Constructing ensembles of flexible fragments in native proteins by iterative stochastic elimination is relevant to protein-protein interfaces

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 68, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 702-711

  Noy, Efrat ^a   Tabakman, Tal ^a   Goldblum, Amiram ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

Conformational changes; Conformational ensembles; Flexible fragments; Loop conformational search; Protein protein docking

Indexed keywords

BINDING PROTEIN; PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; FLEXIBLE FRAGMENT; ITERATIVE STOCHASTIC ELIMINATION; LIGAND BINDING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERFACE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; RECEPTOR BINDING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STOCHASTIC MODEL; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

BINDING SITES; PEPTIDE FRAGMENTS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES; X-RAY DIFFRACTION;

EID: 34447558566     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.21437     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Halperin I, Ma B, Wolfson H, Nussinov R. Principles of docking: an overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions. Proteins 2002;47:409-443.
2. Smith GR, Sternberg MJ, Bates PA. The relationship between the flexibility of proteins and their conformational states on forming protein-protein complexes with an application to protein-protein docking. J Mol Biol 2005;347:1077-1101.
3. Vajda S, Camacho CJ. Protein-protein docking: is the glass half-full or half-empty? Trends Biotechnol 2004;22:110-116.
4. Mendez R, Leplae R, Lensink MF, Wodak SJ. Assessment of CAPRI predictions in rounds 3-5 shows progress in docking procedures. Proteins 2005;60:150-169.
5. Betts MJ, Sternberg MJ. An analysis of conformational changes on protein-protein association: implications for predictive docking. Protein Eng 1999;12:271-283.
6. Lo Conte L, Chothia C, Janin J. The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J Mol Biol 1999;285:2177-2198.
7. Grunberg R, Leckner J, Nilges M. Complementarity of structure ensembles in protein-protein binding. Structure (Camb) 2004;12: 2125-2136.
8. Vajda S. Classification of protein complexes based on docking difficulty. Proteins 2005;60:176-180.
9. Bonvin AM. Flexible protein-protein docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2006;16:194-200.
10. Ehrlich LP, Nilges M, Wade RC. The impact of protein flexibility on protein-protein docking. Proteins 2005;58:126-133.
11. Palma PN, Krippahl L, Wampler JE, Moura JJ. BiGGER: a new (soft) docking algorithm for predicting protein interactions. Proteins 2000;39:372-384.
12. Heifetz A, Eisenstein M. Effect of local shape modifications of molecular surfaces on rigid-body protein-protein docking. Protein Eng 2003;16:179-185.
13. Schneidman-Duhovny D, Inbar Y, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. Geometry-based flexible and symmetric protein docking. Proteins 2005;60: 224-231.
14. Gray JJ, Moughon S, Wang C, Schueler-Furman O, Kuhlman B, Rohl CA, Baker D. Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations. J Mol Biol 2003;331:281-299.
15. Fernandez-Recio J, Totrov M, Abagyan R. ICM-DISCO docking by global energy optimization with fully flexible side-chains. Proteins 2003;52:113-117.
16. Dominguez C, Boelens R, Bonvin AM. HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. J Am Chem Soc 2003;125:1731-1737.
17. Camacho CJ, Gatchell DW. Successful discrimination of protein interactions. Proteins 2003;52:92-97.
18. Li L, Chen R, Weng Z. RDOCK: refinement of rigid-body protein docking predictions. Proteins 2003;53:693-707.
19. Ritchie DW. Evaluation of protein docking predictions using Hex 3.1 in CAPRI rounds 1 and 2. Proteins 2003;52:98-106.
20. Zacharias M. Protein-protein docking with a reduced protein model accounting for side-chain flexibility. Protein Sci 2003;12:1271-1282.
21. Fernandez-Recio J, Totrov M, Abagyan R. Identification of protein-protein interaction sites from docking energy landscapes. J Mol Biol 2004;335:843-865.
22. Bastard K, Prevost C, Zacharias M. Accounting for loop flexibility during protein-protein docking. Proteins 2006;62:956-969.
23. Smith GR, Fitzjohn PW, Page CS, Bates PA. Incorporation of flexibility into rigid-body docking: applications in rounds 3-5 of CAPRI. Proteins 2005;60:263-268.
