Classifications and other ordering systems

Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 169-194

  Mayr, Ernst ^a,c   Bock, Walter J ^b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^c Columbia University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Cladification; Classification; Haeckelian Phylogeny; Hennig; Ordering systems

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION; PHYLOGENY; TAXONOMY;

DARWINIA; HAECKELIA;

EID: 0036936190     PISSN: 09475745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0469.2002.00211.x     Document Type: Article

References (107)

1. Ashlock, P. D., 1971: Monophyly and associated terms. Syst. Zool. 20, 63-69.
2. Avise, J. C.; Johns, G. C., 1999: Proposal for a standardized temporal scheme of biological classification for extant species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 96, 7358-7363.
3. Ax, D., 1984: Das Phylogenetische System. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer.
4. Barrett, M., Donoghue, M. J.; Sober, E., 1991: Against consensus. Syst. Zool. 40, 486-493.
5. Bather, F. A., 1927: Biological classification: past and future. Q. J. Geol. Soc. London 83, LXII-CIV.
6. Bock, W. J., 1964: Kinetics of the avian skull. J. Morph. 114, 1-42.
7. Bock, W. J., 1974: Philosophical foundations of classical evolutionary classification. Syst. Zool. 22, 375-392.
8. Bock, W. J., 1977a: Adaptation and the comparative method. In: Hecht, M. et al. (eds), Major Patterns in Vertebrate Evolution. NATO Advanced Study Institute, Ser. A, Vol. 14. New York: Plenum, pp. 57-82.
9. Bock, W. J., 1977b: Foundations and methods of evolutionary classification. In: Hecht, M. et al. (eds), Major Patterns in Vertebrate Evolution. NATO Advanced Study Institute, Ser. A, Vol. 14. New York: Plenum, pp. 851-895.
10. Bock, W. J., 1978: Comments on classification as historical narratives. Syst. Zool. 27, 362-364.
11. Bock, W. J., 1979: The synthetic explanation of macroevolutionary change - a reductionist approach. Bull. Carnegie Museum 13, 20-69.
12. Bock, W. J., 1981: Functional-adaptive analysis in evolutionary classification. Am. Zool. 21, 5-20.
13. Bock, W. J., 1986: Species concepts, speciation, and macroevolution. In: Iwatsuki, K.; Raven, P. H.: Bock, W. J. (eds), Modern Aspects of Species. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press, pp. 31-57.
14. Bock, W. J., 1988: The nature of explanations in morphology. Am. Zool. 28, 205-215.
15. Bock, W. J., 1989a: Principles of biological comparison. Acta Morphol. Neerl. Scand. 26, 17-32.
16. Bock, W. J., 1989b: The homology concept: its philosophical foundation and practical methodology. Zool. Beiträge, N.F. 32, 327-353.
17. Bock, W. J., 1992: Methodology in avian macrosystematics. Bull. Brit. Orn. Club 112 (Centenary Suppl.), 53-72.
18. Bock, W. J., 1999a: Cranial kinesis revisited. Zool. Anz. 238, 27-39.
19. Bock, W. J., 1999b: Avian cranial kinesis revisited. Acta Ornithol. 34, 115-122.
20. Bock, W. J., 2000a: Toward a new metaphysics: the need for an enlarged philosophy of biology. Biol. Philos. 15, 603-621.
21. Bock, W. J., 2000b: Explanations in a historical science. In: Peters, D. S.; Weingarten, M. (eds), Organisms, Genes, and Evolution. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, pp. 34-42.
22. Bock, W. J., 2002: The evolution of Avian Cranial Kinesis. In: Zhonghe Zhou; Fucheng Zhang (eds), Proceedings of the 5th Symposium of the Society of Avian Paleontology and Evolution, Beijing. Beijing: Science Press, pp. 191-201.
23. Bock, W. J.; von Wahlert, G., 1965: Adaptation and the form-function complex. Evolution 19, 269-299.
24. Boyd, R., 1991: Realism, antifoundationalism, and the enthusiasm for natural kind, Philos. Studies 61, 127-148.
25. Broadfield, A., 1946: The Philosophy of Classification. London: Grafton.
26. Brower, A. V. Z., 2000: Evolution is not a necessary assumption of cladistics. Cladistics 16, 143-154.
27. Brummitt, R. K., 1997: Taxonomy vs. cladonomy; a fundamental controversy in biological systematics. Taxon 46, 723-734.
28. Bynum, W. F., Browne, E. J.; Porter, R., 1981: Dictionary of the History of Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
29. Cavalier Smith, T., 1998: A revised six kingdom system of life. Biol. Rev. 73, 203-266.
30. Charig, A. J., 1982: Systematics in biology. In: Joysey, K. A.; Friday, A. E. (eds), Problems of Phylogenetic Reconstruction. The Systematics Association Special Volume No. 21, pp. 363-440.
31. Cohen, M. R.; Nagel, E., 1934: Applied Logic and the Scientific Method. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
32. Cronquist, A:, 1987: A botanical critique of cladism. Bot. Rev. 53, 152.
33. Darwin, C., 1851-53. A Monograph of the Sub-class Cirripedia, 2 Vols. London: Ray Society.
