Fostering Collaborative Inquiries by Prospective and Practicing Elementary and Middle School Teachers

Science Education

Volumn 87, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 588-612

  Van Zee, Emily ^a   Lay, Diantha ^b   Roberts, Deborah ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b Judith L Resnik Elementary School   (United States)

^c Silver Spring Observatory   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2442478537     PISSN: 00368326     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sce.10084     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Avery, L. M., & Carlsen, W. S. (2001). Knowledge, identity, and teachers' multiple communities of practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO.
2. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is-or might be - the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25, 6-8, 14.
3. Banathy, B. (1991). Systems design of education: A journey to create the future. New York: Educational Technology Publications.
4. Barab, S. A., Barnett, M., Yamagata-Lynch, L., Squire, K., & Keating, T. (in press). Using activity theory to understand the contradictions characterizing a technology-rich introductory astronomy course. To appear in Mind, Culture, and Activity.
5. Barab, S. A., Cherkes-Jutkowski, M., Swenson, R., Garrett, S., Shaw, R. E., & Young, M. (1999). Principles of self-organization: Ecologizing the learner-facilitator system. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3/4), 349-390.
6. Barab, S. A., & Duffy, T. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In D. Jonassen & S. M. Land (Eds.), Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments (pp. 25-56). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E., Bamett, M. G., & Keating, T. (2000). Virtual solar system project: Building understanding through model building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(7), 719-756.
8. Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E., Bamett, M., & Squire, K. (2001). Constructing virtual worlds: Tracing the historical development of learner practices/understandings. Cognition and Instruction, 19(1), 47-94.
9. Barab, S. A., MaKinster, J., Moore, J., Cunningham, D., & ILF Design Team. (2001). Designing and building an online community: The struggle to support sociability in the Inquiry Learning Forum. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(4), 71-96.
10. Barab, S., MaKinster, J., & Scheckler, R. (2001). Designing system dualities: Characterizing online community. In S. Barab, R. Kling, & J. Grey (Eds.), Designing virtual communities in the service of learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11. Barab, S., MaKinster, J., & Scheckler, R. (in press). Designing system dualities; Characterizing online community. To appear in S. Barab, R. Kling, & J. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Barnett, J., & Hodson, D. (2001). Pedagogical context knowledge: Toward a fuller understanding of what good science teachers know. Science Education, 85, 426-453.
13. Barron, B., Schwartz, D., Vye, N., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., Bransford, J., and The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem and project-based learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 271-311.
14. Barron, B., Vye, N. J., Zech, L., Schwartz, D., Bransford, J. D., Goldman, S. R., Pellegrino, J., Morris, J., Garrison, S., & Kantor, R. (1995). Creating contexts for community-based problem solving: The Jasper challenge series. In C. Hedley, P. Antonacci, & M. Rabinowitz (Eds.), Thinking and literacy: The mind at work (pp. 47-72). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Bijker, W., Pinch, T., & Hughes, T. (1987). The social construction of technological systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Blumenfeld, P., Soloway, E., Marx, R., Krajcik, J., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26, 369-398.
17. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141-178.
18. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42.
19. Carr, A. A. (1997). User-design in the creation of human learning systems. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(3), 5-22.
20. Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers' thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 255-296). New York: Mcmillan.
21. Cobb, C. (1999). The use of geographical information systems in educational research and policy studies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
22. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1992). The Jasper Series as an example of anchored instruction: Theory, program description, and assessment data. Educational Psychologist, 27(3), 291-315.
23. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (CTGV). (1993). Anchored instruction and situated cognition revisited. Educational Technology, 33, 52-70.
24. Corno, L., & Randi, J. (1999). A design theory for classroom instruction in self-regulated learning. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II, pp. 183-214). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Dewey, J. (1963). Experience & education. New York: Collier MacMillan. (Original work published in 1938)
26. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1983). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. In G. F. Madaus, M. S. Scriven, & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (pp. 311-334). Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
27. Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J. D., & Smaldino, S. E. (1999). Instructional media and technologies for learning (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
28. Kirshner, D., & Whitson, J. A. (1997). Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Kline, R., & Pinch, T. (1996). Users as agents of technological change: The social construction of the automobile in the rural United States. Technology and Culture, 37, 763-795.
30. Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P., Marx, R., Bass, K., Fredricks, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3/4), 313-351.
31. Krajcik, J., Czerniak, C., & Berger, C. (1999). Teaching Children Science: A Project-Based Approach: McGraw-Hill College Press.
32. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
34. Luehmann, A. L. (2001). Factors affecting secondary science teachers' appraisal and adoption of technology-rich project-based learning environments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
35. Luehmann, A. L. (2002). Understanding the appraisal and customization process of secondary science teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association: New Orleans, LA.
36. Mabry, L. (1999). Portfolio assessments. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37. McLaughlin, M. W., & Marsh, D. D. (1978). Staff development and school change. Teachers College Record, 80(1), 70-94.
38. Papert, S. (1981). Computer-based microworlds as incubators for powerful ideas. In R. Taylor (Ed.), The computer in the school: Tutor, tool, tutee (pp. 203-210). New York: Teacher's College Press.
39. Pea, R. D. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions (pp. 47-87). New York: Cambridge University Press.
40. Randi, J., & Corno, L. (1997). Teachers as innovators. In B. J. Biddle, T. L. Good, & I. F. Goodson (Eds.), The international handbook of teachers and teaching (Vol. II, pp. 1163-1221). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
41. Roschelle, J., & Jackiw, N. (2000). Technology design as educational research: Interweaving imagination, inquiry & impact. In A. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Research design in mathematics & science education (pp. 777-797). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Savery, J., & Duffy, T. (1996). Problem based learning. An instructional model and its constructionist framework. In B. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (pp. 135-148). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
43. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1(1), 37-68.
44. Scharwtz, D., Lin, X., Brophy, S., & Bransford, J. (1999). Toward the development of flexiblity adaptive instructional design. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II, pp. 183-214). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. Schneider, R., & Krajcik, J. (2000). The role of educative curriculum materials in reforming science education. Paper presented at the American Association for Educational Research, New Orleans.
46. Scriven, M. S. (1983). Evaluation methodologies. In G. F. Madaus, M. S. Scriven, & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (pp. 229-260). Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
47. Shapin, S., & Shaffer, S. (1985). Leviathos and the airpump. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
48. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher (Feb.), 4-14.
49. Singer, J., Krajcik, J., Marx, R., & Clay Chamber, J. (2000). Constructing extended inquiry projects: Curriculum materials for science education reform. Educational Psychologist.
50. Stake, R. E. (1983). Program evaluation, particularly responsive evaluation. In G. F. Madaus, M. S. Scriven, & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (pp. 287-310). Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
51. Thomas, G., Wineburg, S., Grossman, P., Myhre, O., & Woolworth, S. (1998). In the company of colleagues: An interim report on the development of a community of teacher learners. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 21-32.
52. Vygotsky,L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.