24. van Dijk AD, de Vries SJ, Dominguez C, Chen H, Zhou HX, Bonvin AM. Data-driven docking: HADDOCK'S adventures in CAPRI. Proteins 2005;60:232-238.
25. May A, Zacharias M. Accounting for global protein deformability during protein-protein and protein-ligand docking. Biochim Biophys Acta 2005;1754:225-231.
26. Mustard D, Ritchie DW. Docking essential dynamics eigenstructures. Proteins 2005;60:269-274.
27. Tobi D, Bahar I. Structural changes involved in protein binding correlate with intrinsic motions of proteins in the unbound state. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:18908-18913.
28. Mintseris J, Wiehe K, Pierce B, Anderson R, Chen R, Janin J, Weng Z. Protein-protein docking benchmark 2.0: an update. Proteins 2005;60:214-216.
29. Rayan A, Senderowitz H, Goldblum A. Exploring the conformational space of cyclic peptides by a stochastic search method. J Mol Graph Model 2004;22:319-333.
30. Rayan A, Noy E, Chema D, Levitzki A, Goldblum A. Stochastic algorithm for kinase homology model construction. Curr Med Chem 2004;11:675-692.
31. Click M, Rayan A, Goldblum A. A stochastic algorithm for global optimization and for best populations: a test case of side chains in proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:703-708.
32. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading. J Mol Biol 1996;256:623-644.
33. Fiser A, Do RK, Sali A. Modeling of loops in protein structures. Protein Sci 2000;9:1753-1773.
34. Kabsch W, Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 1983;22:2577-2637.
35. Letondal C. A Web interface generator for molecular biology programs in Unix. Bioinformatics 2001;17:73-82.
36. Xiang Z, Honig B. Extending the accuracy limits of prediction for side-chain conformations. J Mol Biol 2001;311:421-430.
37. Sybyl, Version 7.0. St. Louis, Missouri 63144, USA: Tripos.
38. Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT. Numerical recipes in C: the art of scientific computing. Cambridge University Press; 1988. p 324.
39. Wang J, Cieplak P, Kollman PA. How well does a restrained electrostatic potential (RESP) model perform in calculating conformational energies of organic and biological molecules? J Comput Chem 2000;21:1049-1074.
40. Eyal E, Gerzon S, Potapov V, Edelman M, Sobolev V. The limit of accuracy of protein modeling: influence of crystal packing on protein structure. J Mol Biol 2005;351:431-442.
41. Rodriguez R, Chinea G, Lopez N, Pons T, Vriend G. Homology modeling, model and software evaluation: three related resources. Bioinformatics 1998;14:523-528.
42. Rapp CS, Pollack RM. Crystal packing effects on protein loops. Proteins 2005;60:103-109.
43. Kovacs JA, Chacon P, Abagyan R. Predictions of protein flexibility: first-order measures. Proteins 2004;56:661-668.
44. Zacharias M. Rapid protein-ligand docking using soft modes from molecular dynamics simulations to account for protein deformability: binding of FK506 to FKBP. Proteins 2004;54:759-767.
45. Jacobs DJ, Rader AJ, Kuhn LA, Thorpe ME Protein flexibility predictions using graph theory. Proteins 2001;44:150-165.
46. Schlessinger A, Rost B. Protein flexibility and rigidity predicted from sequence. Proteins 2005;61:115-126.
47. Xiang Z, Soto CS, Honig B. Evaluating conformational free energies: the colony energy and its application to the problem of loop prediction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:7432-7437.
48. Jacobson MP, Pincus DL, Rapp CS, Day TJ, Honig B, Shaw DE, Friesner RA. A hierarchical approach to all-atom protein loop prediction. Proteins 2004;55:351-367.
49. Rohl CA, Strauss CE, Chivian D, Baker D. Modeling structurally variable regions in homologous proteins widi rosetta. Proteins 2004;55:656-677.
50. Deane CM, Blundell TL. CODA: a combined algorithm for predicting the structurally variable regions of protein models. Protein Sci 2001;10:599-612.
51. Zhang C, Liu S, Zhou Y. Accurate and efficient loop selections by the DFIRE-based all-atom statistical potential. Protein Sci 2004;13:391-399.
52. Monnigmann M, Floudas CA. Protein loop structure prediction with flexible stem geometries. Proteins 2005;61:748-762.
53. Floudas CA, Fung HK, McAllister SR, Monnigmann M, Rajgaria R. Advances in protein structure prediction and de novo protein design. Chem Eng Sci 2006;61:966-988.
54. van Vlijmen HW, Karplus M. PDB-based protein loop prediction: parameters for selection and methods for optimization. J Mol Biol 1997;267:975-1001.