DNA barcoding for ecologists

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 110-117

  Valentini, Alice ^a,b   Pompanon, François ^a   Taberlet, Pierre ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ JOSEPH FOURIER   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TUSCIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA;

DIET; DNA; GENETIC ANALYSIS; IDENTIFICATION METHOD;

ANIMAL; BIODIVERSITY; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; DIET; DNA SEQUENCE; ECOLOGY; FOOD CHAIN; GENETIC DATABASE; METHODOLOGY; REVIEW; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; BIODIVERSITY; CLASSIFICATION; DATABASES, GENETIC; DIET; DNA; ECOLOGY; FOOD CHAIN; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 58349108314     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.09.011     Document Type: Review

References (87)

1. Floyd R., et al. Molecular barcodes for soil nematode identification. Mol. Ecol. 11 (2002) 839-850
2. Hebert P.D.N., et al. Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proc. Biol. Sci. 270 (2003) S96-S99
3. Hebert P.D.N., and Gregory T.R. The promise of DNA barcoding for taxonomy. Syst. Biol. 54 (2005) 852-859
4. Arnot D.E., et al. Digital codes from hypervariable tandemly repeated DNA sequences in the Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite gene can genetically barcode isolates. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 61 (1993) 15-24
5. Kangethe E.K., et al. Identification of the species origin of fresh meat using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent-assay procedure. Meat Sci. 7 (1982) 229-240
6. Kress W.J., et al. Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102 (2005) 8369-8374
7. Lahaye R., et al. DNA barcoding the floras of biodiversity hotspots. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105 (2008) 2923-2928
8. Kress W.J., and Erickson D.L. A two-locus global DNA barcode for land plants: the coding rbcL gene complements the non-coding trnH-psbA spacer region. PLoS ONE 2 (2007) e508
9. Chase M.W., et al. A proposal for a standardised protocol to barcode all land plants. Taxon 56 (2007) 295-299
10. Chase M.W., et al. Land plants and DNA barcodes: short-term and long-term goals. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 360 (2005) 1889-1895
11. Harris D.J. Can you bank on GenBank?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18 (2003) 317-319
12. Ratnasingham S., and Hebert P.D.N. BOLD: the barcode of life data system (www.barcodinglife.org). Mol. Ecol. Notes 7 (2007) 355-364
13. Knowlton N. Sibling species in the sea. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24 (1993) 189-216
14. Hennig W. Anthomyiidae. In: Lindner E. (Ed). Die Fliegen der Palaearktischen Region (1976), Schweizerbart 329-376
15. Ahrens D., et al. DNA-based taxonomy for associating adults and larvae in multi-species assemblages of chafers (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 44 (2007) 436-449
16. Rubinoff D. Utility of mitochondrial DNA barcodes in species conservation. Conserv. Biol. 20 (2006) 1026-1033
17. Neher D.A. Role of nematodes in soil health and their use as indicators. J. Nematol. 33 (2001) 161-168
18. Lambshead P. Marine nematode biodiversity. In: Chen Z.X., et al. (Ed). Nematology: Advances and Perspectives (2004), CABI 436-467
19. Bhadury P., et al. Development and evaluation of a DNA-barcoding approach for the rapid identification of nematodes. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 320 (2006) 1-9
20. Powers T. Nematode molecular diagnostics: from bands to barcodes. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 42 (2004) 367-383
21. Valière N., et al. Long distance wolf recolonization of France and Switzerland inferred from non-invasive genetic sampling over a period of 10 years. Anim. Conserv. 6 (2003) 83-92
22. Sugimoto T., et al. Species and sex identification from faecal samples of sympatric carnivores, Amur leopard and Siberian tiger, in the Russian Far East. Conserv. Genet. 7 (2006) 799-802
23. Pfenninger M., et al. Utility of DNA taxonomy and barcoding for the inference of larval community structure in morphologically cryptic Chironomus (Diptera) species. Mol. Ecol. 16 (2007) 1957-1968
24. Tedersoo L., et al. Ectomycorrhizal fungi of the Seychelles: diversity patterns and host shifts from the native Vateriopsis seychellarum (Dipterocarpaceae) and Intsia bijuga (Caesalpiniaceae) to the introduced Eucalyptus robusta (Myrtaceae), but not Pinus caribea (Pinaceae). New Phytol. 175 (2007) 321-333
25. Smith M.A., et al. DNA barcodes reveal cryptic host-specificity within the presumed polyphagous members of a genus of parasitoid flies (Diptera: Tachinidae). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103 (2006) 3657-3662
