Effects of stress typicality during speeded grammatical classification

Language and Speech

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 353-374

  Arciuli, Joanne ^a,b   Cupples, Linda ^a  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Disyllabic words; Grammatical classification; Individual differences; Lexical stress; Non native speakers

Indexed keywords

EID: 2942627899     PISSN: 00238309     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00238309030460040101     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. th Annual Australasian Experimental Psychology Conference. Australian Journal of Psychology, 54, 47 -65.
2. ARCIULI, J., & CUPPLES, L. (2003). The processing of lexical stress during visual word recognition: Typicality effects and orthographic correlates. Manuscript submitted for publication.
3. ARCIULI, J., & CUPPLES, L. (2004). Effects of stress typicality during spoken word recognition by native and non-native speakers of English: Evidence from onset gating. Memory and Cognition, 32(1), 21-30.
4. BAAYEN, R., PIEPENBROCK, R., & Van RIJN, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
5. BATES, E., DEVESCOVI, A., PIZZAMIGLIO, L., DAMICO, S., & HERNANDEZ, A. (1995). Gender and lexical access in Italian. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 847 -862.
6. BLACK, M., & BYNG, S. (1986). Prosodic constraints on lexical access in reading. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 3, 369-409.
7. BLACK, M., & CHIAT, S. (2003). Noun-verb dissociations: A multifaceted phenomenon. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 16, 231-250.
8. BOND, Z., & SMALL, L. (1983). Voicing, vowel and stress mispronunciations in continuous speech. Perception & Psychophysics, 34, 470-474.
9. BROWN, P., LUPKER, S., & COLOMBO, L. (1994). Interacting sources of information in word naming: A study of individual differences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 537-554.
10. CASSIDY, K., & KELLY, M. H. (1991). Phonological information for grammatical category assignments. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 348-369.
11. CHATEAU, D., & JARED, D. (2003). Spelling-sound consistency effects in disyllabic word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 255-280.
12. CHIARELLO, C., SHEARS, C., & LUND, K. (1999). Imageability and distributional typicality measures of nouns and verbs in contemporary English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 603-637.
13. COLOMBO, L. (1992). Lexical stress effect and its interaction with frequency in word pronunciation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 987-1003.
14. COLTHEART, M. (1981). The MRC psycholinguistic database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 497-505.
15. CUPPLES, L., & HOLMES, V. M. (1992). Evidence for a difference in syntactic knowledge between skilled and less skilled adult readers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 21, 249-274.
16. CUTLER, A., & CLIFTON, C. (1984). The use of prosodic information in word recognition. In H. Bouma, & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 183-196). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. CUTLER, A., & NORRIS, D. (1988). The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 113-121.
18. DAVIS, S. M., & KELLY, M. H. (1997). Knowledge of the English noun-verb stress difference by native and non-native speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 445-460.
19. DRUKS, J. (2002). Verbs and nouns - a review of the literature. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 15, 289-315.
20. FORSTER, K. I., & FORSTER, J. C. (1990). User's Guide To The DMASTR Display System. Unpublished manuscript.
21. FORSTER, K. I., & FORSTER, J. C. (1996). User's Guide To The DMDX Display System. Unpublished manuscript.
22. FRANCIS, W. N., & KUČERA, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
23. FUDGE, E. (1984). English word stress. London: Allen & Unwin.
24. KELLY, M. H. (1988). Rhythmic alternation and lexical stress difference in English. Cognition, 30, 107-137.
25. KELLY, M. H. (1992). Using sound to solve syntactic problems: The role of phonology in grammatical category assignments. Psychological Review, 99, 349-364.
26. KELLY, M. H., & BOCK, J. K. (1988). Stress in time. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 14, 389-403.
27. KELLY, M. H., MORRIS, J.. & VERREKIA, L. (1998). Orthographic cues to lexical stress: Effects on naming and lexical decision. Memory and Cognition, 26, 822-832.
28. KOSTER, M., & CUTLER, A. (1997). Segmental and suprasegmental contributions to spoken-word recognition in Dutch. Proceedings of Eurospeech. pp.2167-2170.
29. LEVY, Y. (1983). It's frogs all the way down. Cognition, 15, 75-93.
30. LEWELLEN, M. J., GOLDINGER, S. D., PISONI, D. B., & GREENE, B. G. (1993). Lexical familiarity and processing efficiency: Individual differences in naming, lexical decision, and semantic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 316-330.
31. MONAGHAN, P., CHATER, N., & CHRISTIANSEN, M. (submitted). Phonological typicality influences lexical processing.
32. MONSELL, S., DOYLE, M. C., & HAGGARD, P. N. (1989). Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: Where are they? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 43-71.
33. POPOVA, M. (1973). Grammatical elements of language in the speech of preschool children. In C. A. Ferguson & D. I. Slobin (Eds.), Studies of child language development (pp. 269-280). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
34. RASTLE, K., & COLTHEART, M. (2000). Lexical and nonlexical print-to-sound translation of disyllabic words and nonwords. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 342-364.
35. SCHILLING, H., RAYNER, K., & CHUMBLEY, J. (1998). Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences. Memory and Cognition, 26, 1270-1281.
36. SERENO, J. A. (1986). Stress pattern differentiation of form class in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 79, S36.
37. SERENO, J. A., & JONGMAN, A. (1990). Phonological and form class relations in the lexicon. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 19, 387-404.
38. SHERMAN, D. (1975). Noun-verb stress alternation: An example of lexical diffusion of sound change in English, 159, 47-71.
39. SHI, R., MORGAN, J., & ALLOPENNA, P. (1998). Phonological and acoustic bases for earliest grammatical category assignment: A cross-linguistic perspective. Journal of Child Language, 25, 169-201.
40. SLOWIACZEK, L. (1990). Effects of lexical stress in auditory word recognition. Language and Speech, 33, 47-68.
41. SLUIJTER, A., & Van HEUVEN, V. (1996). Spectral balance as an acoustic correlate of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 2471-2485.
42. SMALL, L., SIMON, S., & GOLDBERG, J. (1988). Lexical stress and lexical access: Homographs versus nonhomographs. Perception and Psychophysics, 44, 272-280.
43. SUPRENANT, A., & WATSON, C. (2001). Individual differences in the processing of speech and nonspeech sounds by normal-hearing listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110, 2085-2095.
44. TUCKER, G., LAMBERT, W., RIGAULT, A., & SEGALOWITZ, N. (1968). A psychological investigation of French speakers' skill with grammatical gender. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1, 312-316.
45. TYLER, L., & WESSELS, J. (1985). Is gating an on-line task? Evidence from naming latency. Perception and Psychophysics, 38, 217-222.
46. VAN BERGEM, D., (1993). Acoustic vowel reduction as a function of sentence accent, word stress, and word class. Speech Communication, 12, 1-23.
47. VAN KUIJK, D., & BOVES, L. (1999). Acoustic characteristics of lexical stress in continuous telephone speech. Speech Communication, 27, 95-111.
48. WEEKES, N., CAPETILLO-CUNLIFFE, L., RAYMAN, J., IACOBONI, M., & ZAIDEL, E. (1999). Individual differences in the hemispheric specialisation of dual route variables. Brain and language, 67, 110-133.
49. WINGFIELD, A., LINDFIELD, K., & GOODGLASS, H. (2000). Effects of age and hearing sensitivity on the use of prosodic information in spoken word recognition. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 43, 915-925.
50. ZUBIN, D., & KOPKE, K. (1981). Gender: A less than arbitrary category. In R. Hendrick, C. Masek, & M. F. Miller (Eds.), Papers from the Seventh Regional Meeting (pp.439-449). Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.