16. Coll C., Martín E. La evaluación de los aprendizajes: una perspectiva de conjunto. Signos. Teoría y práctica de la educación 1996, 18:64-77.
17. Coll C., Remesal A. Concepciones del profesorado de matemáticas acerca de las funciones de la evaluación del aprendizaje en la educación obligatoria. Infancia y Aprendizaje 2009, 32(3):391-404.
18. Cooney T.J. Considering the paradoxes, perils and purposes of conceptualizing teacher development. Making sense of mathematics teacher education 2001, 9-31. Kluer Academic Press, Dordrecht. F.L. Lin, T.J. Cooney (Eds.).
19. Delanshere G., Jones J.H. Elementary teachers' beliefs about assessment in mathematics. A case of assessment paralysis. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision 1999, 14(3):216-240.
20. Denzin N.K., Lincoln Y.S. The sage handbook of qualitative research 2005, Sage, Thousand Oaks.
21. Duncan C.R., Noonan B. Factors affecting teachers' grading and assessment practices. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research 2007, 53(1):1-21.
22. Duncan C.R., Noonan B., Simon M., Tierney R., Forgette-Giroux R., Hachey K. Comparing grading practices between secondary mathematics teachers in Ontario and Saskatchewan Available from:, Accessed July 2010. http://www.mea.uottawa.ca/documents/CSSE-2009-RD.pdf.
23. Edelenbos P., Kubanek-German A. Teacher assessment: the concept of diagnostic competence. Language Testing 2004, 21(3):259-283.
24. Estepa J., Avila R.M., Ferreras M. Primary and secondary teachers' conceptions about heritage and heritage education: a comparative analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education 2008, 24(8):2095-2107.
25. Flick U. Qualitative Sozialforschung: Eine Einführung 2007, Rohwolt Tb.Verlag, Berlin.
26. Goodenough W.H. Evolution of the human capacity for beliefs. American Anthropologist 1990, 93:597-612.
27. Graham P. Classroom-based assessment: changing knowledge and practice through preservice teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education 2005, 21:607-621.
28. Green T.F. The activities of teaching 1971, McGraw-Hill, New York.
29. Griffiths, T., Gore, J., & Ladwig, J. (2006). Teachers' fundamental beliefs, commitment to reform and the quality of pedagogy. In: Paper prepared for presentation at Australian association for research in education annual conference, Adelaide, November 26-30, 2006.
30. Guskey T.R. How classroom assessments improve learning. Educational Leadership 2003, 60(5):6-11.
31. Harlen W. Teachers' summative practices and assessment for learning - tensions and synergies. The Curriculum Journal 2005, 16(2):207-223.
32. Harris L., Brown G.T.L. The complexity of teachers' conceptions of assessment: tensions between the needs of schools and students. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practices 2009, 16(3):365-381. 10.1080/09695940903319745.
33. Kvale S. InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing 1996, SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA.
34. Lally V.E., Scaife J.A. Towards a collaborative approach to teacher empowerment. British Educational Research Journal 1995, 21(3):323-338.
35. Leighton J.P., Gokiert R.J., Cor M.K., Hefferman C. Teacher beliefs about the cognitive diagnostic information of classroom- versus large-scale tests: implications for assessment literacy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policies & Practice 2010, 17(1):7-21.
36. Liu, X. (2008a). Measuring teachers' perceptions of grading practices: does school level make a difference? In: Proceedings of the Northeastern Educational Research Association (NERA) annual conference, Rocky Hill, Connecticut. http://digitalcommons.uconn.edu/nera_2008/4/.
37. Liu, X. (2008b). Assessing measurement invariance of the teachers' perceptions of grading practices scale across cultures. In: Proceedings of the Northeastern Educational Research Association (NERA) annual conference, Rocky Hill, Connecticut. http://digitalcommons.uconn.edu/nera_2008/3/.
38. Lukin L.E., Bandalos D.L., Eckhout T.J., Mickelson K. Facilitating the development of assessment literacy. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices 2005, 23(2):26-32.
39. Marshall B., Drummond M.J. How teachers engage with assessment for learning: lessons from the classroom. Research Papers in Education 2006, 21(2):133-149.
40. McMillan J.H. Fundamental assessment principles for teachers and school administrators. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation April 25th-27th, 2000, 7(8). Available from:, Accessed 10.05.10. http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp%3Fv%3D7%26n%3D8.
41. McMillan J.H. Secondary teachers' classroom assessment and grading practices. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 2001, 20(1):20-32.
42. McMillan J.H. Understanding and improving teachers' classroom assessment decision making: implications for theory and practice. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 2003, 22(4):34-43.
43. McMillan J.H., Myran S., Workman D. Elementary teachers' classroom assessment and grading practices. Journal of Educational Research 2002, 95(4):203-214.
44. McMillan, J. H., & Nash, S. (2000). Teacher classroom assessment and grading practices decision making. In: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the national council of measurement in education, New Orleans, LA.
45. McMunn N., McColskey W., Butler S. Building teacher capacity in classroom assessment to improve student learning. International Journal of Educational Policy, Research.Practice 2003, 4(4):25-48.
