Speed of lexical and nonlexical processing in French: The case of the regularity effect

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 947-953

  Ziegler, Johannes C ^a   Perry, Conrad ^b,c   Coltheart, Max ^c  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^c MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842787577     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196556     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. ANDREWS, S. (1982). Phonological recoding: Is the regularity effect consistent? Memory & Cognition, 10, 565-575.
2. ANS, B., CARBONNEL, S., & VALDOIS, S. (1998). A connectionist multiple-trace memory model for polysyllabic word reading. Psychological Review, 105, 678-723.
3. BALOTA, D. A., & CHUMBLEY, J. I. (1985). The locus of word frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production? Journal of Memory & Language, 24, 89-106.
4. BARON, J., & STRAWSON, C. (1976). Use of orthographic and word-specific knowledge in reading words aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 2, 383-393.
5. COHEN J. D., MACWHINNEY B., FLATT, M., & PROVOST, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive system for graphic designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257-271.
6. COLTHEART, M., & RASTLE, K. (1994). Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for dual-route models of reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 1197-1211.
7. COLTHEART, M., RASTLE, K., PERRY, C., LANGDON, R., & ZIEGLER, J. C. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
8. CONTENT, A. (1991). The effect of spelling-to-sound regularity on naming in French. Psychological Research, 53, 3-12.
9. FROST, R., KATZ, L., & BENTIN, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographic depth: A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 13, 104-115.
10. GAK, V. G. (1976). L'orthographe du français. Paris: SELAF.
11. GOSWAMI, U., ZIEGLER, J. C., DALTON, L., & SCHNEIDER, W. (2001). Pseudohomophone effects and phonological recoding procedures in reading development in English and German. Journal of Memory & Language, 45, 648-664.
12. JARED, D. (1997). Spelling-sound consistency affects the naming of high-frequency words. Journal of Memory & Language, 36, 505-529.
13. JARED, D. (2002). Spelling-sound consistency and regularity effects in word naming. Journal of Memory & Language, 46, 723-750.
14. KATZ, L., & FELDMAN, L. B. (1983). Relation between pronunciation and recognition of printed words in deep and shallow orthographies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 9, 157-166.
15. KATZ, L., & FROST, R. (1992). The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 45-66). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
16. PAAP, K. R., & NOEL, R. W. (1991). Dual-route models of print to sound: Still a good horse race. Psychological Research, 53, 13-24.
17. PAULESU, E., MCCRORY, E., FAZIO, F., MENONCELLO, L., BRUNSWICK, N., CAPPA, S. F., COTELLI, M., Cossu, G., CORTE, F., LORUSSO, M., PESENTI, S., GALLAGHER, A., PERANI, D., PRICE, C., FRITH, C. D., & FRITH, U. (2000). A cultural effect on brain function. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 91-96.
18. PEEREMAN, R., & CONTENT, A. (1999). LEXOP: A lexical database providing orthography-phonology statistics for French monosyllabic words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 376-379.
19. PLAUT, D. C., MCCLELLAND, J. L., SEIDENBERG, M. S., & PATTERSON, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
20. RASTLE, K., & COLTHEART, M. (1998). Whammies and double whammies: The effect of length on nonword reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 277-282.
21. RASTLE, K., & COLTHEART, M. (1999a). Lexical and nonlexical phonological priming in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 461-481.
22. RASTLE, K., & COLTHEART, M. (1999b). Serial and strategic effects in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 482-503.
23. SEIDENBERO, M. S., & MCCLELLAND, J. L. (1989). A distributed developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
24. SEIDENBERG, M. S., WATERS, G. S., BARNES, M. A., & TANENHAUS, M. K. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition? Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 23, 383-404.
25. TARABAN, R., & MCCLELLAND, J. L. (1987). Conspiracy effects in word pronunciation. Journal of Memory & Language, 26, 608-631.
26. ZIEGLER, J. C., JACOBS, A. M., & STONE, G. O. (1996). Statistical analysis of the bidirectional inconsistency of spelling and sound in French. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 504-515.
27. ZIEGLER, J. C., PERRY, C., & COLTHEART, M. (2000). The DRC model of visual word recognition and reading aloud: An extension to German. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12, 413-430.
28. ZIEGLER, J. C., PERRY, C., JACOBS, A. M., & BRAUN, M. (2001). Identical words are read differently in different languages. Psychological Science, 12, 379-384.
29. ZORZI, M., HOUGHTON, G., & BUTTERWORTH, B. (1998). Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1131-1161.