Capturing translation processes to access metalinguistic awareness

Across Languages and Cultures

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 275-288

  Ehrensberger Dow, Maureen ^a   Perrin, Daniel ^a  

^a ZURICH UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Expert; German English; Metalinguistic awareness; Novice; Translation process

Indexed keywords

EID: 71649091220     PISSN: 15851923     EISSN: 15882519     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1556/Acr.10.2009.2.6     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Adab, B. 2005. Translating into a Second Language: Can We, Should We? In: Anderman, G. & Rogers, M. (eds) In and Out of English: For Better, for Worse. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 227-241.
2. Andersson, B., Dahl, J., Holmqvist, K., Holsanova, J., Johansson, V., Karlsson, H., Strömqvist, S., Tufvesson, S. & Wengelin, A. 2006. Combining Keystroke Logging with Eye-tracking. In: Van Waes, L., Leijten, M. & Neuwirth, D. (eds) Writing and Digital Media. Oxford: Elsevier. 166-172.
3. Asadi, P. & Séguinot, C. 2005. Shortcuts, Strategies and General Patterns in a Process Study of Nine Professionals. Meta Vol. 50. No.2. 522-547.
4. Bernardini, S. 2002. Think-aloud Protocols in Translation Research. Target Vol. 13. No.2. 241-263.
5. Bialystok, E. 1991. Metalinguistic Dimensions of Bilingual Language Proficiency. In: Bialystok, E. (ed) Language Processing in Bilingual Children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 113-140.
6. Buchweitz, A. & Alves, F. 2006. Cognitive Adaptation in Translation: an Interface between Language Direction, Time, and Recursiveness in Target Text Production. Letros de Hoje Vol. 41. No.2. 241-272.
7. Campbell, S. 1998. Translation into the Second Language. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
8. Davies, A. 2003. The Native Speaker: Myth and Reality. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
9. Degenhardt, M. 2006. CAMTASIA and CATMOVIE: Two Digital Tools for Observing, Documenting and Analysing Writing Processes of University Students. In: Van Waes, L., Leijten, M. & Neuwirth, D. (eds) Writing and Digital Media. Oxford: Elsevier. 180-186.
10. Dragsted, B. & Gorm Hansen, I. 2007. Speaking your Translation: Exploiting Synergies between Translation and Interpreting. In: Pöchhacker, F., Jakobsen, A. L. & Mees, I. M. (eds) Interpreting Studies and Beyond. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur Press. 251-274.
11. Ehrensberger-Dow, M. & Massey, G. 2008. Exploring Translation Competence by Triangulating Empirical Data. Norwich Papers Vol. 16. 1-20.
12. Englund Dimitrova, B. 2006. Segmentation of the Writing Process in Translation: Experts versus Novices. In: Sullivan, K. & Lindgren, E. (eds) Computer Keystroke Logging and Writing: Methods and Applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 189-201.
13. Fraser, J. 1999. The Translator and the Word: The Pros and Cons of Dictionaries in Translation. In: Anderman, G. & Rogers, M. (eds) Word, Text, Translation. Liber Amicorum for Peter Newmark. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 25-34.
14. Gnach, A., Wiesner, E., Bertschi-Kaufmann, A. & Perrin, D. 2007. Children's Writing Processes When Using Computers. Insights Based on Combining Analyses of Product and Process. Research in Comparative and International Education Vol. 2. No.1. 13-28.
15. Göpferich, S. 2008. Translationsprozessforschung: Stand -Methoden -Perspektiven. Tübingen: Narr.
16. Hansen, G. 2005. Experience and Emotion in Empirical Translation Research with Think-aloud and Retrospection. Meta Vol. 50. No.2. 511-521.
17. Hansen, G. 2006. Retrospection Methods in Translator Training and Translation Research. Journal of Specialised Translation Vol. 5. 2-41.
18. Heiden, T. 2005. Blick in die Black Box: Kreative Momente im Übersetzungsprozess: eine experimentelle Studie mit Translog. Meta Vol. 50. No.2. 449-472.
19. Jääskeläinen, R. 2002. Think-aloud Protocol Studies into Translation. An Annotated Bibliography. Target Vol. 14. No.1. 107-136.
20. Jakobsen, A. L. 2003. Effects of Think aloud on Translation Speed, Revision, and Segmentation. In: Alves, F. (ed) Triangulating Translation: Perspectives in Process Oriented Research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 69-95.
21. Jarvella, R. J., Jensen, A., Halskov Jensen, E. & Skovgaard Andersen, M. 2002. Towards Characterizing Translator Expertise, Knowledge and Know-how: Some Findings Using TAPs and Experimental Methods. In: Riccardi, A. (ed) Translation Studies: Perspectives on an Emerging Discipline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 172-197.
22. Jessner, U. 1999. Metalinguistic Awareness in Multilinguals: Cognitive Aspects of Third Language Learning. Language Awareness Vol. 8. No.3. 201-209.
23. Krings, H. P. 2001. Repairing Texts: Empirical Investigations of Machine Translation Post-Editing Processes [edited and translated by Koby, G. S.] Kent, OH: The Kent State University Press.
24. Krings, H. P. 2005. Wege ins Labyrinth -Fragestellungen und Methoden der Übersetzungsprozessforschung im Überblick. Meta Vol. 50. No.2. 342-358.
