Science teachers' professional development and changes in science practical assessment practices: What are the issues?

Research in Science Education

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 117-132

  Towndrow, Phillip A ^a   Tan, Aik Ling ^a   Yung, Benny H W ^b   Cohen, Libby ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Educational innovation; Educational policy implementation; Science practical assessment; Teachers' professional development

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955096593     PISSN: 0157244X     EISSN: 15731898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11165-008-9103-z     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Assessment Reform Group (2002). Assessment for learning: 10 principles. Research-based principles to guide classroom practice. Retrieved November 11, 2007, from http://arg. edu. cam. ac. uk/cIE. pdf.
2. Atkin, J. M., & Black, P. (2003). Inside science education reform: A history of curricular and policy change. New York: Teachers' College Press.
3. Baker, E. L. (2007). Principles for scaling up. In B. L. Schneider & S.-K. McDonald (Eds.), Scale-up in education: Ideas in principle vol. 1 (pp. 37-54). Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield.
4. Biggs, J. B. (1996). The assessment scene in Hong Kong. In J. Biggs (Ed.), Testing: To educate or to select? Education in Hong Kong at the crossroad (pp. 3-12). Hong Kong: Hong Kong Educational Publishing.
5. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Berkshire: Open University Press.
6. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principals. Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74.
7. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2003). 'In praise of educational research': Formative assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 29(5), 623-637.
8. Choi, C. C. (1999). Public examinations in Hong Kong. Assessment in Education, 6(3), 405-417. doi: 10. 1080/09695949992829.
9. Cohen, D. K., & Ball, D. L. (1999). Instruction, capacity, and improvement: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania, Graduate School of Education.
10. Cohen, D. K., & Ball, D. L. (2007). Educational innovation and the problem of scale. In B. L. Schneider & S.-K. McDonald (Eds.), Scale-up in education: Ideas in principle vol. 1 (pp. 19-36). Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield.
11. Cohen, D. K., Raudenbush, S. W., & Ball, D. L. (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 119-142. doi: 10. 3102/01623737025002119.
12. Cole, M. (1996). A multilevel methodology for cultural psychology. In Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline (pp. 286-325). Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
13. Davis, E. A., Petish, D., & Smithey, J. (2006). Challenges new science teachers' face. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 607-651. doi: 10. 3102/00346543076004607.
14. Dewey, J. (1998). Experience and education: The 60th anniversary edition. West Lafayette: Kappa Delta Pi.
15. Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, D. C.: National Academy Press.
16. Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Towards an activity-theoretical reconceptualisation. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133-156.
17. Fullan, M. G. (1991). The new meaning of educational change 2nd edn. London: Cassel Education.
18. Fullan, M. G. (2005). Leadership & sustainability: System thinkers in action. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.
19. Gott, R., & Duggan, S. (2002). Problems with assessment of performance in practical science: Which way now. Cambridge Journal of Education, 32, 184-200. doi: 10. 1080/03057640220147540.
20. Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2006). Sustainable leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2000). Mentoring in the new millennium. Theory into Practice, 39(1), 50-57. doi: 10. 1207/s15430421tip3901_8.
22. Harlen, W., & James, M. (1997). Assessment and learning: Differences and relationships between formative and summative assessment. Assessment in Education, 4, 365-379. doi: 10. 1080/0969594970040304.
23. Hayward, E. L. (2007). Curriculum, pedagogies and assessment in Scotland: The quest for social justice. 'Ah kent yir faither'. Assessment in Education, 14(2), 251-268. doi: 10. 1080/09695940701480178.
24. Hibbard, K. M. (2000). Performance-based learning and assessment in middle school science. New York: Eye on Education.
25. Hodkinson, H., & Hodkinson, P. (2005). Improving schoolteachers' workplace learning. Research Papers in Education, 20(2), 109-131. doi: 10. 1080/02671520500077921.
26. Honig, M. I. (2006). New directions in education policy implementation: Confronting complexity. New York: SUNY Press.
27. Kelly, P., & McDiarmid, G. W. (2002). Decentralisation of professional development: Teachers' decisions and dilemmas. Journal of In-service Education, 28, 409-425. doi: 10. 1080/13674580200200224.
