Corrigendum to "Protein contacts, inter-residue interactions and side-chain modelling" [Biochimie 90 (4) (2008) 626-639] (DOI:10.1016/j.biochi.2007.11.007);Protein contacts, inter-residue interactions and side-chain modelling

Biochimie

Volumn 90, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 626-639

  Faure, Guilhem ^a   Bornot, Aurélie ^a   de Brevern, Alexandre G ^a  

^a INSERM   (France)

Author keywords

Amino acid; Contact potential; Hierarchical folding; Local protein structure; Protein domain; Protein stability; Secondary structure; Side chain conformation; Side chain prediction; Side chain side chain; Structural class; Structure sequence relationship

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; PROTEIN;

BIOINFORMATICS; PROTEIN DATA BANK; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW;

EID: 41149083129     PISSN: 03009084     EISSN: 61831638     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biochi.2008.05.002     Document Type: Erratum

References (135)

1. Taylor W.R. The classification of amino acid conservation. J. Theor. Biol. 119 (1986) 205-218
2. Livingstone C.D., and Barton G.J. Protein sequence alignments: a strategy for the hierarchical analysis of residue conservation. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 9 (1993) 745-756
3. Rost B. Review: protein secondary structure prediction continues to rise. J. Struct. Biol. 134 (2001) 204-218
4. Jones D.T. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J. Mol. Biol. 292 (1999) 195-202
5. Pollastri G., and McLysaght A. Porter: a new, accurate server for protein secondary structure prediction. Bioinformatics 21 (2005) 1719-1720
6. Moult J., Fidelis K., Zemla A., and Hubbard T. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-round V. Proteins 53 Suppl. 6 (2003) 334-339
7. Fiser A., Dosztanyi Z., and Simon I. The role of long-range interactions in defining the secondary structure of proteins is overestimated. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13 (1997) 297-301
8. Offmann B., Tyagi M., and de Brevern A.G. Local protein structures. Current Bioinformatics 2 (2007) 165-202
9. de Brevern A.G., Etchebest C., and Hazout S. Bayesian probabilistic approach for predicting backbone structures in terms of protein blocks. Proteins 41 (2000) 271-287
10. de Brevern A.G., and Hazout S. 'Hybrid protein model' for optimally defining 3D protein structure fragments. Bioinformatics 19 (2003) 345-353
11. Schuchhardt J., Schneider G., Reichelt J., Schomburg D., and Wrede P. Local structural motifs of protein backbones are classified by self-organizing neural networks. Protein Eng. 9 (1996) 833-842
12. Unger R., Harel D., Wherland S., and Sussman J.L. A 3D building blocks approach to analyzing and predicting structure of proteins. Proteins 5 (1989) 355-373
13. Sander O., Sommer I., and Lengauer T. Local protein structure prediction using discriminative models. BMC Bioinformatics 7 (2006) 14
14. de Brevern A.G., Etchebest C., Benros C., and Hazout S. "Pinning strategy": a novel approach for predicting the backbone structure in terms of protein blocks from sequence. J. Biosci. 32 (2007) 51-70
15. Etchebest C., Benros C., Hazout S., and de Brevern A.G. A structural alphabet for local protein structures: improved prediction methods. Proteins 59 (2005) 810-827
16. Tyagi M., Gowri V.S., Srinivasan N., de Brevern A.G., and Offmann B. A substitution matrix for structural alphabet based on structural alignment of homologous proteins and its applications. Proteins 65 (2006) 32-39
17. Tyagi M., Sharma P., Swamy C.S., Cadet F., Srinivasan N., de Brevern A.G., and Offmann B. Protein Block Expert (PBE): a web-based protein structure analysis server using a structural alphabet. Nucleic Acids Res. 34 (2006) W119-W123
18. M. Tyagi, A.G. de Brevern, N. Srinivasan, B. Offmann, Protein structure mining using a structural alphabet, Proteins (2008), in press.
