MRI of the prostate: Potential role of robots

Imaging in Medicine

Volumn 2, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 583-592

  Fütterer, Jurgen J ^a   Misra, Sarthak ^b   MacUra, Katarzyna J ^c  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

MRI; prostatic neoplasm; robotics

Indexed keywords

CANCER DIAGNOSIS; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; REVIEW; ROBOTICS; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 77958496197     PISSN: 17555191     EISSN: 17555205     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2217/iim.10.46     Document Type: Review

References (74)

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E et al.: Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J. Clin. 58(2), 71-98 (2008).
2. Cooperberg MR, Lubeck DP, Meng MV, Mehta SS, Carroll PR: The changing face of low-risk prostate cancer: trends in clinical presentation and primary management. J. Clin. Oncol. 22(11), 2141-2149 (2004).
3. Harris SJ, Arambula-Cosio F, Mei Q et al.: The Probot - an active robot for prostate resection. Proceedings of the IMechE 211(4), 317-325 (1997).
4. Wei Z, Wan G, Gardi L, Mills G, Downey D, Fenster A: Robot-assisted 3D-TRUS guided prostate brachytherapy: system integration and validation. Med. Phys. 31(3), 539-548 (2004).
5. Wan G, Wei Z, Gardi L, Downey D, Fenster A: Brachytherapy needle deflection evaluation and correction. Med. Phys. 32(4), 902-909 (2005).
6. Phee L, Xiao D, Chan CF et al.: Ultrasound guided robotic biopsy of the prostate. IJHR 3(4), 463-483 (2006).
7. Fichtinger G, Fiene J, Kennedy CW et al.: Robotic assistance for ultrasound guided prostate. Med. Image Anal. 12(5), 535-545 (2008).
8. Levine MA, Ittman M, Melamed J et al.: Two consecutive sets of transrectal ultrasound guided sextant biopsies of the prostate for the detection of prostate cancer. J. Urol. 159(2), 471-476 (1998).
9. Svetec D, McCabe K, Peretsman S et al.: Prostate rebiopsy is a poor surrogate of treatment efficacy in localized prostate cancer. J. Urol. 159(5), 1606-1608 (1998).
10. May F, Treumann T, Dettmar P, Breul J: Limited value of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasonography in the staging of clinically localized prostate cancer. BJU Int. 87, 66-69 (2001).
11. Abolhassani N, Patel RV, Moallem M: Needle insertion in soft tissue: a survey. Med. Eng. Phys. 29(4), 413-431 (2007).
12. Cleary K, Banovac F, Lindisch D, Watson V: Robotically assisted spine needle placement: program plan and cadaver study. Presented at: 14th IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS). Bethesda, MD, USA, 26-27 July 2001.
13. Cleary K, Melzer A, Watson V, Kronreif G, Stoianovici D: Interventional robotic systems: applications and technology state-of-the-art. Minim. Invasive Ther. Allied Technol. 15(2), 101-113 (2006).
14. Hong J, Dohi T, Hashizume M, Konishi K, Hata N: An ultrasound-driven needle-insertion robot for percutaneous cholecystostomy. Phys. Med. Biol. 49(3), 441-445 (2004).
15. Kokes R, Lister K, Rao G et al.: Towards a teleoperated needledriver robot with haptic feedback for RFA of breast tumors under continuous MRI. Med. Image Anal. 13(3), 445-455 (2009).
16. Koyama H, Uchida T, Funakubo H, Takakura K, Fankhauser H: Development of a new microsurgical robot for stereotactic neurosurgery. Stereotact. Funct. Neurosurg. 54(1-8), 462-467 (1990).
17. Lagerburg V, Moerlanda MA, van Vulpen M, Lagendijk JJW: A new robotic needle insertion method to minimise attendant prostate motion. Radiat. Oncol. 80(1), 73-77 (2006).
