Locating information within extended hypermedia

Educational Technology Research and Development

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 287-313

  Cromley, Jennifer G ^a   Azevedo, Roger ^b  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b University of Memphis   (United States)

Author keywords

Hypermedia; Knowledge; Science; Search

Indexed keywords

EID: 67650046951     PISSN: 10421629     EISSN: 15566501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11423-008-9106-5     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students' learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 523-535. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.523.
2. Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., & Seibert, D. (2004). Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students' ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 344-370. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2003.09.002.
3. Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., Winters, F. I., Moos, D. C., & Green, J. A. (2005). Adaptive human scaffolding facilitates adolescents' self-regulated learning with hypermedia. Instructional Science, 33, 381-412. doi:.10.1007/sl 1251-005-1273-8.
4. Bilal, D., & Kirby, J. (2002). Differences and similarities in information seeking: Children and adults as web users. Information Processing & Management, 38(5), 649-670. doi:10.1016/S0306-4573(01)00057-7.
5. Bookseller. (2006). Eyewitness relaunch set for 2007. Bookseller, (5255), 10.
6. Brown, G. T. L. (2003). Searching informational texts: Text and task characteristics that affect performance. Reading Online, 7(2). Available .http://www.readingonline.org/articles/art-index.asp?HREF=brown/ index.html. Accessed 25 July 2007.
7. Brusilovsky, P. (2001). Adaptive hypermedia. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 11(112), 87-110. doi: 10.1023/A: 101143116306.
8. Brusilovsky, P. (2003). Adaptive navigation support in educational hypermedia: The role of student knowledge level and the case for meta-adaptation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 487-497. doi:10.1111/1467-8535.00345.
9. Calisir, F., Eryazici, M., & Lehto, M. R. (2008). The effects of text structure and prior knowledge of the learner on computer-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(2), 439-450. doi:10.101.6/j.chb.2007.01. 032.
10. Cataldo, M. G., & Cornoldi, C. (1998). Self-monitoring in poor and good reading comprehenders and their use of strategy. The British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16, 155-165.
11. Cataldo, M.G., & Oakhill, J. (2000). Why are poor comprehenders inefficient searchers? An investigation into the effects of text representation and spatial memory on the ability to locate information in text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 791-799. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.791.
12. Chung, J. S., & Neuman, D. (2007). High school students' information seeking and use for class projects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(10), 1503-1517. doi: 10.1002/asi.20637.
13. Cohen, D. J., & Snowden, J. L. (2008). The relations between document familiarity, frequency, and prevalence and document literacy performance among adult readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(1), 9-26. doi:10.1598/RRQ.43.1.2.
14. Coiro, J., & Dobler, E. (2007). Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(2), 214-257. do.i:10..1598/R.RQ.42.2.2.
15. Crain-Thoreson, C, Lippman, M. Z., & McClendon-Magnuson, D. (1997). Windows on comprehension: Reading comprehension processes as revealed by two think-aloud procedures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(4), 579-591. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.89.4.579.
16. Desjarlais, M., & Willoughby, T. (2007). Supporting learners with low domain knowledge when using the internet. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 37(1), 1-17. doi:10.2190/K788-MK86-2342-3600.
17. Electronic Document Systems Foundation. (2001). Printing in the age of the web & beyond Downloaded from the World Wide Web on March 31, 2005 from http://www.edsf.OTg/images/Overview.PDF.
18. Elley, W. B. (Ed.). (1994). The IEA study of reading-literacy: Achievement and instruction in thirty-two school systems. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
19. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Fiorina, L., Antonietti, A., Colombo, B., & Bartolomeo, A. (2007). Thinking style, browsing primes and hypermedia navigation. Computers & Education, 49(3), 916-94.1. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.12.005.
21. Franklin, C. (2007). Factors that influence elementary teachers' use of computers. Journal of Technology á Teacher Education, 15(2), 267-293.
22. Gall, J. (2006). Orienting tasks and their impact on learning and attitudes in the use of hypertext. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 15(1), 5-29.