19. Dudev M., and Lim C. Discovering structural motifs using a structural alphabet: application to magnesium-binding sites. BMC Bioinformatics 8 (2007) 106
20. Hvidsten T.R., Kryshtafovych A., Komorowski J., and Fidelis K. A novel approach to fold recognition using sequence-derived properties from sets of structurally similar local fragments of proteins. Bioinformatics 19 Suppl. 2 (2003) ii81-ii91
21. Baker E.N., and Hubbard R.E. Hydrogen bonding in globular proteins. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 44 (1984) 97-179
22. Burley S.K., and Petsko G.A. Weakly polar interactions in proteins. Adv. Protein Chem. 39 (1988) 125-189
23. Brandl M., Weiss M.S., Jabs A., Suhnel J., and Hilgenfeld R. C-H.pi-interactions in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 307 (2001) 357-377
24. Weiss M.S., Brandl M., Suhnel J., Pal D., and Hilgenfeld R. More hydrogen bonds for the (structural) biologist. Trends Biochem. Sci. 26 (2001) 521-523
25. Mitchell J.B., Thornton J.M., Singh J., and Price S.L. Towards an understanding of the arginine-aspartate interaction. J. Mol. Biol. 226 (1992) 251-262
26. Stickle D.F., Presta L.G., Dill K.A., and Rose G.D. Hydrogen bonding in globular proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 226 (1992) 1143-1159
27. Rose G.D., and Wolfenden R. Hydrogen bonding, hydrophobicity, packing, and protein folding. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 22 (1993) 381-415
28. Gromiha M.M., and Selvaraj S. Importance of long-range interactions in protein folding. Biophys. Chem. 77 (1999) 49-68
29. Bahar I., Kaplan M., and Jernigan R.L. Short-range conformational energies, secondary structure propensities, and recognition of correct sequence-structure matches. Proteins 29 (1997) 292-308
30. Russell R.B., Saqi M.A., Bates P.A., Sayle R.A., and Sternberg M.J. Recognition of analogous and homologous protein folds - assessment of prediction success and associated alignment accuracy using empirical substitution matrices. Protein Eng. 11 (1998) 1-9
31. Drablos F. Clustering of non-polar contacts in proteins. Bioinformatics 15 (1999) 501-509
32. Gromiha M.M., Thangakani A.M., and Selvaraj S. FOLD-RATE: prediction of protein folding rates from amino acid sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 34 (2006) W70-W74
33. Capriotti E., and Casadio R. K-Fold: a tool for the prediction of the protein folding kinetic order and rate. Bioinformatics 23 (2007) 385-386
34. Punta M., and Rost B. Protein folding rates estimated from contact predictions. J. Mol. Biol. 348 (2005) 507-512
35. Zhang L., and Skolnick J. How do potentials derived from structural databases relate to "true" potentials?. Protein Sci. 7 (1998) 112-122
36. Miyazawa S., and Jernigan R.L. Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading. J. Mol. Biol. 256 (1996) 623-644
37. Heringa J., and Argos P. Side-chain clusters in protein structures and their role in protein folding. J. Mol. Biol. 220 (1991) 151-171
38. Dosztanyi Z., Fiser A., and Simon I. Stabilization centers in proteins: identification, characterization and predictions. J. Mol. Biol. 272 (1997) 597-612
39. Kannan N., Selvaraj S., Gromiha M.M., and Vishveshwara S. Clusters in alpha/beta barrel proteins: implications for protein structure, function, and folding: a graph theoretical approach. Proteins 43 (2001) 103-112
40. Dedmon M.M., Lindorff-Larsen K., Christodoulou J., Vendruscolo M., and Dobson C.M. Mapping long-range interactions in alpha-synuclein using spin-label NMR and ensemble molecular dynamics simulations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 (2005) 476-477
41. Gugolya Z., Dosztanyi Z., and Simon I. Interresidue interactions in protein classes. Proteins 27 (1997) 360-366
42. Baker D. A surprising simplicity to protein folding. Nature 405 (2000) 39-42
