Protein contact prediction using patterns of correlation

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 56, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 679-684

  Hamilton, Nicholas ^a   Burrage, Kevin ^a   Ragan, Mark A ^a   Huber, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

CASP5; Correlated mutation; Neural network; Predicted contact map; Protein structure prediction

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; PROTEIN;

ACCURACY; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BINDING AFFINITY; CORRELATED MUTATION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EXPERIMENT; MUTATION; PAIR WISE CORRELATION; PREDICTED CONTACT MAP; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONTACT; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

AMINO ACIDS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CASPASES; CYSTEINE ENDOPEPTIDASES; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

EID: 4043170491     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20160     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. McLachlan AD. Tests for comparing related amino acid sequences. J Mol Biol 1997;61:409-424.
2. Krane DE, Rayner ML. Fundamental Concepts of Bioinformatics Benjamin Cummings; 2003.
3. Jones DT. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J Mol Biol 1999;292:195-202.
4. Koh Ingrid YY et al. Eva: evaluation of protein structure prediction servers. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:3311-3315.
5. Zell A et al. Stuttgart neural network simulator user manual version 4.2. University of Stuttgart, 1998.
6. Mirny L, Domany E. Protein fold recognition and dynamics in the space of contact maps. Proteins 1996;26:319-410.
7. McGuffin LJ, Bryson K, Jones DT. The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server. Bioinformatics 2000;16:404-405.
8. Singer MS, Vriend G, Bywater RP. Prediction of protein residue contacts with a PDB-derived likelihood matrix. Protein Eng 2002;15:721-725.
9. Olmea O, Valencia A. Improving contact predictions by the combination of correlated mutations and other sources of sequence information. Fold Des 1997;2:S25-S32.
10. Fariselli P, Olmea O, Valencia A, Casadio R. Prediction of contact maps with neural networks and correlated mutations. Protein Eng 2001;14:835-843.
11. Fariselli P, Olmea O, Valencia A, Casadio R. Progress in predicting inter-residue contacts of proteins with neural networks and correlated mutations. Proteins 2001;Suppl 5:157-162.
12. Fariselli P, Casadio R. Neural network based prediction of residue contacts in protein. Protein Eng 1999;12:15-21.
13. GöbeI U, Sander C, Scheider R, Valencia A. Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins. Proteins 1994;18:309-317.
14. Hobohm U, Scharf M, Schneider R, Sander C. Selection of a representative set of structures from the Brookhaven protein data bank. Protein Sci 1992;1:409-417.
15. Winker S, Overbeek R, Woese CR, Olsen GJ, Pfluger N. Structure detection through automated covariance search. Comput Appl Biosci 1990;6:365-371.
16. Shao Y, Bystroff C. Predicting interresidue contacts using templates and pathways. Proteins 2003;53:497-502.
17. Aloy P, Stark A, Hadley C, Russell RB. Prediction without templates: new folds, secondary structure, and contacts in CASP5. Proteins 2003;53:436-456.
18. Zaki MJ, Shan J, Bystroff C. Mining residue contacts in proteins using local structure predictions. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 2003;33:789-801.