After 7 years and 1000 citations: Comparative assessment of the DNA barcoding and the DNA taxonomy proposals for taxonomists and non-taxonomists

Mitochondrial DNA

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 206-226

  Teletchea, Fabrice ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

Author keywords

DNA barcoding; DNA taxonomy; Molecular identification

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; DNA BARCODING; MORPHOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPECIES IDENTIFICATION; STANDARD; STANDARDIZATION; TAXONOMY;

ANATOMY, COMPARATIVE; ANIMALS; CLASSIFICATION; DNA BARCODING, TAXONOMIC; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; REFERENCE STANDARDS;

EID: 78650604323     PISSN: 19401736     EISSN: 19401744     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/19401736.2010.532212     Document Type: Article

References (132)

1. Anderson S. 1974. Some suggested concepts for improving taxonomic dialogue. Syst Zool 23:58-70.
2. Aravind K, Ravikanth G, Uma Shaanker R, Chandrashekara K, Kumar ARV, Ganeshaiah KN. 2007. DNA barcoding: An exercise in futility or utility. Curr Sci 92:1213-1216.
3. Baker CS. 2008. A truer measure of the market: The molecular ecology of fisheries and wildlife trade. Mol Ecol 17:3985-3998.
4. Baker RH, Yu X, DeSalle R. 1998. Assessing the relative contribution of molecular and morphological characters in simultaneous analysis trees. Mol Phylogenet Evol 9:427-436.
5. Baker AJ, Tavares ES, Elbourne RF. 2009. Countering criticisms of single mitochondrial DNA gene barcoding in birds. Mol Ecol Resour 9:257-268.
6. Balakrishnan R. 2005. Species concepts, species boundaries and species identification: A view from the tropics. Syst Biol 54: 689-693.
7. Bartlett SE, Davidson WS. 1992. FINS (forensically informative nucleotide sequencing): A procedure for identifying the animal origin of biological specimens. Biotechniques 12:408-411.
8. Bauchot ML, Pras A. 1980. Guide des poissons marins d'Europe. Paris: Delachaux & Niestlé (in French).
9. Bely AE, Weisblat DA. 2006. Lessons from leeches: A call for DNA barcoding in the lab. Evol Dev 8:491-501.
10. Bickford D, Lohman DJ, Sodhi NS, Ng PKL, Meier R, Winker K, Ingram KK, Das I. 2007. Cryptic species as a window on diversity and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 22:148-155.
11. Birstein VJ, DeSalle R, Doukakis P, Hanner R, Ruban GI, Wong E. 2009. Testing taxonomic boundaries and the limit of DNA barcoding in the Siberian sturgeon, acipenser baerii. Mitochondrial DNA 20:110-118.
12. Blaxter M. 2004. The promise of a DNA taxonomy. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 359:669-679.
13. Blaxter M, Floyd R. 2003. Molecular taxonomics for biodiversity surveys: Already a reality. Trends Ecol Evol 18:268-269.
14. Borisenko AV, Sones JE, Hebert PDN. 2009. The front-end logistics of DNA barcoding: Challenges and prospects. Mol Ecol Resour 9:27-34.
15. Bowman DD. 2005. What's in a name? Trends Parasitol 21: 267-269.
16. BrökelandW, George KH. 2009. Editorial: Deep-sea taxonomy:-A contribution to our knowledge of biodiversity. Zootaxa 2096: 6-8.
17. Brummitt RK, Sosef MSM. 1998. Paraphyletic taxa are inherent in Linnaean classification-A reply to Freudenstein. Taxon 47: 411-412.
18. Chang C-H, Rougerie R, Chen J-H. 2009. Identifying earthworms through DNA barcodes: Pitfalls and promise. Pedobiologia 52: 171-180.
19. Cowan RS, Chase MW, Kress WJ, Savolainen V. 2006. 300,000 Species to identify: Problems, progress, and prospects in DNA barcoding of land plants. Taxon 55:611-616.
