Impact of nuclear organization and dynamics on epigenetic regulation in the central nervous system: Implications for neurological disease states

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Volumn 1204, Issue SUPPL.1, 2010, Pages 20-37

  Qureshi, Irfan A ^a   Mehler, Mark F ^a  

^a ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cohesinopathies; Epigenetic memory; Epigenetics; Genomic architecture; Laminopathies; Noncoding rnas; Nuclear ataxias; Nuclear organization; Posttranscriptional processing; RNA editing; RNA trafficking; Spinal muscular atrophy

Indexed keywords

ATM PROTEIN; CIS ACTING ELEMENT; COHESIN; COLONY STIMULATING FACTOR 1; DNA Z; LAMIN; LONG NON CODING RNA; MICRORNA; PIWI INTERACTING RNA; POLYCOMB GROUP PROTEIN; POLYCOMB REPRESSOR COMPLEX 2; PROMOTER ASSOCIATED SMALL RNA; PROTEIN SWI; REPRESSOR ELEMENT 1 SILENCING TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; RIBONUCLEOPROTEIN; RIBOSOME DNA; RIBOSOME RNA; RNA BINDING PROTEIN; SMALL INTERFERING RNA; SMALL NUCLEOLAR RNA; SMALL UNTRANSLATED RNA; SPACER DNA; TATA BINDING PROTEIN RELATED FACTOR; TRANS ACTING FACTOR; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR CTCF; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR MASH1; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR SNF; TRANSFER RNA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; UNTRANSLATED RNA;

3' UNTRANSLATED REGION; ALU SEQUENCE; APOPTOSIS; ARTICLE; ATAXIA TELANGIECTASIA; CELL CYCLE PROGRESSION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FATE; CELL NUCLEUS INCLUSION BODY; CELL NUCLEUS MEMBRANE; CELL STRESS; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; CENTROMERE; CHROMATIN STRUCTURE; COHESINOPATHY; COILED BODY; CYTOPLASM; DE LANGE SYNDROME; DNA BINDING; DNA DAMAGE; DNA METHYLATION; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; EMERY DREIFUSS MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY; ENHANCER REGION; ENVELOPATHY; EPIGENETICS; EXOSOME; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE LOCUS; GENE MUTATION; GENOME IMPRINTING; HEREDITARY MOTOR SENSORY NEUROPATHY; HETEROCHROMATIN; HISTONE ACETYLATION; HUMAN; LAMINOPATHY; LIMB GIRDLE MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY; LONG INTERSPERSED REPEAT; LONG TERM DEPRESSION; LONG TERM POTENTIATION; MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR ORGANIZATION; NUCLEAR PORE COMPLEX; NUCLEOLUS; PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY; PROGERIA; PROMOTER REGION; PROMYELOCYTIC LEUKEMIA; PROTEIN DEFECT; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN RNA BINDING; PURKINJE CELL; REGULATOR GENE; REPRESSOR GENE; RETROPOSON; RNA EDITING; RNA TRANSCRIPTION; RNA TRANSPORT; ROBERTS SYNDROME; SHORT INTERSPERSED REPEAT; SILENCER ELEMENT; SPINOCEREBELLAR DEGENERATION; TELOMERE; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; WERNER SYNDROME; X CHROMOSOME INACTIVATION; CELL NUCLEUS; GENETIC EPIGENESIS; GENETICS; METABOLISM; PATHOLOGY; REVIEW;

EUKARYOTA;

CELL NUCLEUS; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; HUMANS; NERVOUS SYSTEM DISEASES; RNA EDITING; RNA, UNTRANSLATED;

EID: 77957606554     PISSN: 00778923     EISSN: 17496632     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05718.x     Document Type: Article

References (181)

1. Mehler, M.F. 2008. Epigenetic principles and mechanisms underlying nervous systemfunctions in health and disease. Prog. Neurobiol. 86: 305-341.
2. Robertson, K.D. 2005. DNA methylation and human disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6: 597-610.
3. Jenuwein, T. & C.D. Allis. 2001. Translating the histone code. Science 293: 1074-1080.
4. Kouzarides, T. 2007. Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell 128: 693-705.
5. Szyf, M. 2009. Epigenetics, DNA methylation, and chromatin modifying drugs. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 49: 243-263.
