How do potentials derived from structural databases relate to 'true' potentials?

Protein Science

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 112-122

  Zhang, Li ^a   Skolnick, Jeffrey ^a  

^a SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Contact potentials; Potential of mean force; Protein folding; Secondary structure propensity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DATA BASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STABILITY;

EID: 0031916717     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560070112     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Chou PY, Fasman GD. 1974. Prediction of protein conformation. Biochemistry 13:222-245.
2. Finkelstein AV, Badretdinov AY, Gutin AM. 1995. Why do protein architectures have Boltzmann-like statistics? Proteins Struct Funct Genet 23:142-150.
3. Finkelstein AV, Reva BA. 1996. Search for the most stable folds of protein chains: I. Application of a self-consistent molecular force field theory to a problem of protein three dimensional structure prediction. Protein Eng 9:387-397.
4. Godzik A. 1996. Knowledge-based potentials for protein folding: What can we learn from protein structures? Curr Biol 4:363-366.
5. Godzik A, Kolinski A, Skolnick J. 1995. Are proteins ideal mixtures of amino acids? Analysis of energy parameter sets. Protein Sci 4:2107-2117.
6. Goldstein R, Luthey-Schelten ZA, Wolynes P. 1992. Optimal protein-folding codes from spinglass theory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:1282-1286.
7. Jones DT, Thornton JM. 1996. Potential energy functions for threading. Curr Opin Struct Biol 6:210-216.
8. Kocher JPA, Rooman MJ, Wodak SJ. 1994. Factors influencing the ability of knowledge-based potentials to identify native sequence-structure matches. J Mol Biol 235:1598-1613.
9. Kolinski A, Milik M, Skolnick J. 1995. A reduced model of short range interactions in polypeptide chains. J Chem Phys 103:4312-4323.
10. Kolinski A, Skolnick J. 1994. Monte Carlo simulations of protein folding. I. Lattice model and interaction scheme. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 18:338-352.
11. Kolinski A, Skolnick J. 1996. Lattice models of protein folding, dynamics and thermodynamics. Austin. Texas: R.G. Landes Company.
12. Levitt M. 1976. A simplified representation of protein conformation for rapid simulation of protein folding. J Mol Biol 227:876-888.
13. Li H, Heling R, Tang C, Wingreen N. 1996. Emergence of preferred structures in a simple model of protein folding. Science 273:666-669.
14. Lim WA, Hodel A, Sauer RT, Richards FM. 1994. The crystal structure of a mutant protein with altered but improved hydrophobic core packing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:423-427.
15. Liwo A, Pincus MR, Wawak RJ, Rockovsky S, Oldziej S, Scheraga HA. 1997. A united-residue force field for off lattice protein-structure simulations. II. Parameterization of short-range interactions and determination of weights of energy terms by Z-score optimization. J Comput Chem 18:874-887.
16. Maiorov VN, Crippen GD. 1992. Contact potential that recognizes correct folding of globular proteins. J Mol Biol 227:867-888.
17. Mirny L, Domany E. 1996. Protein fold recognition and dynamics in the space of contact maps. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 26:391-410.
18. Mirny LA, Shakhnovich EI. 1996. How to derive protein folding potential? A new approach to an old problem. J Mol Biol 264:1164-1179.
19. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. 1996. Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading. J Mol Biol 256:623-644.
20. Rooman MJ, Kocher JP, Wodak SJ. 1995. Prediction of protein backbone conformation based on 7 structure assignments: Influence of local interactions. J Mol Biol 221:961-979.
21. Serrano L, Day AG, Fersht AR. 1993. Step-wise mutation of barnase to binase. A procedure for engineering increased stability of proteins and an experimental analysis of the evolution of protein stability. J Mol Biol 233:305-312.
22. Sippl MJ. 1993. Boltzmann's principle, knowledge-based mean fields and protein folding. An approach to the computational determination of protein structures. J Comput Aided Mol Des 7:473-501.
23. Sippl MJ. 1995. Knowledge-based potentials for proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 5:229-235.
24. Skolnick J, Jaroszewski L, Kolinski A, Godzik A. 1997. Derivation and testing of pair potentials for protein folding. When is the quasichemical approximation correct? Protein Sci 6:676-688.
25. Thomas PD, Dill KA. 1996. Statistical potentials extracted from protein structures: How accurate are they? J Mol Biol 257:457-469.
26. Ueda Y, Taketomi H, Go N. 1978. Studies of protein folding, unfolding and fluctuations by computer simulations. II. A three dimensional lattice model of lysozyme. Biopolymers 17:1351-1548.
27. Ulrich P, Scott W, van Gunsteren WF, Torda AE. 1997. Protein structure prediction force fields: Parameterization with quasi-Newtonian dynamics. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 27:367-384.
28. Wilson C, Doniach S. 1989. Computer model to dynamically simulate protein folding: Studies with crambin. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 6:193-209.