26. Smith M.A., et al. DNA barcodes affirm that 16 species of apparently generalist tropical parasitoid flies (Diptera, Tachinidae) are not all generalists. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104 (2007) 4967-4972
27. Berkov A. The impact of redefined species limits in Palame (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Lamiinae: Acanthocinini) on assessments of host, seasonal, and stratum specificity. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 76 (2002) 195-209
28. Domingo-Roura X., et al. Badger hair in shaving brushes comes from protected Eurasian badgers. Biol. Conserv. 128 (2006) 425-430
29. Lee J.C.I., et al. DNA profiling of shahtoosh. Electrophoresis 27 (2006) 3359-3362
30. Teletchea F., et al. Molecular identification of vertebrate species by oligonucleotide microarray in food and forensic samples. J. Appl. Ecol. 45 (2008) 967-975
31. Birstein V.J., et al. Polyphyly of mtDNA lineages in the Russian sturgeon, Acipenser gueldenstaedtii: forensic and evolutionary implications. Conserv. Genet. 1 (2000) 81-88
32. Assefa Y., et al. DNA identification of Busseola (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae in Ethiopian sugarcane. Afr. Entomol. 15 (2007) 375-379
33. Ficetola G.F., et al. Species detection using environmental DNA from water samples. Biol. Lett. 4 (2008) 423-425
34. Gaston K.J., and O'Neill M.A. Automated species identification: why not?. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 359 (2004) 655-667
35. Gotelli N.J. A taxonomic wish-list for community ecology. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 359 (2004) 585-597
36. Hajibabaei M., et al. Critical factors for assembling a high volume of DNA barcodes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 360 (2005) 1959-1967
37. Cameron S., et al. Who will actually use DNA barcoding and what will it cost?. Syst. Biol. 55 (2006) 844-847
38. Janzen D.H., et al. Wedding biodiversity inventory of a large and complex Lepidoptera fauna with DNA barcoding. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 360 (2005) 1835-1845
39. Sogin M.L., et al. Microbial diversity in the deep sea and the underexplored "rare biosphere". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103 (2006) 12115-12120
40. Rusch D.B., et al. The Sorcerer II global ocean sampling expedition: northwest Atlantic through eastern tropical Pacific. PLoS Biol. 5 (2007) e77
41. Margurran A.E. Measuring Biological Diversity (2004), Blackwell Science
42. Blaxter M., et al. Defining operational taxonomic units using DNA barcode data. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 360 (2005) 1935-1943
43. Herrera A., et al. Species richness and phylogenetic diversity comparisons of soil microbial communities affected by nickel-mining and revegetation efforts in New Caledonia. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 43 (2007) 130-139
44. Oline D.K. Phylogenetic comparisons of bacterial communities from serpentine and nonserpentine soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72 (2006) 6965-6971
45. Gomez-Alvarez V., et al. Comparative bacterial diversity in recent Hawaiian volcanic deposits of different ages. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 60 (2007) 60-73
46. Blackwood C.B., et al. Interpreting ecological diversity indices applied to terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism data: insights from simulated microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73 (2007) 5276-5283
47. Meyer C.P., and Paulay G. DNA barcoding: error rates based on comprehensive sampling. PLoS Biol. 3 (2005) e422
48. Matz M.V., and Nielsen R. A likelihood ratio test for species membership based on DNA sequence data. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 360 (2005) 1969-1974
49. Nielsen R., and Matz M. Statistical approaches for DNA barcoding. Syst. Biol. 55 (2006) 162-169
50. Hickerson M.J., et al. DNA barcoding will often fail to discover new animal species over broad parameter space. Syst. Biol. 55 (2006) 729-739
51. Willerslev E., et al. Diverse plant and animal genetic records from Holocene and Pleistocene sediments. Science 300 (2003) 791-795
52. Willerslev E., et al. Ancient biomolecules from deep ice cores reveal a forested southern Greenland. Science 317 (2007) 111-114
53. Kuch M., et al. Molecular analysis of a 11 700-year-old rodent midden from the Atacama Desert, Chile. Mol. Ecol. 11 (2002) 913-924
54. Hofreiter M., et al. A molecular analysis of ground sloth diet through the last glaciation. Mol. Ecol. 9 (2000) 1975-1984
