SEARCHing for an answer: The critical role of new literacies while reading on the Internet

Reading Teacher

Volumn 59, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 614-627

  Henry, Laurie A ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845369464     PISSN: 00340561     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1598/RT.59.7.1     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Abilock, D. (2004). Choose the best search for your information need. Information literacy: Search strategies. Retrieved September 5, 2004, from http://www.noodle tools.com/debbie/literacies/information/5locate/advice enqine.html
2. Alexander, P.A., & Jetton, T.L. (2002). Learning from text: A multidimensional and developmental perspective. In M.L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 285-310). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. American Library Association. (2001). Objectives for information literacy instruction: A model statement for academic librarians. Chicago: Author.
4. American Library Association & Association for Educational Communications and Technology. (1998). Literacy standards for student learning. Chicago: Authors.
5. Berkowitz, B. (2002). Moving every child ahead: The Big6 success strategy. Multimedia Schools, 9, 17-22.
6. Brandt, S.D. (1997). Constructivism: Teaching for understanding on the Internet. Communications of the ACM, 40, 112-116.
7. Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
8. Byrnes, J., & Guthrie, J.T. (1992). Prior conceptual knowledge and textbook search. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 17, 8-29.
9. Coiro, J. (2003a). Reading comprehension on the Internet: Expanding our understanding of reading comprehension to encompass new literacies. The Reading Teacher, 56, 458-464.
10. Coiro, J. (2003b). Rethinking comprehension strategies to better prepare students for critically evaluating content on the Internet. The NERA Journal, 39(2), 29-34.
11. Cummins, R. (2001, July/August). Choosing the right tool for the job: Searchbots. The Technology Source. Retrieved December 15,2005, from http://technoloqvsource.org/article/choosing_the_riqht_tool_for_the_job
12. Dreher, M.J. (1993). Reading to locate information: Societal and educational perspectives. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 129-138.
13. Dreher, M.J. (2002). Children searching and using information text: A critical part of comprehension. In C.C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 289-304). New York: Guilford.
14. Eagleton, M.B., & Guinee, K. (2002). Strategies for supporting student Internet inquiry. New England Reading Association Journal, 38(2), 39-47.
15. Eagleton, M.B., Guinee, K., & Langlais, K. (2003). Teaching Internet literacy strategies: The hero inquiry project. Voices From the Middle, 10, 28-35.
16. Educational Testing Service. (2002). Digital transformation: A framework for ICT literacy. A report of the International ICT Literacy Panel. Princeton, NJ: Author. Retrieved December 15,2005, from http://www.ets.org/research/ researcher/ICT-REPORT.html
17. Eisenberg, M., & Berkowitz, R. (1990). Information problem-solving: The Big6 skills approach to library & information skills instruction. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
18. Eliopoulos, D., & Gotlieb, C. (2003). Evaluating web search results rankings. Online, 27, 42-48.
19. Fidel, R., Davies, R.K., Douglass, M.H., Holder, J.K. Hopkins, C.J., Kushner, E.J., et al. (1999). A visit to the information mall: Web searching behavior of high school students. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 24-37.
20. Guinee, K., Eagleton, M.B., & Hall, T.E. (2003). Adolescents' Internet search strategies: Drawing upon familiar cognitive paradigms when accessing electronic information sources. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29, 363-374.
21. Guthrie, J.T., & Kirsch, I.S. (1987). Distinctions between reading comprehension and locating information in text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 220-227.
22. Howe, W. (2001, April). Evaluating quality. Walt's Navigating the Net Forum. Retrieved December 13, 2005, from http://www.walthowe.com/navnet/aualitv. html
23. International Reading Association. (2001). Integrating literacy and technology in the curriculum (Position statement). Retrieved December 15, 2005, from http://www. readinq.orq/downloads/positions/ps1048_technoloqv.pdf
24. International Reading Association & National Council of Teachers of English. (2000). Standards for the English Language Arts. Newark, DE; Urbana, IL: Authors.
25. Jansen, B.A. (1995). The Big6 assignment organizer for grades.3-6. Retrieved December 15,2005, from http://www.sasaustin.orq/library/ assiqnmentOrqanizerLS.php
26. Kafai, Y., & Bates, M. (1997). Internet Web-searching instruction in the elementary classroom: Building a foundation for information literacy. School Library Media Quarterly, 25, 103-111.
27. Kuhlthau, C.C. (1996). The virtual school library: Gateway to the information superhighway. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
28. Kuhlthau, C.C. (1997). Learning in digital libraries: An information search process approach. Library Trends, 45, 708-717.
29. Leu, D.J., Jr. (2000). Our children's future: Changing the focus of literacy and literacy instruction. The Reading Teacher, 53, 424-431.
30. Leu, D.J., Jr., Kinzer, C.K., Coiro, J., & Cammack, D.W. (2004). Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other communication technologies. In R. Ruddell & N. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 1570-1613). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
31. Leu, D.J., Jr., Leu, D.D., & Coiro, J. (2004). Teaching with the Internet: Lessons from the classroom (4th ed.). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
32. Lewin, L. (1998). Taming the Web: Reading for comprehension. Multimedia Schools, 5, 50-52.
33. Martin, L. (2003). Web reading: Linking text and technology. The Reading Teacher, 56, 735-737.
34. Nachmias, R., & Gilad, A. (2002). Needle in a hyperstack: Searching for information on the World Wide Web. Journal of Research on Technology In Education, 34, 475-486.
35. Ogle, D. (1986). K-W-L: A teaching model that develops active reading of expository text. The Reading Teacher, 39, 564-570.
36. Pappas, M., & Tepe, A. (1995). Preparing the information educator for the future. In B.J. Morris (Ed.), School Library Media Annual (pp. 37-44). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
37. RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Retrieved March 3,2004 from http://www.rand. orq/multi/achievementforall/readinq/readreport.html
38. Snyder, I. (2002). Literacy education in the digital age: Reframing curriculum and pedagogy. Pedagogisch Tijdschrift, 27, 145-157.
39. Stripling, B., & Pitts, J. (1988). Brainstorms and blueprints: Teaching library research as a thinking process. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
40. Sutherland-Smith, W. (2002). Weaving the literacy Web: Changes in reading from page to screen. The Reading Teacher, 55, 662-669.
41. Symons, S., & Pressley, M. (1993). Prior knowledge affects text search success and extraction of information. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 251-261.
42. Warlick, D. (2004, January). Landmarks citation machine. Retrieved December 13, 2005, from http://citation machine.net
43. Yang, S. (1997). Information seeking as problem solving using a qualitative approach to uncover the novice learners' information-seeking processes in a Perseus hypertext system. Library and Information Science Research, 19, 71-92.