Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: Commitment, constraints, caution, and change

Journal of Curriculum Studies

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 155-192

  Hennessy, Sara ^a   Ruthven, Kenneth ^a   Brindley, Sue ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33744905962     PISSN: 00220272     EISSN: 13665839     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0022027032000276961     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Andrews R. Framing and design in ICT in English: Towards a new subject and practices in the classroom English in the Digital Age: Information and Communications Technology and the Teaching of English (2000); 22-33In A. Goodwyn (ed.),
2. Barbour R. S., Kitzinger J. Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory and Practice (1999);
3. Becker H. J. Findings from the teaching, learning and computing survey: is Larry Cuban right? Educational Policy Analysis Archives (2000); 8: http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n51/ (visited 20 March 2004)
4. ImpaCT2 (2004) British Educational Communications And Technology Agency (Becta)
5. British National Corpus British National Corpus.
6. Carney J. M. Integrating technology into constructivist classrooms: An examination of one model for teacher development Journal of Computing in Teacher Education (1998); 15: 7-15
7. Collins J., Hammond M., Wellington J. J. Teaching and Learning with Multimedia (1997);
8. Cooper P., McIntyre D. Effective Teaching and Learning: Teachers' and Students' Perspectives (1996);
9. Cuban L. Oversold and Underused: Computers in the Classroom (2001);
10. Culley L. Girls, boys and computers Educational Studies (1988); 14: 3-8
11. Dawes L. What stops teachers using new technology? Issues in Teaching Using ICT (2001); 61-79In M. Leask (ed.),
12. Deaney R., Ruthven K., Hennessy S. Teachers Developing Practical Theories of the Contribution of ICT to Subject Teaching and Learning: An Analysis of Cases from English Secondary school (2004);
13. Deaney R., Ruthven K., Hennessy S. Teachers' practical theories of technology-integrated pedagogy:aN analysis of cases from English secondary schools (2004); in press
14. Demetriadis S., Barbas A., Molohides A., Palaigeorgiou G., Psillos D., Vlahavas I., tsoukalas I., pombortsis A. 'Cultures in negotiation': teachers' acceptance/resistance attitudes considering the infusion of technology into schools Computers and Education (2003); 41: 19-37
15. Teachers: Meeting the Challenge of Change (1998); Department for Education and Employment; (DfEE)
16. The Use of Information and Communications Technology in Subject Teaching: BOF-funded Training: Expected Outcomes for Teachers in England, Northern Ireland and Wales (2000); Department for Education and Employment (DfEE)
17. The National Curriculum: Handbook for Secondary Teachers in England: Key Stages 3 and 4 (1999) Department for Education and Employment (DfEE)/ Qualifications and Curriculum Authority
18. Donnelly J. Departmental characteristics and the experience of secondary science teaching Educational Research (2000); 42: 261-273
19. Ellis V. Analogue clock/digital display: Continuity and change in debates about literacy, technology and English ICT Pedagogy and the Curriculum: Subject to Change (2001); 131-151In A. Loveless and V. Ellis (eds),
20. Firestone W. A., Louis K. S. Schools as cultures Handbook of Research on Educational Administration (1999); 297-322In J. Murphy and K. S. Louis (ed.),
21. Glaser B. G., Strauss A. L. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (1967);
22. Goodson I. F., Mangan J. M. Subject cultures and the introduction of classroom computers British Educational Research Journal (1995); 21: 613-628
23. Goodwyn A., Adams A., Clarke S. The great god of the future: The views of current and future English teachers on the place of IT in literacy English in Education (1997); 31: 54-62
24. Hadley M., Sheingold K. Commonalities and distinctive patterns in teachers' integration of computers American Journal of Education (1993); 101: 261-313
25. Hammersley M., atkinson P. Ethnography: Principles in Practice (1983);
26. Hennessy S., Deaney R., Ruthven K. Pedagogic Strategies for Using ICT to Support Subject Teaching and Learning: An Analysis Across 15 Case Studies (2003);
27. Jarvis J., Woodrow D. Learning preferences in relation to subjects of study of students in higher education Paper presented at British Congress of Mathematics Education: BCME-5 (2001); http://www.leeds.ac.uk/ educol/documents/00001850.htm (visited 20 March 2004)
28. Kerr S. T. Lever and fulcrum: Educational technology in teachers' thought and practice Teachers College Record (1991); 93: 114-136
29. Kirk D., Macdonald D. Teacher voice and ownership of curriculum change Journal of Curriculum Studies (2001); 33: 551-567
30. Kitzinger J., Barbour R. S. Introduction: The challenge and promise of focus groups Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory, and Practice (1999); 1-20In J. Kitzinger and R. S. Barbour (eds),
31. Lave J., Wenger E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (1991);
32. Lagrange J.-B., Artigue M., Laborde C., Trouche L. A meta study on IC technologies in education: Towards a multi-dimensional framework to tackle their integration Proceedings of the 25th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (2001); Vol. 1: 111-125In M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (ed.),
33. Leach J., Moon B. Pedagogy, information and communications technology and teachers' professional knowledge Curriculum Journal (2000); 11: 385-404
34. Loveless A., DeVoogd G. L., Bohlin R. M. Something old, something new⋯ Is pedagogy affected by ICT? ICT, Pedagogy and the Curriculum: Subject to Change (2001); In A. Loveless and V. Ellis (eds),
35. Martin M. O., Mullis I. V. S., Gonzalez E. J., Gregory K. D., Smith T. A., Chrostowski S. J., Garden R. A., O'Connor K. M. TIMSS 1999 International Science Report: Findings from IEA's Report of the Third International Mathematics and Science Study at the Eighth Grade (2000);