55. Rollo F., et al. Otzi's last meals: DNA analysis of the intestinal content of the Neolithic glacier mummy from the Alps. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99 (2002) 12594-12599
56. Duffy J.E., et al. The functional role of biodiversity in ecosystems: incorporating trophic complexity. Ecol. Lett. 10 (2007) 522-538
57. Marrero P., et al. Diet of the endemic Madeira Laurel Pigeon Columba trocaz in agricultural and forest areas: implications for conservation. Bird Conserv. Int. 14 (2004) 165-172
58. Cristobal-Azkarate J., and Arroyo-Rodriguez V. Diet and activity pattern of howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata) in Los Tuxtlas, Mexico: effects of habitat fragmentation and implications for conservation. Am. J. Primatol. 69 (2007) 1013-1029
59. Agusti N., et al. Collembola as alternative prey sustaining spiders in arable ecosystems: prey detection within predators using molecular markers. Mol. Ecol. 12 (2003) 3467-3475
60. Passmore A.J., et al. DNA as a dietary biomarker in Antarctic krill, Euphausia superba. Mar. Biotechnol. 8 (2006) 686-696
61. Deagle B.E., et al. Genetic screening for prey in the gut contents from a giant squid (Architeuthis sp.). J. Hered. 96 (2005) 417-423
62. Blankenship L.E., and Yayanos A.A. Universal primers and PCR of gut contents to study marine invertebrate diets. Mol. Ecol. 14 (2005) 891-899
63. Pons J. DNA-based identification of preys from non-destructive, total DNA extractions of predators using arthropod universal primers. Mol. Ecol. Notes 6 (2006) 623-626
64. Symondson W.O.C. Molecular identification of prey in predator diets. Mol. Ecol. 11 (2002) 627-641
65. Jarman S.N., et al. Group-specific polymerase chain reaction for DNA-based analysis of species diversity and identity in dietary samples. Mol. Ecol. 13 (2004) 1313-1322
66. Bradley B.J., et al. Plant DNA sequences from feces: potential means for assessing diets of wild primates. Am. J. Primatol. 69 (2007) 699-705
67. Nystrom J., et al. Effect of local prey availability on gyrfalcon diet: DNA analysis on ptarmigan remains at nest sitesm. J. Zool. (Lond.) 269 (2006) 57-64
68. Deagle B.E., et al. Studying seabird diet through genetic analysis of feces: a case study on Macaroni penguins (Eudyptes chrysolophus). PLoS ONE 2 (2007) e831
69. Taberlet P., et al. Power and limitations of the chloroplast trnL (UAA) intron for plant DNA barcoding. Nucleic Acids Res. 35 (2007) e14
70. Valentini, A. et al. New perspectives in diet analysis based on DNA barcoding and parallel pyrosequencing: the trnL approach. Mol. Ecol. Res. (in press)
71. Ballard J.W.O., and Whitlock M.C. The incomplete natural history of mitochondria. Mol. Ecol. 13 (2004) 729-744
72. Zhang D.X., and Hewitt G.M. Highly conserved nuclear copies of the mitochondrial control region in the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria: some implications for population studies. Mol. Ecol. 5 (1996) 295-300
73. Kmiec B., et al. Heteroplasmy as a common state of mitochondrial genetic information in plants and animals. Curr. Genet. 50 (2006) 149-159
74. Vences M., et al. Deciphering amphibian diversity through DNA barcoding: chances and challenges. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 360 (2005) 1859-1868
75. Deagle B.E., et al. Quantification of damage in DNA recovered from highly degraded samples - a case study on DNA in faeces. Front. Zool. 3 (2006) 11
76. Hajibabaei M., et al. A minimalist barcode can identify a specimen whose DNA is degraded. Mol. Ecol. Notes 6 (2006) 959-964
77. Meusnier I., et al. A universal DNA mini-barcode for biodiversity analysis. BMC Genomics 9 (2008) 214
78. Hajibabaei M., et al. DNA barcoding: how it complements taxonomy, molecular phylogenetics and population genetics. Trends Genet. 23 (2007) 167-172
79. Illumina. http://www.solexa.com
80. Applied Biosystems. http://solid.appliedbiosystems.com
81. Helicos. http://helicosbio.com
82. Roche Diagnostics. https://www.roche-applied-science.com/sis/sequencing/flx/index.jsp
83. Manel S., et al. Assignment methods: matching biological questions with appropriate techniques. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20 (2005) 136-142
84. Zinger L., et al. CE-SSCP and CE-FLA, simple and high-throughput alternatives for fungal diversity studies. J. Microbiol. Methods 72 (2008) 42-53
85. Hudson M.E. Sequencing breakthroughs for genomic ecology and evolutionary biology. Mol. Ecol. Res. 8 (2008) 3-17
86. Schuster S.C. Next-generation sequencing transforms today's biology. Nat. Methods 5 (2008) 16-18
87. Margulies M., et al. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 437 (2005) 376-380