English syllabification as the interaction of markedness constraints

Studia Linguistica

Volumn 60, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 1-33

  Hall, T A ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645114307     PISSN: 00393193     EISSN: 14679582     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9582.2006.00131.x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. BOROWSKY, T. 1986. Topics in the Lexical Phonology of English. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Massachusetts at Amherst [Published 1990: New York: Garland].
2. BOROWSKY, T. 1989. Structure preservation and the syllable coda in English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7: 145-166.
3. CASALI, R. F. 1998. Resolving hiatus. New York: Garland.
4. CLEMENTS, G. N. 1990. The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the Grammar and Physics of Speech. ed. J. Kingston & M. E. Beckman, 283-333. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. DAVIS, S. & CHO, M.-H. 2003. The distribution of aspirated stops and /h/ in American English and Korean: an alignment approach with typological implications. Linguistics 41.4: 607-652.
6. DAVIS, S. & HAMMOND, M. 1995. On the status of onglides in American English. Phonology 12.2: 159-182.
7. DAVIS, S. & SHIN, S.-H. 1999. The syllable contact constraint in Korean: an Optimality-Theoretic analysis. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 8: 285-312.
8. DOGIL, G. & LUSCHÜTZKY, H. C. 1990. Notes on sonority and segmental strength. Rivista di Linguistica 2.2: 3-54.
9. GIEGERICH, H. 1992. English phonology. An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. GIEGERICH, H. 1999. Lexical strata in English. Morphological causes, phonological effects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. GREEN, A. 1997. The prosodic structure of Irish, Scots Gaelic, and Manx. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.
12. GREEN, A. 2001. The tense-lax distinction in English vowels and the role of parochial and analogical constraints. Linguistics in Potsdam 16: 32-57.
13. GREEN, A. D. 2003. Extrasyllabic consonants and onset well-formedness. The syllable in Optimality Theory, ed. C. Féry & R. van de Vijver, 238-253. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. GUSSENHOVEN, C. 1986. English plosive allophones and ambisyllabicity. Gramma 10: 119-141.
15. HALL, T. A. 2001. The distribution of superheavy syllables in Modern English. Folia Linguistica XXXV-3/4: 339-442.
16. HALL, T. A. 2002. Against extrasyllabic consonants in German and English. Phonology 19.1: 33-75.
17. HAMMOND, M. 1999. The phonology of English. A prosodic Optimality-Theoretic approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. HARRIS, J. 1994. English sound structure. Oxford: Blackwell.
19. HAYES, B. 1986. Inalterability in CV phonology. Language 62: 321-351.
20. HOARD, J. 1971. Aspiration, tenseness, and syllabication in English. Language 47: 133-140.
21. HOOPER, J. 1976. An introduction to Natural Generative Phonology. New York: Academic.
22. JAKOBSON, R. 1962. Selected writings 1: Phonological Studies. Den Haag: Mouton.
23. JENSEN, J. 1993. English phonology. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
24. JENSEN, J. 2000. Against ambisyllabicity. Phonology 17: 187-235.
25. KAHN, D. 1976. Syllable-based generalizations in English phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
26. KENSTOWICZ, M. 1994. Phonology in generative grammar. Cambridge: Blackwell.
27. KENYON, J. S. & KNOTT, T. A. 1953. A pronouncing dictionary of American English. Springfield: Merriam.
28. KIPARSKY, P. 1979. Metrical structure assignment is cyclic. Linguistic Inquiry 10: 421-441.
29. KIPARSKY, P. 1998. Sievers Law as prosodic organization. Mír Curad: Studies in honor of Calvert Watkins. ed. J. Jasanoff, H. C. Melchert & L. Oliver, 345-360. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.
30. LADEFOGED, P. 1993. A course in phonetics. Fort Worth: Harcourt and Brace.
31. MCCARTHY, J. & PRINCE, A. 1993. Generalized alignment. Yearbook of Morphology 1993. ed. G. Booij & J. van Marle, 79-153. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
32. MCCARTHY, J. & PRINCE, A. 1995. Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. Papers in Optimality Theory. ed. J. N. Beckman, L. Walsh Dickey & S. Urbanczyk, 249-384. Amherst, MA.: GLSA.
33. NESPOR, M. & VOGEL, I. 1986. Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.
34. PRINCE, A. & SMOLENSKY, P. 1993. Optimality Theory. Ms. Rutgers University and University of Colorado.
35. RAFFELSIEFEN, R. 1999. Phonological constraints on English word formation. Yearbook of Morphology 1998. ed. G. Booij & J. van Marie, 225-287. Kluwer.
36. RUBACH, J. 1996. Shortening and ambisyllabicity in English. Phonology 13.2: 197-237.
37. SELKIRK, E. O. 1982. The syllable. The structure of phonological representations. Part I. ed. H. van der Hulst & N. Smith, 337-382. Dordrecht: Foris.
38. SELKIRK, E. O. 1984. On the major class features and syllable theory. Language sound structure, ed. M. Aronoff& R. Oehrle, 107-137. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
39. STERIADE, D. 2000. Paradigm uniformity and the phonetics-phonology boundary. Papers in laboratory phonology 5. ed. M. Broe & J. Pierrehumbert, 313-334. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. VENNEMANN, T. 1972. On the theory of syllabic phonology. Linguistische Berichte 18: 1-18.
41. VENNEMANN, T. 1988. Preference laws for syllable structure and the explanation of sound change. Berlin: Mouton.