6. Cairns, B.R. 2009. The logic of chromatin architecture and remodelling at promoters. Nature 461: 193-198.
7. Schoeftner, S. & M.A. Blasco. 2009. A 'higher order' of telomere regulation: telomere heterochromatin and telomeric RNAs. EMBO J. 28: 2323-2336.
8. Peng, J.C. & G.H. Karpen. 2008. Epigenetic regulation of heterochromatic DNA stability. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 18: 204-211.
9. Payer, B. & J.T. Lee. 2008. X chromosome dosage compensation: how mammals keep the balance. Annu. Rev. Genet. 42: 733-772.
10. Mattick, J.S. et al. 2009. RNA regulation of epigenetic processes. Bioessays 31: 51-59.
11. Qureshi, I.A. & M.F. Mehler. 2009. Regulation of noncoding RNA networks in the nervous system-what's the REST of the story? Neurosci. Lett. 466: 73-80.
12. Nunez, E., X.D. Fu & M.G. Rosenfeld. 2009. Nuclear organization in the 3D space of the nucleus - cause or consequence? Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 19: 424-436.
13. Zhao, R., M.S. Bodnar&D.L. Spector. 2009.Nuclear neighborhoods and gene expression. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 19: 172-179.
14. Lanctot, C. et al. 2007. Dynamic genome architecture in the nuclear space: regulation of gene expression in three dimensions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8: 104-115.
15. Joffe, B., H. Leonhardt & I. Solovei. 2010. Differentiation and large scale spatial organization of the genome. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. Jun 17. [Epub ahead of print].
16. Carninci, P. et al. 2005. The transcriptional landscape of the mammalian genome. Science 309: 1559-1563.
17. Katayama, S. et al. 2005. Antisense transcription in the mammalian transcriptome. Science 309: 1564-1566.
18. Birney, E. et al. 2007. Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project. Nature 447: 799-816.
19. Taft, R.J. et al. 2010. Non-coding RNAs: regulators of disease. J. Pathol. 220: 126-139.
20. St Laurent, G., 3rd & C. Wahlestedt. 2007. Noncoding RNAs: couplers of analog and digital information in nervous system function? Trends Neurosci. 30: 612-621.
21. Farajollahi, S.&S.Maas. 2010.Molecular diversity through RNA editing: a balancing act. Trends Genet. 26: 221-230.
22. Cohen, M. et al. 2001. Transcriptional repression, apoptosis, human disease and the functional evolution of the nuclear lamina. Trends Biochem. Sci. 26: 41-47.
23. De Sandre-Giovannoli, A. et al. 2002. Homozygous defects in LMNA, encoding lamin A/C nuclear-envelope proteins, cause autosomal recessive axonal neuropathy in human (Charcot-Marie-Tooth disorder type 2) and mouse. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 70: 726-736.
24. Arocena, D.G. et al. 2005. Induction of inclusion formation and disruption of lamin A/C structure by premutation CGG-repeat RNA in human cultured neural cells. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14: 3661-3671.
25. Padiath, Q.S. et al. 2006. Lamin B1 duplications cause autosomal dominant leukodystrophy. Nat. Genet. 38: 1114-1123.
26. Sheffield, L.G. et al. 2006.Nuclear pore complex proteins in Alzheimer disease. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 65: 45-54.
27. Shumaker, D.K. et al. 2006.Mutant nuclear laminAleads to progressive alterations of epigenetic control in premature aging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 8703-8708.
28. Valero, J. et al. 2006. Pre-neurodegeneration of mitral cells in the pcd mutant mouse is associated with DNA damage, transcriptional repression, and reorganization of nuclear speckles and Cajal bodies. Mol. Cell Neurosci. 33: 283-295.
29. Liu, J. & I.D. Krantz. 2008. Cohesin and human disease. Annu. Rev. Genomics. Hum. Genet. 9: 303-320.
30. Vasudevaraju, P. et al. 2008. Role of DNA dynamics in Alzheimer's disease. Brain Res. Rev. 58: 136-148.
31. Woulfe, J. 2008. Nuclear bodies in neurodegenerative disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1783: 2195-2206.