18. Masamune K, Fichtinger G, Patriciu A et al.: System for robotically assisted percutaneous procedures with computed tomography guidance. Comput. Aided Surg. 6(6), 370-383 (2001).
19. Masamune K, Kobayashi E, Masutani Y et al.: Development of an MRI-compatible needle insertion manipulator for stereotactic neurosurgery. J. Image Guid. Surg. 1(4), 242-248 (1995).
20. Megali G, Tonet O, Stefanini C et al.: A computer-assisted robotic ultrasoundguided biopsy system for video-assisted surgery. Presented at: 4th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Utrecht, The Netherlands, 14-17 October 2001.
21. Okazawa SH, Ebrahimi R, Chuang J, Salcudean SE, Rohling RN: Hand-held steerable needle device. IEEE ASME Trans. Mechatron. 10(3), 285-296 (2005).
22. Onogi S, Morimoto K, Sakuma I et al.: Development of the needle insertion robot for percutaneous vertebroplasty. Presented at: 8th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Palm Springs, USA, 26-29 October 2005.
23. Yanof J, Haaga J, Klahr P et al.: CT-integrated robot for interventional procedures: preliminary experiment and computer-human interfaces. Comput. Aided Surg. 6(6), 352-359 (2001).
24. DiMaio SP, Salcudean SE: Needle steering and motion planning in soft tissues. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 52(6), 965-974 (2005).
25. Glozman D, Shoham M: Image-guided robotic flexible needle steering. IEEE Trans. Robot. 23(3), 459-467 (2007).
26. Abolhassani N, Patel RV, Ayazi F: Minimization of needle deflection in robot-assisted percutaneous therapy. Int. J. Med. Robot. 3(2), 140-148 (2007).
27. Engh J, Podnar G, Kondziolka D, Riviere C: Toward effective needle steering in brain tissue. Presented at: International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). New York City, NY, USA, 30 August-3 September 2006.
28. Yu Y, Podder TK, Zhang YD et al.: Robotic system for prostate brachytherapy. Comput. Aided Surg. 12(6), 366-370 (2007).
29. Reed KB, Kallem V, Alterovitz R, Goldberg K, Okamura AM, Cowan NJ: Integrated planning and image-guided control for planar needle steering. Presented at: IEEE RAS/EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob). Scottsdale, USA, 12-22 October 2008.
30. Stoianovici D: Multi-imager compatible actuation principles in surgical robotics. Int. J. Med. Robot. 1(2), 86-100 (2005).
31. Chinzei K, Kikinis K, Jolesz FA: MR compatibility of mechatronic devices: design criteria. Int. Conf. Med. Image Comput. Assist Interv. 2, 1020-1031 (1999).
32. Kaiser WA, Fischer H, Vagner J, Selig M: Robotic system for biopsy and therapy of breast lesions in a high-field whole-body magnetic resonance tomography unit. Invest Radiol. 35(8), 513-519 (2000).
33. Felden A, Vagner J, Hinz A et al.: ROBITOM-robot for biopsy and therapy of the mamma. Biomed. Tech. (Berl.) 47(Suppl. 1), 2-5 (2002).
34. Hempel E, Fischer H, Gumb L et al.: An MRI-compatible surgical robot for precise radiological interventions. Comput. Aided Surg. 8(4), 180-191 (2003).
35. Choi HS, Han CS, Lee KY, Lee SH: Development of hybrid robot for construction works with pneumatic actuator. AUTCON 14(4), 452-459 (2005).
36. DiMaio S, Fischer G, Haker S et al.: A system for MRI-guided prostate interventions. Presented at: IEEE RAS/EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics. Pisa, Italy, 20-22 February 2006.
37. Krieger A, Susil RC, Menard C et al.: Design of a novel MRI compatible manipulator for image guided prostate interventions. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 52(2), 306-313 (2005).
