A decade of computing to traverse the labyrinth of protein domains

Current Bioinformatics

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 113-131

  Joshi, Rajani R ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY BOMBAY   (India)

Author keywords

Homology modeling; Linker index; Motifs; Protein structural domains; Secondary structure; Template matching

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

AB INITIO CALCULATION; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DATA MINING; DECISION TREE; IMAGE DISPLAY; INTERNET; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; REVIEW; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; STRUCTURAL GENOMICS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

EID: 34249321642     PISSN: 15748936     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/157489307780618213     Document Type: Review

References (107)

1. Holm L, Sander C. Parser for protein folding units. Proteins 1994; 19: 256-268.
2. Taylor WR. Protein structural domain identification. Protein Eng 1999; 12: 203-216.
3. Guo J-t, Xu D, Dongsup KD, Xu Y. Improving the performance of DomainParser for structural domain partition using neural network. Nucl Acids Res 2003; 31: 944-952.
4. Pazos F, Bang J-W. Computational Prediction of Functionally Important Regions in Proteins. Curr Bioinformatics 2006; 1: 15-23.
5. Wetlaufer DB. Nucleation, rapid folding and globular intra-chain regions in proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1973; 70: 697-701.
6. Kong L, Ranganathan S. Delineation of modular proteins: domain boundary prediction from sequence information. Brief Bioinform 2004; 5: 179-191.
7. Hanks S, Quinn AM. Protein kinase catalytic domain sequence database: Identification of conserved features of primary structure and classification of family members. Method Enzymol 1991; 200: 38-62.
8. Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C. SCOP- a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 1995; 247: 536-540.
9. Lo Conte L, Brenner, SE, Hubbard TJ, Chothia C, Murzin AG. SCOP database in 2002: refinements accommodate structural genomics. Nucleic Acids Res 2002; 30: 264-267.
10. Karplus K, Barrett C, Hughey R. Hidden Markov models for detecting remote protein homologies. Bioinformatics 1998; 14: 846-856.
11. Fitch WM. Homology: a personal view on some of the problems. Trends Genet 2000; 16: 227-231.
12. Krissinel E, Henrick K. Secondary-structure matching (SSM), a new tool for fast protein structure alignment in three dimensions. Acta Cryst 2004; D60: 2256-2268.
13. Andreeva A, Howorth D, Brenner SE, Hubbard TJP, Chothia C, Murzin AG. SCOP database in 2004: refinements integrate structure and sequence family data. Nucl Acids Res 2004; 32: D226-D229.
14. Orengo CA, Michie AD, Jones S, Jones DT, Swindells MB, Thornton JM. CATH: A hierarchical classification of protein domain structures. Structure 1997; 5: 1093-1108.
15. Pearl F, Todd A, Sillitoe I, et al. The CATH database: an extended protein family resource for structural and functional genomics. Nucl Acids Res 2003; 31: 452-455.
16. Taylor W, Orengo C. Protein structure alignment. J Mol Biol 1989; 208: 1-22.
17. Swindells MB. A procedure for detecting structural domains in proteins. Protein Science 1995; 4: 103-112 (+A procedure for the automatic determination of hydrophobic cores in protein structures pp. 93-102 of the same issue).
18. Siddiqui AS, Barton GJ. Continuous and Discontinuous Domains: An algorithm for automatic generation of reliable domain definition. Prot Sci 1995; 4: 872-884.
19. Harrison A, Pearl F, Sillitoe I, et al. Recognizing the fold of a protein structure. Bioinformatics 2003; 19: 1748-1759.
20. Sillitoe I, Dibley M, Bray J, Addou S, Orengo C. Assessing strategies for improved superfamily recognition. Prot Sci 2005 14: 1800-1810.
21. Harrison A, Pearl F, Mott R, Thornton J, Orengo C. Quantifying the similarities within fold space. J Mol Biol 2002; 323: 909-926.
22. Andrew CR Martin, Christine A, Orengo, et al. Protein folds and functions. Structure 1998; 6: 875-884.
23. Orengo CA, Thornton JM. Protein Families and their evolution - A structural perspective. Ann Rev Biochem 2005; 74: 867-900.
24. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, et al. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000; 28: 235-242.
25. Benson DA, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, Wheeler DL. GenBank: update. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32: 23-26.
26. Bairoch A. The ENZYME database in 2000. Nucleic Acids Res 2000; 28: 304-305.
27. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Kawashima S, Okuno Y, Hattori M. The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome Nucleic Acids Res. 2004; 32: D277-D280.
28. Harris MA, Clark J, Ireland A, et al. Gene Ontology Consortium. The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32: D258-D261.
29. Yeats C, Maibaum M, Marsden R, et al. Gene3D: modelling protein structure, function and evolution. Nucl Acids Res 2006; 34: D281-D284.
30. Lise S, Johnston C, Sillero A, Thornton J, Orengo C. The CATH Domain Structure Database and related resources Gene3D and DHS provide comprehensive domain family information for genome analysis. Nucl Acids Res 2005; 33: D247-D25.
31. Krogh A, Brown M, Mian IS, Sjolander K, Haussler D. Hidden Markov models in computational biology - Applications to protein modeling J Mol Biol 1994; 235: 1501-1531.
32. Bateman A, Coin L, Durbin R, et al. The Pfam protein families database Nucl Acids Res 2004; 32: D138-D141.
33. Bateman A, Birney E, Durbin R, Eddy SR, Howe KL, Sonnhammer ELL. The Pfam Protein families database. Nucl Acids Res 2000; 30: 263-266.
34. Bateman A, Birney E, Cerruti L, et al. The Pfam protein families database. Nucl Acids Res 2002; 30: 276-280.
35. Boeckmann B, Bairoch A, Apweiler R, et al. The SWISS-PROT protein knowledgebase and its supplement TrEMBL in 2003 Nucl Acids Res 2003; 31: 365-370.
36. Schultz, MF, Bork P, Ponting CP. SMART, a simple modular architecture research tool: identification of signaling domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1998; 95: 5857-5864.
37. Letunic I, Goodstadt L, Dickens NJ, et al. Recent improvements to the SMART domain-based sequence annotation resource. Nucl Acids Res 2002; 30: 242-244.
38. Letunic I, Copley RR, Schmit S, et al. SMART 4.0: towards genomic data integration. Nucl Acids Res 2004; 32: D142-144.
39. Letunic I, Copley RR, Pils B, Pinkert S, Schultz J, Bork P. SMART 5: domains in the context of genomes and networks. Nucl Acids Res 2006; 34: D257-D260.
40. Mulder NJ, Apweiler R, Attwood TK, et al. InterPro, progress and status in 2005. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33: D201-D205.
41. Wu CH, Nikolskaya A, Huang H, et al. PIRSF: family classification system at the Protein Information Resource. Nucl Acids Res 2004; 32: D112-114.
42. Attwood TK, Bradley P, Flower DR, et al. PRINTS and its automatic supplement, prePRINTS. Nucl Acids Res 2003; 31: 400-402.
43. Servant F, Bru C, Carrere S, et al. ProDom: automated clustering of homologous domains. Brief Bioinform 2002; 3: 246-251.
44. Falquet L, Pagni M, Bucher P, et al. The PROSITE database, its status in 2002. Nucl Acids Res 2002; 30: 235-238.
45. Barchler-Bauer A, Panchenko AR, Ariel N, Bryant SH. Comparison of sequence and structure alignments for protein domains. Proteins 2002; 48(3): 439-446.
46. 2+ Binding Protein by PROPAINOR. J Mol Mod 2005; 11: 481-488.
47. Miyazaki S, Kuroda Y, Yokayama S. Characterization and prediction of linker sequences of multi-domain proteins by a Neural Network. J Struc Func Genomic 2002; 15: 37-51.
48. Xu Y, Xu D and Gabow, HN. Protein domain decomposition using a graph-theoretic approach. Bioinformatics 2000;16, 1091-1104.
49. Silverman, BD. Hydrophobic moments of protein structures: spatially profiling the distribution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98: 4996-5001.
50. Viksna J, Gilbert D, Torrance G. Domain discovery method for topological profile searches in protein structures. Genome Inform 2004; 15: 72-81.
51. Rose GD. Hierarchic organization of domains in globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1979; 134: 447-470.
52. Holm L, Sander C. Dictionary of recurrent domains in protein structures. Proteins 1998; 33: 88-96.
53. Islam SA, Luo J, Sternberg MJ. Identification and analysis of domains in proteins. Protein Eng 1995; 8: 513-525.