32. Bose, T. & J.L. Gerton. 2010. Cohesinopathies, gene expression, andchromatin organization. J. Cell Biol. 189: 201-210.
33. Konietzko, U. et al. 2010. Co-localization of the amyloid precursor protein and Notch intracellular domains in nuclear transcription factories. Neurobiol. Aging. 31: 58-73.
34. Orr, H.T. 2010. Nuclear ataxias. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2: a000786.
35. Worman, H.J., C. Ostlund & Y. Wang. 2010. Diseases of the nuclear envelope. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2: a000760.
36. Pheasant, M. & J.S. Mattick. 2007. Raising the estimate of functional human sequences. Genome. Res. 17: 1245-1253.
37. Gingeras, T.R. 2009. Implications of chimaeric non-colinear transcripts. Nature 461: 206-211.
38. Jeziorska, D.M., K.W. Jordan&K.W.Vance. 2009.Asystems biology approach to understanding cis-regulatory module function. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 20: 856-862.
39. Denoeud, F. et al. 2007. Prominent use of distal 5' transcription start sites and discovery of a large number of additional exons in ENCODE regions. Genome. Res. 17: 746-759.
40. Bulger, M.&M.Groudine. 2010. Enhancers: the abundance and function of regulatory sequences beyond promoters. Dev. Biol. 339: 250-257.
41. Theo Sijtse Palstra, R.J. 2009. Close encounters of the 3C kind: long-range chromatin interactions and transcriptional regulation. Brief Funct. Genomic. Proteomic. 8: 297-309.
42. Wallace, J.A. & G. Felsenfeld. 2007. We gather together: insulators and genome organization. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 17: 400-407.
43. Ohlsson, R., V. Lobanenkov&E.Klenova. 2010. DoesCTCF mediate between nuclear organization and gene expression? Bioessays 32: 37-50.
44. Raab, J.R. & R.T. Kamakaka. 2010. Insulators and promoters: closer than we think. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11: 439-446.
45. Brickner, D.G. et al. 2007. H2A.Z-mediated localization of genes at the nuclear periphery confers epigenetic memory of previous transcriptional state. PLoS Biol. 5: e81.
46. Chow, C.M. et al. 2005. Variant histone H3.3 marks promoters of transcriptionally active genes during mammalian cell division. EMBO Rep. 6: 354-360.
47. Goldberg, A.D. et al. 2010. Distinct factors control histone variant H3.3 localization at specific genomic regions. Cell 140: 678-691.
48. Aoto, T. et al. 2006. Nuclear and chromatin reorganization in the MHC-Oct3/4 locus at developmental phases of embryonic stem cell differentiation. Dev. Biol. 298: 354-367.
49. Abrajano, J.J. et al. 2009. REST andCoREST modulate neuronal subtype specification, maturation and maintenance. PLoS One. 4: e7936.
50. Abrajano, J.J. et al. 2009. Differential deployment of REST and CoREST promotes glial subtype specification and oligodendrocyte lineage maturation. PLoS One 4: e7665.
51. Mattick, J.S. 2009. Deconstructing the dogma: a new view of the evolution and genetic programming of complex organisms. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1178: 29-46.
52. Rebollo, R. et al. 2010. Jumping genes and epigenetics: Towards new species. Gene 454: 1-7.
53. Coufal, N.G. et al. 2009. L1 retrotransposition in human neural progenitor cells. Nature 460: 1127-1131.
54. Faulkner, G.J. et al. 2009. The regulated retrotransposon transcriptome of mammalian cells. Nat. Genet. 41: 563-571.
55. Chang, S. et al. 2009. Small regulatory RNAs in neurodevelopmental disorders. Hum. Mol. Genet. 18: R18-R26.
56. Thomson, T.&H. Lin. 2009. The biogenesis and function of PIWI proteins and piRNAs: progress and prospect. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 25: 355-376.
57. Li, C. et al. 2009. Collapse of germline piRNAs in the absence of Argonaute3 reveals somatic piRNAs in flies. Cell 137: 509-521.
