The role of induction in learning to teach toward equity: A study of beginning science and mathematics teachers

Science Education

Volumn 94, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 164-195

  Bianchini, Julie A ^a   Brenner, Mary E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951982216     PISSN: 00368326     EISSN: 1098237X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sce.20353     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Adams, C. M., & Pierce, R. L. (2004). Tiered lessons: One way to differentiate mathematics instruction. Gifted Child Today, 27(2), 58-65.
2. Adams, P. E., & Krockover, G. H. (1997). Concerns and perceptions of beginning secondary science and mathematics teachers. Science Education, 81(1), 29-50.
3. Aikenhead, G. S. (2001). Students' ease in crossing cultural borders into school science. Science Education, 85(2), 180-188.
4. Barton, A. C. (1998). Teaching science with homeless children: Pedagogy, representation, and identity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(4), 379-394.
5. Bianchini, J. A., & Cavazos, L. M. (2007). Learning from students, inquiry into practice, and participation in professional communities: Beginning teachers' uneven progress toward equitable science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 586-612.
6. Bianchini, J. A., Cavazos, L. M., & Helms, J. V. (2000). From professional lives to inclusive practice: Science teachers and scientists' views of gender and ethnicity in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 511-547.
7. Boaler, J. (2003). When learning no longer matters: Standardized testing and the creation of inequality. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(7), 502-506.
8. th International Congress on Mathematics Education, Copenhagen, Denmark.
9. Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3-15.
10. Brand, B. R., & Glasson, G. E. (2004). Crossing cultural borders into science teaching: Early life experiences, racial and ethnic identities, and beliefs about diversity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 119-141.
11. Brown, B. A., & Ryoo, K. (2008). Teaching science as a language: A content-first approach to science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(5), 529-553.
12. Buck, G., Mast, C., Ehlers, N., & Franklin, E. (2005). Preparing teachers to create a mainstream science classroom conducive to the needs of English-language learners: A feminist action research project. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(9), 1013-1031.
13. California Commission on Teacher Credentialing. (1997). California standards for the teaching profession. Sacramento: California Department of Education.
14. California Commission on Teacher Credentialing. (2002). Standards of quality and effectiveness for professional teacher education programs. Sacramento: California Department of Education.
15. California Department of Education. (1999).Mathematics content standards for California public schools: Kindergarten through grade twelve. Sacramento, CA: Author.
16. CaliforniaDepartment of Education. (2000). Science content standards for California public schools: Kindergarten through grade twelve. Sacramento, CA: Author.
17. California Department of Education. (2002). English language development standards for California public schools: Kindergarten through grade twelve. Sacramento, CA: Author.
18. Cochran-Smith,M.,&Lytle, S. (1999). Relationship of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (pp. 249-305). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
19. Davis, E. A., Petish, D., & Smithey, J. (2006). Challenges new science teachers face. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 607-651.
20. Delpit, L. D. (2003). Educators as "seed people"growing a new future. Educational Researcher, 7(32), 14-21.
21. Diaz-Rico, L. T., & Weed, K. Z. (1995). The crosscultural, language, and academic development handbook. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
22. Erbes, S. (2002). Surviving and thriving in the teaching profession: A description of the experiences and resources used by teachers of a California-based Beginning Teacher Support and Assessment (BTSA) program (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara, 2002). Dissertation Abstracts International, 63, 2203.
23. Erickson, F. (1993). Foreword. In M. Cochran-Smith & S. L. Lytle (Eds.), Inside outside: Teacher research and knowledge (pp. vii-ix). New York: Teachers College Press.
24. Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013-1055.
25. Grossman, P., Wineburg, S., & Woolworth, S. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 942-1012.
26. Heacox, D. (2002). Differentiating instruction in the regular classroom. Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit.
27. Hollins, E.,&Guzman,M. T. (2005).Research on preparing teachers for diverse populations. InM.Cochran-Smith & K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education (pp. 477-548). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Khisty, L. L. (1995). Making inequality: Issues of language and meanings in mathematics teaching with Hispanic students. In W. G. Secada, E. Fennema, & L. B. Adajian (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education (pp. 279-297). New York: Cambridge University Press.
29. Kohl, H. (1994). I won't learn from you! In B. Bigelow, L. Christensen, S. Karp, B. Miner, & B. Peterson (Eds.), Rethinking our classrooms (pp. 134-135). Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools.
30. Koutselini, M., & Gagatsis, A. (2003). Curriculum development for the differentiated classroom in mathematics. World Studies in Education, 4(1), 45-65.
31. Kumashiro, K. K. (2001). "Posts"perspectives on anti-oppressive education in social studies, English, mathematics, and science classrooms. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 3-12.
32. Ladson-Billings, G. (2001). Crossing over to Canaan: The journey of new teachers in diverse classrooms. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
33. Liston, D., Whitcomb, J., & Borko, H. (2006). Too little or too much: Teacher preparation and the first years of teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(4), 351-358.
34. Lee, C. (2003). Why we need to re-think race and ethnicity in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 3-5.
35. Lee, O., Lewis, S., Adamson, K., Maerten-Rivera, J., & Secada,W. G. (2007). Urban elementary school teachers' knowledge and practices in teaching science to English language learners. Science Education, 1-26.
36. Levin, B. B., & Rock, T. C. (2003). The effects of collaborative action research on preservice and experienced teacher partners in professional development schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 54, 135-149.