43. Pandit A.D., Jha A., Freed K.F., and Sosnick T.R. Small proteins fold through transition states with native-like topologies. J. Mol. Biol. 361 (2006) 755-770
44. Paci E., Lindorff-Larsen K., Dobson C.M., Karplus M., and Vendruscolo M. Transition state contact orders correlate with protein folding rates. J. Mol. Biol. 352 (2005) 495-500
45. Plaxco K.W., Simons K.T., and Baker D. Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 277 (1998) 985-994
46. Grana O., Baker D., MacCallum R.M., Meiler J., Punta M., Rost B., Tress M.L., and Valencia A. CASP6 assessment of contact prediction. Proteins 61 Suppl. 7 (2005) 214-224
47. Olmea O., and Valencia A. Improving contact predictions by the combination of correlated mutations and other sources of sequence information. Fold Des. 2 (1997) S25-S32
48. Hamilton N., Burrage K., Ragan M.A., and Huber T. Protein contact prediction using patterns of correlation. Proteins 56 (2004) 679-684
49. Fariselli P., Olmea O., Valencia A., and Casadio R. Progress in predicting inter-residue contacts of proteins with neural networks and correlated mutations. Proteins Suppl. 5 (2001) 157-162
50. Fariselli P., Olmea O., Valencia A., and Casadio R. Prediction of contact maps with neural networks and correlated mutations. Protein Eng. 14 (2001) 835-843
51. Lund O., Frimand K., Gorodkin J., Bohr H., Bohr J., Hansen J., and Brunak S. Protein distance constraints predicted by neural networks and probability density functions. Protein Eng. 10 (1997) 1241-1248
52. Pollastri G., Baldi P., Fariselli P., and Casadio R. Improved prediction of the number of residue contacts in proteins by recurrent neural networks. Bioinformatics 17 Suppl. 1 (2001) S234-S242
53. Pollastri G., and Baldi P. Prediction of contact maps by GIOHMMs and recurrent neural networks using lateral propagation from all four cardinal corners. Bioinformatics 18 Suppl. 1 (2002) S62-S70
54. Punta M., and Rost B. PROFcon: novel prediction of long-range contacts. Bioinformatics 21 (2005) 2960-2968
55. Taylor W.R. Evolutionary transitions in protein fold space. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 17 (2007) 354-361
56. Joshi R.R. A decade of computing to traverse the labyrinth of protein domains. Current Bioinformatics 2 (2007) 113-131
57. Holland T.A., Veretnik S., Shindyalov I.N., and Bourne P.E. Partitioning protein structures into domains: why is it so difficult?. J. Mol. Biol. 361 (2006) 562-590
58. Ponting C.P., and Russell R.R. The natural history of protein domains. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 31 (2002) 45-71
59. Holm L., and Sander C. Parser for protein folding units. Proteins 19 (1994) 256-268
60. Siddiqui A.S., and Barton G.J. Continuous and discontinuous domains: an algorithm for the automatic generation of reliable protein domain definitions. Protein Sci. 4 (1995) 872-884
61. Dengler U., Siddiqui A.S., and Barton G.J. Protein structural domains: analysis of the 3Dee domains database. Proteins 42 (2001) 332-344
62. Siddiqui A.S., Dengler U., and Barton G.J. 3Dee: a database of protein structural domains. Bioinformatics 17 (2001) 200-201
63. Swindells M.B. A procedure for detecting structural domains in proteins. Protein Sci. 4 (1995) 103-112
64. Holm L., and Sander C. Dictionary of recurrent domains in protein structures. Proteins 33 (1998) 88-96
65. Wernisch L., Hunting M., and Wodak S.J. Identification of structural domains in proteins by a graph heuristic. Proteins 35 (1999) 338-352
66. Xu Y., Xu D., and Gabow H.N. Protein domain decomposition using a graph-theoretic approach. Bioinformatics 16 (2000) 1091-1104
67. Guo J.T., Xu D., Kim D., and Xu Y. Improving the performance of DomainParser for structural domain partition using neural network. Nucleic Acids Res. 31 (2003) 944-952
68. Alexandrov N., and Shindyalov I. PDP: protein domain parser. Bioinformatics 19 (2003) 429-430
