The role of morphological data in phylogeny reconstruction

Systematic Biology

Volumn 53, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 653-661

  Wiens, John J ^a  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; FOSSIL; GENETICS; GENOMICS; PHYLOGENY; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; DNA; FOSSILS; GENOMICS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 4644371451     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635150490472959     Document Type: Review

References (79)

1. Baker, R. H., X. Yu, and R. DeSalle. 1998. Assessing the relative contribution of molecular and morphological characters in simultaneous analysis trees. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9:427-436.
2. Baum, D. A., and M. J. Donoghue. 1995. Choosing among alternative "phylogenetic" species concepts. Syst. Bot. 20:560-573.
3. Brusca, R. C., and G. J. Brusca. 1990. Invertebrates. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts.
4. Cracraft, J. 1988. The major clades of birds. Pages 333-355 in The phylogeny and classification of the tetrapods (M. J. Benton, ed.). Systematics Assoc. Special Vol. No. 35A, Clarendon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
5. Crane, P. R. 1985. Phylogenetic analysis of seed plants and the origin of angiosperms. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 72:716-793.
6. de Queiroz, K. 1987. Phylogenetic systematics of iguanine lizards. A comparative osteological study. Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 118:1-203.
7. de Queiroz, A., M. J. Donoghue, and J. Kim. 1995. Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26:657-681.
8. Donoghue, M. J., and W. S. Alverson. 2000. A new age of discovery. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 87:110-126.
9. Doyle, J. A. 1996. Seed plant phylogeny and the relationships of Gnetales. Int. J. Plant Sci. 157 (suppl.):S3-S39.
10. Doyle, J. A., and M. J. Donoghue. 1986. Seed plant phylogeny and the origin of angiosperms: an experimental cladistic approach. Bot. Rev. 52:321-431.
11. Doyle, J. J. 1992. Gene trees and species trees: Molecular systematics as one-character taxonomy. Syst. Bot. 17:144-163.
12. Duellman, W. E., and L. Trueb. 1986. Biology of amphibians. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
13. Estes, R., K. de Queiroz, and J. A. Gauthier. 1988. Phylogenetic relationships within Squamata. Pages 119-281 in Phylogenetic relationships of the lizard families (R. Estes and G. K. Pregill, eds.). Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.
14. Farris, J. S., M. Kallersjo, A. G. Kluge, and C. Bult. 1995. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10:315-319.
15. Felsenstein, J. 1978. Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27:401-410.
16. Felsenstein, J. 1988. Phylogenies and quantitative characters. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19:445-471.
17. Gaffney, E. S., and P. A. Meylan. 1988. A phylogeny of turtles. Pages 157-219 in The phylogeny and classification of the tetrapods, Vol. 1 (M. J. Benton, ed.). Clarendon Press, Oxford.
18. Gatesy, S. M., and K. P. Dial. 1996. Locomotor modules and the evolution of avian flight. Evolution 50:331-340.
19. Gauthier, J., A. G. Kluge, and T. Rowe. 1988. Amniote phylogeny and the importance of fossils. Cladistics 4:105-209.
20. Givnish, T. J., and K. J. Sytsma. 1997. Homoplasy in molecular and morphological data: The likelihood of correct phylogenetic inference. Pages 55-101 in Molecular evolution and adaptive radiation (T. J. Givnish and K. J. Sytsma, eds.). Cambridge University Press, New York.
21. Hillis, D. M., and J. J. Wiens. 2000. Molecules versus morphology in systematics: Conflicts, artifacts, and misconceptions. Pages 1-19 in Phylogenetic analysis of morphological data (J. J. Wiens, ed.). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
22. Hollingsworth, B. D. 1998. The systematics of chuckwallas (Sauromalus) with a phylogenetic analysis of other iguanid lizards. Herpetol. Monogr. 12:38-191.
23. Huelsenbeck, J. P. 1991. When are fossils better than extant taxa in phylogenetic analysis? Syst. Zool. 40:458-469.
24. Huelsenbeck, J. P. 1997. Is the Felsenstein Zone a fly trap? Syst. Biol. 46:69-74.
25. Huelsenbeck, J. P., J. J. Bull, and C. W. Cunningham. 1996. Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:152-158.
26. Jenner, R. A. 2004. Accepting partnership by submission? Morphological phylogenetics in a molecular millennium. Syst. Biol. 53:333-342.