34. Darwin, C., 1857: The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, Vol. 7, p. 443.
35. Darwin, C., 1859: On the Origin of Species, 1st edn. London: John Murray. 1964 Facsimile reprint, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36. de Queiroz, K.; Gauthier, G. J., 1992: Phylogenetic taxonomy. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23, 449-480.
37. Duncan, T.; Stuessy, T. F. (eds) 1984: Cladistics. Perspectives on the Reconstruction of Evolutionary History. New York: Columbia University Press.
38. Eldredge, N.; Cracraft, J., 1980: Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary Process. Method and Theory in Comparative Biology. New York: Columbia University Press.
39. Flook, P. K., Klee, S., Rowell, C. H. F., 1999: Combined molecular phylogenetic analysis of the Orthoptera (Arthropoda, Insecta) and implications for their higher systematics. Syst. Biol. 48, 233-253.
40. Gans, C.; Pough, F. H. (eds) 1982: Biology of the Reptilia, New York: Academic Press.
41. Ghiselin, M. T., 1983: Mayr versus Darwin on paraphyletic taxa. Syst. Zool. 34, 460-462.
42. Grant, V., 2001a: Tests of the accuracy of cladograms in Gilia (Polemoniaceae) and some other angiosperm genera. Plant Systematics and Evolution 230, 89-96.
43. Grant, V., 2001b: A guide to understanding recent classifications of the family Polemiaceae. Lundella 4, 12-24.
44. Hacking, I., 1991: A tradition of natural kinds. Phil. Studies 61, 109-126.
45. Haeckel, E., 1866: Generelle Morphologie der Organismen. Berlin: Georg Reiner.
46. Hall, B. G., 2001: Phylogenetic Trees Made Easy. A How To Manual for Molecular Biologists. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
47. Hall, B. K. (ed.) 1994: Homology:The Hierarchical Basis of Comparative Biology. New York: Academic Press.
48. Haszprunar, G., 1998: Parsimony analysis as a specific kind of homology estimation and the implications for character weighing. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9, 333-339.
49. Hedberg, O., 1995: Cladistics in taxonomic botany master or servant? Taxon 43, 311.
50. Hempel, C. G., 1952: Fundamentals of concept formation in empirical science. Fundamentals of the Unity of Science, II 7, 193.
51. Hempel, C. G., 1962: Deductive-nomological vs. statistical explanation. In: Feigl, H.; Maxwell, G. (eds), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. III. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 98-169.
52. Hempel, C. G., 1965: Aspects of Scientific Explanation and other Essays. New York: Free Press.
53. Hennig, W., 1950: Grundzüge einer Theorie der Phylogenetischen Systematik. Berlin: Zentralverlag.
54. Hennig, W., 1966: Phylogenetic Systematics. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
55. Hillis, D. M.; Moritz, C. (eds) 1990: Molecular Systematics. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
56. Homberger, D. G., 2000: Similarities and differences: the distinctive approaches of systematics and comparative anatomy towards homology and analogy. In: Peters, D. S., and Weingarten, M. (eds), Organisms, Genes, and Evolution. Stuttgart: Steiner, pp. 53-72.
57. Huxley, T. H., 1867: On the animals which are most nearly intermediate between the birds and reptiles. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 2, 66-75.
58. Jevons, W. S., 1874: The Principles of Science. London: Macmillan.
59. Judd, W. S.; Campbell, C. S.; Kellogg, E. A.; Stevens, P. F., 1999: Plant Systematics. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
60. Kitching, I. J.; Forey, P. L.; Humphries, C. J.; Williams, D. M., 1998: Cladistics: the Theory and Practice of Parsimony Analysis, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
61. Knight, D. M., 1981: Ordering the World: a History of Classifying Man. London: Burrett Books.
62. Knox, E. B., 1998: The use of hierarchies as organizational models in systematics. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 63, 149.
63. Linnaeus, C., 1737: Critica Botanica. Lugduni Batavorum, XIV + 270 pp.
64. Linnaeus, C., 1758: Systema Naturae, ed. 10. Stockholm: Salvius.
65. Mahner, M.; Bunge, M., 1997: Foundations of Biophilosophy. Berlin: Springer.
66. Mayr, E., 1942: Systematics and the Origin of Species. New York: Columbia University Press.
67. Mayr, E., 1964: The new systematics. In: Leone, C. A. (ed.), Taxonomic Biochemistry and Serology. New York: Ronald Press, pp. 13-32.
68. Mayr, E., 1965: Numerical Phenetics and Taxonomic Theory. Syst. Zool. 14, 73-97.
69. Mayr, E., 1969: Principles of Systematic Zoology, 1st edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.
70. Mayr, E., 1982: The Growth of Biological Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