58. Schratt, G. 2009. Fine-tuning neural gene expression with microRNAs. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 19: 213-219.
59. Qureshi, I.A., J.S. Mattick & M.F.Mehler. 2010. Long noncodingRNAs in nervous systemfunction and disease. Brain Res. 1338: 20-35.
60. Mercer, T.R., M.E. Dinger & J.S. Mattick. 2009. Long noncoding RNAs: insights into functions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10: 155-159.
61. Mercer, T.R. et al. 2008. Specific expression of long noncoding RNAs in themouse brain. Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105: 716-721.
62. Ponjavic, J. et al. 2009. Genomic and transcriptional colocalization of protein-coding and long non-coding RNA pairs in the developing brain. PLoS Genet. 5: e1000617.
63. Fineberg, S.K., K.S. Kosik & B.L. Davidson. 2009. MicroRNAs potentiate neural development. Neuron 64: 303-309.
64. Royo, H. & J. Cavaille. 2008. Non-coding RNAs in imprinted gene clusters. Biol Cell 100: 149-166.
65. Mehler, M.F. & J.S. Mattick. 2007. Noncoding RNAs and RNA editing in brain development, functional diversification, and neurological disease. Physiol. Rev. 87: 799-823.
66. Mercer, T.R. et al. 2010. Long noncodingRNAs in neuronalglial fate specification and oligodendrocyte lineage maturation. BMC Neurosci. 11: 14.
67. Dinger, M.E. et al. 2008. Long noncoding RNAs in mouse embryonic stem cell pluripotency and differentiation. Genome Res. 18: 1433-1445.
68. Sheik Mohamed, J. et al. 2010. Conserved long noncoding RNAs transcriptionally regulated byOct4 andNanogmodulate pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells. RNA 16: 324-337.
69. Nishikura, K. 2009. Functions and Regulation ofRNAEditing by ADAR Deaminases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 79: 321-349.
70. Paz-Yaacov, N. et al. 2010.Adenosine-to-inosineRNAediting shapes transcriptome diversity in primates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107: 12174-12179.
71. Zhou, L. et al. 2009. Activation of toll-like receptor-3 induces interferon-lambda expression in human neuronal cells. Neuroscience 159: 629-637.
72. Schumann, G.G. 2007. APOBEC3 proteins: major players in intracellular defence against LINE-1-mediated retrotransposition. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 35: 637-642.
73. Vuppalanchi, D., D.E. Willis & J.L. Twiss. 2009. Regulation of mRNA transport and translation in axons. Results Probl. Cell Differ. 48: 193-224.
74. Chotiner, J.K. et al. 2010. Assessment of the role of MAP kinase in mediating activity-dependent transcriptional activation of the immediate early gene Arc/Arg3.1 in the dentate gyrus in vivo. Learn Mem. 17: 117-129.
75. Buchan, J.R. & R. Parker. 2009. Eukaryotic stress granules: the ins and outs of translation. Mol. Cell. 36: 932-941.
76. Anderson, P. & N. Kedersha. 2009. RNA granules: posttranscriptional and epigenetic modulators of gene expression. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10: 430-436.
77. Kulkarni, M., S. Ozgur & G. Stoecklin. 2010. On track with P-bodies. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 38: 242-251.
78. Mansfield, K.D.&J.D. Keene. 2009. The ribonome: a dominant force in co-ordinating gene expression. Biol. Cell. 101: 169-181.
79. Culjkovic, B. et al. 2006. eIF4E is a central node of an RNA regulon that governs cellular proliferation. J. Cell Biol. 175: 415-426.
80. Dinger, M.E., T.R. Mercer & J.S. Mattick. 2008. RNAs as extracellular signaling molecules. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 40: 151-159.
81. Feinberg, E.H. & C.P. Hunter. 2003. Transport of dsRNA into cells by the transmembrane protein SID-1. Science 301: 1545-1547.
82. McLellan, A.D. 2009. Exosome release by primary B cells. Crit. Rev. Immunol. 29: 203-217.
83. Smalheiser, N.R. 2009. DoNeural CellsCommunicatewith Endothelial Cells via Secretory Exosomes and Microvesicles? Cardiovasc. Psychiatry Neurol. Article ID 383086.