36. McCormick R., Scrimshaw P. Information and communication technology, knowledge and pedagogy Education, Communication and Information (2001); 1: 37-57
37. Mullis I. V. S., Martin M. O., Gonzalez E. J., Gregory K. D., Garden R. A., O'Connor K. M., Chrostowski S. J., Smith T. A. TIMSS 1999 International Mathematics Report: Findings from IEA's Report of the Third International Mathematics and Science Study at the Eighth Grade (2000);
38. Mumtaz S. Factors affecting teachers' use of information and communications technology: A review of the literature Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education (2000); 9: 319-341
39. Myhre O. R. I think this will keep them busy: Computers in a teacher's thought and practice Journal of Technology and Teacher Education (1998); 6: 93-103
40. The National Curriculum: An Introduction to the National Curriculum (1989) National Curriculum Council (NCC)
41. Niederhauser D. S., Stoddart T. Teachers' instructional perspectives and use of educational software Teaching and Teacher Education (2001); 17: 15-31
42. Norris C., Smolka J., Soloway E. Convergent analysis: A method for extracting the value from research studies on technology in education. US Department of Education The Secretary's Conference on Educational Technology - 1999 (1999); http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/ techconf99/whitepapers/paper2.html (visited 20 March 2004)
43. Noss R., Hoyles C. Windows on Mathematical Meaning: Learning Cultures and Computers (1996);
44. Noss R., Pachler N. The challenge of new technologies: Doing old things in a new way, or doing new things? Understanding Pedagogy and Its Impact on Learning (1999); 195-211In P. Mortimore (ed.),
45. ICT in Schools: The Impact of Government Initiatives: An Interim Report, April 2001 (2001); Office for Standards in Education (Ofsted)
46. ICT in Schools: Effect of Government Initiatives: Progress Report, April 2002: A Report from the Office of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Schools (2002); Office for Standards in Education (Ofsted)
47. Oldknow A. T3 Europe survey of hand-held technology. T3 Co-ordinators Annual Conference (2000); Chantilly, France
48. Olson J. Teacher influence in the classroom: A context for understanding curriculum change Instructional Science (1981); 10: 259-275
49. Olson J. Trojan horse or teacher's pet? Computers and the culture of the school Journal of Curriculum Studies (2000); 32: 1-8
50. Schooling for Tomorrow: Learning to Bridge the Digital Divide (2000); Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
51. Learning to Change: ICT in Schools (2001); Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
52. Papert S. Information and communication technology and education. Keynote address, OECD Meeting on Investing in Competencies for All (2001); http://www.script.lu/activinno/ict_etude_ocde/ ict_rapport_synthese_english.pdf (visited 17 October 2004)
53. Ralston A. Let's abolish pencil-and-paper arithmetic Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching (1999); 18: 173-194
54. Rogers L. Learning science with ICT: How do teachers make a difference? The CeNTRE Seminar Series on the Relationship between ICT and Specific Subject Disciplines (2002);
55. Rogers L., Finlayson H. Does ICT in science really work in the classroom? Part 1: The individual teacher experience School Science Review (2003); 85: 105-112
56. Ruthven K., Hennessy S. A practitioner model of the use of computer-based tools and resources to support mathematics teaching and learning Educational Studies in Mathematics (2002); 49: 47-88
57. Ruthven K., Hennessy S., Brindley S. Teacher representations of the successful use of computer-based tools and resources in teaching and learning secondary English, Mathematics and Science Teaching and Teacher Education (2004); in press
58. Ruthven K., Hennessy S., Deaney R. Incorporating Internet resources into classroom practice: Pedagogical perspectives and strategies of secondary school subject teachers Computers and Education (2005); 44: 1-34
59. Schofield J. W. Computers and Classroom Culture (1995);
60. Scrimshaw P. Computers and the teacher's role Using Information Technology Effectively in Teaching and Learning: Studies in Pre-service and In-service Teacher Education (1997); 100-113In B. Somekh, and N. Davis (eds),
61. Selwyn N. Differences in educational computer use: The influence of subject cultures Curriculum Journal (1999a); 10: 29-48
62. Selwyn N. Why the computer is not dominating schools: A failure of policy or a failure of practice? Cambridge Journal of Education (1999b); 29: 77-91
63. Smerdon B., Cronen S., Lanahan L., Anderson J., Iannotti N., Angeles J. Teachers' Tools for the 21st century: A Report on Teachers' Use of Technology (2000); http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/frss/publications/2000102/ (visited 25 March 2004)
64. Strauss A. L. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists (1987);
65. Tearle P. ICT implementation: What makes the difference? British Journal of Educational Technology (in press);
66. Turkle S. Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet (1995);
67. Veen W. How teachers use computers in instructional practice: Four case studies in a Dutch secondary school Computers and Education (1993); 21: 1-8
68. Watson D. M., Cox M., Johnson D. The ImpacT Report: An Evaluation of the Impact of Information Technology on Children's Achievements in Primary and Secondary Schools (1993); (eds)
69. Wertsch J. V. Mediated action A Companion to Cognitive Science (1998); 518-525In W. Bechtel and G. Graham (eds),
70. Williams D., Coles L., Wilson K., Richardson A., Tuson J. Teachers and ICT: Current use and future needs British Journal of Educational Technology (2000); 31: 307-320
71. Wood T. Gender and 'new age' of computers: Identity, attitudes, and use of the Internet in education (in preparation); Doctoral thesis, Open University
72. Wright D. Mathematics and IT--a pupil's entitlement Paper presented at the British Congress of Mathematics Education: BCME-5 (2001);