20. Crisci JV. 2006. One-dimensional systematist: Perils in a time of steady progress. Syst Bot 31:217-221.
21. Daniel H-M, HimmelreichU, Dedeurwaerdere T. 2006. Integrating different windows on reality: Socio-economic and institutional challenges for culture collections. Int Soc Sci J 58:369-380.
22. Dasmahapatra KK, Mallet J. 2006. Taxonomy: DNA barcodes: Recent successes and future prospects. Heredity 97:254-255.
23. Dayrat B. 2005. Towards integrative taxonomy. Biol J Linnean Soc 85:407-415.
24. de Carvalho MR, Bockmann FA, Amorim DS, Brandão CRF, de Vivo M, de Figueiredo JL, Britski HA, de Pinna MCC, Menezes NA, Marques FPL, Papavero N, Cancello EM, Crisci JV, McEachran JD, Schelly RC, Lundberg JG, Gill AC, Britz R, Wheeler QD, Stiassny MLJ, Parenti LR, Page LM, Wheeler WC, Faivovich J, Vari RP, Grande L, Humphries CJ, DeSalle R, Ebach MC, Nelson GJ. 2007. Taxonomic Impediment or impediment to taxonomy? A commentary on systematics and the cybertaxonomic-automation paradigm. Evol Biol 34:140-143.
25. de Carvalho MR, Bockmann FA, Amorim DS, Brandão CRF. 2008. Systematics must embrace comparative biology and evolution, not speed and automation. Evol Biol 35:150-157.
26. de Meeûs T, Durand P, Renaud F. 2003. Species concepts: What for? Trends Parasitol 19:425-427.
27. de Pinna MCC. 1999. Species concepts and phylogenetics. Rev Fish Biol Fish 9:353-373.
28. DeSalle R. 2006. Species discovery vs. species identification in DNA barcoding efforts: Response to Rubinoff. Conserv Biol 20: 1545-1547.
29. DeSalle R. 2007. Phenetic and DNA taxonomy: A comment on Waugh. BioEssays 29:1289-1290.
30. DeSalle R, Egan MG, Siddall M. 2005. The unholy trinity: Taxonomy, species delimitation and DNA barcoding. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360:1905-1916.
31. Ebach MC, Holdrege C. 2005a. More taxonomy, not DNA barcoding. BioScience 55:822-823.
32. Ebach MC, Holdrege C. 2005b. DNA barcoding is no substitute for taxonomy. Nature 434:697.
33. Ekrem T, Willassen E, Stur E. 2007. A comprehensive DNA sequence library is essential for identification with DNA barcodes. Mol Phylogenet Evol 43:530-542.
34. Erpenbeck D, Hooper JNA, Wörheide G. 2006. CO1 phylogenies in diploblasts and the "Barcoding of Life"-Are we sequencing a suboptimal partition? Mol Ecol Notes 6: 550-553.
35. Esselstyn JA. 2007. Should universal guidelines be applied to taxonomic research? Biol J Linnean Soc 90:761-764.
36. Fautin DG, Walting L. 1999. Review of textbooks of invertebrate zoology. Am Zool 30:818-824.
37. Fink WL, Wiley EO. 1979. Cladism defended. Nature 280:542.
38. Frézal L, Leblois R. 2008. Four years of DNA barcoding: Current advances and prospects. Infect Genet Evol 8:727-736.
39. Galtier N, Nabholz B, Glémin S, Hurst GDD. 2009. Mitochondrial DNA as a marker of molecular diversity: A reappraisal. Mol Ecol 18:4541-4550.
40. Gardiner BG, Janvier P, Patterson C, Forey PL, Greenwood PH, Miles RS, Jefferies RPS. 1979. The salmon, the lungfish and the cow: A reply. Nature 277:175-176.
41. Gaston KJ, O'Neill MA. 2004. Automated species identification: Why not? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 359:655-667.
