Learning orthographic and phonological representations in models of monosyllabic and bisyllabic naming

European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 650-668

  Sibley, Daragh E ^a   Kello, Christopher T ^b   Seidenberg, Mark S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Large scale connectionist modelling; Lexical processing; Sequence encoder; Simple recurrent network; Word reading

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; LEARNING; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; REVIEW; SIMULATION; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 77954980839     PISSN: 09541446     EISSN: 14640635     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09541440903080583     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Ans, B., Carbonnel, S., & Valdois, S. (1998). A connectionist multiple-trace memory model for polysyllabic word reading. Psychological Review, 105, 678-723.
2. Bailey, T. M., & Hahn, U. (2001). Determinants of wordlikeness: Phonotactic or lexical neighborhoods? Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 568-591.
3. Balota, A. A., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D., Simpson, G. B., & Treiman, R. (2002). The English lexicon project: A web-based repository of descriptive and behavioral measures for 40,481 English words and nonwords. Washington University. Retrieved from http://elixicon.wustl. edu
4. Bowers, J., & Davis, C. (2009). Learning representations of wordforms with recurrent networks: Comment on Sibley, Kello, Plaut, & Elman. Cognitive Science, 33, 1183-1186.
5. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
6. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
7. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
8. Davis, C. J. (1999). The self-organizing lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales, Sidney, Australia.
9. Dell, G. S., Juliano, C., & Govindjee, A. (1993). Structure and content in language production: A theory of frame constraints in phonological speech errors. Cognitive Science, 17, 149-195.
10. Elman, J. L. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14, 179-211.
11. Glushko, R. J. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 674-691.
12. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.
13. Grainger, J., & Whitney, C. (2004). Does the huamn mind raed wrods as a wlohe? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 58-59.
14. Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review, 106, 491-528.
15. Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 111, 662-720.
16. Kello, C. T. (2003). The emergence of a double dissociation in the modulation of a single control parameter in a nonlinear dynamical system. Cortex, 39, 132-134.
17. Kello, C. T. (2006). Considering the junction model of lexical processing. In S. Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 50-75). Sydney, Australia: Psychology Press.
18. Kello, C. T., & Plaut, D. C. (2003). Strategic control over rate of processing in word reading: A computational investigation. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 207-232.
19. Kello, C. T., Sibley, D. E., & Colombi, A. (2004). Using simple recurrent networks to learn fixed- length representations of variable-length strings. In Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium on Compositional Connectionism. Washington, DC: AAAI Press.
20. Kello, C. T., Sibley, D. E., & Plaut, D. C. (2005). Dissociations in performance on novel versus irregular items: Single-route demonstrations with input gain in localist and distributed models. Cognitive Science, 29, 627-654.
21. Levy, S. D. (2007). Changing semantic role representations with holographic memory. In Computational approaches to representation change during learning and development: Papers from the 2007 AAAI Symposium (Tech. Rep. No. FS-07-04, pp. 40-45).Washington, DC: AAAI Press.
22. Markman, A. (1999). Knowledge representation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
23. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception, Part 1: An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-405.
24. New, B., Ferrand, L., Pallier, C., & Brysbaert, M. (2006). Re-examining word length effects in visual word recognition: New evidence from the English Lexicon Project. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13, 45-52.
25. Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ Model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114, 273-315.
26. Plate, T. A. (1994). Distributed representation and nested compositional structure. Toronto, Canada: Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto.
27. Plaut, D. C. (1999). A connectionist approach to word reading and acquired dyslexia: Extension to sequential processing. Cognitive Science, 23, 543-568.
28. Plaut, D. C., & Kello, C. T. (1999). The emergence of phonology from the interplay of speech comprehension and production: A distributed connectionist approach. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The emergence of language (pp. 381-415). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
29. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
30. Pollack, J. (1990). Recursive distributed representations. Artificial Intelligence, 46, 77-105.
31. Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (1998). Whammy and double whammy: Length effects in nonword naming. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 277-282.
32. Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (2000). Lexical and nonlexical print-to-sound translation of disyllabic words and nonwords. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 342-364.
33. Rumelhart, D. E., Durbin, R., Golden, R., & Chauvin, Y. (1995). Backpropagation: The basic theory. In Y. Chauvin & D. E. Rumelhart (Eds.), Backpropagation: Theory, architectures, and applications (pp. 1-34). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
34. Seidenberg, M., & McClelland, J. (1989). A distributed developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
35. Seidenberg, M. S., Plaut, D. C., Petersen, A. S., McClelland, J. L., & McRae, K. (1994). Nonword pronunciation and models of word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1177-1196.
36. Sibley, D. E. (2008). Large scale modeling ofsingle word reading and recognition. Unpublished PhD thesis, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.
37. Sibley, D. E., Kello, C. T., Plaut, D. C., & Elman, J. L. (2008). Large-scale modeling of wordform learning and representations. Cognitive Science, 32, 741-754.
38. Wickelgren, W. A. (1969). Context-sensitive coding, associative memory, and serial order in (speech) behavior. Psychological Review, 76, 1-15.
39. Yap, M. (2007). Visual word recognition: Explorations of megastudies, multisyllabic words, and individual differences. Unpublished PhD thesis, Washington University, St. Louis, MO.
40. Yarkoni, T., Balota, D. A., & Yap, M. J. (2008). Moving beyond Coltheart's N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 971-979.