28. Kennedy, A. (2005). Models of continuing professional development: A framework for analysis. Journal of In-service Education, 31(2), 235-250. doi: 10. 1080/13674580500200358.
29. Lam, P. K., Lam, E. Y. K., & Lee, C. Y. P. (2007). G. C. E. 'O' level biology matters: Practical book. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish Education.
30. Learning and Teaching Scotland (2007). What is an AifL School? Retrieved, March, 11, 2008, from http://www. ltscotland. org. uk/assess/images/aifl_triagram_tcm4-232905. pdf.
31. Lefstein, A. (2006). Changing teacher practice through the National Literacy Strategy: A micro-interactional perspective. Unpublished manuscript.
32. Loughran, J., & Gunstone, R. (1997). Professional development in residence: Developing reflection on science teaching and learning. Journal of Education for Teaching, 23(2), 159-178. doi: 10. 1080/02607479720105.
33. Luke, A., Freebody, P. R., Lau, S., & Gopinathan, S. (2005). Towards research-based innovation and reform: Singapore schooling in transition. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 25(1), 5-28. doi: 10. 1080/02188790500032467.
34. Mertler, C. A. (2005). Secondary teachers' assessment literacy: Does classroom experience make a difference. American Secondary Education, 33(2), 76-92.
35. North Central Regional Education Laboratory (NCREL) (2003). enGauge: 21st century skills for 21st century learners. Retrieved April 29, 2007, from http://www. ncrel. org/engauge/skills/skillsbrochure. pdf.
36. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2005). The definition and selection of key competencies: Executive summary. Retrieved January 22, 2008, from http://www. oecd. org/dataoecd/47/61/35070367. pdf.
37. Plake, B. S. (1993). Teacher assessment literacy: Teacher's competencies in the educational assessment students. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 6(1), 21-27.
38. Pong, W. Y., & Chow, J. C. S. (2002). On the pedagogy of examinations in Hong Kong. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 139-149. doi: 10. 1016/S0742-051X(01)00059-2.
39. Richardson, V., & Placier, P. (2001). Teacher change. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching 4th edn (pp. 905-947). Washington, D. C.: American Educational Research Association.
40. Rodrigues, S. (2005). A model of teacher professional development: The partnership in the primary science project. New York: Nova Science.
41. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.
42. Spillane, J. P. (1999). External reform initiatives and teachers' efforts to reconstruct their practice: The mediating role of teachers' zones of enactment. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(2), 143-175. doi: 10. 1080/002202799183205.
43. Stiggins, R. J. (1999). Assessment, student confidence, and school success. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(3), 191-198.
44. Stiggins, R. J. (2002). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment for learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(10), 758-765.
45. Straits Times (2004). Singapore tops the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Studies (TIMSS) 2003. Singapore: Straits Times.
46. Towndrow, P. A. (2008). Critical reflective practice as a pivot in transforming science education: A report of teacher-researcher collaborative interactions in response to assessment reforms. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 903-922. doi: 10. 1080/09500690701279014.
47. Towndrow, P. A., & Tan, A. L. (2006). Transforming science practical assessment practices in Singapore through innovative departmental planning. Singapore: Centre for Research in Pedagogy and Practice, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. (Unpublished paper).
48. Towndrow, P. A., Tan, A. L., Venthan, A. M., & Dorairaju, G. (2006). Designing tasks to teach SPA skills at lower secondary level in Singapore. Singapore: Centre for Research in Pedagogy and Practice, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. (Unpublished report).
49. Tunstall, P., & Gipps, C. (1996). Teacher feedback to young children in formative assessment: A typology. British Educational Research Journal, 22, 389-404. doi: 10. 1080/0141192960220402.
50. Wiggins, G. P. (1989). A true test: Toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 703-713.
51. Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2007). Schooling by design: Mission, action, and achievement. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
52. Yung, B. H. W. (2001). Three views of fairness in a school-based assessment scheme of practical work in biology. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 985-1005. doi: 10. 1080/09500690010017129.
53. Yung, B. H. W. (2006). Assessment reform in Science: Fairness and fear. Dordrecht: Springer.