42. Gee H. 1999. Search of deep time: Beyond the fossil record to a new history of life. New York: Free Press.
43. Glover AG, Sundberg P, Dahlgren TG. 2009. In Linnaeus' wake: 300 years of marine discovery. Zool Scr 38:1-6.
44. Golding GB, Hanner R, Hebert PDN. 2009. Preface. Mol Ecol Resour 9:4-6.
45. Hajibabaei M, Smith MA, Janzen DH, Rodriguez JJ, Whitfield JB, Hebert PDN. 2006. A minimalist barcode can identify a specimen whose DNA is degraded. Mol Ecol Notes 6: 959-964.
46. Hamilton A, Wheeler QD. 2008. Taxonomy and why history of science matters for science. Isis 99:331-340.
47. Hebert PDN, Gregory TR. 2005. The promise of DNA barcoding for taxonomy. Syst Biol 54:852-859.
48. Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, DeWaard JR. 2003a. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 270:313-321.
49. Hebert PDN, Ratnasingham S, DeWaard JR. 2003b. Barcoding animal life: Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 270: S96-S99.
50. Hollingsworth PM, Forrest LL, Spouge JL, Hajibabaei M, Ratnasingham S, van der Bank M, Chase MW, Cowan RS, Erickson DL, Fazekas AJ, Graham SW, James KE, Kim K-J, Kress WJ, Schneider H, Van Alphen Stahl J, Barrett SCH, Van Den Berg C, Bogarin D, Burgess KS, Cameron KM, Carine M, Chacón J, Clark A, Clarkson JJ, Conrad F, Devey DS, Ford CS, Hedderson TAJ, Hollingsworth ML, Husband BC, Kelly LJ, Kesanakurti PR, Jung SK, Kim Y-D, Lahaye R, Lee H-L, Long DG, Madriñán S, Maurin O, Meusnier I, Newmaster SG, Park C-W, Percy DM, Petersen G, Richardson JE, Salazar GA, Savolainen V, Seberg O, Wilkinson MJ, Yi D-K, Little DP. 2009. A DNA barcode for land plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:12794-12797.
51. Hubert N, Hanner R, Holm E, Mandrak NE, Taylor E, Burridge M, Watkinson D, Dumont P, Curry A, Bentzen P, Zhang J, April J, Bernatchez L. 2008. Identifying Canadian freshwater fishes through DNA barcodes. Plos One 3(6):e2490.
52. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754-755.
53. Irfanullah H, Md. 2006. Algal taxonomy in limnology: An example of the declining trend of taxonomic studies? Hydrobiologia 559: 1-9.
54. Isaac NJB, Mallet J, Mace GM. 2004. Taxonomic inflation: Its influence on macroecology and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 19:464-469.
55. Janvier P. 1979. Cladism defended. Nature 280:542.
56. Janzen DH. 2004. Now is the time. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 359:731-732.
57. Knudsen SW, Møller PR, Gravlund P. 2007. Phylogeny of the snailfishes (Teleostei: Liparidae) based on molecular and morphological data. Mol Phylogenet Evol 44:649-666.
58. Kochzius M, Nö lte M,Weber H, Silkenbeumer N, Hjö rleifsdottir S, Hreggvidsson GO, Marteinsson V, Kappel K, Planes S, Tinti F, Magoulas A, Garcia Vazquez E, Turan C, Hervet C, Campo Falgueras D, Antoniou A, Landi M, Blohm D. 2008. DNA microarrays for identifying fishes. Mar Biotechnol 10: 207-217.
59. Kress WJ, Erickson DL. 2008. DNA barcoding-A windfall for tropical biology? Biotropica 40:405-408.
60. Krishnankutty N, Chandrasekaran S. 2008. Linnaeus 300: Tips for tinkering morphological taxonomy. Curr Sci 94: 565-567.
61. La Salle J, Wheeler Q, Jackway P, Winterton S, Hobern D, Lovell D. 2009. Accelerating taxonomic discovery through automated character extraction. Zootaxa 2217:43-55.
62. Lewin R. 1999. Patterns in evolution: The new molecular view. New York: Scientific American Library.
63. Lewis PO. 2001. A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Syst Biol 50: 913-925.
64. Lipscomb D, Platnick N, Wheeler Q. 2003. The intellectual content of taxonomy: A comment on DNA taxonomy. Trends Ecol Evol 18:65-66.
