The effects of communication modality on performance and self-ratings of teamwork components

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 557-576

  Fletcher, Thomas D ^a   Major, Debra A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ST LOUIS   (United States)

^b OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION MODALITIES; FACE TO FACE; LABORATORY STUDIES; MEDIA RICHNESS THEORY; PERFORMANCE RATINGS; PSYCHOMOTORS; SELF-RATINGS; SHARED-WORKSPACE; TEAM MEMBERS; TEAM PERFORMANCE;

DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

EID: 32244440441     PISSN: 10836101     EISSN: 10836101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00027.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Angiolillo, J. S., Blanchard, H. E., Israelski, E. W., & Mané, A. (1997). Technology constraints of video-mediated communication. In K. E. Finn, A. J. Sellen, & S. B. Wilbur (Eds.), Video-Mediated Communication (pp. 51-73). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Armstrong, D. J., & Cole, P. (1995). Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work groups. In S. E. Jackson & M. N. Ruderman (Eds.), Diversity In Work Teams: Research Paradigms for a Changing Workplace (pp. 187-215). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
3. Barnard, P., May, J., & Salber, D. (1996). Deixis and points of view in media spaces: An empirical gesture. Behaviour & Information Technology, 15 (1), 37-50.
4. Bekker, M. M., Olson, J. S., & Olson, G. M. (1995). Analysis of gestures in face-to-face design teams provides guidance for how to use groupware in design. Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, & Techniques, Ann Arbor, MI (pp. 157-166). New York: ACM Press.
5. Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2002). A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership. Group and Organization Management, 27 (1), 12-49.
6. Benford, S., Brown, C., Reynard, G., & Greenhalgh, C. (1996). Shared spaces: Transportation, artificiality, and spatiality. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Cambridge, MA (pp. 77-86). New York: ACM Press.
7. Bowers, C. A., Jentsch, F., Salas, E., & Braun, C. C. (1998). Analyzing communication sequences for team training needs assessment. Human Factors, 40 (4), 672-679.
8. Brannick, M. T., Roach, R. M., & Salas, E. (1993). Understanding team performance: A multimethod study. Human Performance, 6 (4), 287-308.
9. Brannick, M. T., Salas, E., & Prince, C. (Eds.). (1997). Team Performance Assessment and Measurement, Theory, Methods, and Applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Brehmer, B., & Allard, R. (1991). Dynamic decision making: The effects of task complexity and feedback delay. In J. Rasmussen, B. Brehmer, & J. Leplat. (Eds.), Distributed Decision Making: Cognitive Models for Cooperative Work (pp. 319-334). Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons.
11. Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
12. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research In Organizational Behavior (Vol. 6, pp. 191-233). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
14. Dickinson, T. L., & McIntyre, R. M. (1997). A conceptual framework for teamwork measurement. In M. T. Brannick, E. Salas, & C. Prince (Eds.), Team Performance Assessment and Measurement, Theory, Methods, and Applications (pp. 19-43). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Dickinson, T. L., McIntyre, R. M., Ruggeberg, B. J., Yanushefski, A., Hamil, L. S., & Vick, A. L. (1992). A Conceptual Framework for Developing Team Process Measures of Decision-Making Performance. Orlando, FL: Naval Training Systems Center, Human Factors Division.
16. Fleishman, E. A., & Zaccaro, S. J. (1992). Toward a taxonomy of team performance functions. In R. W. Swezey & E. Salas (Eds.), Teams: Their Training and Performance (pp. 31-56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
17. Gutwin, C. & Greenberg, S. (1998). Design for individuals, design for groups: Tradeoffs between power and workspace awareness. Proceedings of the 1998 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Seattle, WA (pp. 207-216). New York: ACM Press.
18. Harris, T. C., & Barnes-Farrell, J. L. (1997). Components of teamwork: Impact on evaluations of contributions to work team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27 (19), 1694-1715.
19. Herbsleb, J. D., Mockus, A., Finholt, T. A., & Grinter, R. E. (2001, May). An Empirical Study of Global Software Development: Distance and Speed. Paper presented at the International Conference on Software Engineering, Toronto, ON.
20. Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., Sego, D. J., Hedlund, J., Major, D. A., & Phillips, J. (1995). Multilevel theory of team (2), 292-316.
21. Hollingshead, A. B., & McGrath, J. E. (1995). Computer-assisted groups: A critical review of the empirical research. In R. A. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team Effectiveness and Decision Making In Organizations (pp. 46-78). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22. Ilgen, D. R., Major, D. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., & Sego, D. J. (1993). Team research in 1990s. In M. M Chemers & R. Ayman (Eds.), Leadership Theory and Research: Perspectives and Directions (pp. 245-270). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
23. James, L. R. (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67 (2), 219-229.
24. James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69 (1), 85-98.
25. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology: Industrial and Organizational Psychology (vol. 12, pp. 333-375). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
26. May, A., & Carter, C. (2001). A case study of virtual team working in the European automotive industry. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 27 (3), 171-186.
27. Maznevski, M. L., & Chudoba, K. M. (2000). Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organization Science, 11 (5), 473-492.
28. McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
29. McGrath, J. E., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1993). Putting the group back in group support systems: Some theoretical issues about dynamic processes in groups with technological enhancements. In L. M. Jessup & J. S. Valacich (Eds.), Group Support Systems: New Perspectives (pp. 78-96). New York: Macmillan.
30. McIntyre, R. M., & Salas, E. (1995). Measuring and managing for team performance: Emerging principles from complex environments. In R. A. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team Effectiveness and Decision Making In Organizations (pp. 9-45). San Francisco: Jossey-bass.
31. Militello, L. G., Kyne, M. M., Klein, G., Gethchell, K., & Thordsen, M. (1999). A synthesized model of team performance. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 3 (2), 131-158.
32. Mills, A. (1998). Collaborative Engineering and the Internet: Linking Product Development Partners Via the Web. Dearborn, MI: Society of Manufacturing Engineers.
33. Olson, J. S., & Teasley, S. (1996). Groupware in the wild: Lessons learned from a year of virtual collocation. Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Cambridge, MA (pp. 419-427). New York: ACM Press.
34. Paris, C. R., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). Teamwork in multi-person systems: A review and analysis. Ergonomics, 43 (8), 1052-1075.
35. Rasker, P. C., Post, W. M., & Schraagen, J. M. C. (2000). Effects of two types of intra-team feedback on developing a shared mental model in command & control teams. Ergonomics, 43 (8), 1167-1189.
36. Reid, F. J. M., Reed, S., & Edworthy, J. (1999). Design visualization and collaborative interaction in undergraduate engineering teams. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 3 (3), 235-259.
37. Rosenstein, R. (1994). The Teamwork Components Model: An Analysis Using Structural Equations Modeling. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA.
38. Salas, E., Bowers, C. A., & Edens, E. (Eds.). (2001). Improving Teamwork In Organizations: Applications of Human Resource Management Training. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39. Salas, E., Dickinson, T. L., Converse, S. A., & Tannenbaum, S. I. (1992). Toward an understanding of team performance and training. In R. Swezey & E. Salas (Eds.), Teams: Their Training and Performance (pp. 3-29). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
40. Stout, R. J., Salas, E., & Carson, R. (1994). Individual task proficiency and team process behavior: What's important for team functioning? Military Psychology, 6 (3), 177-192.
41. Suh, K. S. (1999). Impact of communication medium on task performance and satisfaction: An examination of media-richness theory. Information & Management, 35 (5), 295-312.
42. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using Multivariate Statistics (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
43. Whittaker, S., Geelhoed, E., & Robinson, E. (1993). Shared workspaces: How do they work and when are they useful? International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 39 (5), 813-842.