Stressing what is important: Orthographic cues and lexical stress assignment

Journal of Neurolinguistics

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 237-249

  Ševa, Nada ^a   Monaghan, Padraic ^b   Arciuli, Joanne ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Connectionist model of stress assignment

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; SIMULATION;

EID: 60649121120     PISSN: 09116044     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2008.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ans B., Carbonnel S., and Valdois S. A connectionist multi-trace memory model of polysyllabic word reading. Psychological Review 105 (1998) 678-723
2. Arciuli J., and Cupples L. The processing of lexical stress during visual word recognition: typicality effects and orthographic correlates. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 5 (2006) 920-948
3. Arciuli J., and Cupples L. Would you rather 'embert a cudsert' or 'cudsert an embert'? How spelling patterns at the beginning of English disyllables can cue grammatical category. In: Schalley A., and Khlentzos D. (Eds). Mental statesLanguage and cognitive structure (2007), John Benjamins Publishing.
4. Arciuli, J., & Thompson, J. (6-8 December, 2006). Improving the assignment of lexical stress in text-to-speech systems. Proceedings of the 11th Australian International Conference on speech science and technology (pp. 296-300). New Zealand, University of Auckland.
5. Baayen R.H., Piepenbrock R., and van Rijn H. The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM) (1993), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA Linguistic Data Consortium
6. Chomsky N., and Halle M. The sound pattern of English (1968), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
7. Coltheart M. Dual routes from print to speech and dual routes from print to meaning: some theoretical issues. In: Kennedy A., Radach R., Pynte J., and Heller D. (Eds). Reading as a perceptual process (2000), Elsevier, Oxford
8. Coltheart M., Rastle K., Perry C., Langdon R., and Ziegler J. DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review 108 (2001) 204-256
9. Daelemans W., Gillis S., and Durieux G. The acquisition of stress: a data-oriented approach. Computational Linguistics 20 (1994) 421-451
10. Fudge E. English word-stress (1984), George Allen & Unwin, London
11. Garde P. L'Accent (1968), Presses Univenitaires de France, Paris
12. Gerken L.A. Prosody's role in language acquisition and adult parsing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 25 (1996) 345-356
13. Gerken L.A., Jusczyk P.W., and Mandel D.R. When prosody fails to cue syntactic structure: nine-month-olds' sensitivity to phonological vs. syntactic phrases. Cognition 51 (1994) 237-265
14. Gupta P., and Touretzky D. Connectionist models and linguistic theory: investigations of stress systems in language. Cognitive Science 18 1 (1994) 1-50
15. Harm M.W., and Seidenberg M.S. Reading acquisition, phonology, and dyslexia: insights from a connectionist model. Psychological Review 106 (1999) 491-528
16. Harm M.W., and Seidenberg M.S. Computing the meanings of words in reading: cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review 111 (2004) 662-720
17. Kelly M.H. Words onset patterns and lexical stress in English. Journal of Memory and Language 50 (2004) 231-244
18. Kelly M.H., and Bock J.K. Stress in time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 14 (1988) 389-403
19. Kelly M.H., Morris J., and Verrekia L. Orthographic cues to lexical stress: effects on naming and lexical decision. Memory & Cognition 26 (1998) 822-832
20. Macmillan N.A., and Creelman C.D. Detection theory: A user's guide. 2nd ed. (2005), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
21. Monaghan P., Christiansen M.H., and Chater N. The phonological-distributional coherence hypothesis: cross-linguistic evidence in language acquisition. Cognitive Psychology 55 (2007) 259-305
22. Monaghan, P., & Shillcock, R. C. Hemispheric dissociation and dyslexia in a computational model of reading. Brain and Language, in press.
23. Onnis L., Monaghan P., Richmond K., and Chater N. Phonology impacts segmentation in speech processing. Journal of Memory and Language 53 2 (2005) 225-237
24. Pagliuca, G., & Monaghan, P. (submitted for publication). DANTE++: a connectionist model for reading polysyllabic words in Italian. Proceedings of the 11th neural computation and psychology workshop. Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific.
25. Perry C., Ziegler J.C., and Zorzi M. Nested incremental modelling in the development of computational theories: the CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review 114 (2007) 273-315
26. Plaut D.C., McClelland J.L., Seidenberg M.S., and Patterson K. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review 103 (1996) 56-115
27. Rastle K., and Coltheart M. Lexical and nonlexical print-to-sound translation of disyllabic words and nonwords. Journal of Memory and Language 42 (2000) 342-364
28. Roach P., and Hartman J. The English pronouncing dictionary. 15th ed. (1997), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
29. Rogers T.T., and McClelland J.L. Semantic cognition: A parallel distributed processing approach (2004), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
30. Seidenberg M.S., and McClelland J.L. A distributed developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review 96 (1989) 523-568
31. Shaywitz B.A., Lyon G.R., and Shaywitz S.E. The role of functional magnetic resonance imaging in understanding reading and dyslexia. Developmental Neuropsychology 30 (2006) 613-632
32. Zevin J., and Joanisse M. Stress assignment in nonword reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 41B (2000) S5