DNA barcoding: Perspectives from a "Partnerships for Enhancing Expertise in Taxonomy" (PEET) debate

Systematic Biology

Volumn 54, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 841-844

  Smith, Vincent S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETIC DATABASE; METHODOLOGY; REVIEW; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

CLASSIFICATION; DATABASES, GENETIC; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 31344454555     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635150500354894     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Anonymous. 2003. What's in a name? Economist 366:62.
2. Blaxter, M. 2003. Counting angels with DNA. Nature 421:122-124.
3. Godfray, H. C. J., and S. Knapp. 2004. Introduction [to a theme issue 'Taxonomy for the twenty-first century']. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 359:559-569.
4. Gotelli, N. J. 2004. A taxonomic wish-list for community ecology. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 359:585-597.
5. Hebert, P. D. N., A. Cywinska, S. L. Ball, and J. R. deWaard. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270:313-322.
6. Hebert, P. D. N., and T. R. Gregory. 2005. The promise of DNA barcoding for taxonomy. Syst. Biol. 54:852-859.
7. Hebert, P. D. N., M. Y. Stoeckle, T. S. Zemlak, and C. M. Francis. 2004. Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. PLoS Biol. 2:1657-1663.
8. Holmes, B. 2004. Barcode me. New Scientist 182:32-35.
9. Kurosawa, O., and M. Washizu. 2004. Acquisition and amplification of targeted position of electrostatically stretched DNA. J. Inst. Electrostat. Jpn. 28:59-64.
10. Lipscomb, D. L., N. Platnick, and Q. D. Wheeler. 2003. The intellectual content of taxonomy: a comment on DNA taxonomy. TREE 18:65-66.
11. May, R. M. 2004. Tomorrow's taxonomy: Collecting new species in the field will remain the rate-limiting step. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 359:733-734.
12. Moritz, C., and C. Cicero. 2004. DNA barcoding: Promise and pitfalls. PLoS Biol. 2:1529-1531.
13. NCBI. 2005. National Center for Biological Information. GenBank statistics available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/About/tools/restable_stat. html.
14. Nicholls, H. 2003. DNA: The barcode of life? Originally published on behalf of Elsevier by BioMedNet. Now available at http://www. uoguelph.ca/~phebert/media/BioMedNet%20News%20article. pdf.
15. Pennisi, E. 2003. Modernizing the tree of life. Science 300:1692-1697.
16. Rodman, J. E., and J. H. Cody. 2003. The taxonomic impediment overcome: NSF's Partnerships for Enhancing Expertise in Taxonomy (PEET) as a model. Syst. Biol. 52:428-435.
17. Schindel, D. E., and S. E. Miller. 2005. DNA barcoding a useful tool for taxonomists. Nature 435:17.
18. Tautz, D., P. Arctander, A. Minelli, R. H. Thomas, and A. P. Vogler. 2003. A plea for DNA taxonomy. TREE 18:70-74.
19. Taylor, R. W. 1983. Descriptive taxonomy: Past, present, and future. Pages 93-134 in Australian systematic entomology: A bicentenary perspective (E. Highley, and R. W. Taylor, eds.). CSIRO, Canberra.
20. Vincent, M., Y. Xu, and H. Kong. 2004. Helicase-dependent isothermal DNA amplification. EMBO Rep. 5:795-800.
21. Will, K. W., B. D. Mishler, and Q. D. Wheeler. 2005. The perils of DNA barcoding and the need for integrative taxonomy. Syst. Biol. 54:844-851.