69. Zhou H., Xue B., and Zhou Y. DDOMAIN: Dividing structures into domains using a normalized domain-domain interaction profile. Protein Sci. 16 (2007) 947-955
70. Lesk A.M., and Rose G.D. Folding units in globular proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 78 (1981) 4304-4308
71. Sowdhamini R., and Blundell T.L. An automatic method involving cluster analysis of secondary structures for the identification of domains in proteins. Protein Sci. 4 (1995) 506-520
72. Tsai C.J., and Nussinov R. Hydrophobic folding units derived from dissimilar monomer structures and their interactions. Protein Sci. 6 (1997) 24-42
73. Pugalenthi G., Archunan G., and Sowdhamini R. DIAL: a web-based server for the automatic identification of structural domains in proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 33 (2005) W130-W132
74. Wodak S.J., and Janin J. Location of structural domains in protein. Biochemistry 20 (1981) 6544-6552
75. Wetlaufer D.B. Nucleation, rapid folding, and globular intrachain regions in proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 70 (1973) 697-701
76. Wetlaufer D.B. Folding of protein fragments. Adv. Protein Chem. 34 (1981) 61-92
77. Gelly J.C., de Brevern A.G., and Hazout S. 'Protein Peeling': an approach for splitting a 3D protein structure into compact fragments. Bioinformatics 22 (2006) 129-133
78. Sali A., and Blundell T.L. Definition of general topological equivalence in protein structures. A procedure involving comparison of properties and relationships through simulated annealing and dynamic programming. J. Mol. Biol. 212 (1990) 403-428
79. Kolinski A., and Bujnicki J.M. Generalized protein structure prediction based on combination of fold-recognition with de novo folding and evaluation of models. Proteins 61 Suppl. 7 (2005) 84-90
80. Hardin C., Pogorelov T.V., and Luthey-Schulten Z. Ab initio protein structure prediction. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12 (2002) 176-181
81. Karplus K., Katzman S., Shackleford G., Koeva M., Draper J., Barnes B., Soriano M., and Hughey R. SAM-T04: what is new in protein-structure prediction for CASP6. Proteins 61 Suppl. 7 (2005) 135-142
82. Vasquez M. Modeling side-chain conformation. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 6 (1996) 217-221
83. Dunbrack Jr. R.L., Gerloff D.L., Bower M., Chen X., Lichtarge O., and Cohen F.E. Meeting review: the second meeting on the critical assessment of techniques for protein structure prediction (CASP2). Asilomar, California, December 13-16, 1996. Fold Des. 2 (1997) R27-R42
84. Dunbrack Jr. R.L. Rotamer libraries in the 21st century. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12 (2002) 431-440
85. Schrauber H., Eisenhaber F., and Argos P. Rotamers: to be or not to be? An analysis of amino acid side-chain conformations in globular proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 230 (1993) 592-612
86. De Maeyer M., Desmet J., and Lasters I. All in one: a highly detailed rotamer library improves both accuracy and speed in the modelling of sidechains by dead-end elimination. Fold Des. 2 (1997) 53-66
87. Lovell S.C., Word J.M., Richardson J.S., and Richardson D.C. The penultimate rotamer library. Proteins 40 (2000) 389-408
88. Koehl P., and Delarue M. Application of a self-consistent mean field theory to predict protein side-chains conformation and estimate their conformational entropy. J. Mol. Biol. 239 (1994) 249-275
89. Bower M.J., Cohen F.E., and Dunbrack Jr. R.L. Prediction of protein side-chain rotamers from a backbone-dependent rotamer library: a new homology modeling tool. J. Mol. Biol. 267 (1997) 1268-1282
90. Dunbrack Jr. R.L., and Cohen F.E. Bayesian statistical analysis of protein side-chain rotamer preferences. Protein Sci. 6 (1997) 1661-1681
91. Dunbrack Jr. R.L., and Karplus M. Backbone-dependent rotamer library for proteins. Application to side-chain prediction. J. Mol. Biol. 230 (1993) 543-574