54. Janin J, Chothia C. Domains in Proteins - Definitions, Location and Structural Principles. Method Enzymol 1985; 115: 420-430.
55. Sowdhamini R., Rufino SD, Blundell TL. A database of globular protein structural domains: clustering of representative family members into similar folds. Fold Des 1996; 1: 209-220.
56. Sokolova AV, Volkov VV, Svergun DI. Prototype of a database for rapid protein classification based on solution scattering data. J Appl Cryst 2003; 36: 865-868.
57. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer, AA, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST - a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucl Acids Res 1997; 25: 3389-3402.
58. Marsden, RL, McGuffin LJ, Jones DT. Rapid protein domain assignment from amino acid sequence using predicted secondary structure. Protein Sci 2002; 11: 2814-2824 (http://bioinf.cs.ucl.ac.uk/dompred/ DomPredform.html).
59. Jones DT. Protein Secondary Structure Prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J Mol Biol 1999-b; 292: 195-202. http://bioinfo.cs.ucl.ac.uk/psipred/.
60. Wheelan SJ, Marchler-Baucer A, Bryant SH. Domain size distributions can predict domain boundaries. Bioinformatics 2000; 16: 613-618.
61. Joshi RR, Samant VV. Fast Prediction of Protein Domain Boundaries using Conserved Local Patterns. J Mol Mod 2006; 12 : 943-952.
62. Gewehr JE, Zimmer R. SSEP-Domain: protein domain prediction by alignment of secondary structure elements and profiles. Bioinformatics 2006; 22: 181-187.
63. Zdobnov EM, Apweiler R. InterProScan: an integration platform for the signature-recognition methods in InterPro. Bioinformatics 2001; 17: 847-848.
64. Rigden DJ. Use of covariance analysis for the prediction of structural domain boundaries from multiple protein sequence alignments. Protein Eng 2002; 15: 65-77.
65. Olmea O, Valencia A. Improving contact predictions by the combination of correlated mutations and other sources of sequence information, Fold Des 1997; 2: S25-S32.
66. Jones DT. GenTHREADER: An efficient and reliable protein fold recognition method for genomic sequences. J Mol Biol 1999-a; 287: 797-815.
67. Nagrajan N, Yona G. Automatic prediction of protein domains from sequence information using a hybrid learning system. Bioinformatics 2004; 20: 1335-1360 http://biozon.org/ tools/domains/.
68. Suyama M, Ohara O. DomCut: prediction of inter-domain linker regions in amino acid sequences. Bioinformatics 2003; 19: 673-674.
69. Henikoff JG, Henikoff S. Using substitution probabilities to improve position-specific scoring matrices. Comput Appl Biosci 1996; 12: 135-143.
70. Henikoff S, Henikoff JG. Amino-acid substitution matrices from Protein Blocks. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1992; 89: 10915-10919.
71. Pazos F, Helmer-Citterich M, Ausiello G, Valencia A. Correlated mutations contain information about protein-protein interactions. J Mol Biol 1997; 271: 511-523.
72. Dong Q, Wang X, Lin L, Xu Z. Domain boundary prediction based on profile domain linker propensity index. Comp Biol Chem 2006; 30: 127-133.
73. Sim J, Kim SY, Lee J. PPRODO: prediction of protein domain boundaries using neural networks. Proteins: Struc Func Genet 2005; 59: 627-632.
74. Kim DE, Chivian D, Baker D. Protein structure prediction and analysis using the Robetta server. Nucl Acids Res 2004; 32: W526-W531.
75. Kim DE, Chivian D, Malmstrom L, Baker D. Automated prediction of domain boundaries in CASP6 targets using Ginzu and Rosetta-DOM. Proteins 2005; 61: 193-200.
76. Chivian D, Kim DE, Malmstrom L, et al. Automated prediction of CASP-5 structures using the Robetta server. Proteins 2003; 53: 524-533.
77. Simons KT, Ruczinski I, Kooperberg C, Fox BA, Bystroff C, Baker D. Improved recognition of native-like protein structures using a combination of sequence-dependent and sequence-independent features of proteins. Proteins 1999; 34: 82-95.
78. Ortiz AR, Strauss CE, Olmea, O. MAMMOTH (matching molecular models obtained from theory): an automated method for model comparison. Protein Sci 2002; 11: 2606-2621.
79. Uversky VN, Gillespie JR, Fink AL. Why are "natively unfolded" proteins unstructured under physiologic conditions? Proteins 2000; 41: 415-427.