37. Lippincott, A. C. (1999). Reflective thinking among and between beginning professional educators. Unpublished dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.
38. Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago.
39. Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., & Stiles, K. E. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
40. Lovin, L., Kyger, M., & Allsopp, D. (2004). Differentiation for special needs learners. Teaching Children Mathematics, 11(3), 158-167.
41. Luft, J. A., Roehrig, G. H., & Patterson, N. C. (2003). Contrasting landscapes: A comparison of the impact of different induction programs on beginning secondary science teachers' practices, beliefs, and experiences. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(1), 77-97.
42. Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
43. McGinnis, J. R., Parker, C.,&Graeber, A. O. (2004). A cultural perspective of the induction of five reform-minded beginning mathematics and science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(7), 729-747.
44. McLaughlin, M., & Talbert, J. E. (1993). Contexts that matter for teaching and learning: Strategic opportunities for meeting the nation's educational goals. Stanford, CA: Center for Research on the Context of Secondary School Teaching, Stanford University.
45. Meyer, H. (2004). Novice and expert teachers' conceptions of learner's prior knowledge. Science Education, 88, 970-983.
46. Moschkovich, J. N. (1999). Understanding the needs of Latino students in reform-oriented mathematics classrooms. In L. Ortiz-Franco, N. Hernandez, & Y. De La Cruz (Eds.), Changing the faces of mathematics: Vol. 4. Perspectives on Latinos (pp. 5-12). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
47. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
48. National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
49. National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
50. Nieto, S. (1999). The light in their eyes. New York: Teachers College Press.
51. Noffke, S. E. (1997). Professional, personal, and political dimensions of action research. In M. W. Apple (Ed.), Reviewof research in education (pp. 305-343).Washington, DC:American Educational Research Association.
52. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000).What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
53. Research Committee, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2005). Equity in school mathematics education: How can research contribute? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(2), 92-100.
54. Rodriguez, A. J., & Kitchen, R. S. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing mathematics and science teachers for diverse classrooms: Promising strategies for transformative pedagogy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
55. Roehrig, G. H., & Luft, J. A. (2006). Does one size fit all? The induction experience of beginning science teachers from different teacher-preparation programs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(9), 963-985.
56. Rosebery, A. S., & Puttick, G. M. (1998). Teacher professional development as situated sense-making: A case study in science education. Science Education, 82, 649-677.
57. Ruthven, K. (2001). Issues of cultural diversity in school mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 32, 355-364.
58. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
59. Silver, E. A., Smith, M. S., & Nelson, B. S. (1995). The QUASAR Project: Equity concerns meet mathematics education reform in the middle school. In W. G. Secada, E. Fennema, & L. B. Adajian (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education (pp. 9-56). New York: Cambridge University Press.
60. Simmons, P. E., Emory, A., Carter, T., Coker, T., Finnegan, B., Crockett, D., et al. (1999). Beginning teachers: Beliefs and classroom actions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(8), 930-954.
61. Stanley, W. B., & Brickhouse, N. W. (1994). Multiculturalism, universalism, and science education. Science Education, 78, 387-398.
62. Stanley, W. B., & Brickhouse, N. W. (2001). Teaching sciences: The multicultural question revisited. Science Education, 85(1), 35-49.
63. Stoddart, T., Pinal, A., Latzke, M., & Canaday, D. (2002). Integrating inquiry science and language development for English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(8), 664-687.
64. Sweeney, A. E., Bula, E. A., & Cornett, J. W. (2001). The role of personal practice theories in the professional development of a beginning high school chemistry teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(4), 408-441.
65. Thompson, M., Paek, P., Goe, L.,&Ponte, E. (2004a). Study of the impact of the California Formative Assessment and Support System for Teachers: Report 2, Relationship of BTSA/CFASST engagement and teacher practices (CFASST Rep. No. 2, ETS RR-04-31). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Retrieved February 17, 2005, from http://www.ets.org/research/newpubs.html
66. Thompson, M., Paek, P., Goe, L., & Ponte, E. (2004b). Study of the impact of the California Formative Assessment and Support System for Teachers: Report 3, Relationship of BTSA/CFASST engagement and student achievement (CFASST Rep. No. 3, ETS RR-04-32). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Retrieved February 17, 2005, from http://www.ets.org/research/newpubs.html
67. Tieso, C. (2005). The effects of grouping practices and curricular adjustments on achievement. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29, 60-89.
68. nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
69. van Zee, E., Lay, D., & Roberts, D. (2003). Fostering collaborative inquiries by prospective and practicing elementary and middle school teachers. Science Education, 87, 588-612.
70. Wang, J., & Odell, S. (2002). Mentored learning to teach according to standards-based reform: A critical review. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 481-546.
71. Wang, J., Odell, S. J., & Schwille, S. A. (2008). Effects of teacher induction on beginning teachers' teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(2), 132-152.
72. Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonoswki, M., Rosebery, A. S., & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2001). Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense-making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(5), 529-552.
73. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
74. Wilkins, M. M., Wilkins, J. L. M., & Oliver, T. (2006). Differentiating the curriculum for elementary gifted mathematics students. Teaching Children Mathematics, 13(1), 6-13.
75. Willis, S. (1996). Gender justice and the mathematics curriculum: Four perspectives. In L. Parker, L. Rennie, & B. Fraser (Eds.), Gender, science and mathematics: Shortening the shadow (pp. 41-52). Boston: Kluwer.