Online discussion and college student learning: Toward a model of influence

Technology, Pedagogy and Education

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 61-76

  Johnson, Genevieve M ^a   Howell, Andrew J ^a   Code, Jillianne R ^a  

^a MACEWAN UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85009630386     PISSN: 1475939X     EISSN: 17475139     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14759390500200193     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Alavi, M. & Leidner, D.E. (2001) Technology-mediated Learning: a call for greater depth and breadth of research, Information Systems Research, 12, pp. 1-10.
2. Brown, W. & Sak, D. (1986) Measuring the Effects of Instructional Time on Student Learning: evidence from the beginning teacher evaluation study, American Journal of Education, 94, pp. 480-500.
3. Clark, R. (1994) Media Will Never Influence Learning, Educational Technology Research and Development, 42, pp. 21-29.
4. Cook, T.D. & Campbell, D.T. (1979) Quasi-experimentation: design & analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
5. Dinh, H.G., Walker, N., Hodges, L.F., Song, C. & Kobayashi, A. (1999) Evaluating the Importance of Multisensory Input on Memory and the Sense of Presence in Virtual Environment, in L. Rosenblum, P. Astheimer & D. Teichmann (Eds) Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality ‘99 Conference, pp. 222-228. Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society Press.
6. Holloway, J.H. (2002) Extracurricular Activities and Student Motivation, Educational Leadership, 60, pp. 80-82.
7. Hung, D. & Chen, D.T. (2001) Distinguishing Between Online and Face-to-face Communities: how technology makes the differences, Educational Technology, 41, pp. 28-32.
8. Krendl, K.A. & Broihier, M. (1991) Student Responses to Computers: a longitudinal study. Paper presented at the 41st Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago, 23-27 May. ERIC Document Reproduction Service, ED 332 250.
9. Kulik, C. & Kulik, J. (1986) Mastery Testing and Student Learning: a meta-analysis, Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 15, pp. 325-345.
10. Liu, E., Lin, S., Chiu, C.H. & Yuan, S.M. (2001) Web-based Peer Review: the learner as both adapter and reviewer, IEEE Transactions on Education, 44, p. 246.
11. Martinson, O. (1995) Cognitive Styles and Experience in Solving Insight Problems: replication and extension, Creativity Research Journal, 8, pp. 291-298.
12. Minotti, J.A. (2002) Three Criticisms of the Online Classroom: an examination of a higher education online course in computer-mediated communication, Learning Technology, 4, pp. 18-19.
13. Olson, G.M. & Olson, J.S. (2003) Human-computer Interaction: psychological aspects of the human use of computing, Annual Review of Psychology, 54, pp. 491-516.
14. Poole, D. (2000) Student Participation in a Discussion-oriented Online Course: a case study, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33, p. 162.
15. Rinne, C. (1998) Motivating Students is a Percentage Game, Phi Delta Kappan, 79, pp. 620-627.
16. Rolls, E.T. (2000) Memory Systems in the Brain, Annual Review of Psychology, 51, pp. 599-630.
17. Russell, A.L. (1995) Stages in Learning New Technology: naive adult email users, Computers and Education, 25, pp. 173-178.
18. Saito, R. (2002) Anxiety and Waiting: a Heideggerian view of instructional computer simulation, Educational Technology, 42, pp. 56-58.
19. Smith, L.F. & Smith, J.K. (2002) Relation of Test-specific Motivation and Anxiety to Test Performance, Psychological Reports, 91, pp. 1011-1022.
20. Walberg, H. (1988) Synthesis of Research on Time and Learning, Educational Leadership, 45, pp. 76-85.
21. Wang, A.Y., Newlin, M.H. & Tucker, T.L. (2001) A Discourse Analysis of Online Classroom Chats: predictors of cyber-student performance, Teaching of Psychology, 28, pp. 222-226.
22. WebCT (2003) WebCT Campus Edition: bringing educational excellence online. Available at: www.webct.com