92. Canutescu A.A., Shelenkov A.A., and Dunbrack Jr. R.L. A graph-theory algorithm for rapid protein side-chain prediction. Protein Sci. 12 (2003) 2001-2014
93. Eyal E., Najmanovich R., McConkey B.J., Edelman M., and Sobolev V. Importance of solvent accessibility and contact surfaces in modeling side-chain conformations in proteins. J. Comput. Chem. 25 (2004) 712-724
94. Xiang Z., and Honig B. Extending the accuracy limits of prediction for side-chain conformations. J. Mol. Biol. 311 (2001) 421-430
95. J. Xu, Rapid side-chain prediction via tree decomposition, RECOMB, 2005.
96. Hartmann C., Antes I., and Lengauer T. IRECS: a new algorithm for the selection of most probable ensembles of side-chain conformations in protein models. Protein Sci. 16 (2007) 1294-1307
97. Noguchi T., and Akiyama Y. PDB-REPRDB: a database of representative protein chains from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) in 2003. Nucleic Acids Res. 31 (2003) 492-493
98. Noguchi T., Matsuda H., and Akiyama Y. PDB-REPRDB: a database of representative protein chains from the Protein Data Bank (PDB). Nucleic Acids Res. 29 (2001) 219-220
99. Berman H.M., Westbrook J., Feng Z., Gilliland G., Bhat T.N., Weissig H., Shindyalov I.N., and Bourne P.E. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28 (2000) 235-242
100. Porto M., Bastolla U., Roman H.E., and Vendruscolo M. Reconstruction of protein structures from a vectorial representation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 218101
101. Hubbard S.J., and Thornton J.M. 'NACCESS', Computer Program (1993), Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University College, London
102. Murzin A.G., Brenner S.E., Hubbard T., and Chothia C. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol. 247 (1995) 536-540
103. Michie A.D., Orengo C.A., and Thornton J.M. Analysis of domain structural class using an automated class assignment protocol. J. Mol. Biol. 262 (1996) 168-185
104. Cheng J., and Baldi P. Improved residue contact prediction using support vector machines and a large feature set. BMC Bioinformatics 8 (2007) 113
105. Samanta U., Pal D., and Chakrabarti P. Packing of aromatic rings against tryptophan residues in proteins. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 55 (1999) 1421-1427
106. Samanta U., Pal D., and Chakrabarti P. Environment of tryptophan side chains in proteins. Proteins 38 (2000) 288-300
107. Meurisse R., Brasseur R., and Thomas A. Aromatic side-chain interactions in proteins. Near- and far-sequence His-X pairs. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1649 (2003) 85-96
108. Gelly J.C., Etchebest C., Hazout S., and de Brevern A.G. Protein Peeling 2: a web server to convert protein structures into series of protein units. Nucleic Acids Res. 34 (2006) W75-W78
109. Chothia C. The nature of the accessible and buried surfaces in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 105 (1976) 1-12
110. Thomas A., Meurisse R., and Brasseur R. Aromatic side-chain interactions in proteins. II. Near- and far-sequence Phe-X pairs. Proteins 48 (2002) 635-644
111. Thomas A., Meurisse R., Charloteaux B., and Brasseur R. Aromatic side-chain interactions in proteins. I. Main structural features. Proteins 48 (2002) 628-634
112. Bhattacharyya R., and Chakrabarti P. Stereospecific interactions of proline residues in protein structures and complexes. J. Mol. Biol. 331 (2003) 925-940
113. Chakrabarti P., and Chakrabarti S. C-H.O hydrogen bond involving proline residues in alpha-helices. J. Mol. Biol. 284 (1998) 867-873
114. Eswar N., and Ramakrishnan C. Secondary structures without backbone: an analysis of backbone mimicry by polar side chains in protein structures. Protein Eng. 12 (1999) 447-455