65. Lockley AK, Bardsley RG. 2000. DNA-based methods for food authentication. Trends Food Sci Tech 11:67-77.
66. Lukhtanov VA. 2010. From Haeckel's phylogenetics and Hennig's cladistics to the method of maximum likelihood: Advantages and limitations of modern and traditional approaches to phylogeny reconstruction. Entomol Rev 90:299-310.
67. Mallet J, Willmott K. 2003. Taxonomy: Renaissance or Tower of Babel? Trends Ecol Evol 18:57-59.
68. Martens K, Segers H. 2005. Taxonomy and systematics in biodiversity research. Hydrobiologia 542:27-31.
69. Mayo SJ, Allkin R, Baker W, Blagoderov V, Brake I, Clark B, Govaerts R, Godfray C, Haigh A, Hand R, Harman K, Jackson M, Kilian N, Kirkup DW, Kitching I, Knapp S, Lewis GP, Malcolm P, Von Raab-Straube E, Roberts DM, Scoble M, Simpson DA, Smith C, Smith V, Villalba S, Walley L, Wilkin P. 2008. Alpha e-taxonomy: Responses from the systematics community to the biodiversity crisis. Kew Bull 63:1-16.
70. Mayr E. 1981. Biological classification: Toward a synthesis of opposing methodologies. Science 214:510-516.
71. Mayr E. 1982. The growth of biological thought. Diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
72. Mayr E, Bock WJ. 2002. Classifications and other ordering systems. J Zool Syst Evol Res 40:169-194.
73. Meier R. 2009. DNA sequences in taxonomy: Opportunity and challenges. In: Wheeler Q, editor. The new taxonomy. The Systematics Association Special Volume Series 76. New York: CRC Press. p 95-127.
74. Meier R, Zhang G, Ali F. 2008. The use of mean instead of smallest interspecific distances exaggerates the size of the "barcoding gap" and leads to misidentification. Syst Biol 57: 809-813.
75. Mitchell A. 2008. DNA barcoding demystified. Aust J Entomol 47: 169-173.
76. Morin J, Bertrand J, Cochard ML, Coppin F, Léauté JP, Lobry J, Mahé J-C, Poulard J-C, Rochet M-J, Schlaich I, Souplet A, Trenkel V, Vaz S, Verin Y. 2009. L'état des communautés exploitées au large des cô tes de France. Application d'indicateurs à l'évaluation de l'impact de la pêche. Bilan 2004-Edition 2009. Ifremer: HMMN (in French).
77. Moritz C, Cicero C. 2004. DNA Barcoding: Promise and pitfalls. PLoS Biol 2:1529-1531.
78. Nelson G. 1979. Cladistic analysis and synthesis: Principles and definitions with a historical note on Adanson's familles des plantes (1763-1764). Syst Zool 28:1-21.
79. Nelson JS. 1999. Editorial and introduction: The species concept in fish biology. Rev Fish Biol Fish 9:277-280.
80. Nilsson RH, Ryberg M, Kristiansson E, Abarenkov K, Larsson K-H, Kö ljalg U. 2006. Taxonomic reliability of DNA sequences in public sequences databases: A fungal perspective. PLoS One 1: e59.
81. Nylander JAA, Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP, Nieves-Aldrey JL. 2004. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of combined data. Syst Biol 53:47-67.
82. Packer L, Gibbs J, Sheffield C, Hanner R. 2009a. DNA barcoding and the mediocrity of morphology. Mol Ecol Resour 9:42-50.
83. Packer L, Grixti JC, Roughley RE, Hanner R. 2009b. The status of taxonomy in Canada and the impact of DNA barcoding. Can J Zool 87:1097-1110.
84. Panchen AL. 1979. The cladistic debate continued. Nature 280: 541.
85. Page RDM, Holmes EC. 1998. Molecular evolution: A phylogenetic approach. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
86. Pegg GG, Sinclair B, Briskey L, Aspden WJ. 2006. MtDNA barcode identification of fish larvae in the southern Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Sci Mar 70:7-12.