46. Nunziati G. Pour construire un dispositif d'évaluation formatrice. Cahiers Pédagogiques 1990, 280:47-64.
47. Ogan-Bekiroglu F. Assessing assessment: examination of pre-service physics teachers' attitudes towards assessment and factors affecting their attitudes. International Journal of Science Education 2009, 31(1):1-39.
48. O'Leary M. Towards an agenda for professional development in assessment. Journal of In-service Education 2008, 34(1):109-114.
49. Pajares M.F. Teachers' beliefs and educational research: cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research 1992, 62(3):307-332.
50. Perrenoud P. Évaluation formative et évaluation certificative: postures contradictoires ou complémentaires?. Formation Professionelle Suisse 2001, 4:25-33.
51. Philippou G., Christou C. Cypriot and Greek primary teachers' conceptions about mathematical assessment. Educational Research & Evaluation 1997, 3(2):140.
52. Pilcher J.K. The role of instructional assessment and teacher assessment practices. National Forum Teacher Education Journal 2001, 11(3):1-6.
53. Pope N., Green S.K., Johnson R.L., Mitchell M. Examining ethical dilemmas in classroom assessment. Teaching and Teacher Education 2009, 25:778-782.
54. Remesal, A. (2006). Los problemas en la evaluación del aprendizaje matemático en la educación obligatoria: perspectiva de profesores y alumnos. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Universidad de Barcelona.
55. Remesal A. Educational reform and primary and secondary teachers' conceptions of assessment: the Spanish instance. Building upon Black and Wiliam (2005). The Curriculum Journal 2007, 18(1):27-38.
56. Remesal, A. (2008). Student teachers' conceptions of assessment: first year conceptions. Paper presented at Northumbria-EARLI SIG-Assessment, August 27th-29th, Potsdam, Germany.
57. Remesal, A. (2009). Spanish student teachers' conceptions of assessment when starting their career. Symposium: Perceptions and conceptions of assessment in the classroom: Different national perspectives. 13th Conference of the European Association for Research in Learning and Instruction, Amsterdam, Holland.
58. Rico, L., & Gil, F. (1997). Teachers' beliefs and implicit theories about mathematics assessment. In: First Mediterranean conference of mathematics education and applications, Nicosia, Chipre (pp. 255-268).
59. Rochera Ma.J., Remesal A., Barberà E. El punto de vista del profesorado en educación primaria y educación secundaria obligatoria sobre las prácticas de evaluación del aprendizaje matemático: un análisis comparativo. Revista de Educación 2002, 327:249-265.
60. Sato K., Kleinsasser R.C. Beliefs, practices, and interactions of teachers in a Japanese high school English department. Teaching and Teacher Education 2004, 20:797-816.
61. Simon M., Tierney R., Forgette-Giroux R. Grading in a standards-based educational system: a secondary school teacher account Available from:, Accessed July 2010. http://www.mea.uottawa.ca/documents/CSSE08paperMSMay10-08.pdf.
62. Stiggins R.J. Revitalizing classroom assessment: the highest instructional priority. Phi Delta Kappan 1988, 69(5):363-368.
63. Stiggins R.J. Assessment literacy. Phi Delta Kappan 1991, 72(7):534-539.
64. Stiggins R.J. Evaluating classroom assessment training in teacher education programs. Educational Meassurement: Issues and Practice 1999, 18(1):23-27.
65. Stiggins R.J. New assessment beliefs for a new school mission. Phi Delta Kappan 2004, 86(1):22-27.
66. Stiggins R.J. The unfulfilled promise of classroom assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices 2005, 20(3):5-15.
67. Stiggins R.J. From formative assessment to assessment for learning: a path to success in standards-based schools. Phi Delta Kappan 2005, 85(4):324-328.
68. Stiggins R.J., Faires-Conklin N., Bridgeford N.J. Classroom assessment: a key to effective education. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 2005, 5(2):5-17.
69. Towndrow P.A., Tan A.-L., Yung B.H., Cohen L. Science teachers' professional development and changes in science assessment practices: what are the issues?. Research in Science Education 2010, 40:117-132. 10.1007/s11165-008-9103-z.
70. Vandeyar S., Killen R. Has curriculum in South Africa really changed assessment practices, and what promise does the revised National Curriculum Statement hold?. Perspectives in Education 2003, 21(1):119-134. http://hdl.handle.net/2263/5044.
71. Volante, L. (2007). Evaluating test-based accountability systems: an international perspective. In: Paper presented at the association for educational assessment - Europe, Stockholm, Sweden.
72. Volante L., Fazio J. Exploring teacher candidates' assessment literacy: implications for teacher education reform and professional development. Revue Canadienne de l'Éducation 2007, 30(3):749-770.
73. Wang J.R., Kao H.L., Lin S.W. Preservice teachers' initial conceptions about assessment of science learning: the coherence with their views of learning science. Teaching and Teacher Education 2009, 26(3):522-529.
74. Wang T.-H., Wang K.-H., Huang S.-C. Designing a web-based assessment environment for improving pre-service teacher assessment literacy. Computers & Education 2008, 51:448-462.
75. Wolf D., Bixby J., Glenn H., Gardner H. To use their minds well: investigation new forms of students' assessment. Review of Research in Education 1991, 17:31-74.
76. Xu Y., Liu Y. Teacher assessment knowledge and practice: a narrative inquiry of a Chinese college EFL teacher's experience. TESOL Quarterly 2009, 43(3):493-513.