Towards integrative taxonomy

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 85, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 407-415

  Dayrat, Benoît ^a,b  

^a CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Character variation; DNA barcoding; Ecology; Morphodiversity; Phylogenetics; Phylogeography; Population biology; Species delineation; Systematics

Indexed keywords

TAXONOMY;

EID: 22044434823     PISSN: 00244066     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00503.x     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Avise JC. 2000. Phylogeography: the history and formation of species. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
2. Avise JC, Ball M. 1990. Principles of genealogical concordance in species concepts and biological taxonomy. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 7: 45-67.
3. Baker AM, Bartlett C, Bunn SE, Goudkamp K, Sheldon F, Hughes JM. 2003a. Cryptic species and morphological plasticity in long-lived bivalves (Unionoida: Hyriidae) from inland Australia. Molecular Ecology 12: 2707-2717.
4. Baker CS, Dalebout ML, Lavery S, Ross HA. 2003b. www. DNA-surveillance: applied molecular taxonomy for species conservation and discovery. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 271-272.
5. Blaxter ML. 2004. The promise of DNA taxonomy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 359: 669-679.
6. Boisselier-Dubayle M-C, Gofas S. 1999. Genetic relationships between marine and marginal-marine populations of Cerithium species from the Mediterranean Sea. Marine Biology 135: 671-682.
7. Cain AJ. 1954. Animal Species and their evolution. New York: Harper & Row.
8. Drotz MK, Saura A. 2001. The species delimitation problem applied to the Agabus bipustulatus complex (Coleoptera, Dysticidae) in north Scandinavia. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 73: 11-22.
9. Fall A, Thompson RCA, Hobbs RP, Morgan-Ryan U. 2003. Morphology is not reliable tool for delineating species within Cryptosporidium. Journal of Parasitology 89: 399-402.
10. Felsenstein J. 1979. Alternative methods of phylogenetic inference and their interrelationships. Systematic Zoology 28: 183-196.
11. Finlay BJ. 2004. Protist taxonomy: an ecological perspective. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 359: 599-610.
12. Garcia-Paris M, Alcobendas M, Buckley D, Wake DB. 2003. Dispersal of viviparity across contact zones in Iberian populations of fire salamanders (Salamandra) inferred from discordance of genetic and morphological traits. Evolution 57: 129-143.
13. Gaston KJ, O'Neill MA. 2004. Automated species identification: why not? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 359: 655-667.
14. Gewin V. 2002. All living things, online. Nature 418: 362-363.
15. Godfray HCJ. 2002. Challenges for taxonomy. Nature 417: 17-19.
16. Hayes KA. 2004. Systematics, phylogeography and evolution of apple snails (Pomacea spp.). In: Wells FE, ed. Abstracts, World Congress of Malacology. Perth, Australia: Western Australian Museum, 64-65.
17. Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 270: 313-321.
18. International Botanical Congress. 2000. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature. Königstein, Germany: Koeltz Scientific Books.
19. th edition. London: International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature.
20. Kirkendale L. 2004. Molecular phylogeography of the Patelloida profunda group (Gastropoda: Acmaeidae). In: Wells FE, ed. Abstracts, World Congress of Malacology. Perth, Australia: Western Australian Museum, 79.
21. Lessios HA, Kessing BD, Pearse JS. 2001. Population structure and speciation in tropical sea: global phylogeography of the sea urchin Diadema. Evolution 55: 955-975.
22. Lipscomb D, Platnick N, Wheeler Q. 2003. The intellectual content of taxonomy: a comment on DNA taxonomy. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 65-66.
23. Malaquias MAE, Reid DG. 2004. The systematics and evolution of Bullidae (Gastropoda: Opisthobranchia). In: Wells FE, ed. Abstracts, World Congress of Malacology. Perth, Australia: Western Australian Museum, 92.
24. Malhotra A, Thorpe RS. 2004. Maximizing information in systematic revisions: a combined molecular and morphological analysis of a cryptic green pitviper complex (Trimeresurus stejnegeri). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 82: 219-235.
25. Mallett J, Willmott K. 2003. Taxonomy: renaissance or Tower of Babel. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 57-59.
26. Marcussen T. 2003. Evolution, phylogeography and taxonomy within the Viola alba complex (Violaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 237: 51-74.