84. Mercer, T.R. et al. 2008. Noncoding RNAs in long-term memory formation. Neuroscientist 14: 434-445.
85. Chen, C. et al. 2010. Microfluidic isolation and transcriptome analysis of serum microvesicles. Lab Chip 10: 505-511.
86. Skog, J. et al. 2008. Glioblastoma microvesicles transport RNA and proteins that promote tumour growth and provide diagnostic biomarkers. Nat. Cell Biol. 10: 1470-1476.
87. Holbrook, S.R. 2008. Structural principles from large RNAs. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 37: 445-464.
88. Pang, K.C., M.C. Frith & J.S. Mattick. 2006. Rapid evolution of noncoding RNAs: lack of conservation does not mean lack of function. Trends Genet. 22: 1-5.
89. Andre, G. et al. 2008. S-box and T-box riboswitches and antisense RNA control a sulfur metabolic operon of Clostridium acetobutylicum. Nucleic Acids Res. 36: 5955-5969.
90. Wang, J.X. & R.R. Breaker. 2008. Riboswitches that sense S-adenosylmethionine and S-adenosylhomocysteine. Biochem. Cell Biol. 86: 157-168.
91. Regulski, E.E.&R.R.Breaker. 2008. In-line probing analysis of riboswitches. Methods Mol. Biol. 419: 53-67.
92. Barrick, J.E.&R.R. Breaker. 2007. The distributions,mechanisms, and structures of metabolite-binding riboswitches. Genome Biol. 8: R239.
93. Strobel, S.A. & J.C. Cochrane. 2007. RNA catalysis: ribozymes, ribosomes, and riboswitches. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 11: 636-643.
94. Coppins, R.L., K.B. Hall & E.A. Groisman. 2007. The intricate world of riboswitches. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 10: 176-181.
95. Henkin, T.M. & F.J. Grundy. 2006. Sensing metabolic signals with nascent RNA transcripts: the T box and S box riboswitches as paradigms. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant Biol. 71: 231-237.
96. Rouault, T.A. 2006. The role of iron regulatory proteins in mammalian iron homeostasis and disease. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2: 406-414.
97. Rogers, J.T. et al. 2008. Iron and the translation of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) and ferritinmRNAs: riboregulation against neural oxidative damage in Alzheimer's disease. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 36: 1282-1287.
98. Wang, G. & K.M. Vasquez. 2007. Z-DNA, an active element in the genome. Front Biosci. 12: 4424-4438.
99. Liu, H. et al. 2006. Cooperative activity of BRG1 and ZDNA formation in chromatin remodeling. Mol. Cell Biol. 26: 2550-2559.
100. Placido, D. et al. 2007. A left-handed RNA double helix bound by the Z alpha domain of the RNA-editing enzyme ADAR1. Structure 15: 395-404.
101. Hetzer, M.W. 2010. The nuclear envelope. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2: a000539.
102. Strambio-De-Castillia, C., M. Niepel & M.P. Rout. 2010. The nuclear pore complex: bridging nuclear transport and gene regulation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11: 490-501.
103. Wilson, K.L. & R. Foisner. 2010. Lamin-binding Proteins. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2: a000554.
104. Cremer, T. & C. Cremer. 2001. Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2: 292-301.
105. Lieberman-Aiden, E. et al. 2009. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326: 289-293.
106. Pickersgill, H. et al. 2006. Characterization of the Drosophila melanogaster genome at the nuclear lamina. Nat. Genet. 38: 1005-1014.
107. Kumaran, R.I. & D.L. Spector. 2008. A genetic locus targeted to the nuclear periphery in living cells maintains its transcriptional competence. J. Cell Biol. 180: 51-65.
108. Williams, R.R. et al. 2006. Neural induction promotes large-scale chromatin reorganisation of the Mash1 locus. J. Cell Sci. 119: 132-140.
109. Nielsen, J.A., L.D. Hudson & R.C. Armstrong. 2002. Nuclear organization in differentiating oligodendrocytes. J. Cell Sci. 115: 4071-4079.
