Teacher professional development as situated sense-making: A case study in science education

Science Education

Volumn 82, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 649-677

  Rosebery, Ann S ^a   Puttick, Gillian M ^a  

^a TERC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032328245     PISSN: 00368326     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199811)82:6<649::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-H     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Bakhtin, M. (1981). In M. Holquist (Ed.), C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Trans.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
2. Ball, D. (1990). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics (Craft Paper 90-3). East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Learning.
3. Ball, D. (in press). What do studeits know? Facing challenges of distance, context, and desire in trying to hear children. In B. J. Biddle, T. L. Good & I. F. Goodson (Eds.), International handbook of teachers and teaching. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
4. Ballenger, C. (1996). Argumentation in a Haitian bilingual classroom (TERC Working Paper 2-96). Cambridge, MA: TERC.
5. Ballenger, C. (1998). Three teachers' perspectives on knowing in science. In A. Rosebery & B. Warren (Eds.), Boats, balloons and classroom video: Science teaching as inquiry. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
6. Barnes, D. (1976). From curriculum to communication. New York: Penguin Books.
7. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
8. Brown, J., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42.
9. Boulter, C. (1997). Discourse and conceptual understanding in science. In: Oral discourse and education (vol. 3). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
10. Boulter, C., & Gilbert, J. (1995). Argument and science education. In P. Costello & S. Mitchell (Eds.), Competing and consensual voices (pp. 84-98). London: Multilingual Matters.
11. Cazden, C. (1988). Classroom discourse. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
12. Chazan, D., & Ball, D. L. (1995) Beyond exportations not to tell: What is the teacher's role in discussion-intensive mathematics classes? National Center for Research on Teacher Learning (Craft Paper 95-2). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
13. Collins, H., & Pinch, T. (1993). The Golem, what everyone should know about science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14. Dennis, E. (1998). Floating balloons, floating theories. In A. Rosebery & B. Warren (Eds.), Boats, balloons and classroom video: Science teaching as inquiry. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
15. DiSchino, M. (1998). Why do bees sting and why do they die afterwards? In A. Rosebery & B. Warren (Eds.), Boats, balloons and classroom video: Science teaching as inquiry. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
16. Duckworth, E. (1987). The having of wonderful ideas. New York: Teachers College Press.
17. Dyson, A. (1989). Multiple worlds of child writers. New York: Teachers College Press.
18. Edwards, D. (1993). But what do children really think?: Discourse analysis and conceptual content in children's talk. Cognition and Instruction, 11, 207-225.
19. Erickson, F., & Shultz, J. (1977). When is a context? Some issues and methods in the analysis of social competence. In J. Green and C. Wallat (Eds.), Ethnography and langnage in educational settings (pp. 147-160). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
20. Gallas, K. (1994). The languages of learning: How children talk, write, dance, draw and sing their understanding of the world. New York: Teachers College Press.
21. Gallas, K. (1995). Talking their way into science. New York: Teachers College Press.
22. Gamow, G. (1961). The great physicists from Galileo to Einstein. New York: Dover.
23. Gee, J. P. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London: Falmer Press.
24. Gooding, D. (1992). Putting agency back into experiment. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 65-112). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. Goodwin, C. (1995). Seeing in depth. Social Studies of Science, 25, 237-274.
26. Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. (1992). Context, activity, and participation. In P. Auer & A. di Luzio (Eds.), The contextualization of language (pp. 77-99). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
27. Gudmundsdottir, S. (1990). Nancy: Pedagogical content knowledge of an expert teacher. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.
28. Greeno, J. (1997). On claims that answer the wrong questions. Educational Researcher, 26, 5-17.
29. Hanlon, J. (1998). Exploring rust, talking science. In A. Rosebery & B. Warren (Eds.), Boats, balloons and classroom video: Science teaching as inquity. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
30. Hawkins, D. (1970). Messing about in science. The ESS render. Newton, MA: Educational Development Corp.
31. Hein, G. (1970). Children's science is another culture. The ESS reader. Newton, MA: Educational Development Corp.
32. Kolata, G. (1996). Inquiry lacking due process. New York Times, June 25, C3.
33. Knorr-Cetina, K. D., & Mulkay, M. (Eds.) (1983). Science observed: Perspectives on the social study of science. London: Sage.
34. Lampert, M. (1985). How do teachers manage to teach? Perspectives on problems in practice. Harvard Educational Review, 55, 178-194.