87. Polaszek A, Wilson EO. 2005. Sense and stability in animal names. Trends Ecol Evol 20:421-422.
88. Pretti VQ, Calcagnotto D, Toledo-Piza M, de Almeida-Toledo LF. 2009. Phylogeny of the neotropical genus Acestrorhynchus (Ostariophysi: Characiformes) based on nuclear and mitochondrial gene sequences and morphology: A total evidence approach. Mol Phylogenet Evol 52:312-320.
89. Quéro J-C, Vayne J-J. 1997. Les poissons de mer des pêches françaises. Paris: Delachaux & Niestlé (in French).
90. Quéro J-C, Porché P, Vayne J-J. 2003. Guide des poissons de l'Atlantique européen. Paris: Delachaux et Niestlé (in French).
91. Raczkowski JM, Wenzel JW. 2007. Biodiversity studies and their foundation in taxonomic scholarship. BioScience 57: 974-979.
92. Rainbow PS. 2009. Marine biological collections in the 21st century. Zool Scr 38:33-40.
93. Rasmussen RS, Morrissey MT. 2008. DNA-based methods for the identification of commercial fish and seafood species. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 7:280-295.
94. RubinoffD. 2006. Utility of mitochondrial DNAbarcodes in species conservation. Conserv Biol 20:1026-1033.
95. Rubinoff D, Cameron S, Will K. 2006. Are plant DNA barcodes a search for the Holy Grail? Trends Ecol Evol 21:1-2.
96. Schander C, Willassen E. 2005. What can biological barcoding do for marine biology. Mar Biol Res 1:79-83.
97. Schindel DE, Miller SE. 2005. DNA barcoding a useful tool for taxonomists. Nature 435:17.
98. Scotland RW, Olmstead RG, Bennett JR. 2003. Phylogeny reconstruction: The role of morphology. Syst Biol 52: 539-548.
99. Seberg O, Humphries CJ, Knapp S, Stevenson DW, Petersen G, Scharff N, Andersen NM. 2003. Shortcuts in systematics? A commentary on DNA-based taxonomy. Trends Ecol Evol 18: 63-65.
100. Shneyer VS. 2007. On the species-specificity of DNA: Fifty years later. Biochemistry 72:1377-1384.
101. Smith VS. 2005.DNAbarcoding: Perspectives from a "Partnerships for enhancing expertise in taxonomy" (PEET) debate. Syst Biol 54:841-844.
102. Smith PJ, McVeagh SM, Steinke D. 2008a. DNA barcoding for the identification of smoked fish products. J Fish Biol 72: 464-471.
103. Smith PJ, Steinke D, Mcveagh SM, Stewart AL, Struthers CD, Roberts CD. 2008b. Molecular analysis of Southern Ocean skates (Bathyraja) reveals a new species of Antarctic skate. J Fish Biol 73:1170-1182.
104. Strugnell JM, Lindgren AR. 2007. A barcode of life database for the Cephalopoda? Considerations and concerns. Rev Fish Biol Fish 17:337-344.
105. Summerbell RC, Levesque CA, Seifert KA, Bovers M, Fell JW, Diaz MR, Boekhout T, De Hoog GS, Stalpers J, Crous PW. 2005. Microcoding: The second step in DNA barcoding. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360:1897-1903.
106. Sweijd NA, Bowie RCK, Evans BS, Lopata AL. 2000. Molecular genetics and the management and conservation of marine organisms. Hydrobiologia 420:153-156.
107. Tassy P. 1986. Construction systématique et soumission au test: Une forme de connaissance objective. In: Tassy P, editor. L'ordre et la diversité du vivant. Paris: Fayard. p 83-89 (in French).