38. Elhawary H, Tse ZTH, Hamed A, Rea M, Davies BL, Lamperth MU: The case for MR-compatible robotics: a review of the state of the art. Int. J. Med. Robot. 4(2), 105-113 (2008).
39. Stoianovici D, Patriciu A, Mazilu D, Petrisor D, Kavoussi L: A new type of motor: pneumatic step motor. IEEE ASME Trans. Mechatron. 12(1), 98-106 (2007).
40. Lufkin R, Teresi L, Hanafee W: New needle for MR-guided aspiration cytology of the head and neck. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 149, 380-382 (1987).
41. Roberson PL, Narayana V, McShan DL, Winfield RJ, McLaughlin PW: Source placement error for permanent implant of the prostate Med. Phys. 24, 251-257 (1997).
42. Lagerburg V, Moerland MA, Konings MK, van de Vosse RE, Lagendijk JJ, Battermann JJ: Development of a tapping device: a new needle insertion method for prostate brachytherapy. Phys. Med. Biol. 51(4), 891-902 (2006).
43. Menard C, Susil RC, Choyke P et al.: MRI-guided HDR prostate brachytherapy in standard 1.5 T scanner. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 59(5), 1414-1423 (2004).
44. Hata N, Jinzaki M, Kacher D et al.: MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy with surgical navigation software: device validation and feasibility. Radiology 220(1), 263-268 (2001).
45. Barnes AS, Haker SJ, Mulkern RV, So M, D'Amico AV, Tempany CM: Magnetic resonance spectroscopy-guided transperineal prostate biopsy and brachytherapy for recurrent prostate cancer. Urology 66(6), 1319 (2005).
46. Beyersdorff D, Winkel A, Hamm B, Lenk S, Loening SA, Taupitz M: MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy with a closed MR unit at 1.5 T: initial results. Radiology 234(2), 576-581 (2005).
47. Engelhard K, Hollenbach HP, Kiefer B, Winkel A, Goeb K, Engehausen D: Prostate biopsy in the supine position in a standard 1.5-T scanner under real time MR-imaging control using a MR-compatible endorectal biopsy device. Eur. Radiol. 16(6), 1237-1243 (2006).
48. Anastasiadis AG, Lichy MP, Nagele U et al.: MRI-guided biopsy of the prostate increases diagnostic performance in men with elevated or increasing PSA levels after previous negative TRUS biopsies. Eur. Urol. 50(4), 738-748 (2006).
49. Hambrock T, Somford DM, Hoeks C et al.: Magnetic resonance imaging guided prostate biopsy in men with repeat negative biopsies and increased prostate specific antigen. J. Urol. 183(2), 520-527 (2010).
50. Fichtinger G, Krieger A, Susil RC, Tanacs A, Whitcomb LL, Atalar E: Transrectal prostate biopsy insideclosed MRI scanner with remote actuation, under real-time image guidance. Presented at: 5th Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI). Tokyo, Japan, 25-28 September 2002.
51. Susil RC, Menard C, Krieger A et al.: Transrectal prostate biopsy and fiducial marker placement in a standard 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging scanner. J. Urol. 175(1), 113-120 (2006).
52. Susil RC, Krieger A, Derbyshire JA et al.: System for MR image-guided prostate interventions: canine study. Radiology 228(3), 886-894 (2003).
53. Susil RC, Camphausen K, Choyke P et al.: System for prostate brachytherapy and biopsy in a standard 1.5 T MRI scanner. Magn. Reson. Med. 52(3), 683-687 (2004).
54. Lattouf JB, Grubb RL 3rd, Lee SJ et al.: Magnetic resonance imaging-directed transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsies in patients at risk of prostate cancer. BJU Int. 9(5), 1041-1046 (2007).