27. Masta S, Maddison WP. 2002. Sexual selection driving diversification in jumping spiders. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 99: 4442-4447.
28. Mayr E, Linsley E, Usinger RL. 1953. Methods and principles of systematic zoology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
29. Meyer CP. 2003a. Molecular systematics of cowries (Gastropoda: Cypraeidae) and diversification patterns in the tropics. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 79: 401-460.
30. Meyer CP. 2003b. All Snails Initiative. In: Ó Foighil D, Lee T, eds. Abstracts, 69th Annual Meeting of the American Malacological Society. Ann Arbor, MI: American Malacological Society, 40.
31. Meyer CP. 2004. Toward comprehensiveness: increased molecular sampling within Cypraeidae and its phylogenetic implications. Malacologia 46: 127-156.
32. Moritz C. 1994. Defining 'Evolutionary Significant Units' for conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9: 373-375.
33. Nelson GJ. 1971. 'Cladism' as a philosophy of classification. Systematic Zoology 20: 373-376.
34. Oliver I, Beattie AJ. 1996. Invertebrate morphospecies as surrogates for species: a case study. Conservation Biology 10: 99-109.
35. Oren A. 2004. Prokaryote diversity and taxonomy: current status and future challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 359: 623-638.
36. Parmakelis A, Spanos E, Papagiannakis G, Louis C, Mylonas M. 2003. Mitochondrial DNA phylogeny and morphological diversity in the genus Mastus (Beck, 1837): a study in a recent (Holocene) island group (Koufounisi, southeast Crete). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 78: 383-399.
37. Proudlove G, Wood PJ. 2003. The blind leading the blind: cryptic subterranean species and DNA taxonomy. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 272-273.
38. de Queiroz K. 1999. The general lineage concept of species and the defining properties of the species category. In: Wilson RA, ed. New interdisciplinary essays. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 49-89.
39. de Queiroz K. 2005. A unified concept of species and its consequences for the future of taxonomy. In: Jablonski N, Ghiselin M, eds. Taxonomy as the organization of knowledge. San Francisco: California Academy of Sciences, in press.
40. Schaal BA, Leverich WJ. 2001. Plant population biology and systematics. Taxon 50: 679-695.
41. Scotland R, Hughes C, Bailey D, Wortley A. 2003. The Big Machine and the much-maligned taxonomist. Systematics and Biodiversity 1: 139-143.
42. Seberg O, Humphries CJ, Knapp S, Stevenson DW, Petersen G, Scharff N, Andersen NM. 2003. Shortcuts in systematics? A commentary on DNA-based taxonomy. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 63-65.
43. Shaw AJ, Allen B. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships, morphological incongruence, and geographic speciation in the Fontinalaceae (Bryophyta). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 16: 225-237.
44. Sites JW, Marshall JC. 2003. Delimiting species: a renaissance issue in systematic biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 462-470.
45. Steppan SJ, Zawadzki C, Heaney LR. 2003. Molecular phylogeny of the endemic Philippine rodent Apomys (Muridae) and the dynamics of diversification in an oceanic archipelago. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 80: 699-715.
46. Stoeckle M. 2003. Taxonomy, DNA, and the Bar Code of Life. Bioscience 53: 796-797.
47. Tautz D, Arctander P, Minelli A, Thomas RH, Vogler AP. 2003. A plea for DNA taxonomy. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 70-74.
48. Vane-Wright RI. 2003. Indifferent philosophy versus almighty authority: on consistency, consensus and unitary taxonomy. Systematics and Biodiversity 1: 3-11.
49. Wada S, Oishi M, Yamada TK. 2003. A newly discovered species of living baleen whale. Nature 426: 278-281.
50. Wake MH. 2003. What is 'Integrative Biology'? Journal of Integrative and Comparative Biology 43: 239-241.
51. Wheeler QD, Raven PH, Wilson EO. 2004. Taxonomy: impediment or expedient? Science 303: 285.
52. Will KW, Rubinoff D. 2004. Myth of the molecule: DNA barcodes for species cannot replace morphology for identification and classification. Cladistics 20: 47-55.
53. Williams ST. 2000. Species boundaries in the starfish genus Linckia. Marine Biology 136: 137-148.
54. Wilson EO. 2003. The encyclopedia of Life. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 77-80.
55. Wilson EO. 2004. Taxonomy as a fundamental discipline. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 359: 739.