Closing the digital divide: Update from the early childhood longitudinal study

Journal of Educational Research

Volumn 100, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 52-60

  Judge, Sharon ^a   Puckett, Kathleen ^b   Bell, Sherry Mee ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer access in high And low poverty schools; Early childhood longitudinal study; Kindergarten, first , and third grade children

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749353147     PISSN: 00220671     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/JOER.100.1.52-60     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Attowell, P. (2000, November). Beyond the digital divide (Working Paper No. 164). New York: Sage.
2. Becker, H. J. (2000). Who's wired and who's not: Children's access to and use of computer technology. The Future of Children: Children and Computer Technology, 10(2), 44-75.
3. Brush, T. A., Armstrong, J., Barbrow, D., & Ulintz, L. (1999). Design and delivery of integrated learning systems: Their impact on student achievement and attitudes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 21, 475-486.
4. CEO Forum. (2001, June). School technology and readiness report. Retrieved June 21, 2002, from http://www.ceoforum.org/downloads/report4.pdf
5. Coley, R., Cradler, J., & Engel, P. (1998). Computers and classrooms: The status of technology in U.S. schools. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
6. DeBell, M., & Chapman, C. (2003). Computer and Internet use by children and adolescents in 2001 (NCES 2004-014). U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
7. Fairlie, R. (2002). Race and the digital divide. Chicago: Joint Center for Poverty Research.
8. Judge, S., Puckett, K., & Cabuk, B. (2004). Digital equity: New findings from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(4), 383-396.
9. Kleiner, A., & Lewis, L. (2003). Internet access in U.S. public schools and classrooms: 1994-2002 (NCES 2004-011). U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
10. National Institute for Community Innovations. (2003). The five dimensions of digital equity. Retrieved August 29, 2003, from http://digitalequity. edreform.net/
11. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (National Reading Panel Report No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
12. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
13. Norris, C., Sullivan, T., Poirot, J., & Soloway, E. (2003). No access, no use, no impact: Snapshot surveys of educational technology in K-12. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 15-27.
14. O'Bannon, B., & Judge, S. (2004). Implementing partnerships across the curriculum with technology. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(2), 197-216.
15. President's Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology. (1997). Report to the President on the use of technology to strengthen K-12 education in the United States. [Online version]. Washington, DC: U.S. Government, Office of Science and Technology Policy. Retrieved June 6, 2002, from http://www.ostp.gov/PCAST/k-12ed.html
16. Puma M., Chapin, D., & Pape, A. (2003). E-rate and the digital divide: A preliminary analysis from the integrated studies of educational technology. Washington DC: The Urban Institute.
17. Ringstaff, C., & Kelley, L. (2002). The learning return on our education technology investment: A review of findings from research. San Francisco: WestEd. Retrieved July 21, 2003, from www.WestEd.org/online_ppubs/ learning_return.pdf
18. Schacter, J. (1999). The impact of education technology on student achievement: What the most current research has to say. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Exchange on Education Technology. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED430537)
19. Sivin-Kachala, J., & Bialo, E. R. (1999). 1999 research report on the effectiveness of technology in schools (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Software and Information Industry Association.
20. Smerdon, B., Cronen, S., Lanahan, L., Anderson, J., Iannotti, N., & Angeles J. (2000). Teachers' tools for the 21st century: A report on teachers' use of technology (NCES 2000-102). U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
21. Solomon, G. (2002). Digital equity: It's not just about access anymore. Technology & learning, 22(9), 18-26.
22. Swain, C., & Pearson, T. (2002). Educators and technology standards: Influencing the digital divide. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(3), 326-336.
23. U.S. Department of Commerce. (2000, October). Falling through the net: Toward digital inclusion. Retrieved June 6, 2002, from http://search.ntia.doc. gov/pdf/fttnoo.pdf
24. U.S. Department of Education. (1999). Student computer use (Office of Educational Research and Improvement, NCES Publication 1999-011). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
25. Wenglinsky, H. (1998). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and student achievement in mathematics (Policy information report. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Services. Retrieved June 12, 2002, from http://ftp.ets.org/pub/res/technolog.pdf