23. Gauss, B., & Urbas, L. (2003). Individual differences in navigation between sharable content objects: An evaluation study of a learning module prototype. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 499-509. doi:10.1111/1467-8535.00346.
24. Gwizdka, J., & Spence, I. (2007). Implicit measures of lostness and success in web navigation. Interacting with Computers, 19(3), 357-369. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2007.01.001.
25. Hegarty, M. (1991). Knowledge and processes in mechanical problem solving. In R. J. Sternberg & P. A, Frensch (Eds.), Complex problem solving: Principles and mechanisms (pp. 253-285). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Associates.
26. Hennessy, S., Ruthven, K., & Brindley, S. (2005). Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: Commitment, constraints, caution, and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(2), 155-192. doi: 10.1080/0022027032000276961.
27. Henry, L. A. (2006). SEARCHing for an answer: The critical role of new literacies while reading on the Internet. The Reading Teacher, 59(7), 614-627. doi:.10.1598/RT.59.7.1.
28. Hitlin, P., & Rainie, L. (2005). Teens, technology, and school. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Downloaded from, the World Wide Web on July 25, 2007 from http://www.pewi.nte.rnet.org/pdfs/PIP-Internet- and-schools-05.pdf.
29. International Society for Technology in Education. (2007). National Educational Technology Standards for students. Downloaded from, the World Wide Web on June 3, 2008 from http://www.iste.org/Content/NavigationMenu/NETS/ ForStudents/2007Standards/NETS-for-Stude.nts-2CX)7.htm.
30. Ishizuka, K. (2005). Teens are tech wizards? Not! School Library Journal, 51(4), 24-25.
31. Jones, K. S., Farris, J. S., & Johnson, B. R. (2005). Why does the negative impact of inconsistent knowledge on web navigation persist? International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 19, 201-221. doi: 10.1207/sl.5327590ijhcl902-3.
32. Judge, S., Puckett, K., & Bell, S. M. (2006). Closing the digital divide: Update from, the early childhood longitudinal study. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(1), 52-60. doi:10.3200/JOER.100.1.52-60.
33. Kirsch, I. S. (2001). The framework used in developing and interpreting the international adult literacy survey (IALS). European Journal of Psychology of Education, 16(3), 335-361.
34. Kirsch, I. S., & Jungeblut, A. (1986). Literacy: Profile of America's young adults. Princeton, NJ: Educa- tional. Testing Service.
35. Kirsch, I. S., Jungeblut, A., Jenkins, L., & Kolstad, A. (1993). Adult literacy in America. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
36. Kirsch, I. S., & Mosenthal, P. B. (1.990). Toward an explanatory model of document literacy. Journal of Reading, 36, 322-327.
37. Kuiper, E., Volman, M., & Terwel, J. (2005). The Web as an information resource in K-12 education: Strategies for supporting students in searching and processing information. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 285-328. doi: 10.3102/00346543075003285.
38. Kutner, M., Greenberg, E., Jin, Y., Boyle, B., Hsu, Y., Dunleavy, E., et al. (2007). Literacy in everyday life: Results from the 2003 national assessment of adult literacy. Washington, DC: National. Center for Education Statistics.
39. Lajoie, S. P., & Azevedo, R. (2006). Teaching and learning in technology-rich environments. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 803-822). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Lajoie, S. P., Lavigne, N. C., & Guerrera, C. (2001). Constructing knowledge in the context of BioWorld. Instructional Science, 29(2), 155-186. doi:10.1023/A:1.003996000775.
41. Large, A. (2005). Children, teenagers, and the web. Annual Review of Information Technology, 39(1), 347-392. doi: 10.1002/aris. 1440390116.
42. Lawless, K. A., Schrader, P. G., & Mayall, H. J. (2007). Acquisition of information online: Knowledge, navigation and learning outcomes. Journal of Literacy Research, 39(3), 289-306.
43. Lazonder, A. W. (2005). Do two heads search better that one? Effects of student collaboration on Web search behaviour and search outcomes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 465-475. doi: 10.1111/J.1467-8535. 2005.00478.x.
44. Le Bigot, L., & Rouet, J. (2007). The impact of presentation format, task assignment, and prior knowledge on students' comprehension of multiple online documents. Journal of Literacy Research, 39(4), 445-470. doi: 10.1080/10862960701675317.
45. Lenhart, A., Arafeh, S., Smith, A., & Macgill, A, R. (2008). Writing, technology, and teens. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Downloaded from the World Wide Web on June 10, 2008 from. http,.//www. pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP-Writi.ngJReport-F.l.NAL3.pdf.