115. Eswar N., and Ramakrishnan C. Deterministic features of side-chain main-chain hydrogen bonds in globular protein structures. Protein Eng. 13 (2000) 227-238
116. Blundell T.L., Sibanda B.L., Montalvao R.W., Brewerton S., Chelliah V., Worth C.L., Harmer N.J., Davies O., and Burke D. Structural biology and bioinformatics in drug design: opportunities and challenges for target identification and lead discovery. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci. 361 (2006) 413-423
117. Kamat A.P., and Lesk A.M. Contact patterns between helices and strands of sheet define protein folding patterns. Proteins 66 (2007) 869-876
118. Holm L., and Sander C. Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. J. Mol. Biol. 233 (1993) 123-138
119. de Melo R.C., Lopes C.E., Fernandes Jr. F.A., da Silveira C.H., Santoro M.M., Carceroni R.L., Meira Jr. W., and Araujo Ade A. A contact map matching approach to protein structure similarity analysis. Genet. Mol. Res. 5 (2006) 284-308
120. Rainey J.K., and Goh M.C. Statistically based reduced representation of amino acid side chains. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 44 (2004) 817-830
121. Gromiha M.M., and Selvaraj S. Inter-residue interactions in protein folding and stability. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 86 (2004) 235-277
122. Lesk A.M., and Chothia C. Solvent accessibility, protein surfaces, and protein folding. Biophys. J. 32 (1980) 35-47
123. Etchebest C., Benros C., Bornot A., Camproux A.C., and de Brevern A.G. A reduced amino acid alphabet for understanding and designing protein adaptation to mutation. Eur. Biophys. J. 36 (2007) 1059-1069
124. Meurisse R., Brasseur R., and Thomas A. Aromatic side-chain interactions in proteins: near- and far-sequence Tyr-X pairs. Proteins 54 (2004) 478-490
125. Srinivasan N., Sowdhamini R., Ramakrishnan C., and Balaram P. Conformations of disulfide bridges in proteins. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 36 (1990) 147-155
126. Sowdhamini R., Srinivasan N., Shoichet B., Santi D.V., Ramakrishnan C., and Balaram P. Stereochemical modeling of disulfide bridges. Criteria for introduction into proteins by site-directed mutagenesis. Protein Eng. 3 (1989) 95-103
127. Vinayagam A., Pugalenthi G., Rajesh R., and Sowdhamini R. DSDBASE: a consortium of native and modelled disulphide bonds in proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 32 (2004) D200-D202
128. Thangudu R.R., Sharma P., Srinivasan N., and Offmann B. Analycys: a database for conservation and conformation of disulphide bonds in homologous protein domains. Proteins 67 (2007) 255-261
129. Thangudu R.R., Vinayagam A., Pugalenthi G., Manonmani A., Offmann B., and Sowdhamini R. Native and modeled disulfide bonds in proteins: knowledge-based approaches toward structure prediction of disulfide-rich polypeptides. Proteins 58 (2005) 866-879
130. Mitchell J.B., Nandi C.L., McDonald I.K., Thornton J.M., and Price S.L. Amino/aromatic interactions in proteins: is the evidence stacked against hydrogen bonding?. J. Mol. Biol. 239 (1994) 315-331
131. Brocchieri L., and Karlin S. How are close residues of protein structures distributed in primary sequence?. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92 (1995) 12136-12140
132. Shapovalov M.V., and Dunbrack Jr. R.L. Statistical and conformational analysis of the electron density of protein side chains. Proteins 66 (2007) 279-303
133. Matthews B.W. X-ray crystallographic studies of proteins. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 27 (1976) 493-523
134. Hazout S. Entropy-derived measures for assessing the accuracy of N-state prediction algorithms. In: de Brevern A.G. (Ed). Recent Advances in Structural Bioinformatics (2007), Research signpost, Trivandrum, India 395-417
135. DeLano W.L.T. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System (2002), DeLano Scientific, San Carlos, CA, USA. http://www.pymol.org