Prostate biopsy in the supine position in a standard 1.5-T scanner under real time MR-imaging control using a MR-compatible endorectal biopsy device

European Radiology

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1237-1243

  Engelhard, K ^a   Hollenbach, H P ^b   Kiefer, B ^b   Winkel, A ^c   Goeb, K ^a   Engehausen, D ^d  

^a Martha Maria Medical Center   (Germany)

^b SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

^c Invivo Germany GmbH   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ERLANGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biopsy; MRI; Prostate

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT; ANTIGEN DETECTION; ARTICLE; CHRONIC PROSTATITIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FIBROSIS; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT POSITIONING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE ADENOCARCINOMA; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATE HYPERTROPHY; RECTUM BIOPSY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STANDARDIZATION; STEADY STATE; SUPINE POSITION; TUMOR LOCALIZATION;

ADENOCARCINOMA; AGED; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; CONTRAST MEDIA; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTATE; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; PROSTATITIS; RADIOLOGY, INTERVENTIONAL; SUPINE POSITION;

EID: 33744818910     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-005-0100-6     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Dennis LK, Resnick MI (2000) Analysis of recent trends in prostate cancer incidence and mortality. Prostate 42:247-252
2. Beyersdorff D, Winkel A, Hamm B, Lenk S, Loening StA, Taupitz M (2005) MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy with a closed MR unit at 1.5 T: Initial results. Radiology 234:576-581
3. Wefer AE, Hricak H, Vigneron DB, Coakley FV, Lu Y, Wefer U, Mueller-Lisse U et al. (2000) Sextant localization of prostate cancer: comparison of sextant biopsy magnetic Resonance imaging and magnetized resonance spectroscopic imaging with step section histology. J Urol 164:400-404
4. Ikonen S, Kärkkäinen P, Kivisaari L, Salo JO, Taari K, Vehmas T, Tervahartiala P et al (1998) Magnetic resonance imaging of clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol 159:915-919
5. Beyersdorff D, Taupitz M, Winkelmann B, Fischer Th, Lenk S, Loening StA, Hamm B (2002) Patients with a history of elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and negative transrectal US-guided quadrant or sextant biopsy results: Value of MR imaging. Radiology 224:701-706
6. D'Amico AV, Schnall M, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, Schultz D, Tomaszewski JE, Wein A (1998) Endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging identifies locally advanced prostate cancer in select patients with clinically localized disease. Urology 51:449-454
7. Vilanova JC, Comet J, Capdevila A, Barcelo J, Dolz JLI, Huguet M, Barcelo C et al (2001) The value of endorectal MR imaging to predict positive biopsies in clinically intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients. Eur Radiol 11:229-235
8. Cruz M, Tsuda K, Narumi Y, Kuroiwa Y, Nose T, Kojima Y et al (2002) Characterization of low-intensity lesions in the peripheral zone of prostate on pre-biopsy endorectal coil MR imaging. Eur Radiol 12:357-365
9. Perrotti M, Han KR, Epstein RE, Kennedy EC, Rabbani F, Badani K (1999) Prospective evaluation of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging to detect tumor foci in men with prior negative prostatic biopsy: A pilot study. J Urol 162:1314-1317
10. Comet-Batlla J, Vilanova-Busquets JC, Saladie-Roig JM, Gelabert-Mas A, Barcelo-Vidal C (2003) The value of endorectal MRI in the early diagnosis of prostate cancer. Eur Urol 44:201-208
11. Engelhard K, Hollenbach HP, Deimling M, Kreckel M, Riedl C (2000) Combination of signal intensity measurements of lesions in the peripheral zone of prostate with MRI and serum PSA level for differentiating benign disease from prostate cancer. Eur Radiol 10:1947-1953
12. Kiessling F, Lichy M, Grobholz R, Heilmann M, Farhan N, Michel MS, Trojan L et al (2004) Simple models improve the discrimination of prostate cancers from the peripheral gland by T1-weighted dynamic MRI. Eur Radiol 14:1793-1801
13. Cooksen MS et al (2000) Update on transrectal ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of the prostate. Mol Urol 4:93-97
14. Uzzo RG, Wie JT, Waldbaum RS, Perlmutter AP, Byrne JC, Vaughan ED (1995) The influence of prostate size on cancer detection. J Urol 152:2304-2307
15. Keetch DW, Catalona WJ, Smith DS (1995) Serial prostatic biopsies in men with persistently elevated serum prostate specific antigen values. J Urol 6:1571-1574
16. Kimberly A, Roehl JO, Ann V, Catalona A, Catalona WJ (2002) Serial biopsy results In prostate cancer screening study. J Urol 167:2435-2439
17. Rørvik J, Haukaas S (2001) Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate. Curr Opin Urol 11:181-188
18. Quint LE, Van Erp JS, Bland PH, Del Buono EA, Mandell StH, Grossman HB, Gikas PW (1991) Prostate cancer: Correlation of MR images with tissue optical density at pathologic examination. Radiology 179:837-842
19. Hata N, Jinzaki M, Kacher D, Cormak R, Gering D, Nabavi A, Silverman StG et al (2001) MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy with surgical navigation software: Device validation and feasibility. Radiology 220:263-268
20. Cormack RA, D'Amico AV, Hata N, Silverman S, Weinstein M, Tempany CM (2000) Feasibility of transperineal prostate biopsy under interventional magnetic resonance Guidance. Urology 56:663-664
21. D'Amico AV, Tempany CM, Cormack R, Hata N, Jinzaki M, Tuncali K, Weinstein M et al. (2000) Transperineal magnetic resonance image guided prostate biopsy. J Urol 104:385-387
22. Susil RC, Camphausen K, Choyke P, Elliot R, McVeigh ER, Gustafson GS, Ning H et al (2004) System for prostate brachytherapy and biopsy in a standard 1.5-T MRI scanner. Magn Reson Med 52:683-687
23. Zangos ST, Eichler K, Engelmann K, Ahmed M, Dettmer S, Herzog C, Pegios W et al (2005) MR-guided transgluteal biopsies with an open low-field system in patients with clinically suspected prostate cancer: Technique and preliminary results. Eur Radiol 15:174-182
24. Lopez-Corona E, Ohori M, Scardino PT, Reuter VE, Gonen M, Kattan MW (2003) A Nomogram for predicting a positive repeat prostate biopsy in patients with a previous negative biopsy session. J Urol 170:1184-1188