Learning style under two web-based study conditions

Educational Psychology

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 617-634

  Johnson, Genevieve Marie ^a  

^a MACEWAN UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34848821205     PISSN: 01443410     EISSN: 14695820     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01443410701309159     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Allinson, C. W., & Hayes, J. (1996). The Cognitive Style Index: A measure of intuition-analysis for organisational research. Journal of Management Studies, 33, 119-135.
2. Aragon, S. R., Johnson, S. D., & Shaik, N. (2002). The influence of learning style preferences on student success in online versus face-to-face environments. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16, 227-244.
3. Bajraktarevic, B., Hall, W., & Fullick, P. (2003). Incorporating learning styles in hypermedia environment: Empirical evaluation. Retrieved October 15, 2006, from http://wwwis.win.tue.nl/ah2003/proceedings/paper4.pdf
4. Bol, L., & Hacker, D. J. (2001). A comparison of the effects of practice tests and traditional review on performance and calibration. Journal of Experiential Education, 69, 133-151.
5. Brothen, T., & Wambach, C. (2001). Effective student use of computerized quizzes. Teaching of Psychology, 28, 292-294.
6. Bull, S., & McCalla, G. (2002). Modelling cognitive style in a peer help network. Instructional Science, 30, 497-528.
7. Chen, S. Y., Margoulas, G. D., & Dimakopoulos, D. (2005). A flexible interface design for web directories to accommodate different cognitive styles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56, 70-83.
8. Clapp, R. G. (1993). Stability of cognitive style in adults and some implications: A longitudinal study of the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory. Psychological Reports, 73, 1235-1245.
9. Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: A systematic and critical review. London: Learning and Skills Research Centre.
10. Crook, C. (2001). The campus experience of networked learning. In C. Steeples & C. Jones (Eds.), Networked learning (pp. 293-308). London: Springer-Verlag.
11. Crook, C. (2002). Deferring to resources: Collaborations around traditional vs. computer-based notes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 64-76.
12. Derouza, E., & Fleming, M. (2003). A comparison of in-class quizzes vs. online quizzes on student exam performance. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 14, 121-134.
13. Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1999). The complete guide to the Learning Styles Inservice System. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
14. Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2005). Understanding student differences. Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 57-72.
15. Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78, 674-681.
16. Felder, R. M., & Spurlin, J. (2005). Applications, reliability and validity of the Index of Learning Styles. International Journal of Engineering Education, 21, 103-112.
17. Fleming, N. D. (2001). Teaching and learning styles: VARK strategies. Christchurch, New Zealand: Neil Fleming.
18. Fletcher, T. D., & Major, D. A. (2006). The effects of communication modality on performance and self-ratings of teamwork components. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11. Retrieved October 15, 2006, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue2/fletcher.html
19. Fritz, K. M. (2003). Using Blackboard 5 to deliver both traditional and multimedia quizzes on-line for foreign language classes. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED482584)
20. Grabe, M., & Sigler, E. (2001). Studying online: Evaluation of an online study environment. Computers and Education, 38, 375-383.
21. Graff, M. (2003). Learning from web-based instructional systems and cognitive style. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34, 407-418.
22. Heikkila, A., & Lonka, K. (2006). Studying in higher education: Students' approaches to learning, self-regulation, and cognitive strategies. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 99-117.
23. Honey, P., & Mumford, A. (1986). The manual of learning styles. Maidenhead, UK: Peter Honey Associates.
24. Hutchins, H. M. (2003). Instructional immediacy and the seven principles: Strategies for facilitating online courses. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 6. Retrieved October 15, 2006, from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall63/hutchins63.html
25. Itoh, R., & Hannon, C. (2002). The effect of online quizzes on learning Japanese. CALICO Journal, 19, 551-561.
26. Jensen, M., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2002). Impact of positive interdependence during electronic quizzes on discourse and achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 95, 161-167.
27. Jensen, M., Moore, R., & Hatch, J. (2002). Electronic cooperative quizzes. American Biology Teacher, 64, 169-174.
28. Johnson, G. M. (2006a). Optional online quizzes: College student use and relationship to achievement. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 32, 105-118.
29. Johnson, G. M. (2006b). Online study groups: Reciprocal peer questioning vs. mnemonic devices. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35, 83-96.
30. Johnson, G. (2006c). A theoretical framework for organizing the effect of the Internet of cognitive development. In E. Pearson and P. Bohman (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2006 (pp. 3041-3048). Norfolk, VA: AACE. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED493998.
31. Johnson, G. M. (2006d). Synchronous and asynchronous text-based CMC in educational contexts: A review of recent research. TechTrends, 50, 46-53.
32. Johnson, G. M., & Howell, A. J. (2006). The impact of Internet learning technology: Experimental methods of determination. In B. L. Mann (Ed.), Selected styles in web-based educational research (pp. 282-301). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
33. Johnson, G. M., Howell, A. J., & Code, J. R. (2005). Online discussion and college student learning: Toward a model of influence. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14, 61-75.
34. Johnson, G., & Johnson, J. (2005). Online study groups: Comparison of two strategies. In P. Kommers and C. Richards (Eds.), Proceedings of the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia, and Telecommunications (pp. 2025-2030). Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
35. Johnson, G., & Johnson, J. (2006). Learning style and preference for online learning support: Individual quizzes versus study groups. In E. Pearson and P. Bohman (Eds.), Proceedings of the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia, and Telecommunications 2006 (pp. 1861-1868). Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
36. Jones, C., Reichard, C., & Mokhtari, K. (2003). Are students' learning styles discipline specific? Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 27, 363-375.