80. Dunker AK, Cortese MS, Romero P, Iakoucheva LM, Uversky VN. Flexible nets: The roles of intrinsic disorder in protein interaction networks. FEBS J 2005; 272: 5129-5148.
81. Chen JW, Romero P, Uversky VN, Dunker AK. Conservation of Intrinsic Disorder in Protein Domains and Families: I. A Database of Conserved Predicted Disordered Regions. Proteome Res 2006; 5: 879-887.
82. Romero P, Obradovic Z, Dunker, AK. Sequence data analysis for long disordered regions prediction in the calcineurin family. Genome Inform 1997-a; 8: 110-124.
83. Romero P, Obradovic Z, Kissinger C, Villafranca JE, Dunker AK. Identifying disordered regions in proteins from amino acid sequence. Proc Int Conf Neural Networks 1997-b; 1: 90-95.
84. Romero P, Obradovic Z, Li X, Garner EC, Brown CJ, Dunker, AK. Sequence complexity of disordered protein. Proteins 2001; 42: 38-48.
85. Obradovic Z, Peng K, Vucetic S, Radivojac P, Brown CJ, Dunker AK. Predicting intrinsic disorder from amino acid sequence. Proteins 2003; 53: 566-572.
86. Jones S, Stewart M, Michie A, Swindells MB, Orengo C, Thornton JM. Domain assignment for protein structures using a consensus approach: characterization and analysis. Protein Sci 1998; 7: 233-242.
87. Hutchinson EG, Thornton JM. PROMOTIF: A program to identify structural motifs in proteins. Protein Sci 1996; 5: 212-220.
88. Joshi RR, Samant VV. Bayesian Data Mining of Protein Domains Gives Efficient Predictive Algorithm and New Insight. J Mol Mod 2007; 13: 275-282.
89. Galzitskaya OV, Melnik BS. Prediction of protein domain boundaries from sequence alone. Protein Sci 2003; 12: 696-701.
90. George RA, Heringa J. SnapDRAGON: a method to delineate protein structural domains from sequence data. J Mol Biol 2002-a; 316: 839-851.
91. George RA, Lin K, Heringa J. Scooby-domain: prediction of globular domains in protein sequence. Nucl Acids Res 2005; 33: W160-W163.
92. Dumontier M, Yao R, Feldman HJ, Hogue CW. Armadillo: domain boundary prediction by amino acid composition. J Mol Biol 2005; 350: 1061-1073.
93. Liu J, Rost B. Sequence-based prediction of protein domains. Nucl Acids Res 2004; 32: 3522-3530.
94. Bae K, Mallick BK, Elsik CG. Prediction of protein inter-domain linker regions by a hidden Markov model. Bioinformatics 2005; 21: 2264-2270.
95. Chen L, Wang W, Ling S, Jia C, Fei Wang F. KemaDom: a web server for domain prediction using kernel machine with local context. Nucl Acids Res 2006; 34: W158-W163.
96. Kyte J, Doolittle RF. A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein, J Mol Biol 1982; 157: 105-132.
97. Tanaka T, Kuroda Y, Yokoyama S. Characteristic and prediction of domain-linker sequences in multi-domain proteins. J Struc Func Genomics 2003; 4: 79-85.
98. Tanaka T, Yokoyama S, Kuroda Y. Improvement of domain linker prediction by incorporating loop-length-dependent characteristics. Biopolymers 2006; 84: 161-168.
99. George RA, Heringa J. An analysis of protein domain linkers: their classification and role in protein folding, Protein Eng 2002-b; 15: 871-879.
100. Saini HK, Fischer D. Meta-DP: domain prediction meta-server. Bioinformatics 2005; 21: 2917-20.
101. Holland TA, Veretnik S, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. Partitioning Protein Structures into Domains: Why Is it so Difficult? J Mol Biol 2006; 361: 562-590.
102. Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ. Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth, Belmont, California 1984.
103. Segal MR, Cummings UP, Hubbard AE. Relating Amino Acid Sequence to Phenotype: Analysis of peptide-Binding Data. Biometrics 2001; 57: 632-643.
104. Çamoglu O, Can T, Singh AK, Wang Y-F. Decision Tree Based Information Integration for Automated Protein Classification. J Bioinfo Comp Bio 2005; 3: 717-742.
105. Mehta D. Prediction Of Protein Domain Class Using CART. MTech-Bioinformatics Project Thesis (project done at IIT Bombay under guidance of Prof. Joshi R.R.), Mumbai University, 2005.
106. Joshi RR. Statistical Mining of Gene-Protein Data - CART for Structural Domains. Invited Paper at INCOB 2006, New Delhi. (Proc. in special issue of J Bio Sci 2007).
107. Singh YK. Classification and Decision Trees applied to Protein Data. M.Sc. (ASI) Home Paper Project with Prof. Joshi R.R., Dept. of Mathematics, IIT Bombay, 2006.