Supporting learners with low domain knowledge when using the internet

Journal of Educational Computing Research

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 1-17

  Desjarlais, Malinda ^a   Willoughby, Teena ^a  

^a BROCK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548009620     PISSN: 07356331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/K788-MK86-2342-3600     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Benton, S. L., Kiewra, K. A., Whitfill, J. M., & Dennison, R. (1993). Encoding and external storage effects on writing processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 267-280.
2. Bjorklund, D. F., & Schneider. W. (1996). The interaction of knowledge, aptitude, and strategies in children's memory performance. In H. W. Reese (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 26, pp. 59-89). San Diego: Academic Press.
3. Chi, M. (1978). Children's thinking: What develops? In R. S. Siegler (Eds.), Knowledge structures and memory development (pp. 73-96). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Chiesi, H., Spilich, G., & Voss, J. (1979). Acquisition of domain-related information in relation to high and low domain knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 18, 257-274.
5. Dias, P., & Sousa, A. P. (1997). Understanding navigation and disorientation in hypermedia learning environments. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 6, 173-185.
6. Downing, R. E., Moore, J. L., & Brown, S. W. (2005). The effects and interaction of spatial visualization and domain expertise on information seeking. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 195-209.
7. Dryburgh, H. (2001). Changing our ways: Why and how Canadians use the Internet. Retrieved May 20, 2005, from http://www.statcan.ca/cgi/downpub/ listpub.cgi?catno=56F0006XIE2000001.
8. Foltz, P. W. (1996). Comprehension, coherence, and strategies in hypertext and linear text. In J. Rouet, A. Dillon, & R. J. Spiro (Eds.), Hypertext and cognition (pp. 109-136). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Ford, N., & Chen, S. Y. (2000). Individual differences, hypermedia navigation, and learning: An empirical study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9, 281-311.
10. Jones, S. (2002). The Internet goes to college: How students are living in the future with today's technology. Retrieved May 30, 2005, from http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/71/report_display.asp.
11. Kellogg, R. T. (1988). Attentional overload and writing performance: Effects of rough draft and outline strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 355-365.
12. Kiewra, K. A. (1985). Investigating notetaking and review: A depth of processing alternative. Educational Psychologist, 20, 23-32.
13. Kiewra. K. A., DuBois, N. F., Christian, D., McShane, A., Meyerhoffer, M., & Roskelley, D. (1991). Note-taking functions and techniques. Journal of Educational Psycholog), 2, 240-245.
14. Last, D. A., O'Donnell, A. M., & Kelly, A. E. (2001). The effects of prior knowledge and goal strength on the use of hypermedia. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10, 3-25.
15. Lawless, K. A., Brown, S. W., Mills R., & Mayall, H. J. (2003). Knowledge, interest, recall and navigation: A look at hypertext processing. Journal of Literacy Research, 35, 911-934.
16. Lawless, K. A., & Kulikowich, J. M. (1996). Understanding hypertext navigation through cluster analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14, 385-399.
17. Lawless, K. A., Schrader, P. G., & Mayall, H. J. (2006, April). The impact of domain knowledge and navigation on learning online. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
18. Lidstone, J., & Lucas, K. B. (1998). Teaching and learning research methodology from interactive multimedia programs: Postgraduate students' engagement with an innovative program. Journal of Educational Multimedia & Hypermedia, 7, 237-261.
19. Marchionini, G., Dwiggins, S., Katz, A., & Lin, X. (1993). Information seeking in full-text end-user-oriented search systems: The roles of domain and search expertise. Library and Information Science Research, 15, 35-69.
20. Mayer, R. E., Mathias, A., & Wetzell, K. (2002). Fostering understanding of multimedia messages through pre-training: Evidence for a two-stage theory of mental model construction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 8, 147-154.
21. McDonald, S., & Stevenson, R. J. (1998). Navigation in hyperspace: An evaluation of the effects of navigational tools and subject matter expertise on browsing and information retrieval in hypertext. Interacting with Computers, 10, 129-142.
22. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2002).Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: When reading helps listening. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 156-163.
23. Patel, S. C., Drury, C. G., & Shalin, V. L. (1998). Effectiveness of expert semantic knowledge as a navigational aid within hypertext. Behavior and Information Technology, 17, 313-324.
24. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.
25. Riffe, D., Lacy, S., & Fico, F. G. (1998). Analyzing media messages: Quantitative content analysis. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
26. Schneider, W., Korkel. J., & Weinert, F. (1990). Expert knowledge, general abilities, and text processing. In W. Schneider & F. Weinert, (Eds.) Interactions Among Aptitudes, Strategies, and Knowledge in Cognitive Performance (pp. 235-250). New York: Springer-Verlag.
27. Shapiro, A. (1999). The relationship between prior knowledge and interactive overviews during hypermedia-aided learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20, 143-167.
28. Shuell, T. J., & Farber, S. L. (2001). Students' perceptions of technology use in college courses. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 24, 119-138.
29. Slotte, V., & Lonka, K. (1999). Review and process effects of spontaneous note-taking on text comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 1-20.
30. Small, R. V., & Ferreira, S. M. (1994, February). Multimedia vs. print information resources: Information location and use, motivation, and learning patterns for children and adults. Paper presented at the 1994 National convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Nashville, TN.
31. Spilich, G. J., Vesonder, G. T., Chejese, H. L., & Voss, J. F. (1979). Text processing of domain-related information for individuals with high and low domain knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning and Learning Behavior, 18, 275-290.
32. Stein, B. S., Morris, C. D., & Bransford, J. D. (1978). Constraints on effective elaboration. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 17, 707-714.
33. Watson, (1998). "If you don't have it, you can find it," A close look at students' perceptions of using technology. Journal of American Society for Information Science, 49, 1024-1036.
34. Willoughby, T., Anderson, A. S., Wood, E., Mueller, J., & Ross, C. (2006). Learning from the Internet: Does prior knowledge matter? Article submitted for publication.
35. Winters, F. I., Azevedo, R., & Levin, D. M. (2004, April). How do highschool students regulate their learning when using a computer-based environment to collaboratively engage in inquiry? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
36. Yang, Y. (1991-1992). The effects of media on motivation and content recall: Comparison of computer- and print-based instruction. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 20, 95-105.