55. Singh AK, Krieger A, Lattouf JB et al.: Patient selection determines the prostate cancer yield of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-guided transrectal biopsies in a closed 3-Tesla scanner. BJU Int. 101(2), 181-185 (2008).
56. Pondman KM, Fütterer JJ, ten Haken B et al.: MR-guided biopsy of the prostate: an overvieuw of techniques and a systematic review. Eur. Urol. 54(3), 517-527 (2008).
57. DiMaio SP, Pieper S, Chinzei K et al.: Robot-assisted needle placement in open MRI: system architecture, integration and validation. Comput. Aided Surg. 12(1), 15-24 (2007).
58. Chinzei K, Miller K: Towards MRI guided surgical manipulator. Med. Sci. Monit. 7(1), 153-163 (2001).
59. Krieger A, Csoma C, Iordachita II et al.: Design and preliminary accuracy studies of an MRI-guided transrectal prostate intervention system. Presented at: 10th Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI). Brisbane, Australia, 29 October-2 November 2007.
60. Stoianovici D, Song D, Petrisor D et al.: MRI stealth robot for prostate interventions. Minim. Invasive Ther. Allied Technol. 16(4), 241-248 (2007).
61. Mozer PC, Partin AW, Stoianovici D: Robotic image-guided needle interventions of the prostate. Rev. Urol. 11(1), 7-15 (2009).
62. Muntener M, Patriciu A, Petrisor D et al.: Magneticresonance imaging compatible robotic system for fully automated brachytherapy seed placement. Urology 68(6), 1313-1317 (2006).
63. Muntener M, Patriciu A, Petrisor D et al.: Transperineal prostate intervention: robot for fully automated MR imaging system description and proof of principle in a canine model. Radiology 247(2), 543-549 (2008).
64. Fischer GS, Iordachita I, Csoma C et al.: MRI compatible pneumatic robot for transperineal prostate needle placement. IEEE ASME Trans. Mechatron. 13(3), 295-305 (2008).
65. Zangos S, Herzog C, Eichler K et al.: MR-compatible assistance system for punction in a high-field system: device and feasibility of transgluteal biopsies of the prostate gland. Eur. Radiol. 17(4), 1118-1124 (2007).
66. van den Bosch MR, Moman MR, van Vulpen M et al.: MRI-guided robotic system for transperineal prostate interventions: proof of principle. Phys. Med. Biol. 55(5), 133-140 (2010).
67. Lagerburg V, Moerland MA, van Vulpen M, Lagendijk JJ: A new robotic needle insertion method to minimise attendant prostate motion. Radiother. Oncol. 80(1), 73-77 (2006).
68. Lagerburg V, Moerland MA, Konings MK et al. Development of a tapping device: a new needle insertion method for prostate brachytherapy. Phys. Med. Biol. 51(4), 891-902 (2006).
69. Schouten MG, Ansems J, Renema WKJ, Bosboom D, Scheenen TWJ, Futterer JJ: Introduction of a new method to image guided prostate biopsies: the MR-compatible transrectal prostate biopsy robot. Med. Phys. (2010) (In Press).
70. Kallem V, Cowan NJ: Image guidance of exible tip-steerable needles. IEEE Trans. Robot. 25(1), 67-78 (2009).
71. Alterovitz R, Branicky M, Goldberg K: Motion planning under uncertainty for image-guided medical needle steering. Int. J. Rob. Res. 27(11-12), 1361-1374 (2008).
72. Misra S, Ramesh KT, Okamura AM: Modeling of tool-tissue interactions for computer-based surgicalsimulation: a literature review. Presence (Camb.) 17(5), 463-491 (2008).
73. Misra S, Macura KJ, Ramesh KT, Okamura AM: The importance of organ geometry and boundary constraints for planning of medical interventions. Med. Eng. Phys. 31(2), 195-206 (2009).
74. Misra S, Reed KB, Schafer BW, Ramesh KT, Okamura AM: Mechanics of flexible needles robotically steered through soft tissue. Int. J. Rob. Res. DOI: 10.1177/0278364910369714 (2010) (Epub ahead of print).