27. Kristensen, N. P. 1981. Phylogeny of insect orders. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 26:135-157.
28. Kristensen, N. P. 1991. Phylogeny of extant hexapods. Pages 125-140 in The insects of Australia. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.
29. Lauder, G. V., and K. F. Liem. 1983. The evolution and interrelationships of actinopterygian fishes. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 150:95-197.
30. Lewis, P. O. 2001. A likelihood approach to inferring phylogeny from discrete morphological characters. Syst. Biol. 50:913-925.
31. Maddison, W. P. 1996. Molecular approaches and the growth of phylogenetic biology. Pages 47-63 in Molecular zoology: Advances, strategies, and protocols (J. D. Ferraris and S. R. Palumbi, eds.). Wiley-Liss, New York.
32. Maddison, W. P. 1997. Gene trees in species trees. Syst. Biol. 46:523-536.
33. May, R. M. 2000. The dimensions of life on earth. Pages 30-45 in Nature and human society: The quest for a sustainable world (P. R. Raven and T. Williams, eds.). National Academy of Sciences Press, Washington, DC.
34. Meyer, A. 1994. Shortcomings of the cytochrome b gene as a molecular marker. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9:278-280.
35. Meyer, A., and R. Zardoya. 2003. Recent advances in the (molecular) phylogeny of vertebrates. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34:311-338.
36. Mishler, B. D., and S. P. Churchill. 1985. Transition to a land flora: Phylogenetic relationships of the green algae and bryophytes. Cladistics 1:305-328.
37. Nixon, K. C., W. L. Crepet, D. Stevenson, and E. M. Friis. 1994. A reevaluation of seed plant phylogeny. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 81:484-533.
38. Novacek, M. J. 1986. The skull of lepticid insectivorans and the higher-level classification of eutherian mammals. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 183:1-112.
39. Novacek, M. J., and Q. D. Wheeler. 1992. Extinct taxa - accounting for 99.9990 ... % of the earth's biota. Pages 1-16 in Extinction and phylogeny (M. J. Novacek and Q. D. Wheeler, eds.). Columbia University Press, New York.
40. Petren, K., and T. J. Case. 1997. A phylogenetic analysis of body size evolution and biogeography in chuckwallas (Sauromalus) and other iguanines. Evolution 51:206-219.
41. Poe, S., and J. J. Wiens. 2000. Character selection and the methodology of morphological phylogenetics. Pages 20-36 in Phylogenetic analysis of morphological data. (J. J. Wiens, ed.). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
42. Rassmann, K. 1997. Evolutionary age of the Galapagos iguanas predates the age of the present Galapagos islands. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 7:158-172.
43. Reeder, T. W., and J. J. Wiens. 1996. Evolution of the lizard family Phrynosomatidae as inferred from diverse types of data. Herpetol. Mon. 10:43-84.
44. Rokas, A., B. L. Williams, N. King, and S. B. Carroll. 2003. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 425:798-804.
45. Rowe, T., J. Kappelman, W. D. Carlson, R. A. Ketcham, and C. Denison. 1997. High-resolution computed tomography: A breakthrough technology for Earth scientists. Geotimes 42:23-27.
46. Sanderson, M. J. 1997. A nonparametric approach to estimating divergence times in the absence of rate constancy. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:1218-1231.
47. Sanderson, M. J. 2002. Estimating absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times: A penalized likelihood approach. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:101-109.
48. Sanderson, M. J., and M. J. Donoghue. 1989. Patterns of variation in levels of homoplasy. Evolution 43:1781-1795.
49. Sanderson, M. J., and M. J. Donoghue. 1996. The relationship between homoplasy and confidence in a phylogenetic tree. Pages 67-89 in Homoplasy. The recurrence of similarity in evolution (M. J. Sanderson and L. Hufford, eds.). Academic Press, San Diego, California.
50. Shultz, J. W. 1990. Evolutionary morphology and phylogeny of Arachnida. Cladistics 6:1-38.
51. Scotland, R. W., R. G. Olmstead, and J. R. Bennett. 2003. Phylogeny reconstruction: The role of morphology. Syst. Biol. 52:539-548.
52. Sites, J. W., Jr., S. K. Davis, T. Guerra, J. B. Iverson, and H. L. Snell. 1996. Character congruence and phylogenetic signal in molecular and morphological data sets: A case study in the living iguanas (Squamata: Iguanidae). Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:1087-1105.