110. Hewitt, S.L. et al. 2004. Nuclear repositioning marks the selective exclusion of lineage-inappropriate transcription factor loci during T helper cell differentiation. Eur. J. Immunol. 34: 3604-3613.
111. Ahmed, S.&J.H. Brickner. 2007. Regulation and epigenetic control of transcription at the nuclear periphery. Trends Genet. 23: 396-402.
112. Brickner, J.H. 2009. Transcriptionalmemory at the nuclear periphery. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21: 127-133.
113. Kundu, S., P.J. Horn & C.L. Peterson. 2007. SWI/SNF is required for transcriptional memory at the yeast GAL gene cluster. Genes Dev. 21: 997-1004.
114. Tan-Wong, S.M., H.D.Wijayatilake&N.J. Proudfoot. 2009. Gene loops function to maintain transcriptional memory through interaction with the nuclear pore complex. Genes Dev. 23: 2610-2624.
115. Laine, J.P. et al. 2009. A physiological role for gene loops in yeast. Genes Dev. 23: 2604-2609.
116. Lamond, A.I. & J.E. Sleeman. 2003. Nuclear substructure and dynamics. Curr. Biol. 13: R825-828.
117. Osborne, C.S. et al. 2007. Myc dynamically and preferentially relocates to a transcription factory occupied by Igh. PLoS Biol. 5: e192.
118. Schoenfelder, S. et al. 2010. Preferential associations between co-regulated genes reveal a transcriptional interactome in erythroid cells. Nat. Genet. 42: 53-61.
119. Dhar, S.S., S. Ongwijitwat&M.T.Wong-Riley. 2009. Chromosome conformation capture of all 13 genomic Loci in the transcriptional regulation of the multisubunit bigenomic cytochrome C oxidase in neurons. J. Biol. Chem. 284: 18644-18650.
120. Ferrai, C. et al. 2010. Poised transcription factories prime silent uPA gene prior to activation. PLoS Biol. 8: e1000270.
121. Cook, P.R. 1999. The organization of replication and transcription. Science 284: 1790-1795.
122. Louvet, E. et al. 2005. Dynamics and compartmentation of the nucleolar processing machinery. Exp. Cell Res. 304: 457-470.
123. Shav-Tal, Y. et al. 2005. Dynamic sorting of nuclear components into distinct nucleolar caps during transcriptional inhibition. Mol. Biol. Cell. 16: 2395-2413.
124. McStay, B. & I. Grummt. 2008. The epigenetics of rRNA genes: from molecular to chromosome biology. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 24: 131-157.
125. Mayer, C. et al. 2006. Intergenic transcripts regulate the epigenetic state of rRNA genes. Mol. Cell. 22: 351-361.
126. Makeyev, E.V. et al. 2007. The MicroRNA miR-124 promotes neuronal differentiation by triggering brainspecific alternative pre-mRNA splicing. Mol. Cell. 27: 435-448.
127. Klevecz, R.R. & D.B. Murray. 2001. Genome wide oscillations in expression. Wavelet analysis of time series data from yeast expression arrays uncovers the dynamic architecture of phenotype. Mol. Biol. Rep. 28: 73-82.
128. Nizami, Z., S. Deryusheva&J.G.Gall. 2010. TheCajal Body and Histone Locus Body. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2(7): a000653. Epub 2010 May 26.
129. Pontes, O. & C.S. Pikaard. 2008. siRNA and miRNA processing: new functions for Cajal bodies. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 18: 197-203.
130. Borden, K.L. 2008. Pondering the puzzle of PML (promyelocytic leukemia) nuclear bodies: can we fit the pieces together using anRNAregulon? Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1783: 2145-2154.
131. Gurrieri, C. et al. 2004. Loss of the tumor suppressor PML in human cancers of multiple histologic origins. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 96: 269-279.
132. Van Damme, E. et al. 2010. A manually curated network of the PML nuclear body interactome reveals an important role for PML-NBs in SUMOylation dynamics. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 6: 51-67.
133. Yeager, T.R. et al. 1999. Telomerase-negative immortalized humancells contain a novel type of promyelocytic leukemia (PML) body. Cancer Res. 59: 4175-4179.