46. Leu, D. J., Zawilinksi, L., Castek, J., Banerjee, M., Housand, B., Liu, Y., et al. (2007). What is new about the new literacies of online reading comprehension? In L. Rush, J. Eakle, & L. Berger (Eds.), Secondary school reading and writing: What research reveals for classroom practices (pp. 37-69). Chicago, IL:NCTE.
47. Müller-Kalthoff, T., & Möller, J. (2006). Browsing while reading: Effects of instructional, design and learners' prior knowledge. ALT-J Research in teaming Technology, 14(2), 183-198.
48. Murphy, P. K., & Alexander, P. A. (2004). Persuasion as a dynamic, multidimensional process: An investigation of individual and intraindividual differences. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 337-363. doi: 10.3102/0002831.2041002337.
49. Naumann, J., Richter, T., Christmann, U., & Groeben, N. (2008). Working memory capacity and reading skill moderate the effectiveness of strategy training in learning from hypertext. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(2), 197-213. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2007.08.007.
50. OECD. (2002). Reading for change: Performance and engagement across countries, results from PISA 2000. Paris: OECD.
51. OECD. (2004). Learning for tomorrow's world: First results from PISA 2003. Paris: OECD.
52. OECD. (2007). PISA 2006 science competencies for tomorrow's world. Paris: OECD.
53. Pak, R., Rogers, W. A., & Fisk, A. D. (2006). Spatial ability subfactors and their influences on a computerbased information search task. Human Factors, 48(1), 154-165. doi : 10.1518/001872006776412180.
54. Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
55. Puntambekar, S., Stylianou, A., & Hübscher, R. (2004). CoMPASS: Improving navigational, decisions and conceptual learning in hypermedia environments by using navigable conceptual, maps. Human- Computer Interaction, 18(4), 395-428. doi: 10.1207/S15327051HCI1804-3.
56. Reynolds, P. L., & Symons, S. (2001). Motivational variables and children's text search. Journal of Edu- cational Psychology, 93(1), 14-22. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.14.
57. Roncevic, M. (2006). The Chicago manual, of style gets digitized. Library Journal, 131(15), 88.
58. Rouet, J.-F. (2003). What was I looking for? The influence of task specificity and prior knowledge on students' search strategies in hypertext. Discourse Processes, 3(2), 163-186.
59. Rouet, J.-F., & Coutelet, B. (2008). The acquisition of document search strategies in grade school students. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 389-406. doi : 10.1002/acp. 1415.
60. Rouet, J.-F., Vidal-Abarca, E., Erboul, A. B., & Millogo, V. (2001). Effects of information search, tasks on the comprehension of instructional text. Discourse Processes, 3(2), 163-186. doi: 10.1207/S15326950 DP3102-3.Salmerón, L., Kintsch, W., & Cañas, J. J. (2006). Reading strategies and prior knowledge in learning from.hypertext. Memory & Cognition, 34(5), 1157-1171.
61. Schrader, P. G., Lawless, K., & Mayall, H, (2008). The model of domain learning as a framework for understanding .internet navigation. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 17(2), 235.
62. Sheehan, K. M., & Mislevy, R. J. (1990). Integrating cognitive and psychometric models in a measure of document literacy. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 255-272. doi: 10.11 ll/j.1745-3984.1990. tb00747.x.
63. Smerdon, B., Cronen, S., Lanahan, L., Anderson, J., Nicholas, I., & Angeles, J. (2000). Teachers' tools for the 21st century: A report on teachers' use of technology. Downloaded from the World Wide Web on March 20, 2005 from www.nces.gov/pubs2000/2000102.pdf.
64. Smith, M. C., Mikulecky, L., Kibby, M. W., Dreher, M. J., & Dole, J. A. (2000). What will be the demands of literacy in the workplace in the next millennium? Reading Research Quarterly, 35(3), 378-383. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.35.3.3.
65. Snyder, T. D., Dillow, S. A., & Hoffman, C. M. (2007). Digest of education statistics, 2006. NCES 2007-017.
66. Symons, S., MacLatchy-Gaudet, H., Stone, T. D., & Reynolds, P. L. (2001). Strategy instruction for elementary students searching informational text. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(1), 1-33. doi: 10.1207/S1532799XSSR0501-1.
67. USPIRG. (2005). Ripoff 101: How the publishing industry's practices needlessly drive up textbook costs. Downloaded from the World Wide Web on November 1, 2008 from http://www.uspirg.org/ uploads/-H/rF/-H.rFuXAyUQ- KUSZ8Y80bAQ/ripoff2005.pdf.
68. Wecker, C., Kohnle, C., & Fischer, F. (2007). Computer literacy and inquiry learning: When geeks learn less. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(2), 133. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.0021.8.x.
69. Wells, J., & Lewis, L. (2006). Internet access in U.S. public schools and classrooms: 1994-2005. Highlights. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. White, S., & Dillow, S. (2005). Key concepts and features of the 2003 national assessment of adult literacy.Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.