53. Stephens, P. R., and J. J. Wiens. 2003. Ecological diversification and phylogeny of emydid turtles. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 79:577-610.
54. Thiele, K. 1993. The holy grail of the perfect character: The cladistic treatment of morphometric data. Cladistics 9:275-304.
55. Thorne, J. L., and H. Kishino. 2002. Divergence time and evolutionary rate estimation with multilocus data. Syst. Biol. 51:689-702.
56. Trueb, L., and R. Cloutier. 1991. A phylogenetic investigation of the inter- and intrarelationships of the Lissamphibia (Amphibia: Temnospondyli). Pages 223-313 in Origins of the higher groups of tetrapods-Controversy and consensus (H.-P. Schultze and L. Trueb, eds.). Comstock Publishing Associates, Ithaca, New York.
57. Wiens, J. J. 1993a. Phylogenetic systematics of the tree lizards (genus Urosaurus). Herpetologica 49:399-420.
58. Wiens, J. J. 1993b. Phylogenetic relationships of phrynosomatid lizards and monophyly of the Sceloporus group. Copeia 1993:287-299.
59. Wiens, J. J. 1995. Polymorphic characters in phylogenetic systematics. Syst. Biol. 44:482-500.
60. Wiens, J. J. 1998a. Testing phylogenetic methods with tree-congruence: Phylogenetic analysis of polymorphic morphological characters in phrynosomatid lizards. Syst. Biol. 47:427-444.
61. Wiens, J. J. 1998b. The accuracy of methods for coding and sampling higher-level taxa for phylogenetic analysis: A simulation study. Syst. Biol. 47:381-397.
62. Wiens, J. J. 1998c. Does adding characters with missing data increase or decrease phylogenetic accuracy? Syst. Biol. 47:625-640.
63. Wiens, J. J. 1998d. Combining data sets with different phylogenetic histories. Syst. Biol. 47:568-581.
64. Wiens, J. J. 1999. Polymorphism in systematics and comparative biology. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30:327-362.
65. Wiens, J. J. 2000a. Preface. Pages ix-x in Phylogenetic analysis of morphological data (J. J. Wiens, ed.). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
66. Wiens, J. J. 2000b. Coding morphological variation for phylogenetic analysis: Polymorphism and interspecific variation in higher taxa. Pages 115-145 in Phylogenetic analysis of morphological data (J. J. Wiens, ed.). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
67. Wiens, J. J. 2001. Character analysis in morphological phylogenetics: Problems and solutions. Syst. Biol. 50:688-699.
68. Wiens, J. J. 2003a. Incomplete taxa, incomplete characters, and phylogenetic accuracy: What is the missing data problem? J. Vert. Paleontol. 23:297-310.
69. Wiens, J. J. 2003b. Missing data, incomplete taxa, and phylogenetic accuracy. Syst. Biol. 52:528-538.
70. Wiens, J. J., P. T. Chippindale, and D. M. Hillis. 2003. When are phylogenetic analyses misled by convergence? A case study in Texas cave salamanders. Syst. Biol. 52:501-514.
71. Wiens, J. J., and R. E. Etheridge. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships of hoplocercid lizards: Coding and combining meristic, morphometric, and polymorphic data using step matrices. Herpetologica 59:375-398.
72. Wiens, J. J., and B. D. Hollingsworth. 2000. War of the iguanas: Conflicting molecular and morphological phylogenies and long-branch attraction in iguanid lizards. Syst. Biol. 49:143-159.
73. Wiens, J. J., and T. L. Penkrot. 2002. Delimiting species based on DNA and morphological variation and discordant species limits in spiny lizards (Sceloporus). Syst. Biol. 51:69-91.
74. Wiens, J. J., and T. W. Reeder. 1997. Phylogeny of the spiny lizards (Sceloporus) based on molecular and morphological evidence. Herpetol. Mon. 11:1-101.
75. Wiens, J. J., and M. R. Servedio. 1997. Accuracy of phylogenetic analysis including and excluding polymorphic characters. Syst. Biol. 46:332-345.
76. Wiens, J. J., and M. R. Servedio. 1998. Phylogenetic analysis and intraspecific variation: Performance of parsimony, likelihood, and distance methods. Syst. Biol. 47:228-253.
77. Wiley, E. O. 1981. Phylogenetics. The theory and practice of phylogenetic systematics. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
78. Wilson, E. O. 1992. The diversity of life. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
79. Yoder, A. D., and Z. Yang. 2000. Estimation of primate speciation dates using local molecular clocks. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17:1081-1090.