134. Kumar, P.P. et al. 2007. Functional interaction between PMLandSATB1regulates chromatin-loop architecture and transcription of theMHCclass I locus. Nat. Cell Biol. 9: 45-56.
135. Drane, P. et al. 2010. The death-associated protein DAXX is a novel histone chaperone involved in the replicationindependent deposition of H3.3. Genes Dev. 24: 1253-1265.
136. Regad, T. et al. 2009. The tumor suppressor Pml regulates cell fate in the developing neocortex. Nat. Neurosci. 12: 132-140.
137. Ito, K. et al. 2008. PML targeting eradicates quiescent leukaemia-initiating cells. Nature 453: 1072-1078.
138. Li, W., T. Rich & C.J.Watson. 2009. PML: a tumor suppressor that regulates cell fate in mammary gland. Cell Cycle 8: 2711-2717.
139. Saitoh, N. et al. 2004. Proteomic analysis of interchromatin granule clusters. Mol. Biol. Cell. 15: 3876-3890.
140. Salichs, E. et al. 2009. Genome-wide analysis of histidine repeats reveals their role in the localization of human proteins to the nuclear speckles compartment. PLoS Genet. 5: e1000397.
141. Brown, J.M. et al. 2008. Association between active genes occurs at nuclear speckles and is modulated by chromatin environment. J. Cell Biol. 182: 1083-1097.
142. Dent, M.A. et al. 2010. NeuN/Fox-3 is an intrinsic component of the neuronal nuclear matrix. FEBS Lett. 584: 2767-2771.
143. Sunwoo, H. et al. 2009.MENepsilon/beta nuclear-retained non-coding RNAs are up-regulated upon muscle differentiation and are essential components of paraspeckles. Genome Res. 19: 347-359.
144. Clemson, C.M. et al. 2009. An architectural role for a nuclear noncoding RNA: NEAT1 RNA is essential for the structure of paraspeckles. Mol. Cell. 33: 717-726.
145. Bond, C.S. & A.H. Fox. 2009. Paraspeckles: nuclear bodies built on long noncoding RNA. J. Cell Biol. 186: 637-644.
146. Sasaki, Y.T. et al. 2009. MENepsilon/beta noncoding RNAs are essential for structural integrity of nuclear paraspeckles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106: 2525-2530.
147. Zhang, Z. & G.G. Carmichael. 2001. The fate of dsRNA in the nucleus: a p54(nrb)-containing complex mediates the nuclear retention of promiscuously A-to-I edited RNAs. Cell 106: 465-475.
148. Prasanth, K.V. et al. 2005. Regulating gene expression through RNA nuclear retention. Cell 123: 249-263.
149. Ramskold, D. et al. 2009. An abundance of ubiquitously expressed genes revealed by tissue transcriptome sequence data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5: e1000598.
150. Chen, L.L. & G.G. Carmichael. 2009. Altered nuclear retention of mRNAs containing inverted repeats in human embryonic stem cells: functional role of a nuclear noncoding RNA. Mol. Cell. 35: 467-478.
151. Hata, K. et al. 2008. Paraspeckle protein p54nrb links Sox9-mediated transcription with RNA processing during chondrogenesis in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 118: 3098-3108.
152. Brown, S.A. et al. 2005. PERIOD1-associated proteins modulate the negative limb of the mammalian circadian oscillator. Science 308: 693-696.
153. Sone, M. et al. 2007. The mRNA-like noncoding RNA Gomafu constitutes a novel nuclear domain in a subset of neurons. J. Cell Sci. 120: 2498-2506.
154. Biamonti, G. & C. Vourc'h. 2010. Nuclear stress bodies. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2: a000695.
155. Li, L. et al. 2006. Dynamic nature of cleavage bodies and their spatial relationship to DDX1bodies, Cajal bodies, and gems. Mol. Biol. Cell. 17: 1126-1140.
156. Gil, J. et al. 2004. Polycomb CBX7 has a unifying role in cellular lifespan. Nat. Cell Biol. 6: 67-72.
157. Downes, M. et al. 2000. Identification of a nuclear domain with deacetylase activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 10330-10335.