108. Tassy P. 1991. L'arbre à remonter le temps. Paris: Christian Bourgeois (in French).
109. Tautz D, Arctander P, Minelli A, Thomas RH, Vogler AP. 2003. A plea for DNA taxonomy. Trends Ecol Evol 18:70-74.
110. Teletchea F. 2005. Révision taxonomique des Gadidae et puce à ADN pour l'identification d'espèces: De l'intérêt de la systématique. Phd Thesis (in French). Available online at: http://www.cgmc.univ-lyon1.fr/cgmc-biblio-listetheses.php
111. Teletchea F. 2009. Molecular identification methods of fish species: Reassessment and possible applications. Rev Fish Biol Fish 19: 265-293.
112. Teletchea F, Maudet C, Hänni C. 2005. Food and forensic molecular identification: Update and challenges. Trends Biotechnol 23:359-366.
113. Teletchea F, Laudet V, Hanni C. 2006. Phylogeny of the Gadidae (sensu Svetovidov 1948) based on their morphology and two mitochondrial genes. Mol Phylogenet Evol 38: 189-199.
114. Teletchea F, Bernillon J, Duffraisse M, Laudet V, Hänni C. 2008. Molecular identification of vertebrate species by oligonucleotide microarray in food and forensic samples. J Appl Ecol 45: 967-975.
115. Turan C, Gunduz I, Gurlek M, Yaglioglu D, Erguden D. 2009. Systematics of scorpaeniformes species in the mediterranean sea inferred from mitochondrial 16S rDNA sequence and morphological data. Folia Biol 57:219-226.
116. Turner GF. 1999. What is a fish species. Rev Fish Biol Fish 9: 281-297.
117. Valentini A, Pompanon F, Taberlet P. 2009. DNA barcoding for ecologists. Trends Ecol Evol 24:110-117.
118. Vogler AP, Monaghan MT. 2007. Recent advances in DNA taxonomy. J Zool Syst Evol Res 45:1-10.
119. Ward RD, Costa FO, Holmes BH, Steinke D. 2008. DNA barcoding shared fish species from the North Atlantic and Australasia: Minimal divergence for most taxa but a likely two species for both Zeus faber (John dory) and Lepidopus caudatus (silver scabbardfish). Aquat Biol 3:71-78.
120. Ward RD, Hanner R, Hebert PDN. 2009. The campaign to DNA barcode all fishes, FISH-BOL. J Fish Biol 74: 329-356.
121. Warren AD, Ogawa JR, Brower AVZ. 2009. Revised classification of the family Hesperiidae (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea) based on combined molecular and morphological data. Syst Entomol 34: 467-523.
122. Waugh J. 2007. DNA barcoding in animal species: Progress, potential and pitfalls. BioEssays 29:188-197.
123. Wheeler Q. 2005. Losing the plot: DNA "barcodes" and taxonomy. Cladistics 21:405-407.
124. Wiens JJ. 2004. The role of morphological data in phylogeny reconstruction. Syst Biol 53:653-661.
125. Wiley EO, Siegel-Causey D, Brooks DR, Funk VA. 1991. The compleat cladist: A primer of phylogenetic procedures. University of Kansas Museum of Natural History Special Publication No. 19.
126. Will KW, Rubinoff D. 2004. Myth of the molecule: DNA barcodes for species cannot replace morphology for identification and classification. Cladistics 20:47-55.
127. Will KW, Mishler BD, Wheeler QD. 2005. The perils of DNA barcoding and the need for integrative taxonomy. Syst Biol 54: 844-851.
128. Willerslev E, Cooper E. 2005. Ancient DNA. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 272:3-16.
129. Winston JE. 1999. Describing species: Practical taxonomic procedures for biologists. New York: Columbia University Press.
130. Wong E, Hanner RH. 2008. DNA barcoding detects market substitution in North American seafood. Food Res Int 41: 828-837.
131. Zemlak TS, Ward RD, Connell AD, Holmes BH, Hebert PDN. 2009. DNA barcoding reveals overlooked marine fishes. Mol Ecol Resour 9:237-242.
132. Zhang X-L, Ge X-J, Liu J-Q, Yuan Y-M. 2006. Morphological, karyological and molecular delimitation of two gentians: Gentiana crassicaulis vs. G. tibetica (Gentianaceae). Acta Phytotaxon Sin 44:627-640.