71. Mayr, E., 1985. Darwin's five theories of evolution. In: Kohn, D. (ed.), The Darwinian Heritage. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 755-762.
72. Mayr, E., 1995: Systems of ordering data. Biol. Philos., 10, 419-434.
73. Mayr, E., 1998: Two empires or three? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95, 9720-9723.
74. Mayr, E.; Ashlock, P. D., 1991: Principles of Systematic Zoology, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.
75. Mayr, E.; Bock, W. J., 1994: Provisional classifications vs. standard avian sequences: heuristics and communication in ornithology. Ibis 136, 12-18.
76. McKenna, M. L.; Bell, S. K., 1997: Classification of Mammals. New York: Columbia University Press.
77. Meyer, A., 1999: Homology and homoplasy: the retention of genetic programmes. Novartis Symposium 222. New York: John Wiley, pp. 141-157.
78. Mill, J. S., 1843: A system of logic. In: Robson, J. M. (ed.) 1963. The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
79. Nagel, E., 1961: The Structure of Science. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
80. Osche, G., 2002: Gerd von Wahlert and the German evolutionary biology from 1950 to 1970 - a companion's perspective. Bonner zool. Monogr. 50, 7-23.
81. Owen, R., 1843: Lectures on Comparative Anatomy and Physiology of the Invertebrate Animals delivered at the Royal College of Surgeons. London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans.
82. Padian, K., 1999: Charles Darwin's views of classification in theory and practice. Syst. Biol. 18, 352-364.
83. Prum, R. O., 1988: Phylogenetic interrelationships of the barbets (Ayes: Capitonidae) and toucans (Aves: Ramphastidae) based on morphology with comparisons to DNA-DNA hybridization. Zool. J. Linnean Soc. 92, 313-343.
84. Salvini-Plawen, L.; Mayr, E., 1977: On the evolution of photoreceptors and eyes. Evol. Biol. 10, 207-263.
85. Sanderson, M. J.; Hufford, L. (eds) 1996: Homoplasy. San Diego: Academic Press.
86. Scott-Ram, N. R., 1990: Transformed Cladistics, Taxonomy, and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
87. Short, L. L.; Horne, J. F. M., 2001: Toucans, Barbets and Honeyguides. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
88. Sibley, C. G.; Ahlquist, J. E., 1990: Phylogeny and Classification of Birds. New Haven: Yale University Press.
89. Sibley, C. G.; Monroe, B. L. Jr., 1990: Distribution and Taxonomy of Birds of the World. New Haven: Yale University Press.
90. Simonetta, A. M., 1999: Is parsimony a justified criterion in the assessment of possible phylogenetic reconstruction. Ital. J. Zool. 99, 159-169.
91. Simpson, G. G., 1945: The principles of classification and a classification of mammals. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 85, xvi + 350 pp.
92. Simpson, G. G., 1961: Principles of Animal Taxonomy. New York: Columbia University Press.
93. Smith, A. B.; Patterson, C., 1988: The influence of taxonomic method on the perception of patterns of evolution. Evol. Biol. 23, 127-216.
94. Sheath, P. H. A.; Sokal, R. R., 1973: Principles of Numerical Taxonomy. San Francisco: Freeman.
95. Stevens, P. E., 1994: The Development of Biological Systematics. New York: Columbia University Press.
96. Strickland, H. E., 1840a: On the true method of discovering the natural system in zoology and botany. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 6, 184-186.
97. Strickland, H. E., 1840b: Observations upon affinities and analogies of organized beings. Mag. Nat. Hist. 4, 219-226.
98. Strickland, H. E., 1846a: On the structural relations of organized beings. Phil. Mag. J. Sci., 28, 354-369.
99. Strickland, H. E., 1846b: On the use of the word homology in comparative anatomy. Phil. Mag. J. Sci. 29, 35.
100. Swofford, D. L.; Olsen, G. J., 1990: Phylogeny reconstruction. In: Hillis, D. M.; Moritz, C. (eds), Molecular Systematics. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
101. Throckmorton, L. H., 1963: Similarity versus relationship in Drosophila. Syst. Zool. 14, 221-236.
102. Throckmorton, L. H., 1969: Concordance and discordance of taxonomic characters in Drosophila classifications. Syst. Zool., 17, 355-387.
103. Warburton, F. E., 1967: The purpose of classifications. Syst. Zool. 16, 241-245.
104. Whewell, W., 1840: Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences. London: J.W. Parker.
105. Wiley, F. O., 1981: Phylogenetics. The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
106. Zardoya, R.; Meyer, A., 1998: Complete mitochondrial genome suggests diapsid affinities of turtles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95, 14226-14231.
107. Zardoya, R.; Meyer, A., 2001: The evolutionary position of turtles revised. Naturwissenschaften 88, 193-200.