158. Lafarga, M. et al. 2002. Clastosome: a subtype of nuclear body enriched in 19S and 20S proteasomes, ubiquitin, and protein substrates of proteasome.Mol. Biol. Cell. 13: 2771-2782.
159. Li, L., E.A.Monckton&R.Godbout. 2008.Arole for DEAD box 1 at DNA double-strand breaks. Mol. Cell Biol. 28: 6413-6425.
160. Manfiolli, A.O. et al. 2008. FBXO25-associated nuclear domains: a novel subnuclear structure. Mol. Biol, Cell. 19: 1848-1861.
161. Scaffidi, P. & T. Misteli. 2006. Lamin A-dependent nuclear defects in human aging. Science 312: 1059-1063.
162. Bione, S. et al. 1994. Identification of a novel X-linked gene responsible for Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy. Nat. Genet. 8: 323-327.
163. Gros-Louis, F. et al. 2007. Mutations in SYNE1 lead to a newly discovered form of autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxia. Nat. Genet. 39: 80-85.
164. Ozelius, L.J. et al. 1997. The early-onset torsion dystonia gene (DYT1) encodes an ATP-binding protein. Nat. Genet. 17: 40-48.
165. Hakelien, A.M. et al. 2008. Expression of themyodystrophic R453W mutation of lamin A in C2C12 myoblasts causes promoter-specific and global epigenetic defects. Exp. Cell Res. 314: 1869-1880.
166. Makatsori, D. et al. 2004. The inner nuclear membrane protein lamin B receptor forms distinctmicrodomains and links epigenetically marked chromatin to the nuclear envelope. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 25567-25573.
167. Vuilleumier, N. et al. 2002. Neuropathological analysis of an adult case of the Cornelia de Lange syndrome. Acta Neuropathol. 104: 327-332.
168. Wendt, K.S. & J.M. Peters. 2009. How cohesin and CTCF cooperate in regulating gene expression. Chromosome Res. 17: 201-214.
169. Gard, S. et al. 2009. Cohesinopathy mutations disrupt the subnuclear organization of chromatin. J. Cell Biol. 187: 455-462.
170. Lefebvre, S. et al. 1995. Identification and characterization of a spinal muscular atrophy-determining gene. Cell 80: 155-165.
171. Ule, J. 2008. Ribonucleoprotein complexes in neurologic diseases. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 18: 516-523.
172. Clelland, A.K. et al. 2009. The SMNprotein is a key regulator of nuclear architecture in differentiating neuroblastoma cells. Traffic 10: 1585-1598.
173. Fujimura, K., F. Kano&M.Murata. 2008. Dual localization of the RNA binding protein CUGBP-1 to stress granule and perinucleolar compartment. Exp. Cell Res. 314: 543-553.
174. Ricciardi, S. et al. 2009. CDKL5 influences RNA splicing activity by its association to the nuclear speckle molecular machinery. Hum. Mol. Genet. 18: 4590-4602.
175. Casafont, I. et al. 2009. TDP-43 localizes in mRNA transcription and processing sites in mammalian neurons. J. Struct. Biol. 167: 235-241.
176. Luciani, J.J. et al. 2006. PML nuclear bodies are highly organised DNA-protein structures with a function in heterochromatin remodelling at the G2 phase. J. Cell Sci. 119: 2518-2531.
177. Servadio, A. et al. 1995. Expression analysis of the ataxin-1 protein in tissues from normal and spinocerebellar ataxia type 1 individuals. Nat. Genet. 10: 94-98.
178. Zuhlke, C. et al. 2001. Different types of repeat expansion in the TATA-binding protein gene are associated with a new form of inherited ataxia. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 9: 160-164.
179. Savitsky, K. et al. 1995. A single ataxia telangiectasia gene with a product similar to PI-3 kinase. Science 268: 1749-1753.
180. Takashima, H. et al. 2002. Mutation of TDP1, encoding a topoisomerase I-dependent DNA damage repair enzyme, in spinocerebellar ataxia with axonal neuropathy. Nat. Genet. 32: 267-272.
181. Moreira, M.C. et al. 2001. The gene mutated in ataxiaocular apraxia 1 encodes the new HIT/Zn-finger protein aprataxin. Nat. Genet. 29: 189-193.