35. Lampert, M. (1986). Knowing, doing, and teaching multiplication. Cognition and Instruction, 3, 305-342.
36. Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 29-63.
37. Latour, B. & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38. Lave, J. (1991). Situating learning in communities of practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. Levine, & S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 63-82). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
39. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
40. Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. New York: Ablex.
41. Lynch, M. (1985). Art and artifact in laboratory science: A study of shop work and shop talk in a research laboratory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
42. McDermott, R. (1993). The acquisition of a child by a learning disability. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 269-305). New York: Cambridge University Press.
43. Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongst teachers and learners. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
44. Monk, S., & Nemirovsky, R. (1994). The case of Dan: Student construction of a functional situation through visual attributes. Research in collegiate mathematics education, 1, 139-168.
45. Nemirovsky, R. (1994). On ways of symbolizing: The case of Laura and velocity sign. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 13, 389-422.
46. Ochs, E., Gonzales, P., & Jacoby, S. (1993, October). When I come down I'm in the domain state: Grammar and graphic representation in the interpretive activity of physicists. Paper presented at TESOL and Applied Linguistics Conference.
47. Peterson, G. (1998). Experimenting with jawbreakers in a second grade classroom. In A. Rosehery & B. Warren (Eds.), Boats, balloons and classroom video: Science teaching as inquiry. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
48. Phillips, A. (1990). What teachers need to know (Tech. Rep. No. 3). Newton, MA: The Literacies Institute.
49. Phillips, A. (1993). Raising the teacher's voice: The ironic role of silence. In Children's voices, teachers' stories: Papers from the Brookline Teacher Researcher Seminar (Tech. Rep. No. 11). Newton, MA: The Literacies Institute.
50. Resnick, L. (1989). Treating mathematics as an ill-structured discipline. In R. Charles & E. Silver (Eds.), The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem-solving. Reston, VA: NCTM.
51. Rosebery, A. (1998). Investigating a teacher's questions through video. In A. Rosebery & B. Warren (Eds.), Boats, balloons, and classroom video: Science teaching as inquiry. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
52. Rosebery, A., & Ogonowski, M. (1996). Valerie: The relationship between doing science and teaching science. In A. Rosebery & B. Warren (Eds.), Sense making in science, a video series. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
53. Rosebery, A., & Warren, B. (Eds.) (1996). Sense making in science, a video series. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
54. Rosebery, A., & Warren, B. (Eds.) (1998). Boats, balloons, and classroom video: Science teaching as inquiry. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
55. Schifter, D. (1993). Mathematics process as mathematics content: A course for teachers. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 12, 271-283.
56. Schifter, D., & Fosnot, C. (1993). Reconstructing mathematics education. New York: Teachers College Press.
57. Schoenfeld, A. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition and sense-making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan.
58. Shulman, L. (1986, February). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher.
59. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
60. Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated actions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
61. Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
62. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
63. Warren, B. (1998). That's another meaning of volume then, for me: On learning from what children say. In A. Rosebery & B. Warren (Eds.), Boats, balloons, and classroom video: Science teaching as inquiry. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
64. Warren, B., & Bodwell, M. (1996). Why do big, heavy boats float? Teacher inquiry into student learning. In A. Rosebery & B. Warren (Eds.), Sense making in science, a video series. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
65. Warren, B., & Ogonowski, M. (1998). From knowledge to knowing: an inquiry into teacher learning in science. Center for the Development of Teaching Paper Series. Newton, MA: Educational Development Center Inc.
66. Warren, B., & Rosebery, A. (1995). Equity in the future tense: Redefining relationships among teachers, students, and science in linguistic minority classrooms. In W. Secada, E. Fennema, & L. Adajian (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education (pp. 289-328). New York: Cambridge University Press.
67. Warren, B., & Rosebery, A. (1996). This question is just too, too easy! Students' perspectives on accountability in science. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 97-126). Mahwah: NJ: Erlbaum.
68. Wilson, S., Shulman, L., & Richert. A. (1987). 150 different ways of knowing: Representations of knowledge in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring teachers' thinking (pp. 104-124). Eastbourne, UK: Cassell.