25. Kussmaul, P. 1995. Training the Translator. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
26. Leijten, M. & Van Waes, L. 2006. Inputlog: New Perspectives on the Logging of On-line Writing. In: Sullivan, K. P. H. & Lindgren, E. (eds) Computer Key-Stroke Logging and Writing: Methods and Applications. Oxford: Elsevier. 73-94.
27. Livbjerg, I. & Mees, I. M. 2003. Patterns of Dictionary Use in Non-domain-specific Translation. In: Alves, F. (ed) Triangulating Translation: Perspectives in Process Oriented Research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 123-136.
28. Lörscher, W. 2005. The Translation Process: Methods and Problems of its Investigation. Meta Vol. 50. No.2. 597-608.
29. Massey, G. & Ehrensberger-Dow, M. submitted. Investigating Demands on Language Professionals: Methodological Challenges in Exploring Translation Competence. Bulletin suisse de linguistique appliquée (Special issue).
30. Massey, G., Riediger, H. & Lenz, S. 2008. Teaching Instrumental Competence in an E-learning Environment: a Swiss Perspective. In: Dimitriu, R. & Freigang, K.-H. (eds) Translation Technology in Translation Classes. Iasi: Institutul European. 175-183.
31. O'Brien, S. 2006. Pauses as Indicators of Cognitive Effort in Post-editing Machine Translation Output. Across Languages and Cultures Vol. 7. No.1. 1-21.
32. PACTE Group 2003. Building a Translation Competence Model. In: Alves, F. (ed) Triangulating Translation: Perspectives in Process Oriented Research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 43-66.
33. PACTE Group 2005. Investigating Translation Competence: Conceptual and Methodological Issues. Meta Vol. 50. No.2. 609-619.
34. PACTE Group 2007. Zum Wesen der Übersetzungskompetenz. Grundlagen für die experimentelle Validierung eines Ük-Modells. In: Wotjak, G. (ed) Quo vadis Translatologie? Ein halbes Jahrhundert universitäre Ausbildung von Dolmetschern und Übersetzern in Leipzig. Rückshau, Zwischenbericht und Perspektiven aus der Aussensicht. Berlin: Frank & Timme. 327-342.
35. PACTE Group 2008. First Results of a Translation Competence Experiment: "Knowledge of Translation" and "Efficacy of the Translation Process". In: Kearns, J. (ed) Translator and Interpreter Training: Issues, Methods and Debates. London: Continuum. 104-126.
36. Pavlovi?, N. 2007. Directionality in Translation and Interpreting Practice: Report on a Questionnaire Survey in Croatia. Forum Vol. 5. No.2. 79-99.
37. Perrin, D. 2001. Wie Journalisten schreiben. Ergebnisse angewandter Schreibprozessforschung. In: Mast, C. & Russ-Mohl, S. (eds) Journalismus Vol. 40. Constance: UVK.
38. Perrin, D. 2002. Investigating Writing Strategies in the Workplace. In: Levy, C. M. & Olive, T. (eds) Contemporary Tools and Techniques for Studying Writing. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. 105-117.
39. Perrin, D. 2003. Progression Analysis (PA): Investigating Writing Strategies at the Workplace. Journal of Pragmatics Vol. 35. 6. 907-921.
40. Perrin, D. 2006. Progression Analysis: An Ethnographic, Computer-based Multi-method Approach to Investigate Natural Writing Processes. In: Van Waes, L., Leijten, M. & Neuwirth, C. (eds) Writing and Digital Media. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 173-181.
41. Perrin, D. & Ehrensberger-Dow, M. 2006. Journalists' Language Awareness: Inferences from Writing Strategies. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses Vol. 19. 319-343.
42. Perrin, D. & Ehrensberger-Dow, M. 2008. Progression Analysis: Tracing Journalistic Language Awareness. In: Burger, M. (ed) L'analyse linguistique des discours des médias: théories, méthodes en enjeux. Entre sciences du langage et sciences de la communication et des medias. Québec: Nota Bene.
43. Pokorn, N. 2005. Challenging the Traditional axioms. Translation into a Non-mother Tongue. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
44. Pokorn, N. 2007. In Defence of Fuzziness. Target Vol. 19. No.2. 327-336.
45. Rydning, A. F. & Janyan, A. 2008. Eye Movement Recordings as a Tool for Studying Mental Simulation of Speed in Text Processing by Professional Translators. Forum Vol. 6. No.1. 59-74.
46. Sharmin, S., Spakov, O., Räihä, K.-J. & Jakobsen, A. L. 2008. Where and for How Long do Translators Look at the Screen while Translating? Copenhagen Studies in Language Vol. 36, 31-51.
47. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research. Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
48. Sullivan, K. & Lindgren, E. 2006. Digital Tools for the Recording, the Logging and the Analysis of Writing Processes. In: Van Waes, L., Leijten, M. & Neuwirth, D. (eds) Writing and Digital Media. Oxford: Elsevier. 153-157.
49. Tirkkonen-Condit, S. 2002. Process Research: State of the Art and Where to Go Next? Across Languages and Cultures Vol. 3. No.1. 5-19.
50. Tirkkonen-Condit, S. 2005. The Monitor Model Revisited: Evidence from Process Research. Meta Vol. 50. No.2. 405-414.
51. Van Waes & Leijten, M. 2006. Logging Writing Processes with Inputlog. In: Van Waes, L., Leijten, M. & Neuwirth, D. (eds) Writing and Digital Media. Oxford: Elsevier. 158-165.