37. Karuppan, C. M. (2001). Web-based teaching materials: A user's profile. Internet Research, 11, 138-148.
38. Kashy, E. K., Thoennessen, M., Albertelli, G., & Tsai, Y. (2000). Implementing a large-scale oncampus ALN: Faculty perspective. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4. Retrieved October 15, 2006, from http://www.aln.org/publications/jaln/v4n3/index.asp
39. Kearsley, G. (2000). Online education: Learning and teaching in cyberspace. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Thomson.
40. Keefe, J. W. (1979). Learning style: An overview. In J. W. Keefe (Ed.), Student learning styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs (pp. 1-17). Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
41. Kerlin, B. A. (2005). Working with quizzes in WebCT CE 4.1. Retrieved October 15, 2006, from http://www.its.queensu.ca/webct/facultyguide/ tools/webctquizzes.pdf
42. Killedar, M. (2002). Online self-tests: A powerful tool for self-study. Indian Journal of Open Learning, 11, 135-146.
43. Kim, K. S., & Moore, J. L. (2005). Web-based learning: Factors affecting students' satisfaction and learning experience. First Monday, 10. Retrieved October 15, 2006, from http:// www.firstmonday.org/issues/ issue10_11/kim/index.html
44. Kolb, D. A. (1985). Kolb Learning Style Inventory version 3.1. Boston, MA: Hay Resources Direct.
45. Koory, M. A. (2003). Differences in learning outcomes for the online and F2F versions of "An Introduction to Shakespeare." Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7. Retrieved October 15, 2006, from http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v7n2/v7n2_koory.asp
46. Kossowska, M., & Necka, E. (1994). Do it your own way: Cognitive strategies, intelligence, and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 33-46.
47. Loomis, K. (2000). Learning style and asynchronous learning: Comparing the LASSI model to classroom performance. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4. Retrieved October 15, 2006, from http://www.aln.org/ publications/jaln/v4n1/v4n1_loomis.asp
48. Luca, J., & Clarkson, B. (2002, June). Promoting students' learning through peer tutoring: A case study. Paper presented at the ED-MEDIA World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia, and Telecommunications, Denver, CO. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED477058)
49. McConnell, D. (2005). Examining the dynamics of networked e-learning groups and communities. Studies in Higher Education, 30, 25-42.
50. McGraw-Hill Higher Education. (2006) Educational psychology online learning center. Retrieved October 15, 2006, from http://highered.mcgraw- hill.com/sites/0070909695/student_view0/index.html
51. McKeachie, W. J. (1995). Learning styles can become learning strategies. The National Teaching and Learning Forum, 4, 1-3. Retrieved October 15, 2006, from http://www.ntlf.com/html/pi/9511/article1.htm
52. Mehlenbacher, B., Miller, C. R., Covington, D., & Larsen, J. S. (2000). Active and interactive learning online: A comparison of Web-based and conventional writing classes. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 43, 166-184.
53. Miller, M. T., & Lu, M. Y. (2003). Serving non-traditional students in e-learning environments: Building successful communities in the virtual campus. Education Media International, 40, 163-169.
54. Neuhauser, C. (2002). Learning style and effectiveness of online and face-to-face instruction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16, 99-113.
55. Nowak, K. L., Watt, J., & Walther, J. B. (2005). The influence of synchrony and sensory modality on the person perception process in computer-mediated groups. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10. Retrieved October 15, 2006, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue3/nowak. html
56. Perlman, C. L. (2003). Practice tests and study guides: Do they help? Are they ethical? What is ethical test preparation practice? (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED480062)
57. Renaud, R. (2003). Test item file for educational psychology (2nd Canadian ed.). Toronto, ON: Pearson Education Canada.
58. Riding, R., & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive style: An overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11, 193-215.
59. Riding, R., Glass, A., Butler, S. R., & Pleydell-Pearce, C. W. (1997). Cognitive style and individual differences in EEG alpha during information processing. Educational Psychology, 17, 219-234.
60. Riding, R., & Rayner, S. (1998). Cognitive styles and learning strategies: Understanding style differences in learning and behaviour. London: David Fulton.
61. Rochford, R. (2003). Assessing learning styles to improve the quality of performance of community college students in developmental writing programs: A pilot study. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 27, 665-677.
62. Sabry, K., & Baldwin, L. (2003). Web-based learning interaction and learning styles. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34, 443-454.
63. Shale, D. (2002). The hybridisation of higher education in Canada. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 2. Retrieved March 15, 2007, from http:// www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/ viewFile/64/132.
64. Shindler, J., & Yang, H. (2003). Paragon Learning Style Inventory. Oswego, NY: State University of New York. Retrieved October 15, 2006, from http://www.oswego.edu/plsi/
65. Stokes, S. P. (2003, November). Temperament, learning styles, and demographic predictors of college student satisfaction in a digital learning environment. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Biloxi, MS. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED482454)
66. Subrahmanyam, K., Kraut, R., Greenfield, P., & Gross, E. (2001). New forms of electronic media: The impact of interactive games and the Internet on cognition, socialization, and behavior. In D. G. Singer & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of children and the media (pp. 73-99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
67. Tait, A., & Mills, R. (Eds.). (2003). Rethinking learner support in distance education: Change and continuity in an international context. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
68. Terrell, S. R. (2002). The effect of learning style on doctoral course completion in a Web-based learning environment, Internet and Higher Education, 5, 345-352.
69. Terrell, S. R., & Dringus, L. (1999). An investigation of the effect of learning style on student success in an online learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 28, 231-238.
70. Volet, S., & Wosnitza, M. (2004). Social affordances and students' engagement in cross-national online learning: An exploratory study. Journal of Research in International Education, 3, 5-29.
71. Wang, M. (2004). Correlational analysis of student visibility and performance in online learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8. Retrieved October 15, 2006, from http:// www.sloan-c.org/publications/ jaln/v8n4/index.asp